Treatment Options for Abdominal Rectus Diastasis

Introduction

Abdominal rectus diastasis is a condition where the abdominal muscles are separated by an abnormal distance due to widening of the linea alba, which causes the abdominal content to bulge. The rectus fascia is intact, and the condition should therefore not be confused with a ventral hernia. Rectus diastasis can be congenital but is most commonly acquired during pregnancies and/or larger weight gain causing laxity of linea alba (1). It is a common condition in pregnancy as the incidence in the third trimester is as high as 66% whereof 30–60% persist post-partum (2, 3). Not all patients with abdominal rectus diastasis have symptoms, but when they do, treatment can be considered. The symptoms include pain and discomfort in the abdomen (4), musculoskeletal problems like pelvic instability and lumbar back pain (5), and urogynecological symptoms such as urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse (6). In addition, patients with rectus diastasis also experience lower perception of body image, lower body satisfaction, and lower quality of life compared with the general population (6, 7). Even though the condition is common, literature on treatment of rectus diastasis is sparse (5).

The purpose of this review was to give an overview of treatment options for abdominal rectus diastasis. This review is intended for general surgeons, plastic surgeons, and general practitioners. It is based on a comprehensive literature search in PubMed with search topics “rectus diastasis” and “treatment” and inclusion of the most relevant literature.

Physiotherapy

The medical doctor may start the treatment of rectus diastasis by referring the patient to a physiotherapist for conservative (non-surgical) treatment. The success rate is questionable and not possible to state, as no identified studies report on the long-term effects of physiotherapy. We suggest that physiotherapy can begin 6 or 8 weeks post-partum, which has been chosen in some studies (8, 9). The conservative interventions are exercise, postural and back care education, external support with elastic tubular bandage or a corset, and/or aerobic exercises (5). Table 1 presents examples of conservatory approaches in published studies. The approaches are heterogeneous, and it is difficult to compare the studies. In a systematic review including four studies that assessed the effect of physiotherapy as treatment for rectus diastasis, the authors concluded that it was impossible to recommend physiotherapy in general or to recommend a specific exercise routine since the included studies both had insufficient number of patients and were heterogeneously conducted with a low level of evidence (5).

Table 1. Overview of published non-surgical treatments.

A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) that included 175 primiparous women failed to show any difference in the prevalence of rectus diastasis between an exercise group completing a 16-week program and a non-exercising control group, evaluated 6 and 12 months post-partum (8). However, the presence of rectus diastasis was not an inclusion criterion. A systematic review found that physiotherapy did not lead to resolution of abdominal rectus diastasis in relaxed state, but that physiotherapy could achieve a limited reduction of the inter-recti distance during contraction of the muscles (14). In several of the included studies in this review, physiotherapy began within the first months post-partum where the diastasis might resolve naturally. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude if physiotherapy or natural resolution had an effect since the studies lacked control groups (14).

An RCT with long-term follow up compared 3 months of intensive physiotherapy with surgical treatment in patients with rectus diastasis (7). The study reported pain and restrictions in daily activities, assessed by a validated pain questionnaire, quality of life with Short Form 36 (SF-36). All patients receiving physiotherapy had significantly lower quality of life score on all eight domains of the SF-36 at baseline compared with the background population. Physiotherapy significantly improved some parts of the pain variables compared with the baseline measurements, but patients still had pain during sport and during daily activities and there was no improvement in “pain right now.” Physiotherapy significantly improved the patients' scores on four out of the eight domains in the SF-36, however, especially “bodily pain” score was still significantly lower than the background population (7).

Surgical Treatment

Surgery can be considered when physiotherapy fails to reduce the abnormal widening of linea alba and discomforts are severe. We suggest that surgery can be considered 6–12 months post-partum since the diastasis might resolve naturally during this period (8). Surgical options include open-, laparoscopic-, and robot assisted surgery. In all described techniques, a plication of the rectus fascia is performed. During open approach, it is usually the anterior rectus fascia that is plicated, whereas during laparoscopic and robot assisted approach, it is the posterior rectus fascia that is plicated.

Open Surgery

The success rate is overall high as most studies report a 0% recurrence rate 6 months after open surgery (7, 15–17). The most widely used open approach is a classic abdominoplasty with transverse suprapubic incision extended laterally to the anterior iliac crests to visualize the rectus muscles and the linea alba (7, 12, 15–19). Other incisions are possible as well: midline supraumbilical incision, typically used in cases of other coexisting conditions (nephrectomy and hernia) (20, 21); left suprapubic incision, extended 2–3 cm upwards; and midline ventral incision, extending from the xiphiod process to the pubic area (22, 23).

Plication can be done with or without mesh reinforcement. Mesh is often used when a coexisting hernia is present (21–23). Regarding the plication techniques, the surgeon might use single or double layer, interrupted or continuous suture, and absorbable, slowly absorbable, or permanent sutures (12, 15–19, 24). Three RCTs have compared different types of plication techniques (12, 15, 16). In the aforementioned RCT with both short-term and long-term follow up published as two articles (7, 12), the purpose was to compare physiotherapy with two different types of plication techniques in open abdominoplasty. The plication was done with either one layer of absorbable continuous sutures or two layers of slowly absorbable continuous sutures. The results showed that surgery significantly improved pain scores on the validated ventral pain questionnaire compared with physiotherapy while there was no difference between the two types of plication. There were significant improvements in the quality of life score on all eight domains of the SF-36 compared with baseline measurements, and the surgically treated patients were on the same level as the background population 1 year post-operatively. Again, there were no differences between the two types of suture techniques (12). This RCT compared surgery with physiotherapy and concluded that improvements in the two surgical treatment groups were significantly greater compared with the aforementioned improvements in the physiotherapy group (7). The second RCT compared two patient groups that were sutured with double layers of interrupted sutures using permanent or absorbable sutures, respectively (15). They reported a 0% recurrence rate in both groups assessed by CT scan 6 months post-operatively. The seroma rate was 20–30% without a significant difference between the groups, and they reported no other complications (15). The third RCT compared single layer interrupted absorbable suture plication with single layer interrupted permanent suture plication. Both groups had 0% recurrence rate at 6 months follow up assessed by imaging (16). All three RCTs had a 100% follow up rate. Based on the results from these three RCTs (12, 15, 16), surgical plication has impressive results with low complication rates, and it is not possible to recommend one plication technique over another.

Four cohort studies have assessed complications in groups of patients receiving a uniform surgical repair technique (17–19, 24). In the first retrospective cohort study, the surgeons used a continuous single layer plication of the rectus sheath (18). The study included 113 patients who were followed for a mean of 12 months (range 2–40 months). The authors reported no major complications and 18% of the patients suffered from minor complications, which was seroma formation in 8%, hypertrophic scar with need for scar revision in 8%, wound infection in 1%, and skin necrosis in 1% of the patients. In another retrospective cohort study, the plication was done in a single layer with continuous permanent suture in 22 patients (17). The follow-up was >25 months and they reported 0% recurrence rate, no hernias, and no patient discomfort, but they did not state assessment of the patient discomfort. A third retrospective cohort study, including 70 patients plicated with a single layer with continuous absorbable suture, reported a recurrence rate of 40% with a mean follow up of 64 months (range 32–109 months) (19). This high recurrence rate is an outlier, and it is not possible to say whether the authors are correct in their conclusion that absorbable sutures leads to a high long-term recurrence rate. There is a risk of attrition bias since they did not have planned follow up and did not state how the patients were chosen for the follow up in addition to only 55% of the invited patients attending the follow up. A fourth prospective cohort study included 214 patients treated with abdominoplasty with plication repair of the rectus diastasis (24). They showed significant improvements 6 months post-operatively compared with pre-operative assessments of low back pain scores and urinary incontinence, using validated questionnaires.

The recurrence rates and complication rates in open surgical treatments are in general low and the complications that occur are minor. The one study that compared surgery with physiotherapy showed better results regarding pain in the surgery group than the physiotherapy group (7). Studies have shown that open repair of abdominal rectus diastasis have improved low back pain, urinary incontinence, and quality of life in patients compared with pre-surgery (7, 24).

Laparoscopic Surgery

The success rate for laparoscopic surgery is high, as most studies report a 0% recurrence rate 6 months after surgery (25–31). A laparoscopic technique is commonly used when diastasis and ventral hernia coexists but can also be used for treatment of abdominal rectus diastasis solely (1).

Several different placements of trocars are used, most commonly suprapubic and periumbilical (26, 29, 32–34) or suprapubic and in both iliac fossae (28, 30, 35, 36). Four studies included patients with ventral hernia, specified as umbilical, epigastric, supraumbilical, or incisional hernia (28, 33, 35, 36). As during open approach, the repair of the rectus fascia can be performed with or without mesh reinforcement. Mesh is often used when a coexisting hernia is present (27, 28, 31, 35). Single or double layer and interrupted or continuous plication technique is possible, and absorbable, slowly absorbable, and permanent suture can be used. Permanent suture has been used in most studies (26, 29, 33, 35, 36), but absorbable suture was used in 94% of 50 patients in a prospective cohort study showing 0% recurrence with a mean follow up of 23 months (28). More details about laparoscopic surgery options are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flowchart with suggested treatment steps. ^*: Laparoscopic techniques used for rectus diastasis repair: pre-aponeurotic endoscopic (REPA) repair (28), intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair (31), total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, subcutaneous endoscopic repair (34, 36) or other endoscopic abdominoplasty techniques (29, 32, 33).

Most studies using laparoscopic repair of rectus diastasis reported a 0% recurrence rate (25–31). The seroma formation rate in patients without a coexistent hernia has been reported to be 3–25% (26, 29, 32), hematoma rate 0% (26, 29), and infection rate 0–25% (26, 29).

Coexisting ventral hernia and rectus diastasis is a complex and significant clinical problem as well. In addition to the traditional laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (25, 35), several additional techniques for surgical correction have been developed recently including endoscopic mini or less open sublay repair (EMILOS) (37) and laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) (38). The new techniques (37, 38) show great potential with low complication rates and less pain and might be used to correct rectus diastasis without a concomitant hernia as well. A recent study has shown the importance of detection of rectus diastasis in patients with ventral hernia. They found rectus diastasis to be a significant risk factor for recurrence when treating ventral hernia with primary sutures without mesh and they recommended checking for rectus diastasis pre-operatively (39).

Robot Assisted Surgery

Robot assisted surgery provides new possibilities of minimal invasive treatment for specific indications. In a systematic review that compared robot assisted laparoscopic repair with open and laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias, the length of the patients' hospital stay was decreased by a mean of 3 days with robot assisted repair compared to open repair. The authors stated that it was likely that the result was due to less operative pain as fewer patients needed regional block analgesia. Robot assisted repair offered technical advantages in the closure of the hernia defect and a higher rate of defect closure was achieved with robot assisted repair compared with laparoscopic repair. However, the operating time was significantly longer for robot assisted repair compared with open repair with a mean difference of 84 min, and laparoscopic repair with a mean difference of 52 min (40).

It is likely that we will see positive results with robot assisted surgery in patients with rectus diastasis. Robot assisted surgery in the treatment of abdominal rectus diastasis is being presented at conferences as case reports and conference abstracts have been published showing promising results: low morbidity and excellent cosmetic outcome (41, 42). Unfortunately, no studies have been published that compare robot assisted surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery.

Discussion

When a patient presents with a symptomatic rectus diastasis without a concomitant ventral hernia, the first treatment option is physiotherapy. However, the success rate of physiotherapy is questionable. Conservatory treatment includes exercise, postural, and back care education, external support with elastic tubular bandage or a corset, and/or aerobic exercises. Evidence is lacking for which conservative treatment and which exercise program to use. If physiotherapy does not lead to resolution or improvement of the rectus diastasis, surgery may be considered. Rectus diastasis can be corrected with plication performed during open or laparoscopic surgery, and both techniques have high success rates. The plication can be done in a single or double-layer, with permanent or absorbable suture, and in an interrupted or continuous way, and the literature does not imply that any plication technique is superior to another. The recurrence rates and other complications after surgical treatment are in general low, and studies have shown that repair of abdominal rectus diastasis improves various symptoms including low back pain, urinary incontinence, and quality of life.

Studies have shown a high incidence of rectus diastasis post-partum (2, 3), but there are no published articles showing how many of the women who seek medical advice. Even less is known about men with rectus diastasis. Contacting a medical doctor might be a good indicator that the symptoms are severe and have a negative impact on the patient's life. Therefore, doctors should always consider referring a patient who has rectus diastasis with symptoms to a physiotherapist for conservatory treatment. If a severe symptomatic rectus diastasis without a concomitant ventral hernia is diagnosed when women have a planned medical check a couple of weeks or months post-partum, this can be the time to refer the patient to a physiotherapist. If the patient returns after 2–6 months of conservatory treatment with persistent symptoms, a referral to a surgeon might be considered. A suggestion for treatment steps is shown in Figure 1. Some patients experience natural resolution in the first year post-partum (8), and surgery should therefore wait until at least 1 year post-partum, if possible.

Regarding physiotherapy, there is no evidence for a specific treatment method, and the choice of approach can depend on the individual physiotherapist's expertise and clinical results. Ideally, more research needs to be conducted to investigate which conservatory treatment method that is the best. So far, studies have not shown promising or significant effect of physiotherapy. Nevertheless, it is still recommendable to try conservatory treatment before considering surgery as it is not possible to determine whether the lack of evidence for conservatory treatment is due to lack of research or lack of effect. One study did show an improvement in quality of life after physiotherapy (7). More strength in the abdominal muscles likely improves symptoms in some patients, which can improve quality of life even though the rectus diastasis persists. Even though physiotherapy might not completely resolve the condition, it can improve symptoms and should always be the first line treatment.

When physiotherapy does not lead to satisfying recovery and surgery is considered in the treatment of rectus diastasis, the question is whether an open or laparoscopic approach should be performed since both approaches are associated with high success rates and low complication rates. A plastic surgeon might be chosen for the open approach with diastasis repair combined with removal of excess skin or liposuction if necessary. A general surgeon might be chosen for an open as well as a laparoscopic approach, especially when there is a coexisting hernia (14). In the future, robot assisted surgery by general surgeons might replace the laparoscopic procedure as it has potential to make the operation easier for the surgeon and still with a minimally invasive approach.

As a clinician, it is important to recognize that rectus diastasis is a significant problem and to acknowledge this patient group and their symptoms and especially their impaired quality of life compared with the background population (12). A suggestion for diagnostics and treatment strategy is presented in Figure 1. More research needs to be conducted to investigate which conservative treatment to use and to compare the surgical techniques. Preferably, an international guideline on the treatment of rectus diastasis could be compiled.

In conclusion, patients with abdominal rectus diastasis who have symptoms in addition to the bulge caused from the diastasis should be referred to a physiotherapist. Evidence is lacking for which conservatory treatment to use, and more research needs to be conducted in this area. If conservatory treatment leads to unsatisfying results, surgery can be considered. Open or laparoscopic surgery are options, and the choice of surgical technique should depend on the amount of excess skin, need for liposuction, presence of coexisting hernia, and general relative contraindications for laparoscopic surgery such as multiple previous laparotomies or peritonitis. Both types of surgery have low recurrence and complication rates. Robotic assisted surgery is being presented at conferences with promising results, and it might become a treatment method in the near future. An international guideline for the treatment of rectus diastasis could be beneficial for patients and clinicians.

Author Contributions

MJ contributed substantially to the conception and design of the work, acquisition and interpretation of data, and the drafted work. SÖ and JR contributed substantially to the conception and design of the work, the interpretation of the data, and revised the work critically. All authors have approved the final version to be published and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflict of Interest

JR reports personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References