pISSN 0513-5796   eISSN 1976-2437
Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Monthly
    Yonsei Med J. 2016 Jan;57(1):50-57. English.
    Published online Nov 30, 2015.
    https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.50
    © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016
    Original Article

    Concomitance of P-gp/LRP Expression with EGFR Mutations in Exons 19 and 21 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

    Hong Wei,1 Weipeng Lu,1 Mei Li,2 Qiuping Zhang,3 and Shen Lu2
      • 1MD Candidate in Pathology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
      • 2Central Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
      • 3Department of Pathology, The First Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
    • Corresponding author: Dr. Shen Lu, Central Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116027, Liaoning Province, China. Tel: 86-411-84687554-601, Fax: 86-411-84672130, Email: lvshen1956@126.com
    Received October 08, 2014; Revised February 10, 2015; Accepted March 10, 2015.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Traditional chemotherapy is the main adjuvant therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) has greatly restricted the curative effect of chemotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to find a method to treat MDR NSCLC clinically. It is worth investigating whether NSCLCs that are resistant to traditional chemotherapy can be effectively treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

    Materials and Methods

    The expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and lung resistance-related protein (LRP) was detected by immunohistochemistry, and mutations in EGFR (exons 19 and 21) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (exon 2) were detected by high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) of surgical NSCLC specimens from 127 patients who did not undergo traditional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A Pearson chi-square test was performed to analyze the correlations between the expression of P-gp and LRP and mutations in EGFR and KRAS.

    Results

    The expression frequencies of P-gp and LRP were significantly higher in adenocarcinomas from non-smoking patients; the expression frequency of LRP was significantly higher in cancer tissue from female patients. The frequency of EGFR mutations was significantly higher in well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas from non-smoking female patients. The frequency of EGFR mutations in the cancers that expressed P-gp, LRP, or both P-gp and LRP was significantly higher than that in cancers that did not express P-gp or LRP.

    Conclusion

    NSCLCs expressing P-gp/LRP bear the EGFR mutation in exon 19 or 21 easily.

    Keywords
    Chemotherapy; multi-drug resistance; epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor; non-small cell lung cancer

    INTRODUCTION

    Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. Until now, the main therapeutic method for NSCLC has been surgical resection with adjuvant chemotherapy, and for patients with unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic tumors, chemotherapy is the predominant treatment method. 1 Unfortunately, the use of traditional chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC is greatly limited by primary or secondary multi-drug resistance (MDR).2 MDR, which is defined as a resistance to one drug that is accompanied by a resistance to many other drugs, is believed to be a major reason for the primary drug resistance of NSCLC and can lead to the failure of traditional chemotherapy.3, 4 Therefore, determining how to treat NSCLC patients with primary drug resistance has become an urgent problem. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKIs) comprise one class of molecular target drugs and have achieved remarkable success in the treatment of patients with NSCLCs bearing activating mutations of EGFR in exons 19 and 21.5, 6 Moreover, these activating EGFR mutations appear more frequently in adenocarcinomas from Asian, female, and non-smoking patients. 7, 8, 9, 10 Primary drug resistance to EGFR-TKIs still exists in NSCLC patients bearing the activating mutations in exon 2 of the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene.11 Activating mutations in EGFR exons 19 and 21 have been used as biomarkers of NSCLC sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs, while activating mutations in KRAS exon 2 have been used as biomarkers of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Clinically, many NSCLCs with MDR are well differentiated carcinomas, and well differentiated adenocarcinomas are generally sensitive to EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that some NSCLCs with primary MDR may be sensitive to EGFR-TKIs or, in other words, that NSCLC patients with primary MDR may benefit from EGFR-TKIs. Both P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and lung resistance-related protein (LRP) are drug transporters in cells, and the expression of these factors is often observed in cancers that have developed MDR.4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Recently, the expression levels of these factors have been recognized as major biomarkers of MDR in NSCLC.

    In this study, the expression of P-gp and LRP as biomarkers of MDR was detected in NSCLCs by immunohistochemistry, and mutations in EGFR exons 19 and 21 and KRAS exon 2 (as biomarkers of whether the patients can benefit from EGFR-TKIs, respectively) were analyzed by high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) in 127 NSCLCs. By comparing the expression of P-gp/LRP and EGFR mutation status, we investigated whether patients with NSCLC resistant to traditional chemotherapy would benefit from treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients and tissue samples

    The NSCLC samples were collected from 127 patients who underwent surgical procedures without any traditional chemotherapy or radiotherapy at the affiliated hospitals of Dalian Medical University from July 2007 to May 2009. Seventy-five of these patients were male and 52 were female. The patients had a mean±SD age of 62.1±9.1 years (range 36-80 years); 47 patients had a history of smoking, and 80 patients had no history of smoking. Histologically, the tumor samples consisted of 42 squamous cell carcinomas and 85 adenocarcinomas. Lymph node metastases were found in 64 of the patients. There were 74 patients with well to moderately differentiated tumors and 53 patients with poorly differentiated tumors. All of the tissue samples were collected with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the affiliated hospitals of Dalian Medical University and with the informed consent of the patients or families before the surgical procedures.

    Immunohistochemistry

    Monoclonal antibodies (Abs) against human P-gp (1:200; clone F4; Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA) and LRP (1:100; clone 1032; Beijing Golden Bridge Biotechnology Company Ltd., Beijing, China) were used as primary antibodies. Biotin-streptavidin-peroxidase staining with 3, 3'-diaminobenzidine-tetrahydrochloride detection was used. Tumor cells with staining in the cell membrane or cytoplasm were considered to be positive. Each slide was graded blindly according to the percentage of positive tumor cells. The immunoreactivity of P-gp and LRP was scored as negative (-) when the proportion of positive tumor cells was less than 10% or as positive (+) when the number of positive tumor cells was between 10% and 100%.

    DNA extraction and gene mutation detection

    Tumor-enriched areas were selected and cut from the stained frozen sections that were marked by two pathologists. Genomic DNA was extracted from these areas and purified using the TIANamp Genomic DNA kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Tiangen, Beijing, China). EGFR exons 19 and 21 and KRAS exon 2 were amplified in triplicate from each sample in a 10-µL reaction volume with a 15-µL mineral oil overlay in each well of a 96-well PCR plate on a Mastercycler thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The primers were 5'-TG GATCCCAGAAGGTGAGAA-3' and 5'-AGCAGAAACTCACAT CGAGGA-3' (EGFR exon 19); 5'-CGCAGCATGTCAAGATCA-3' and 5'-CCTCCTTACTTTGCCTCC-3' (EGFR exon 21); and 5'-A GGCCTGCTGAAAATGACT-3' and 5'-AATGGTCCTGCACCA GTAA-3' (KRAS exon 2). The reaction conditions were described previously. The mutations were detected with HRMA on a LightScanner® 96 (Biofire Diagnostics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Melting curves were acquired at temperatures ranging from 60℃ to 95℃ and analyzed using LightScanner software (version 2.0, Biofire Diagnostics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.17, 18

    Statistics

    Pearson chi-square tests were used to analyze correlations for the expression of P-gp and LRP and mutations in EGFR and KRAS with the clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients; similar tests evaluated the correlation between the expression of P-gp and LRP and mutations in EGFR and KRAS. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS 11.5 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

    RESULTS

    P-gp and LRP expressions and their correlations with the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients

    Of the 127 NSCLC samples analyzed by immunohistochemistry, the expression of P-gp was detected in 56 samples, corresponding to a positive expression frequency of 44.1%. LRP was expressed in 84 samples, corresponding to a positive expression frequency of 66.1% of the tested NSCLCs.

    The frequency of positive P-gp expression in patients aged >60 years (52.1%, 37/71) was significantly higher than that in the patients aged ≤60 years (33.9%, 19/56) (p=0.004), and the frequency of positive P-gp expression in non-smokers was 51.3% (41/80), which was significantly higher than that in smokers (31.9%, 15/47) (p=0.034). The frequency of positive P-gp expression in adenocarcinomas was 57.6% (49/85), significantly higher than that in squamous cell carcinomas (16.7%, 7/42) (p=0.000). Significant relationships were observed between protein expression and patient age, smoking history, and tumor histology, but no significant relationships were found with patient gender, tumor differentiation, or lymph node metastasis (Table 1).

    Table 1
    The Associations between Clinicopathological Characteristics and P-gp or LRP Expression in NSCLC

    The frequency of positive LRP expression in female patients was 80.8% (42/52), significantly higher than that observed in male patients (56.0%, 42/75) (p=0.004), and the frequency of positive LRP expression in non-smokers was 80.0% (64/80), significantly higher than that observed in smokers (42.6%, 20/47) (p=0.000). The frequency of positive LRP expression in adenocarcinomas was 85.9% (73/85), significantly higher than that in squamous cell carcinomas (26.2%, 11/42) (p=0.000). We concluded that significant relationships exist between protein expression and patient gender, smoking history, and tumor histology, but not between protein expression and patient age, tumor differentiation, or lymph node metastasis (Table 1).

    EGFR and KRAS mutations detected by HRMA in NSCLC

    Of the 127 NSCLC samples analyzed by HRMA, EGFR mutations were detected in 52 samples, corresponding to a mutation frequency of 40.9%; 19 samples contained mutations in exon 19 (Fig. 1) and 33 samples contained mutations in exon 21 (Fig. 2). However, mutations in exon 2 of KRAS were detected in seven samples, corresponding to a mutation frequency of 5.5%.

    Fig. 1
    High-resolution melting curves for exon 19 of the EGFR gene. (A) Temperature shift observed in the melting curves of a NSCLC sample with a mutation in exon 19 of the EGFR and a NSCLC sample with a wild-type EGFR. Each sample was analysed in triplicate. (B) Fluorescence difference curves of the same samples depicted in A. The NSCLC sample with a mutation in EGFR exon 19 is a well differentiated adenocarcinoma from a non-smoking woman. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

    Fig. 2
    High-resolution melting curves for exon 21 of the EGFR gene. (A) Temperature shift observed in the melting curves of a NSCLC sample with a mutation in exon 21 of the EGFR and a NSCLC sample with a wild-type EGFR. Each sample was analysed in triplicate. (B) Fluorescence difference curves of the same samples depicted in A. The NSCLC sample with a mutation in EGFR exon 21 is a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma from a non-smoking woman. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

    Correlations between EGFR and KRAS mutations and the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients

    The EGFR mutation frequency in female patients (59.6%, 31/52) was significantly higher than that in male patients (28.0%, 21/75) (p=0.000), and the frequency of EGFR mutations in non-smokers (55.0%, 44/80) was significantly higher than that in smokers (17.0%, 8/47) (p=0.000). The frequency of EGFR mutations in adenocarcinomas was 58.8% (50/85), which was significantly higher than that in squamous cell carcinomas (4.8%, 2/42) (p=0.000); and the frequency of EGFR mutations in well to moderately differentiated tumors (50.0%, 37/74) was significantly higher than that in poorly differentiated tumors (28.3%, 15/53) (p=0.014). We concluded that significant relationships exist between EGFR mutation status and patient gender, smoking history, tumor histology, and degree of differentiation, but not between EGFR mutation status and patient age or lymph node metastasis (Table 2).

    Table 2
    The Associations between Clinicopathological Characteristics and EGFR or KRAS Mutations in NSCLC

    The KRAS mutation frequency in male patients was 9.3% (7/75), significantly higher than that in female patients (0.0%, 0/52) (p=0.041). We concluded that a significant relationship exists between KRAS mutation status and patient gender, but not between KRAS mutation status and patient age, smoking history, lymph node metastasis, histological type, or differentiation (Table 2).

    Correlations of P-gp and LRP expression with EGFR mutation

    The EGFR mutation frequency in P-gp-positive samples was 57.1% (32/56); this was significantly higher than that in the P-gp-negative samples (28.2%, 20/71) (p=0.001). The EGFR mutation frequency in the LRP-positive samples was 53.6% (45/84), significantly higher than that in the LRP-negative samples (16.3%, 7/43) (p=0.000). We then selected samples that were positive for P-gp or LRP and analyzed the correlation between the expression in these samples and the presence of EGFR mutations. We found that the EGFR mutation frequency in these samples was 52.1% (49/94), significantly higher than that in the negative samples (9.1%, 3/33) (p=0.000). We then selected the samples that coexpressed both P-gp and LRP and analyzed the correlation between the coexpression of these proteins and EGFR mutations. We found that the EGFR mutation frequency in these samples was 60.9% (28/46), significantly higher than that in the P-gp- and LRP-negative samples (29.6%, 24/81) (p=0.001). Because the samples with positive expression of either P-gp or LRP could be considered to have MDR, we concluded that the NSCLCs with MDR always bear the EGFR mutations (Table 3, Fig. 3).

    Fig. 3
    Immunohistochemical staining of P-glycoprotein and lung resistance-related protein expression in NSCLC samples. Immunohistochemical staining of P-glycoprotein expression (A) and lung resistance-related protein expression (B) in the same sample (a well differentiated adenocarcinoma from a female non-smoker). This was the NSCLC sample with a mutation in exon 19 of the epidermal growth factor receptor, as detected by high-resolution melting analysis, shown in Fig. 1. Immunohistochemical staining of P-glycoprotein expression (C) and lung resistance-related protein expression (D) in the same sample (a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma from a non-smoking woman). This sample was the NSCLC sample that carried a mutation in exon 21 of the epithemal growth factor receptor, as detected by high-resolution melting, shown in Fig. 2. Original magnification: ×400. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

    Table 3
    The Association of P-gp or LRP Expression with EGFR Mutations in NSCLC

    Correlations between P-gp and LRP expression and KRAS mutations

    The KRAS mutation frequency in the P-gp-positive samples was 5.4% (3/56), lower than that in the negative samples (5.6%, 4/71), although this difference was not significant (p=1.000). The KRAS mutation frequency in the LRP-positive samples was 6.0% (5/84), higher than that in the LRP-negative samples(4.7%, 2/43), although this difference was also not significant (p=1.000). Moreover, we selected the samples that were positive for P-gp or LRP and analyzed the correlation between the expression of these proteins and KRAS mutations. We found that the KRAS mutation frequency in these samples was 5.3% (5/94), lower than that in the negative samples (6.1%, 2/33), although this difference was not significant (p=1.000). We then selected the samples that coexpressed both P-gp and LRP and analyzed the correlation between the coexpression of these proteins and the presence of KRAS mutations. We found that the KRAS mutation frequency in these samples was 6.5% (3/46), higher than that in the P-gp- and LRP-negative samples (4.9%, 4/81), although this difference was not significant (p=1.000). Thus, we concluded that no significant relationship exists between MDR and the presence of KRAS mutations in NSCLC (Table 4).

    Table 4
    The Association between the Expression of P-gp or LRP and Mutations in KRAS in NSCLC

    DISCUSSION

    NSCLC accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers.19 Traditional chemotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of NSCLC, although its curative effect has been greatly limited by MDR. It is well known that the occurrence of MDR is closely related to the expression of P-gp/LRP in NSCLCs. P-gp is a 170-kDa transmembrane protein that was first discovered in 1976. P-gp can decrease the concentration of various drugs in the cytoplasm by extruding them out of cells and promoting the development of MDR.20, 21, 22, 23 LRP, which was initially identified in a non-P-gp MDR lung cancer cell line, is a major component of the human major vault protein.24, 25, 26, 27, 28 LRP can decrease the concentration of chemical drugs in the nucleus by regulating nucleocytoplasmic transport and the drugs that are transported to the cytoplasm can then be extruded from the cancer cell by exocytosis.16, 29, 30, 31 Previous studies have reported that P-gp is expressed in 35-52% of NSCLCs and LRP is expressed in 65-88% of NSCLCs.29, 32, 33 The expression of P-gp/LRP could be regarded as a biomarker of primary MDR in NSCLCs. In this study, we found that the frequencies of positive expression of P-gp and LRP detected by immunohistochemistry were 44.1% and 66.1% respectively, which was consistent with the frequencies reported previously, thus the expressions of them were reliable for used as biomarkers to indicate primary MDR of the patients in this study.

    In this research, clinicopathological characteristics of the patients with NSCLCs expressing P-gp/LRP positively were similar to those bearing EGFR mutation in exon 19 or 21. Generally, patients with NSCLCs bearing these mutations could benefit from EGFR-TKI. Therefore, one could speculate that patients with NSCLCs expressing P-gp/LRP would also benefit from EGFR-TKIs. Recently, mutation in EGFR exon 19 or 21 has been used as a biomarker for sensitivity of NSCLCs to EGFR-TKIs.34, 35, 36, 37 Thus, we analyzed correlations of P-gp/LRP expression with EGFR mutation status to investigate whether patients with NSCLCs expressing P-gp/LRP would bear the EGFR mutation in exon 19 or 21. We found that the EGFR mutation frequency in cancers expressing P-gp/LRP was significantly higher than in those without. These results suggest that NSCLCs expressing P-gp/LRP bear the EGFR mutation in exon 19 or 21. As P-gp/LRP expression was found to be a biomarker for MDR, we discerned that NSCLC patients who are not fit for traditional chemotherapy due to cancers with MDR may benefit from EGFR-TKIs.

    Notes

    The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81071805).

    References

      1. Okamoto T, Ichinose Y. [Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2006;33:1985–1990.
      1. Monzo M, Rosell R, Taron M. Drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2001;34 Suppl 2:S91–S94.
      1. Fojo A, Hamilton TC, Young RC, Ozols RF. Multidrug resistance in ovarian cancer. Cancer 1987;60 8 Suppl:2075–2080.
      1. Baguley BC. Multiple drug resistance mechanisms in cancer. Mol Biotechnol 2010;46:308–316.
      1. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129–2139.
      1. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497–1500.
      1. Kaneda H, Tamura K, Kurata T, Uejima H, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M. Retrospective analysis of the predictive factors associated with the response and survival benefit of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2004;46:247–254.
      1. Takano T, Ohe Y, Kusumoto M, Tateishi U, Yamamoto S, Nokihara H, et al. Risk factors for interstitial lung disease and predictive factors for tumor response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. Lung Cancer 2004;45:93–104.
      1. Tamura K, Fukuoka M. Gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005;6:985–993.
      1. Ando M, Okamoto I, Yamamoto N, Takeda K, Tamura K, Seto T, et al. Predictive factors for interstitial lung disease, antitumor response, and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2549–2556.
      1. Massarelli E, Varella-Garcia M, Tang X, Xavier AC, Ozburn NC, Liu DD, et al. KRAS mutation is an important predictor of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:2890–2896.
      1. Sandor V, Fojo T, Bates SE. Future perspectives for the development of P-glycoprotein modulators. Drug Resist Updat 1998;1:190–200.
      1. Szakács G, Paterson JK, Ludwig JA, Booth-Genthe C, Gottesman MM. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5:219–234.
      1. Kitazono M, Sumizawa T, Takebayashi Y, Chen ZS, Furukawa T, Nagayama S, et al. Multidrug resistance and the lung resistance-related protein in human colon carcinoma SW-620 cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1647–1653.
      1. Scheffer GL, Schroeijers AB, Izquierdo MA, Wiemer EA, Scheper RJ. Lung resistance-related protein/major vault protein and vaults in multidrug-resistant cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2000;12:550–556.
      1. Meschini S, Marra M, Calcabrini A, Monti E, Gariboldi M, Dolfini E, et al. Role of the lung resistance-related protein (LRP) in the drug sensitivity of cultured tumor cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2002;16:389–398.
      1. Li M, Liu L, Liu Z, Yue S, Zhou L, Zhang Q, et al. The status of KRAS mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancers from mainland China. Oncol Rep 2009;22:1013–1020.
      1. Li M, Zhang Q, Liu L, Liu Z, Zhou L, Wang Z, et al. The different clinical significance of EGFR mutations in exon 19 and 21 in non-small cell lung cancer patients of China. Neoplasma 2011;58:74–81.
      1. Hayes DN, Monti S, Parmigiani G, Gilks CB, Naoki K, Bhattacharjee A, et al. Gene expression profiling reveals reproducible human lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in multiple independent patient cohorts. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5079–5090.
      1. Juliano RL, Ling V. A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1976;455:152–162.
      1. Riordan JR, Ling V. Purification of P-glycoprotein from plasma membrane vesicles of Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants with reduced colchicine permeability. J Biol Chem 1979;254:12701–12705.
      1. Debenham PG, Kartner N, Siminovitch L, Riordan JR, Ling V. DNA-mediated transfer of multiple drug resistance and plasma membrane glycoprotein expression. Mol Cell Biol 1982;2:881–889.
      1. Riordan JR, Deuchars K, Kartner N, Alon N, Trent J, Ling V. Amplification of P-glycoprotein genes in multidrug-resistant mammalian cell lines. Nature 1985;316:817–819.
      1. Kedersha NL, Rome LH. Isolation and characterization of a novel ribonucleoprotein particle: large structures contain a single species of small RNA. J Cell Biol 1986;103:699–709.
      1. Rome L, Kedersha N, Chugani D. Unlocking vaults: organelles in search of a function. Trends Cell Biol 1991;1:47–50.
      1. Scheper RJ, Broxterman HJ, Scheffer GL, Kaaijk P, Dalton WS, van Heijningen TH, et al. Overexpression of a M(r) 110,000 vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Cancer Res 1993;53:1475–1479.
      1. Scheffer GL, Wijngaard PL, Flens MJ, Izquierdo MA, Slovak ML, Pinedo HM, et al. The drug resistance-related protein LRP is the human major vault protein. Nat Med 1995;1:578–582.
      1. Izquierdo MA, Shoemaker RH, Flens MJ, Scheffer GL, Wu L, Prather TR, et al. Overlapping phenotypes of multidrug resistance among panels of human cancer-cell lines. Int J Cancer 1996;65:230–237.
      1. Scagliotti GV, Novello S, Selvaggi G. Multidrug resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 1999;10 Suppl 5:S83–S86.
      1. Chugani DC, Rome LH, Kedersha NL. Evidence that vault ribonucleoprotein particles localize to the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Sci 1993;106(Pt 1):23–29.
      1. Schuurhuis GJ, Broxterman HJ, de Lange JH, Pinedo HM, van Heijningen TH, Kuiper CM, et al. Early multidrug resistance, defined by changes in intracellular doxorubicin distribution, independent of P-glycoprotein. Br J Cancer 1991;64:857–861.
      1. Paredes Lario A, Blanco García C, Echenique Elizondo M, Lobo C. [Expression of proteins associated with multidrug resistance and resistance to chemotherapy in lung cancer]. Arch Bronconeumol 2007;43:479–484.
      1. Zuo Y, Huang J, Mu C, Shen D. The expression and significance of the multidrug resistance-related proteins P-gp, MRP and LRP in human non-small cell lung cancer tissues. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol 2007;6:432–436.
      1. Fiala O, Pešek M, Fínek J, Brůha F, Bortlíček Z, Krejčí J, et al. [EGFR mutations in patients with advanced NSCLC]. Klin Onkol 2012;25:267–273.
      1. Fukihara J, Watanabe N, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, Kimura T, Kataoka K, et al. Clinical predictors of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Oncology 2014;86:86–93.
      1. Wang J, Nong J, Jia H, Qin N, Li X, Zhang H, et al. Efficacy and predictors of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Chinese advanced lung adenocarcinoma: analyses of 253 cases from a single institute. Oncol Res 2014;21:237–246.
      1. Pallis AG, Fennell DA, Szutowicz E, Leighl NB, Greillier L, Dziadziuszko R. Biomarkers of clinical benefit for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2011;105:1–8.
    Cited by
    Crossref 9
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 6
    Scopus 14
    Web of Science 13
    MeSH Terms
    Aged
    Aged, 80 and over
    Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics*
    Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery
    Exons/genetics*
    Female
    Humans
    Lung Neoplasms/genetics*
    Lung Neoplasms/pathology
    Lung Neoplasms/surgery
    Middle Aged
    Mutation
    P-Glycoprotein/genetics*
    Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
    Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
    Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics*
    Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/genetics*
    Treatment Outcome
    Vault Ribonucleoprotein Particles/genetics*
    ras Proteins/genetics*
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 4

    Funding Information
    PERMALINK