Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Immunol., 08 August 2022
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research Topic Combinational Immunotherapy of Cancer: Novel Targets, Mechanisms, and Strategies View all 85 articles

Response to apatinib and camrelizumab combined treatment in a radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patient resistant to prior anti-angiogenic therapy: A case report and literature review

Jiayi Li,,&#x;Jiayi Li1,2,3†Xin Zhang,,,&#x;Xin Zhang1,2,3,4†Zhuanzhuan Mu,,,Zhuanzhuan Mu1,2,3,4Di Sun,,,Di Sun1,2,3,4Yuqing Sun,,,Yuqing Sun1,2,3,4Yansong Lin,,*Yansong Lin1,2,3*
  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Beijing, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  • 4Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

Background: Patients with radioactive iodine refractory progressive (RAIR) differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) often developed resistance after first-line therapy. Apatinib plus camrelizumab is a therapy with promising efficacy in patients with other malignant cancers. Herein, we presented a case of progressive RAIR DTC treated with apatinib plus camrelizumab.

Case presentation: We reported a 43-year-old man diagnosed as DTC with metastases in the lungs, the 7th cervical vertebra, and malignant lymph nodes mainly in the mediastinum. While initially showing disease stabilization after giving the first-line multitargeted kinase inhibitor (MKI) therapy, the patient developed progressive disease and was enrolled into a combined therapy with both apatinib and camrelizumab on November 10, 2020. Upon the first 6 months, the combination therapy showed disease control in terms of both stable structural lesions and biochemical thyroglobulin (Tg) level. Six months later, a decrease over the targeted lesions was observed and a partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was finally achieved upon 12 months’ assessment, followed by the decline in serum Tg level. The main adverse event was occasional diarrhea without treatment interruption.

Conclusion: We reported a case with RAIR DTC that benefited from combination immunotherapy, apatinib plus camrelizumab, after resistance from donafenib. We observed a gradually getting better efficacy and a mild and long duration of this combination therapy and hoped to provide a therapeutic choice for these patients.

Introduction

The progression in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) can occur in up to approximately 20% after standard therapeutic approaches in the 10-year follow-up (1). After radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, loss of the ability of iodine uptake can occur in two-thirds of these patients, which are called RAI-refractory, progressive differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) (2). Those with RAIR-DTC have a 10-year survival rate less than 10% survival, which greatly reduce clinical dilemma.

Currently, two multitargeted kinase inhibitors (MKI) sorafenib and lenvatinib have been approved for use in patients with progressive RAIR DTC by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) as the first-line systemic therapy based upon their promising antitumor activity (3). However, most RAIR-DTC patients developed resistance to MKIs over the following 1 to 2 years (4). In addition, drug-induced adverse effects were commonly seen with MKI treatment under standard doses, which may downgrade the patients’ quality of life and even lead to termination of MKI therapy (5). Cabozantinib is a recently approved therapy after first-line resistance (6). However, it is still a MKI therapy and could not be available in Chinese patients.

Immunotherapy PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have also achieved promising results in many tumor types such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (7). A non-randomized, phase Ib trial KEYNOTE-028 estimated response of patients with RAIR-DTC to PD-1 and observed objective responses in a minority of patients (8). The influence of PD-1 treatment to RAIR-DTC must be substantiated in subsequent clinical trials. The combination of immunotherapy and MKIs is a topic of high interest in the treatment of advanced malignant tumors. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed more potent antitumor activity compared with either agent alone in mouse xenograft (9) and human studies (10), showing promising benefit in RAIR-DTC (11). Apatinib is a domestic MKI which showed rapid and significant efficacy in its phase II and phase III studies conducted in progressive RAIR-DTC (12), and apatinib plus camrelizumab is a combined therapy which has shown promising efficacy recently in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or neuroendocrine carcinoma (13).

To our knowledge, apatinib combined with camrelizumab therapy has not been systematically reported in thyroid cancers. We presented here a case of progressive RAIR-DTC treated with apatinib plus camrelizumab (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04560127).

Case presentation

A 43-year-old man diagnosed with follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) with metastases in the lungs, the 7th cervical vertebra, and malignant lymph nodes mainly in the mediastinum and resistance to first-line MKI was given a combined therapy of antiangiogenic MKI apatinib and anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in October 2020.

In 2015, the patient was diagnosed with DTC (Figures 1A, B) and received radical thyroidectomy and subsequent RAI therapy. Mutation analysis was performed, and results were positive for TERT, BRAF p.L597Q, and VEGF, while negative for RAS and BRAF p.VAL600. During the regular follow-up including cervical ultrasound and chest computed tomography (CT) scanning accompanied by TSH suppression therapy, recurrences were found in cervical lymph nodes, mediastinal lymph nodes, lungs, and the 7th cervical vertebra in 2017. Therefore, he received cervical lymph node dissection and several subsequent RAI therapies. However, his pulmonary lesions did not take iodine revealed by whole-body iodine scan after last RAI therapy in October 2019 (Figure 1C). Thus, he was identified as RAIR after receiving several surgeries and RAI therapies with a cumulative dose of 670 mCi. He was then given a first-line MKI in October 2019. While initially showing disease stabilization after giving the first-line MKI, the patient developed progressive disease (PD) and terminated the first-line MKI therapy on September 10, 2020.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining showing follicular thyroid cancer cells (magnification ×100). (B) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining showing lymph node metastasis from follicular thyroid cancer (magnification ×100). (C) Whole-body iodine scan showed radioactive iodine refractory.

Followed by a 4-week discontinuation, the patient was enrolled into an exploratory phase II clinical trial combining antiangiogenic MKI apatinib and anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in November 2020. The therapeutic schedule was given by 250 mg apatinib orally once daily and 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously once every 2 weeks in a 4-week cycle. The patient was evaluated every cycle in the first 2 cycles and every 2 cycles thereafter. During the first 6 months’ assessment, the combination therapy initially showed disease control in terms of both stable structural lesions and biochemical thyroglobulin (Tg) level (Figure 2). Six months later from April 2021, the targeted and non-targeted lesions began to shrink rapidly followed by a rapid decrease in serum Tg, and a partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was finally achieved upon 12 months’ assessment in October 2021 (targeted lesions: 4.7 to 2.9 cm) (Figures 2B, C). Along with this process, the biochemical Tg level also decreased from 22,481 ng/ml (October 2020) to 5,351 ng/ml (October 2021) (Figure 2D).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 (A) Timeline of the reported case. (B) Chest computed tomography (CT) scanning showed change of a pulmonary lesion which was located in the left lower lobe of the lung. (C) Chest CT scanning showed change of a subcarinal lymph node lesion. (D) Change in the serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level in each assessment.

During this process, the main adverse event was occasional diarrhea without treatment interruption. The patient was in the state of PR at the last assessment and will be followed up in the future.

Discussion

We presented here a case of RAIR DTC with disease progression that responded to apatinib plus camrelizumab after resistance to an antiangiogenic drug. To our knowledge, we believed this was the first case of RAIR DTC with disease progression treated with apatinib plus camrelizumab. The patient showed a durable and safe response of nearly 1 year.

In our case, the patient with RAIR DTC got resistant to the first MKI donafenib. There were no public-approved treatments for RAIR DTC patients who became resistant to MKI in China. A number of previous clinical studies have explored the use of camrelizumab combined with apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma, NSCLC, SCLC, cervical cancer, breast cancer, osteosarcoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, biliary tract cancer, and gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer and showed promising results (1425) (Table 1). Another combination therapy of immunotherapy PD-1 inhibitors and MKIs, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, showed disease control in thyroid cancer. Luongo et al. (26) showed that patients with paucicellular variant anaplastic thyroid cancer reached PR 5 months after giving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and PR persisted over 18 months. Dierks et al. (27) and Iyer et al. (28) showed that disease control happened in over half of patients with thyroid cancer after lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab therapy (Table 2). The efficacy of these studies was consistent with our research. The mechanism may be related to that use of MKI could normalize the abnormal tumor vasculature, thus increasing the infiltration of immune effector cells like CD4+ and CD8+ T cells into tumors (3032). Preclinical experiments also found that apatinib could enhance the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade through alleviating hypoxia, increasing the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, and reducing tumor-associated macrophage recruitment and TGFβ amounts in both tumor and serum (33). The selection of dosing is also a question needed to be resolved. Previous fundamental studies observed a more favorable microenvironment for immunotherapy in low-dose apatinib instead of high-dose treatment (33). Therefore, the dose of our case is 250 mg apatinib in combination with 200 mg camrelizumab, which was consistent with previous studies (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Clinical trials for camrelizumab combined with apatinib for the treatment of other diseases.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Clinical studies for lenvatinib combined with pembrolizumab for the treatment of thyroid cancer.

The response pattern of this combined therapy featured as initial stabilization and delayed tumor reduction was quite different from the current effect of mono-MKI therapy, which may suggest the difference between our combined effect and monotherapy. As we previously mentioned, patients always showed rapid response to antiangiogenic drugs but progressed eventually. Previous studies found that in apatinib monotherapy, the serum Tg level decreased as early as 2 weeks (34), the median time to objective response was 1.9 months (29), and an expected time to progression was between 11 and 18 months (33, 35). Meanwhile, the response to immunotherapy seems to be more durable. A study found that time to response for patients with DTC after PD-1 inhibitor therapy who reached PR was 4 to 5 months (11). For our patient, time to PR was much longer than previous research of apatinib monotherapy. In addition, we did not find the patient who showed the same response pattern in apatinib monotherapy. Therefore, the first 6-month response in this patient may suggest the effect of a low-dose MKI to some extent, while the subsequent response may suggest the effect of immunotherapy. The long duration indicated a mild and lasting therapeutic effect of low-dose apatinib combined with camrelizumab in thyroid cancer.

During this process, the main adverse event was occasional diarrhea without treatment interruption. Adverse events including hand–foot syndrome, hypertension, and proteinuria are commonly observed in apatinib therapy but did not appear in this patient (36), which may suggest the safety of a low-dose schedule. The reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was a common adverse event in camrelizumab therapy (37). There is a hypothesis that apatinib, a kind of antiangiogenic drug, would inhibit the proliferation of endothelial cells and thus would present a counteracting effect against adverse effects of camrelizumab. Compared with camrelizumab monotherapy, the skin capillary hyperplasia symptoms in combined therapy were lower than before (Table 1).

The change in serum Tg level in our case also suggested the potential prediction value of serum Tg on target and immunotherapy. The correlation between ps-Tg and therapeutic response was proposed in 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines, and the relationship between Tg and apatinib plus camrelizumab therapy needed to be confirmed (2). Therefore, our results indicated the value of Tg in observing response to target therapy.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

JL and XZ: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; software; visualization; writing—original draft. ZM, DS, and YS: supervision; validation; visualization; writing—review and editing. YL: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; project administration; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (No. 2020-I2M-2-003), the CSCO-Hengrui Research Foundation (No. Y-HR2018-143, Y-HR2018-144), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81771875), and the Project on Inter-Governmental International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation in the National Key Projects of Research and Development Plan (grant 2019YFE0106400). In addition, apatinib and camrelizumab were provided by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this study was funded by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (No. 2020-I2M-2-003), the CSCO-Hengrui Research Foundation (No. Y-HR2018-143, Y-HR2018-144), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81771875), the Project on Inter-Governmental International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation in the National Key Projects of Research and Development Plan (grant 2019YFE0106400). In addition, apatinib and camrelizumab were provided by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Schlumberger M, Brose M, Elisei R, Leboulleux S, Luster M, Pitoia F, et al. Definition and management of radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2014) 2:356–8. doi: 10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70215-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid (2016) 26:1–133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Brose MS, Nutting CM, Jarzab B, Elisei R, Siena S, Bastholt L, et al. Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet (2014) 384:319–28. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60421-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, Robinson B, Brose MS, Elisei R, et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med (2015) 372:621–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Pitoia F, Jerkovich F. Selective use of sorafenib in the treatment of thyroid cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther (2016) 10:1119–31. doi: 10.2147/dddt.s82972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wang E, Karedan T, Perez CA. New insights in the treatment of radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinomas: to lenvatinib and beyond. Anticancer Drugs (2015) 26:689–97. doi: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ancker OV, Krüger M, Wehland M, Infanger M, Grimm D. Multikinase inhibitor treatment in thyroid cancer. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 21. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Laursen R, Wehland M, Kopp S, Pietsch J, Infanger M, Grosse J, et al. Effects and role of multikinase inhibitors in thyroid cancer. Curr Pharm Des (2016) 22:5915–26. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160614084943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Brose MS, Robinson B, Sherman SI, Krajewska J, Lin CC, Vaisman F, et al. Cabozantinib for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (COSMIC-311): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol (2021) 22:1126–38. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00332-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Alsaab HO, Sau S, Alzhrani R, Tatiparti K, Bhise K, Kashaw SK, et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint signaling inhibition for cancer immunotherapy: Mechanism, combinations, and clinical outcome. Front Pharmacol (2017) 8:561. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mehnert JM, Varga A, Brose MS, Aggarwal RR, Lin CC, Prawira A, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced, PD-L1-positive papillary or follicular thyroid cancer. BMC Cancer (2019) 19:196. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5380-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kimura T, Kato Y, Ozawa Y, Kodama K, Ito J, Ichikawa K, et al. Immunomodulatory activity of lenvatinib contributes to antitumor activity in the Hepa1-6 hepatocellular carcinoma model. Cancer Sci (2018) 109:3993–4002. doi: 10.1111/cas.13806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mo DC, Luo PH, Huang SX, Wang HL, Huang JF. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib versus pembrolizumab and lenvatinib monotherapies in cancers: A systematic review. Int Immunopharmacol (2021) 91:107281. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mei K, Qin S, Chen Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Zou J. Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in second-line or above therapy for advanced primary liver cancer: cohort a report in a multicenter phase Ib/II trial. J Immunother Cancer (2021) 9. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xu J, Shen J, Gu S, Zhang Y, Wu L, Wu J, et al. Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (RESCUE): A nonrandomized, open-label, phase II trial. Clin Cancer Res (2021) 27:1003–11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ren S, He J, Fang Y, Chen G, Ma Z, Chen J, et al. Camrelizumab plus apatinib in treatment-naive patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. JTO Clin Res Rep (2022) 3:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Fan Y, Zhao J, Wang Q, Huang D, Li X, Chen J, et al. Camrelizumab plus apatinib in extensive-stage SCLC (PASSION): A multicenter, two-stage, phase 2 trial. J Thorac Oncol (2021) 16:299–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lan C, Shen J, Wang Y, Li J, Liu Z, He M, et al. Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced cervical cancer (CLAP): A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38:4095–106. doi: 10.1200/jco.20.01920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Liu J, Liu Q, Li Y, Li Q, Su F, Yao H, et al. Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with apatinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: an open-label phase II trial. J Immunother Cancer (2020) 8. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000696

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Xie L, Xu J, Sun X, Guo W, Gu J, Liu K, et al. Apatinib plus camrelizumab (anti-PD1 therapy, SHR-1210) for advanced osteosarcoma (APFAO) progressing after chemotherapy: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. J Immunother Cancer (2020) 8. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Meng X, Wu T, Hong Y, Fan Q, Ren Z, Guo Y, et al. Camrelizumab plus apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CAP 02): a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol (2022) 7:245–53. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00378-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ren C, Mai ZJ, Jin Y, He MM, Wang ZQ, Luo HY, et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 plus apatinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Am J Cancer Res (2020) . 10:2946–54.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

23. Cheng H, Zong L, Kong Y, Wang X, Gu Y, Cang W, et al. Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with high-risk chemorefractory or relapsed gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (CAP 01): a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol (2021) 22:1609–17. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00460-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wang D, Yang X, Long J, Lin J, Mao J, Xie F, et al. The efficacy and safety of apatinib plus camrelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer: A prospective clinical study. Front Oncol (2021) 11:646979. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646979

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Xu J, Zhang Y, Jia R, Yue C, Chang L, Liu R, et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric, or esophagogastric junction cancer: An open-label, dose escalation and expansion study. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25:515–23. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Luongo C, Porcelli T, Sessa F, De Stefano MA, Scavuzzo F, Damiano V, et al. Combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as salvage treatment for paucicellular variant of anaplastic thyroid cancer: A case report. Curr Oncol (2021) 28:5401–7. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Dierks C, Seufert J, Aumann K, Ruf J, Klein C, Kiefer S, et al. Combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is an effective treatment option for anaplastic and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid (2021) 31:1076–85. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Iyer PC, Dadu R, Gule-Monroe M, Busaidy NL, Ferrarotto R, Habra MA, et al. Salvage pembrolizumab added to kinase inhibitor therapy for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer (2018) 6:68. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0378-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lin Y, Qin S, Li Z, Yang H, Fu W, Li S, et al. Apatinib vs placebo in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: The REALITY randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol (2022) 8:242–50. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Fukumura D, Kloepper J, Amoozgar Z, Duda DG, Jain RK. Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2018) 15:325–40. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.29

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Huang Y, Yuan J, Righi E, Kamoun WS, Ancukiewicz M, Nezivar J, et al. Vascular normalizing doses of antiangiogenic treatment reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2012) 109:17561–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215397109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Schmittnaegel M, Rigamonti N, Kadioglu E, Cassará A, Wyser Rmili C, Kiialainen A, et al. Dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGFA inhibition elicits antitumor immunity that is enhanced by PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Sci Transl Med (2017) 9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Zhao S, Ren S, Jiang T, Zhu B, Li X, Zhao C, et al. Low-dose apatinib optimizes tumor microenvironment and potentiates antitumor effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res (2019) 7:630–43. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-17-0640

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lin Y, Wang C, Gao W, Cui R, Liang J. Overwhelming rapid metabolic and structural response to apatinib in radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Oncotarget (2017) 8:42252–61. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Brose MS, Schlumbeger M, Jeffers M, Kappeler C, Meinhardt G, Peña CEA. Analysis of biomarkers and association with clinical outcomes in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: Subanalysis of the sorafenib phase III DECISION trial. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25:7370–80. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Shao F, Zhang H, Yang X, Luo X, Liu J. Adverse events and management of apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic cancers: A review. Neoplasma (2020) 67:715–23. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_190801N701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Wang F, Qin S, Sun X, Ren Z, Meng Z, Chen Z, et al. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with camrelizumab: data derived from a multicenter phase 2 trial. J Hematol Oncol (2020) 13:47. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00886-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: radioactive iodine refractory, differentiated thyroid cancer, combination immunotherapy, multitargeted kinase inhibitors plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors therapy, apatinib plus camrelizumab treatment

Citation: Li J, Zhang X, Mu Z, Sun D, Sun Y and Lin Y (2022) Response to apatinib and camrelizumab combined treatment in a radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patient resistant to prior anti-angiogenic therapy: A case report and literature review. Front. Immunol. 13:943916. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.943916

Received: 14 May 2022; Accepted: 27 June 2022;
Published: 08 August 2022.

Edited by:

Xian Zeng, Fudan University, China

Reviewed by:

Chae Moon Hong, Kyungpook National University, South Korea
Zhongling Qiu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Copyright © 2022 Li, Zhang, Mu, Sun, Sun and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yansong Lin, linyansong1968@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.