Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2008

01.07.2008 | Original Research Article

How Much Time Do Patients Spend on Outpatient Visits?

The American Time Use Survey

verfasst von: Professor Louise B. Russell, Yoko Ibuka, Deborah Carr

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 3/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background: In Crossing the Quality Chasm, the Institute of Medicine recommended that patient-centered care should not waste patients’ time and should recognize the involvement of family and friends. Studies have documented the time spent by physicians on outpatient visits, but not that spent by patients and their companions. The patient’s perspective provides an important yet overlooked indicator of healthcare effectiveness
Objective: To document how much time American patients spend on outpatient visits, for what purposes (travel, waiting, receiving services), and the time required of family members and friends
Methods: We used data from the first 4 years (2003–6) of the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), conducted by the US Census Bureau for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which asks respondents about their activities over a 24-hour period. ATUS is a nationally representative population-based survey that samples days continuously throughout the year. In 2003–6, 60 674 respondents aged ≥15 years were randomly selected from households that completed the Current Population urvey; 1621 reported seeking medical care for themselves on their survey day. We documented the percentage of the population that reported outpatient visits, the percentage who were accompanied to those visits and by whom, and the mean time spent by patients and their companions, by type of activity, and by age and sex
Results: After weighting the data to represent the US population, we found that 3.4% of people aged ≥15 years reported traveling, waiting, or receiving services in connection with an outpatient visit on their survey day. The mean time for those who reported the activity was 35 minutes for travel (95% CI 33, 37), 42 minutes of waiting (95% CI 37, 47), and 74 minutes receiving services (95% CI 70, 79). Overall, 39.5% were accompanied, usually by family members. Companions spent a mean of 124 minutes per encounter (95% CI 112, 135). Nearly half of those aged ≥65 years were accompanied, almost always by adults only, suggesting that they may have needed help with transportation, negotiating the healthcare system, or performing cognitive and emotional tasks involved in receiving care
Conclusion: Outpatient visits are time intensive for American patients and their families: the equivalent of 207 million 40-hour work-weeks each year. Patients and their families spend substantially more time on outpatient visits than the time with the physician reported by the annual National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Further research is needed on the components of outpatient visits that do not directly involve physicians. Efforts to improve care should address waiting times and recognize the involvement of family members. The ATUS could provide periodic benchmarks of patient time use as a supplement to other indicators of patient-centered care in the annual National Healthcare Quality Report
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press, 2001 Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press, 2001
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Juster FT, Stafford FP. The allocation of time: empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. J Econ Lit 1991; 29(2): 471–522 Juster FT, Stafford FP. The allocation of time: empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. J Econ Lit 1991; 29(2): 471–522
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell LB, Ibuka Y, Abraham KG. Health-related activities in the American Time Use Survey. Med Care 2007; 45: 680–5PubMedCrossRef Russell LB, Ibuka Y, Abraham KG. Health-related activities in the American Time Use Survey. Med Care 2007; 45: 680–5PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilchrist VJ, Stange KC, Flocke SA, et al. A comparison of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) measurement approach with direct observation of outpatient visits. Med Care 2004; 42: 276–80PubMedCrossRef Gilchrist VJ, Stange KC, Flocke SA, et al. A comparison of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) measurement approach with direct observation of outpatient visits. Med Care 2004; 42: 276–80PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo A, Ryder K, Shorr RI. Relationship between patient age and duration of physician visit in ambulatory setting: does one size fit all? J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 1162–7PubMedCrossRef Lo A, Ryder K, Shorr RI. Relationship between patient age and duration of physician visit in ambulatory setting: does one size fit all? J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 1162–7PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottschalk A, Flocke SA. Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 488–93PubMedCrossRef Gottschalk A, Flocke SA. Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 488–93PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherry DK, Woodwell DA, Rechsteiner EA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary [Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics; report no. 387]. Rockville (MD): National Centre for Health Statistics, 2007 Jun 29 Cherry DK, Woodwell DA, Rechsteiner EA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary [Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics; report no. 387]. Rockville (MD): National Centre for Health Statistics, 2007 Jun 29
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Services Res 2007; 42: 1871–94CrossRef Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Services Res 2007; 42: 1871–94CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Horrigan M, Herz D. Planning, designing, and executing the BLS American Time-Use Survey. Mon Labor Rev 2004; 127(10): 3–19 Horrigan M, Herz D. Planning, designing, and executing the BLS American Time-Use Survey. Mon Labor Rev 2004; 127(10): 3–19
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham K, Maitland A, Bianchi S. Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opin Q 2006; 70 (5 Special Issue): 676–703CrossRef Abraham K, Maitland A, Bianchi S. Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opin Q 2006; 70 (5 Special Issue): 676–703CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shelley KJ. Developing the American Time Use Survey activity classification system. Mon Labor Rev 2005; 128: 3–15 Shelley KJ. Developing the American Time Use Survey activity classification system. Mon Labor Rev 2005; 128: 3–15
18.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Neill GE, Sincavage JR. Response analysis survey: a qualitative look at response and nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bls.gov/ore/pdf/st040140.pdf [Accessed 2007 Oct 5] O’Neill GE, Sincavage JR. Response analysis survey: a qualitative look at response and nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​bls.​gov/​ore/​pdf/​st040140.​pdf [Accessed 2007 Oct 5]
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Get better care from your doctor: what 39 090 patients and 335 doctors have to say about how to make the most of your next appointment. Consum Rep 2007 Feb; 72 (2): 32-36 Get better care from your doctor: what 39 090 patients and 335 doctors have to say about how to make the most of your next appointment. Consum Rep 2007 Feb; 72 (2): 32-36
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagan MJ, Diaz JA, Reinert SE, et al. Impact of interpretation method on clinic visit length. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 634–8PubMedCrossRef Fagan MJ, Diaz JA, Reinert SE, et al. Impact of interpretation method on clinic visit length. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 634–8PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, et al. Illuminating the ‘black box’: a description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Practice 1998; 46: 377–89 Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, et al. Illuminating the ‘black box’: a description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Practice 1998; 46: 377–89
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Klag MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Carswell CI, et al. The role of The Patient in promoting patient-centered outcomes research. Patient 2008; 1(1): 1–3PubMedCrossRef Klag MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Carswell CI, et al. The role of The Patient in promoting patient-centered outcomes research. Patient 2008; 1(1): 1–3PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Iezzoni LI, O’Day BL, Killeen M, et al. Communicating about health care: observations from persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 356–62PubMed Iezzoni LI, O’Day BL, Killeen M, et al. Communicating about health care: observations from persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 356–62PubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Durso SC. Using clinical guidelines designed for older adults with diabetes mellitus and complex health status. JAMA 2006; 295: 1935–40PubMedCrossRef Durso SC. Using clinical guidelines designed for older adults with diabetes mellitus and complex health status. JAMA 2006; 295: 1935–40PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson ED. Patient-centered cardiac care for the elderly: TIME for reflection. JAMA 2003; 289: 1157–8PubMedCrossRef Peterson ED. Patient-centered cardiac care for the elderly: TIME for reflection. JAMA 2003; 289: 1157–8PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. 2006 National Healthcare Quality Report [publication 07-0013]. Rockville (MD): AHRQ, 2006 Dec Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. 2006 National Healthcare Quality Report [publication 07-0013]. Rockville (MD): AHRQ, 2006 Dec
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimes D, Schulz K. Bias and causal association in observational research. Lancet 2002; 359: 248–52PubMedCrossRef Grimes D, Schulz K. Bias and causal association in observational research. Lancet 2002; 359: 248–52PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff JL, Roter DL. Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults. Arch Int Med 2008; 168(13): 1409–15CrossRef Wolff JL, Roter DL. Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults. Arch Int Med 2008; 168(13): 1409–15CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yabroff KR, Warren JL, Knopf K, et al. Estimating patient time costs associated with colorectal cancer care. Med Care 2005; 43: 640–8PubMedCrossRef Yabroff KR, Warren JL, Knopf K, et al. Estimating patient time costs associated with colorectal cancer care. Med Care 2005; 43: 640–8PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yabroff KR, Davis WW, Lamont EB, et al. Patient time costs associated with cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 14–23PubMedCrossRef Yabroff KR, Davis WW, Lamont EB, et al. Patient time costs associated with cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 14–23PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cantor SB, Levy LB, Cardenas-Turanzas M, et al. Collecting direct non-health care and time cost data: application to screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer. Med Decis Making 2006; 26: 265–72PubMedCrossRef Cantor SB, Levy LB, Cardenas-Turanzas M, et al. Collecting direct non-health care and time cost data: application to screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer. Med Decis Making 2006; 26: 265–72PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham K, Mackie C, editors. Beyond the market. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2005 Abraham K, Mackie C, editors. Beyond the market. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2005
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996 Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS, et al. Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study. Med Decis Making 2008; 28: 56–65PubMedCrossRef Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS, et al. Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study. Med Decis Making 2008; 28: 56–65PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lafata JE, Martin SA, Kaatz S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for patients on chronic warfarin therapy. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15: 31–7PubMedCrossRef Lafata JE, Martin SA, Kaatz S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for patients on chronic warfarin therapy. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15: 31–7PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How Much Time Do Patients Spend on Outpatient Visits?
The American Time Use Survey
verfasst von
Professor Louise B. Russell
Yoko Ibuka
Deborah Carr
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2008
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 3/2008
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/1312067-200801030-00008

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2008

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Pioneer Profile

Erik Rifkin, PhD