[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Impact Factor 2022: 1.4
Cite Score 2022: 2.1
SJR 2022: 0.347
SNIP 2022: 0.545
..
Publication Charge
►Publication Fee
..
In Press
 In Press Articles
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 2 (3-2020) ::
Caspian J Intern Med 2020, 11(2): 163-170 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Two Manual Therapy Techniques in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Ghadam Ali Talebi , Payam Saadat , Yahya Javadian , Mohammad Taghipour
Mobility Impairment Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , taghipourm@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5709 Views)
Background: Manual therapy techniques are part of physiotherapy treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) which are classified into two groups including nerve mobilization and mechanical interface mobilization. The aim of the study was to find which manual therapy method-technique directed to mechanical interface and nerve mobilization–has superior beneficial effects on clinical and electrophysiological findings in conservative management of patients with CTS.
Methods: Thirty patients with CTS participated into two groups namely: mechanical interface and nerve mobilization in this randomized clinical trial. The intervention was performed three times weekly for 4 weeks. Mechanical interface mobilization was directed to structures around the median nerve at the forearm and wrist. Techniques of median nerve gliding and tension were used in the nerve mobilization group. The outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), symptom severity scale (SSS), hand functional status scale (FSS) and motor and sensory distal latencies of median nerve. Paired t-test and ANCOVA were used for statistical analysis.
Results: At the end of the 4th week of the treatment, the mean of VAS, SSS and FSS significantly improved in both groups (p<0.05), but the difference was not significant between the two groups (P>0.05). Although the mean of motor and sensory distal latencies of median nerve at the end of the treatment period only improved in the nerve mobilization group (p<0.05), the difference was not significant between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Mechanical interface mobilization and nerve mobilization techniques are not superior to each other in reducing pain and improving hand symptoms and functional status.
Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Manual therapy, Nerve mobilization
Full-Text [PDF 771 kb]   (1303 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Physiotherapy
Received: 2019/08/24 | Accepted: 2019/10/26 | Published: 2020/04/22
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Talebi G A, Saadat P, Javadian Y, Taghipour M. Comparison of Two Manual Therapy Techniques in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Caspian J Intern Med 2020; 11 (2) :163-170
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-2031-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 2 (3-2020) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645