The value of incorporating personally relevant stimuli into consciousness assessment with the Coma Recovery Scale – Revised: A pilot study

Authors

  • Jonas Stenberg
  • Alison K. Godbolt
  • Marika C. Möller

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2309

Keywords:

consciousness disorders, minimally consciousness state, vegetative state, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, personally relevant stimuli.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the use of personally relevant stimuli, for some tasks in the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R), generates more responses in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness compared with neutral stimuli. DESIGN: Multiple single-case design. SUBJECTS: Three patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness recruited from an inpatient department at a regional brain injury rehabilitation clinic in Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: Patients were repeatedly assessed with the CRS-R. Randomization tests (bootstrapping) were used to compare the number of responses generated by personally relevant and neutral stimuli on 5 items in the CRS-R. RESULTS: Compared with neutral stimuli, photographs of relatives generated significantly more visual fixations. A mirror generated visual pursuit to a significantly greater extent than other self-relevant stimuli. On other items, no significant differences between neutral and personally relevant stimuli were seen. CONCLUSION: Personally relevant visual stimuli may minimize the risk of missing visual fixation, compared with the neutral stimuli used in the current gold standard behavioural assessment measure (CRS-R). However, due to the single-subject design this conclusion is tentative and more research is needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-03

How to Cite

Stenberg, J., Godbolt, A. . K., & Möller, M. C. (2018). The value of incorporating personally relevant stimuli into consciousness assessment with the Coma Recovery Scale – Revised: A pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2309

Issue

Section

Original Report