Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 1/2012

01.01.2012 | Original Research Article

Alcohol policy and taxation in South Africa

An examination of the economic burden of alcohol tax

verfasst von: John Ele-Ojo Ataguba

Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Alcohol consumption accounts for over 4% of the global burden of disease and an even higher figure in developing countries. Several policies have been proposed to curb the negative impact of alcohol misuse. Apart from South Africa, which has witnessed a rapid development in alcohol policy, such policies are poorly developed in most African countries. South Africa uses taxation as a policy lever, in line with international evidence, to reduce alcohol consumption. However, the problem of alcohol abuse still exists.

Objective

The objective of this article is to present an analysis of alcohol tax incidence for the first time in South Africa. This was done for each category of alcohol tax (wines, spirits, beer and traditional brew [sorghum beer]) and for alcohol tax as a whole. The paper also uses the results to point to the areas where a greater understanding of the issues surrounding alcohol abuse needs to be developed.

Methods

Data were drawn from the 2005/06 South African Income and Expenditure Survey. Reported expenditures on alcohol beverages were used to obtain the tax component paid by households. This was done under certain assumptions relating to alcohol content and the price per litre of alcohol. Per adult equivalent consumption expenditure was used as the measure of relative living standards and concentration curves and Kakwani indices to assess relative progressivity of alcohol taxes. Statistical dominance tests were also performed.

Results

Most sorghum beer and malt beer drinkers were in the poorer quintiles. The reverse was the case for wines and spirits. Overall, alcohol tax in South Africa was regressive (Kakwani index–0.353). The individual categories were found to be regressive. The most regressive tax was that on sorghum beer (Kakwani index–1.01); the least regressive was that on spirits (Kakwani index–0.09), although this was not statistically significant at conventional levels. These results were confirmed by the test of dominance.

Conclusion

In South Africa, there has been a renewed interest in addressing the problem of rising alcohol abuse, but the extent to which this will translate into meaningful policies is unclear. The use of an excise tax is increasingly being recognized by economists as a way to get around some of the negative effects of abusive alcohol consumption. However, this study indicates that alcohol taxes are regressive in South Africa.
Fußnoten
1
1 Controls on packaging include preventing manufacturers from using papsakke (wine or alcohol in plastic bags or sacks) and limiting the size of the alcohol bottle or can.
 
2
2 Here the authors only assessed alcohol tax as a whole without splitting this up into the various categories.
 
Literatur
1.
WHO. The world health report 2000: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2002
2.
Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity research public policy. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010CrossRef
3.
Doran C, Jainullabudeen T. Economic efficiency of alcohol policy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2010; 8(5): 351–4PubMedCrossRef
4.
Bennett LA, Campillo C, Chandrashekar C, et al. Alcoholic beverage consumption in India, Mexico, and Nigeria: a cross-cultural comparison. Alcohol Health Res World 1998; 22(4): 243–52PubMed
5.
Parry CDH. Alcohol policy in South Africa: a review of policy development processes between 1994 and 2009. Addiction 2010; 105(8): 1340–5PubMedCrossRef
6.
Schneider M, Norman R, Parry C, et al. Estimating the burden of disease attributable to alcohol use in South Africa in 2000. S Af Med J 2007; 97(8): 664–72
7.
World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999
8.
9.
World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health: South Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011
10.
Parry CDH, Myers B, Thiede M. The case for an increased tax on alcohol in South Africa. S Af J Econ 2003; 71(2): 137–45CrossRef
11.
May PA, Brooke L, Gossage JP, et al. Epidemiology of fetal alcohol syndrome in a South African community in the Western Cape Province. Am J Public Health 2000; 90(12): 1905–12PubMedCrossRef
12.
Plüddemann A, Parry C, Donson H, et al. Alcohol use and trauma in Cape Town, Durban and Port Elizabeth, South Africa: 1999–2001. Inj Control Saf Promot 2004; 11(4): 265–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
Mauser E, Van Stelle KR, Moberg DP. The economic impact of diverting substance-abusing offenders into treatment. Crime Delinquency 1994; 40(4): 568–88CrossRef
14.
Baumberg B. The global economic burden of alcohol: a review and some suggestions. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006; 25(6): 537–51PubMedCrossRef
15.
Nakamura K, Tanaka A, Takano T. The social cost of alcohol abuse in Japan. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 1993; 54(5): 618–25
16.
Cook PJ, Moore MJ. This tax’s for you: the case for higher beer taxes. Nat Tax J 1994; 47: 559–73
17.
Lyon AB, Schwab R. Consumption taxes in a life-cycle framework: are sin taxes regressive? Rev Econ Stat 1995; 77(3): 389–40CrossRef
18.
Ballard CL, Shoven JB, Whalley J. The welfare cost of distortions in the United States tax system: a general equilibrium approach. NBER working paper no. 1043. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, 1982
19.
Grossman M, Sindelar JL, Mullahy J, et al. Policy watch: alcohol and cigarette taxes. J Econ Perspect 1993; 7(4): 211–22CrossRef
20.
Kaplow L. Taxing leisure complements. Econ Inq 2010; 48(4): 1065–71CrossRef
21.
Corlett WJ, Hague DC. Complementarity and the excess burden of taxation. Rev Econ Stud 1953; 21(1): 21–30CrossRef
22.
Manning WG, Keeler EB, Newhouse JP, et al. The costs of poor health habits. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1991
23.
Statistics South Africa. Income and expenditure of households 2005/2006: Statistical release P0100. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, 2008
24.
National Treasury. 2004 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2004
25.
National Treasury. 2005 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2005
26.
National Treasury. 2006 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2006
27.
National Treasury. 2007 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2007
28.
National Treasury. 2008 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2008
29.
National Treasury. 2009 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2009
30.
National Treasury. 2010 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2010
31.
National Treasury. 2011 Budget review. Pretoria: National Treasury, 2011
32.
South African Revenue Service. Tax guide for small businesses 2005/06. Pretoria: South African Revenue Service, 2005
33.
Borghi J, Ataguba J, Mtei G, et al. Methodological challenges in evaluating health care financing equity in data-poor contexts: lessons from Ghana, South Africa and Tanzania. In: Chernichovsky D, Hanson K, editors. Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, Volume 21: Innovations in health system finance in developing and transitional economies. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 2009: 133–56CrossRef
34.
O’Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, et al. Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington (DC): World Bank Publications, 2008
35.
Deaton A. The analysis of household surveys. Baltimore (MD): The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997CrossRef
36.
Banks J, Johnson P. Equivalence scale relativities revisited. Econ J 1994; 104(425): 883–90CrossRef
37.
Gemmell N, Morrissey O. Distribution and poverty impacts of tax structure reform in developing countries: how little we know. Dev Policy Rev 2005; 23(2): 131–44CrossRef
38.
Shah A, Whalley J. Tax incidence analysis of developing countries: an alternative view. World Bank Econ Rev 1991; 5(3): 535–52CrossRef
39.
Barde J-P, Braathen NA. Environmentally related levies. In: Cnossen S, editor. Theory and practice of excise taxation: smoking, drinking, gambling, polluting, and driving. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 120–54CrossRef
40.
Smith S. Economic issues in alcohol taxation. In: Cnossen S, editor. Theory and practice of excise taxation: smoking, drinking, gambling, polluting, and driving. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 56–83CrossRef
41.
Lambert PJ. The distribution and redistribution of income. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001
42.
Duclos JY, Araar A. Poverty and equity: measurement, policy, and estimation with DAD. Berlin and Ottawa: Springer and IDRC, 2006
43.
Suits DB. Measurement of tax progressivity. Am Econ Rev 1977; 67(4): 747–52
44.
Kakwani NC. Measurement of tax progressivity: an international comparison. Econ J 1977; 87(345): 71–80CrossRef
45.
Kakwani N, Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. J Econometrics 1997; 77(1): 87–103CrossRef
46.
Lerman RI, Yitzhaki S. Improving the accuracy of estimates of Gini coefficients. J Econometrics 1989; 42(1): 43–7CrossRef
47.
Dardanoni V, Forcina A. Inference for Lorenz curve orderings. Econometrics J 1999; 2(1): 49–75CrossRef
48.
Segal I, Reinach S, De Beer M. Factors associated with oesophageal cancer in Soweto, South Africa. Br J Cancer 1988; 58(5): 681–6PubMedCrossRef
49.
50.
Almeida-Filho N, Lessa I, Magalhães L, et al. Alcohol drinking patterns by gender, ethnicity, and social class in Bahia, Brazil. Revista de Saúde Pública 2004; 38(1): 45–54PubMedCrossRef
51.
Dawson DA, Grant BF, Patricia Chou S, et al. Subgroup variation in US drinking patterns: results of the 1992 national longitudinal alcohol epidemiologic study. J Subst Abuse 1995; 7(3): 331–44PubMedCrossRef
52.
53.
Statistics South Africa. Income and expenditure of households 2005/2006: analysis of results. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, 2008
54.
Sammartino F. Federal taxation of tobacco, alcohol beverages and motor fuels. Washington (DC): The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office, 1990
55.
Sahn DE, Younger SD. Dominance testing of social sector expenditures and taxes in Africa. IMF WOrking Paper No WP/99/172. Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, 1999
56.
Sahn DE, Younger SD. Expenditure incidence in Africa: microeconomic evidence. Fisc Stud 2000; 21(3): 329–47CrossRef
57.
Heien DM. Are higher alcohol taxes justified? Cato J 1996; 15: 243–58
58.
Wimbush E. The cost of poor health habits [book review]. Sociol Health Illness 1992; 14(3): 434–5CrossRef
59.
60.
61.
Harper TA, Mooney G. Prevention before profits: a levy on food and alcohol advertising. Med J Austr 2010; 192(7): 400–2
62.
Samman E, McAuliffe E, MacLachlan M. The role of celebrity in endorsing poverty reduction through international aid. Int J Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Market 2009; 14(2): 137–48CrossRef
63.
Loxley W, Gray D, Wilkinson C, et al. Alcohol policy and harm reduction in Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24(6): 559–68PubMedCrossRef
64.
Byrnes JM, Cobiac LJ, Doran CM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia. Med J Austr 2010; 192(8): 439–43
65.
Doran CM, Hall WD, Shakeshaft AP, et al. Alcohol policy reform in Australia: what can we learn from the evidence. Med J Austr 2010; 192(8): 468–70
66.
Byrnes J, Petrie DJ, Doran CM, et al. The efficiency of a volumetric alcohol tax in Australia. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2011; 10(1): 37–49CrossRef
67.
Mooney G. Alcohol taxation policy in Australia: public health imperatives for action (Letter). Med J Austr 2009; 190(12): 714–5
68.
Metadaten
Titel
Alcohol policy and taxation in South Africa
An examination of the economic burden of alcohol tax
verfasst von
John Ele-Ojo Ataguba
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2012
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11594860-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

The role of health economics in alcohol policy

Original Research Article

Tackling alcohol misuse

Original Research Article

Intra-operative vs pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones

Original Research Article

The efficiency of a volumetric alcohol tax in Australia

Practical Application

Triangulating health expenditure estimates from different data sources in developing countries