JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |
YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
EXPERTS’ OPINION Free access
Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 January;87(1):101-5
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14564-4
Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: tool or toy?
Christopher LOTZ 1, Ralf M. MUELLENBACH 2, Peter SPIETH 3 ✉
1 Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; 2 Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Städtisches Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany; 3 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Neurological outcome and quality of live are of uttermost interest in survivors of cardiac arrest. Assuming acceptable rates of return of spontaneous circulation, the long-term effects on neurological function and quality of live after cardiopulmonary resuscitation remain unsatisfactory. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) can reduce low-flow times and therefore provide adequate cerebral tissue perfusion and oxygenation. This may improve favorable outcomes after cardiac arrest. Due to the risk of procedure related complications and ethical issues, this technique should be only performed in selected patients by specially trained and experienced teams. In this review we aimed at providing an insight into the sparse evidence in this field and discussing ethical issues associated with the use of eCPR.
KEY WORDS: Heart arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation