Skip to main content
Erschienen in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 1/2004

01.02.2004 | Original Research Article

The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale

A Validation Study

verfasst von: Dr Doris J. Day, Curt M. Littler, Richard W. Swift, Scott Gottlieb

Erschienen in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology | Ausgabe 1/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is the most important outcome in facial aesthetic surgery. However, the need for evidence-based evaluation of aesthetic procedures dictates the use of more objective and quantitative measures of treatment outcome.
Objective: The present study was undertaken to validate a new clinical outcome instrument, the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale.
Methods: Five clinical investigators were presented with 30 photographic images of the lower face and asked to rate nasolabial fold severity on each side using the 5-grade Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). Standardized definitions of the five grades were provided to the investigators in visual (photographic) and descriptive formats. To take into account possible facial asymmetry, nasolabial folds on the left and right sides of the face were rated separately. Assessments were conducted independently and were repeated after ≥2 weeks.
Results: Intra-observer (test-retest) agreement was 68.7% (left side) and 72.7% (right side); weighted kappa coefficients for the left and right sides were 0.77 and 0.81, respectively. Mean inter-observer agreement (internal consistency) was 67.7% (left side) and 72.3% (right side); weighted kappa coefficients for the left and right sides were 0.75 (95% CI 0.70–0.79) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.72–0.83), respectively.
Conclusion: The WSRS is a valid and reliable instrument for quantitative assessment of facial skin folds, with good inter- and intra-observer consistency. By allowing objective and reproducible grading of data, the WSRS should prove a useful clinical tool for assessing the effectiveness of soft-tissue augmentation and other facial contouring procedures.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Most SP, Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF. Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18: 119–24PubMedCrossRef Most SP, Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF. Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18: 119–24PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Luce EA. Outcome studies and practice guidelines in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1187–90PubMedCrossRef Luce EA. Outcome studies and practice guidelines in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1187–90PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, et al. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1735–50PubMedCrossRef Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, et al. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1735–50PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gormley DE, Wortzman MS. Objective evaluation of methods used to treat cutaneous wrinkles. Clin Dermatol 1988; 6: 15–23PubMedCrossRef Gormley DE, Wortzman MS. Objective evaluation of methods used to treat cutaneous wrinkles. Clin Dermatol 1988; 6: 15–23PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Grove GL, Grove MJ, Leyden JJ. Optical profilometry: an objective method for quantification of facial wrinkles. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 631–7PubMedCrossRef Grove GL, Grove MJ, Leyden JJ. Optical profilometry: an objective method for quantification of facial wrinkles. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 631–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grover R, Grobbelaar AO, Morgan BDG, et al. A quantitative method for the assessment of facial rejuvenation: a prospective study investigating the carbon dioxide laser. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51: 8–13PubMedCrossRef Grover R, Grobbelaar AO, Morgan BDG, et al. A quantitative method for the assessment of facial rejuvenation: a prospective study investigating the carbon dioxide laser. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51: 8–13PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffiths CEM, Wang TS, Hamilton TA, et al. A photonumeric scale for assessment of cutaneous photodamage. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128: 347–51PubMedCrossRef Griffiths CEM, Wang TS, Hamilton TA, et al. A photonumeric scale for assessment of cutaneous photodamage. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128: 347–51PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, 1981 Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, 1981
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde JM, Rouvrais C, Black D, et al. Skin topography measurement by interference fringe projection: a technical validation. Skin Res Technol 2001; 7: 112–21PubMedCrossRef Lagarde JM, Rouvrais C, Black D, et al. Skin topography measurement by interference fringe projection: a technical validation. Skin Res Technol 2001; 7: 112–21PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Narins R, Brandt F, Leyden J, et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 588–95PubMedCrossRef Narins R, Brandt F, Leyden J, et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 588–95PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale
A Validation Study
verfasst von
Dr Doris J. Day
Curt M. Littler
Richard W. Swift
Scott Gottlieb
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2004
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology / Ausgabe 1/2004
Print ISSN: 1175-0561
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1888
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200405010-00007

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2004

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 1/2004 Zur Ausgabe

Guest Commentary

Azelaic Acid

BookReview

Book Reviews

Guest Commentary

Azelaic Acid

Leitlinien kompakt für die Dermatologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Dermatologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.