Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Roles of Calcium Regulating MicroRNAs in Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Condensins are Required for Maintenance of Nuclear Architecture
Previous Article in Special Issue
microRNAs and Cardiac Cell Fate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 3
Issue 3
10.3390/cells3030883
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Coding RNAs Including miRNAs and lncRNAs in Cardiovascular Biology and Disease

by
Masaharu Kataoka
1,2 and
Da-Zhi Wang
1,3,*
1
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 320 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
3
Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2014, 3(3), 883-898; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells3030883
Submission received: 10 July 2014 / Revised: 15 August 2014 / Accepted: 15 August 2014 / Published: 22 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular Biology and Disease)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
It has been recognized for decades that proteins, which are encoded by our genome and produced via transcription and translation steps, are building blocks that play vital roles in almost all biological processes. Mutations identified in many protein-coding genes are linked to various human diseases. However, this “protein-centered” dogma has been challenged in recent years with the discovery that the majority of our genome is “non-coding” yet transcribed. Non-coding RNA has become the focus of “next generation” biology. Here, we review the emerging field of non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and their role in cardiovascular function and disease.

1. Introduction

When the human genome project was completed, it was surprising that only about 20,000 to 25,000 protein-coding genes exist in our species, with less than 2% of the human genome used for coding proteins. What are the functions of non-coding sequences, which make up more than 98% of our genome? The answers are now emerging with the recognition that the majority of the genome is actively transcribed to produce thousands of non-coding transcripts, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), in many cell types and tissues. miRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs (~22 nucleotides) and were first discovered in C. elegans two decades ago. More than 2,000 miRNAs have been found in humans, and many of them are evolutionarily conserved. By imperfect base pairing with target mRNAs in a sequence dependent manner, miRNAs repress gene expression by degrading target mRNAs and/or inhibiting their translation. Roles for miRNAs have been demonstrated in the regulation of a broad range of biological activities and diseases [1]. More recently, thousands of lncRNAs, which are transcribed non-coding RNAs greater than 200 nucleotides, were discovered and implicated in a variety of biological processes [2,3]. Clearly, investigating and understanding of how miRNAs and lncRNAs regulate gene expression during cardiovascular development and function will greatly facilitate therapeutic treatment of cardiovascular disease. Here, we briefly review the function of miRNAs and lncRNAs in the cardiovascular system and related human disorders.

2. miRNAs in Cardiac Development

Global disruption of the expression and maturation of all miRNAs in the heart is the first step to understand the function of miRNAs in cardiac development and physiology. Dicer, an RNase III endoribonuclease, is a critical enzyme for the maturation of most miRNAs. Conventional deletion of Dicer causes early embryonic lethality in mice, demonstrating the critical role of miRNAs in animal development [4]. Disrupting miRNA expression in early embryonic hearts using Nkx2.5-Cre mediated Dicer mutation leads to improperly compacted ventricular myocardium in mutant embryos [5], further indicating that miRNAs are indispensible for cardiogenesis. Similarly, α-MHC-Cre-mediated conditional deletion of Dicer causes postnatal lethality due to dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure [6]. These studies suggest that many miRNAs play crucial roles in cardiac development and physiological function. miR-1 is tissue-specifically expressed in the heart and skeletal muscle, and genetic deletion of both miR-1-1 and miR-1-2 indicated that miR-1 is required for cardiomorphogenesis and the expression of many cardiac contractile proteins [7,8].

3. Cardiac Regeneration Regulated by miRNAs

Mammalian adult cardiomyocytes are terminally differentiated cells that exit the cell cycle. Lack of regenerative ability of adult hearts is one of the major causes of cardiomyopathy. A recent report identified about 40 miRNAs that strongly enhanced cell proliferation in neonatal mouse and rat cardiomyocytes. Two of these miRNAs, miR-590 and miR-199a, were further demonstrated to induce cardiomyocyte proliferation both in vitro and in vivo [9]. It remains to be determined which molecular target(s) mediate the function of these miRNAs in cardiomyocyte proliferation. Using both gain- and loss-of function approaches in transgenic and knockout mouse models, we demonstrated that the miR-17-92 cluster is required for and sufficient to induce cardiomyocyte proliferation. More specifically, we identified miR-19a/b as the major contributors among the miR-17-92 cluster to the regulation of the cardiomyocyte proliferation [10]. Mechanistically, we identified Pten as one of the miR-19a/19b targets which participate in the regulation of cardiomyocyte proliferation. These studies demonstrate that miRNAs are key regulators of cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration, suggesting their significant therapeutic potential to treat cardiac-degeneration associated heart disease.
In rodent hearts, neonatal cardiomyocytes can still proliferate, leading to the regeneration potential in newborn hearts. However, proliferation potential is gradually lost by postnatal day 7 (P7) and cardiomyocytes exit the cell cycle by then. As a result, hearts beyond P7 lost their potential to regenerate in response to stress or injury. Through profiling and comparing miRNA expression between P1 and P10 rat cardiomyocytes, members of the miR-15 family, including miR-195, miR-15a, miR-15b, miR-16, and miR-497, were identified as important regulators of postnatal cardiomyocyte mitotic arrest [11]. Further studies demonstrate that cardiomyocyte proliferation can be inhibited by this family of miRNAs through the repression of multiple cell cycle regulators. Interestingly, the expression of miR-15 family was also shown to be up-regulated in cardiac ischemia and heart failure [12]. Recently, it has been reported that neonatal mammalian hearts can regenerate after myocardial infarction through the proliferation of preexisting cardiomyocytes, and that the miR-15 family of miRNAs participates in this process in neonatal hearts [13]. Furthermore, it was reported that miR-15 induces apoptosis by targeting anti-apoptotic factor Bcl2 [14]. Together, these studies suggest that the miR-15 family may play distinct roles in cardiomyocyte proliferation, apoptosis under different developmental and/or pathological conditions, implying their potential to treat cardiac regeneration related disease.
Recently, an exciting breakthrough was achieved in which Ieda et al. developed a new strategy to directly reprogram fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes through the combination of three cardiac-specific transcriptional factors, Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5 (GMT) in vitro [15]. The above observation was further supported by two independent studies, in which Qian et al. and Song et al. demonstrated that cardiomyocyte direct reprogramming was also achievable in vivo [16,17]. These investigators reported that they were able to use three (GMT) or four cardiac transcription factors, Gata4, Hand2, Mef2c, and Tbx5 (GHMT) respectively, to reprogram cardiac fibroblasts into beating cardiomyocyte-like cells. More importantly, reprogramming cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes in vivo was shown to improve cardiac function and reduce cardiac fibrosis in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. It is not known whether miRNAs are involved in the process of reprogramming in these studies. However, it was reported in a separated study that a combination of miR-1, miR-133, miR-208, and miR-499 was able to directly induce the cellular reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells in vitro [18]. In this study, the investigators showed that miR-1 alone is sufficient to induce the fibroblast to cardiomyocyte reprogramming. However, this reprogramming efficiency was dramatically enhanced when miRNAs 133, 208, and 499 were added. Interestingly, the process of reprogramming was further enhanced by about 10-fold after JAK inhibitor I treatment. Moreover, administration of miRNAs into ischemic mouse myocardium resulted in direct conversion of cardiac fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes in situ. Recently, Nam et al., used a combination of transcription factors and miRNAs to induce direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells [19]. They treated human fibroblasts with four transcriptional factors, GATA-4, Hand2, Tbx5 and Myocardin [20], together with two miRNAs, miR-1 and miR-133. A portion of the treated human fibroblasts was reprogrammed into cells with sarcomere-like structures, showing spontaneous contractility after 4 to 11 weeks in culture, suggesting the success of partial reprogramming.Besidesphenotypic changes, the investigators found that the transcriptome of reprogrammed cells had also shifted toward that of cardiomyocytes. Taken together, these studies indicated that miRNAs could function in concert with cardiac transcriptional factors and other signaling pathways to synergistically enhance cardiomyocyte reprogramming.

4. miRNAs in Cardiac Hypertrophy, Remodeling and Heart Failure

Cardiac remodeling, which is defined as an alteration in the structure (dimensions, mass, shape) of the heart, is one of the major responses of the heart to biomechanical stress and pathological stimuli. Numerous studies have demonstrated the functional involvement of many miRNAs during cardiac remodeling [21]. Cardiac hypertrophy is anatomically characterized as an increase in the thickness of the cardiac ventricular wall, owing to the enlargement of myocyte size and/or increased fibrosis. Sustained cardiac hypertrophy often leads to end stage heart failure. To investigate the involvement of miRNAs in this process, genome-wide profiling of miRNA expression has been performed and dysregulated miRNAs were identified during cardiac remodeling [22,23]. For instance, miR-21 was shown to promote cardiac fibroblast survival and the development of cardiac fibrosis by enhancing ERK-MAP kinase activity through the down-regulation of Sprouty homologue 1, a direct target of miR-21 and an endogenous inhibitor of ERK-MAP kinase [24]. Inhibition of miR-21 via an antagomir was shown to repress cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in vivo in response to stress. However, these results could not be verified through genetic deletion of miR-21 in mice [25], indicating that miR-21 may not be essential for the pathological remodeling of the heart. Most recently, it was reported that cardiac fibroblasts secrete star miRNA-enriched exosomes and identify fibroblast-derived miR-21* as a paracrine signaling mediator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy that has potential as a therapeutic target [26]. Another study showed that isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy could be repressed when miR-23a was knocked down. miR-23a represents another miRNA up-regulated during hypertrophy and the repressive effect of miR-23a in cardiac hypertrophy was suggested, at least in part, due to the repression of MuRF1, an anti-hypertrophic factor [27].
Recently, we and others demonstrated that miR-22, a miRNA enriched in cardiomyocytes but only mildly up-regulated during cardiac hypertrophy, significantly promotes cardiac hypertrophy in vitro and in vivo [28,29]. Cardiac-specific knockout of miR-22 in mice repressed stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy, accompanied by accelerated dilation. Conversely, cardiac-specific overexpression of miR-22 induced spontaneous hypertrophic growth in the heart. Additional studies showed that miR-22 represses a broad spectrum of target genes, including Sirt1, HDAC4, PPARα, and Purb, a negative regulator of Serum Response Factor (SRF) during the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy [28,29].
In another study, we demonstrated that miR-155 is expressed in cardiomyocytes and that its expression is reduced in pressure overload-induced hypertrophic hearts [30]. In mouse models of cardiac hypertrophy, genetic deletion of miR-155 suppressed cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac remodeling in response to pathological stressors, including both transverse aortic constriction and an activated calcineurin transgene. Most importantly, we found that loss of miR-155 prevented the progress of heart failure and substantially extended the survival of calcineurin transgenic mice. These studies uncovered miR-155 as an inducer of pathological cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and suggested that inhibition of endogenous miR-155 might have clinical potential to suppress cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Given that miR-155 is expressed in both cardiomyocytes and non-cardiomyocytes of the heart, it is important to define the role of this miRNA in myocyte vs. non-myocyte portions of the heart in future studies. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that paracrine regulation of cardiac miRNAs by transplanted bone marrow progenitor cells contributes to the anti-fibrotic effect. Mechanistically, it was found that bone marrow progenitor cells release HGF, which inhibits miR-155-mediated profibrosis signaling, thereby preventing cardiac fibrosis under diabetic conditions [31].
Cardiac fibrosis, which is defined as abnormal deposition of collagen by cardiac fibroblasts, is often observed to replace the “drop-out” of cardiomyocytes during cardiac remodeling. Many genes and molecular pathways have been reported to participate in the regulation of this process. It is not surprising that miRNAs were reported to regulate cardiac fibrosis in recent years. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a key molecule in the process of fibrosis and therefore seemingly serves as an attractive therapeutic target [32]. However, it was unknown how CTGF transcripts were regulated post-transcriptionally. Duisters et al. showed that miR-133 and miR-30 were involved in myocardial matrix remodeling through regulating CTGF [33]. Both miR-133 and miR-30 were found consistently down-regulated in several models of heart failure and pathological hypertrophy. Knockdown of these miRNAs resulted in a strong increase of CTGF levels. Conversely, overexpression of miR-133 and miR-30c repressed the production of collagens, which was accompanied with a decrease in CTGF expression levels. In another study, the miR-29 family, which is predominantly expressed in cardiac fibroblasts [34], was found to be significantly down-regulated in the fibrotic border zone of infracted hearts. Intriguingly, many of the miR-29 downstream target genes, such as FBN1, COL1A1, COL1A2, ELN and COL3A1, are up-regulated after myocardial infarction, suggesting that miR-29 controls the physiological levels of many matrix proteins in such a manner that down-regulation of miR-29 is associated with an excessive accumulation of matrix protein and cardiac fibrosis. Though the function of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis was established using gain- and loss-of function studies in vitro and in vivo, genetic evidence is still lacking to support the conclusion. Taken together, emerging evidences have demonstrated that miRNAs are not only important for cardiovascular development, but also essential factors for cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling.
miRNAs also play important roles in endothelial function, vascular integrity, and angiogenesis. Endothelial cell-restricted miR-126 mediated developmental angiogenesis via enhancement of the pro-angiogenic actions of VEGF and FGF and promoted blood vessel formation by repressing the expression of Spred-1, an intracellular inhibitor of angiogenic signaling [35]. miR-24 is enriched in cardiac endothelial cells and upregulated after cardiac ischemia, and acts as a critical regulator of endothelial cell apoptosis and angiogenesis [36]. Furthermore, it has been reported that miR-24 suppression prevents the transition from compensated hypertrophy to decompensated hypertrophy by stabilizing junctophilin-2 expression and protecting the ultrastructure of T-tubule-sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions [37]. Similarly, miR-210 can improve angiogenesis, inhibit apoptosis, and improve cardiac function in a murine model of myocardial infarction, though the molecular mechanism is not fully understood [38].

5. Cardiac Ischemia Regulated by miRNAs

Ischemia is an independent risk factor of cardiovascular events, which leads to myocardial infarction and ischemia-reperfusion injury. At cellular level, cardiomyocytes often undergo apoptosis following myocardial infarction and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Several miRNAs participate in the regulation of these pathologic processes. miR-92a, a member of the miR-17-92 cluster involved in cardiomyocyte proliferation, also participates in the control of cardiomyocyte survival by targeting integrin subunit α5 and eNOS. Inhibition of miR-92a by antagomir improved cardiac function and reduced cardiomyocyte apoptosis after MI in mice [39]. miR-21 serves as an anti-apoptotic factor in myocardial infarction animal models by targeting PDCD4 and repressing its expression. Interestingly, miR-21 seems to target cardiac fibroblasts, not cardiomyocytes, in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction, highlighting the significant contribution of cardiomyocyte-fibroblast interaction to cardiac function [40]. Conversely, miR-320 is down-regulated after ischemia-reperfusion injury. Gain- and loss-of-function studies demonstrated that miR-320 promotes cardiomyocyte apoptosis via maintaining HSP20 levels [41]. It is speculated that additional miRNAs will be found participating in the regulation of cardiac ischemia and heart disease.

6. miRNAs “Conducting” Arrhythmia

The cardiac conduction system can be damaged following cardiac injury, such as cardiac ischemia or acute MI, and cellular necrosis can lead the dysfunction of the whole cardiac conduction system, including the sinoatrial node, atrioventricular node, and His-Purkinje system. Electrical signals cannot be conducted smoothly through this damaged conduction system, resulting in a series of arrhythmia. miRNAs have been shown to participate in this process and the proper expression of miRNAs is critical for sustaining the normal function of cardiac conduction system. For instance, it has been reported that miR-1 and miR-133, two most commonly expressed miRNAs in striated muscle, target several ion channel and gap-junction associated genes, such as HCN2, HCN4, KCNJ2, ERG and GJA1 (Cx43) [42]. Overexpression of miR-1 in infarcted myocardium can promote arrhythmogenesis, whereas arrhythmia could be alleviated through deleting endogenous miR-1. miR-208a, a cardiac-specific miRNA encoded by the intron of the myosin heavy chain gene Myh6, has also been demonstrated to play an important role in arrhythmogenesis [43], especially in the process of atrial depolarization, by regulating the expression of Connexin-40 (GJA5). Therefore, studies have established the role of miRNAs in the development and maintenance of the cardiac conduction system.

7. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses of miRNAs

miRNAs could be utilized as biomarkers for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, given that the expression of many miRNAs is altered in a variety of cardiac biologic processes and disease conditions. Importantly, “circulating miRNAs” appear to be stable in mammalian serum and plasma, which are easy to acquire, raising the possibility that they could serve as biomarkers for heart disease diagnosis and prediction [44,45]. Recently, a clinical study has already made progress toward this possibility by showing that circulating miR-192 levels are correlated with the development of ischemic heart failure after acute myocardial infarction in human patients [46]. Furthermore, it has been reported that several circulating miRNAs, such as miR-133, miR-1291, miR-663b, miR-328, and miR-134, exhibit clinical impact on human myocardial infarction [47,48]. Likewise, miR-328 can be a potential mediator of atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation [49].
Though the therapeutic potential of miRNAs in cardiovascular disease remains debatable, much remarkable progress in miRNA-based translational medicine has been made. Cardiologists are now attempting to use miRNAs and/or their inhibitors to treat heart diseases. In addition, many efficient techniques to manipulate miRNA levels in vivo have been developed. Among these techniques, antagomirs, which knock down targeted miRNAs by sequestering them from the functional complex, were shown to be stable in blood [50]. Conversely, miRNA mimics, synthesized chemically modified double-stranded oligonucleotides, can create gain-of-function effects for specific miRNAs in vitro and in vivo [51,52]. With the identification of miRNAs and their targets in normal and diseased hearts and the understanding of their function (Table 1), we are confident that diagnostic tools and therapeutics based on miRNAs will play even more important roles in the field of cardiology.
Table
Table 1. miRNAs and their targets implicated in the function of the heart.
Table 1. miRNAs and their targets implicated in the function of the heart.
microRNAmiRNA TargetsFunction in the HeartReference(s)
miR-1RhoA, Cdc42, Nelf-A/WHSC2, Kcnj2, Gja1, Ppp2r5a, Vegfacardiac hypertrophy, arrythmia, reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells[18,42,53,54]
miR-15Chek1postnatal cardiomyocyte mitotic arrest[11]
miR-16Chek1postnatal cardiomyocyte mitotic arrest[11]
miR-19Ptencardiomyocyte proliferation[10]
miR-21Ppara, Mpv17l, Sorbs2, Pdlim5, PDCD4ischemia/reperfusion, cardiac hypertrophy[24,25,40]
miR-22Sirt1, HDAC4, PPARα, Purbcardiac hypertrophy[28,29]
miR-23MuRF1cardiac hypertrophy[27]
miR-25Serca2, Ip3r1arrythmia, heart failure[55]
miR-26KCNJ2 arrythmia[56]
miR-29Col1a1, Col1a2, Col3a1, ELNarrythmia, cardiac fibrosis[34]
miR-30CTGFcardiac fibrosis[33]
miR-34PPP1R10, vinculin, Sema4b, Pofut1, Bcl6myocardial infarction, cardiac hypertrophy[57,58]
miR-132FoxO3cardiac hypertrophy[59]
miR-133CTGFcardiac fibrosis, cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac remodeling, reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells[18,33,47,54]
miR-155Jarid2, Socs1cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis[30,31]
miR-195Chek1postnatal cardiomyocyte mitotic arrest[11]
miR-199Dyrk1a cardiac hypertrophy, cardiomyocyte proliferation[9]
miR-208Med13cardiac hypertrophy, reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells[18]
miR-212FoxO3cardiac hypertrophy[59]
miR-214Slc8a1, Bcl2l11, Ppifcardiac remodeling[60]
miR-320Hsp6bmyocardial ischemia[41]
miR-328Cacna1c, Cacnb1atrial fibrillation[61]
miR-486Pten, Foxo1acardiac hypertrophy[62]
miR-497Chek1postnatal cardiomyocyte mitotic arrest[11]
miR-499Calcineurin, Drp1cardiac hypertrophy, reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells[18,63]
miR-590unknowncardiomyocyte proliferation[9]

8. Long Non-Coding RNAs (LncRNAs) in Cardiac Development

Long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) are a novel class of ncRNAs that are larger than 200 nucleotides but do not encode proteins. Thousands of lncRNAs have been identified in different species. Emerging evidence has suggested that lncRNAs have crucial roles in controlling gene expression and other cellular processes during both developmental and differentiation processes. lncRNAs regulate gene expression at the levels of epigenetic control, transcription, RNA processing, and translation. Many lncRNAs have recently been discovered and their function in a variety of biological processes is emerging. However, relatively little is known about the involvement of lncRNAs in the cardiovascular system. A novel lncRNA, Braveheart, has been identified as a critical regulator of cardiovascular commitment from embryonic stem cells [64,65]. Braveheart activates a cardiovascular gene network and functions upstream of mesoderm posterior basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor 1 (MESP1), a master regulator of a common multi-potent cardiovascular progenitor. Braveheart mediates the epigenetic regulation of cardiac commitment by interacting with SUZ12, a component of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which appears to be a common mechanism for lncRNAs’ function. Braveheart therefore represents the first lncRNA that defines cardiac cell fate and lineage specificity, linking lncRNAs to cardiac development and disease. However, it remains to be seen if Braveheart is required for normal heart development in vivo. Braveheart appears to exist as a mouse specific lncRNA, as direct sequence alignment did not identify mouse Braveheart homologues in other species. The expression of Braveheart was nicely documented in mouse ESCs and heart samples using an RNA-Seq approach. However, the potentially orthologous human and rat genomic regions were not actively transcribed. The lack of an apparent human Braveheart homologue raises the question of how well the lessons learned from mouse Braveheart will translate to human cardiovascular disease. Perhaps an undiscovered functional Braveheart homologue, transcribed from a different genomic locus, exists in the human genome. Nevertheless, the discovery of Braveheart will likely impact the cardiovascular research field.
Fendrr, another novel lncRNA expressed in the heart, is one of very few lncRNAs whose in vivo functions have been explored using mouse genetics. Two independent studies demonstrated that loss of Fendrr is lethal in mice. Mutant mice display a spectrum of defects, including cardiac morphogenesis, consistent with the findings that Fendrr is expressed in the mouse lateral plate mesoderm and developing hearts [66,67]. However, there is a difference in the phenotype severity associated with the two mutant mouse lines; while one mutant line dies embryonically around E13.75, the other one dies postnatally. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the different targeting strategies used to remove the Fendrr gene. Mechanistically, Fendrr was shown, similarly to Braveheart, to interact with the PRC2 complex to modulate the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. In addition, Fendrr may be involved in the control of the activating H3K4me3 mark on a subset of promoters, thereby modifying the expression level of those genes. However, the mechanisms of Fendrr-dependent molecular events remain to be fully understood. It is expected that many more lncRNAs will be found to play important roles in cardiovascular development and function.

9. lncRNAs in Cardiac Disease

Given the emerging role of lncRNAs in a large spectrum of biological systems examined, it is not surprising that several recent studies have identified many lncRNAs associated with diseased hearts, both in human patients with cardiovascular disease and mouse models for human disease. In these studies, the investigators took genome-wide, next generation RNA sequencing approaches and documented many lncRNAs expressed in the heart. Most importantly, they found that expression of cardiac-expressed or circulating lncRNAs was altered in patients with cardiomyopathy or heart failure [68,69,70,71]. Future investigations will certainly link the functional characteristics of lncRNAs to maladaptive remodeling, cardiac function, cardiac regeneration and cardiovascular disease.
Recent studies also linked several lncRNAs to heart disease. ANRIL, an lncRNA, was identified as a risk factor for coronary disease [72]. Though it is still not fully understood how ANRIL functions, evidence suggests that this lncRNA may participate in the regulation of histone methylation [73]. Another lncRNA, MIAT (myocardial infarction-associated transcript) (or Gomafu/RNCR2) was identified as a risk factor associated with patients with myocardial infarction [74]. However, how MIAT controls the status of myocardial infarction remains largely unknown. Intriguingly, the genetic loci that encode MYH6 and MYH7, the main myosin heavy chain genes in cardiac muscle, appear to produce a non-coding anti-sense transcript (Myh7-as). Myh7-as transcription may regulate the ratio of Myh6 and Myh7, altering the function of muscle contraction [75].
While Braveheart was shown to be an important lncRNA for cardiac cell fate, additional cardiac-expressed lncRNAs, in particular those selectively expressed in cardiomyocytes, remain to be identified and studied. Intriguingly, recent studies demonstrate that cardiac transcription factors and miRNAs reprogram cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo [15,16,17,18], raising the tantalizing possibility that reprogramming strategies may be used to enhance the limited native regenerative capacity of adult mammalian hearts [76,77]. Most recently, one novel lncRNA, lincRNA-RoR, was reported to modulate the reprogramming of induced pluripotent stem cells, at least in part, by regulating the expression levels and activities of key reprogramming factors, Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog [78]. These studies suggest that lncRNAs could form a feedback loop with core TFs and miRNAs to regulate ESC maintenance and differentiation. It will be interesting to determine whether lncRNAs might also participate in cardiac regeneration or be used to stimulate cellular reprogramming to directly reprogram non-myocyte cells such as cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes.

10. lncRNAs as Competing Endogenous RNA

Recently, it has been reported that competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) regulate the distribution of miRNA molecules on their targets and thereby impose an additional level of post-transcriptional regulation. In particular, a muscle-specific lncRNA, linc-MD1, sponges miR-133 to regulate the expression of MAML1 and MEF2C, transcription factors that activate muscle-specific gene expression. It was found that HuR, which is under the repressive control of miR-133, is derepressed due to the sponging activity of linc-MD1 on miR-133. This study therefore uncovered a feedforward positive loop involving muscle transcription factors, RNA binding proteins, miRNAs, and an lncRNA, that controls early phases of myogenesis [79]. Interestingly, the levels of linc-MD1 are strongly reduced in muscle cells of patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [80]. In another study, it was reported that cardiac apoptosis-related lncRNA (CARL) could act as an endogenous miR-539 sponge to regulate PHB2 expression, mitochondrial fission and apoptosis. Modulation of their levels may provide a new approach for tackling apoptosis and myocardial infarction [81]. Clearly, understanding this novel RNA crosstalk will lead to significant insight into gene regulatory networks and have implications in human development and disease.
Importantly, lncRNAs have unique functional and regulatory characteristics. One major finding of numerous recent studies of lncRNAs, specifically within the heart, was that lncRNAs are highly tissue-specific. Genome-wide profiling of the cardiac transcriptome after myocardial infarction revealed hundreds of novel heart-specific lncRNAs with unique regulatory and functional characteristics relevant to maladaptive remodelling, cardiac function, and possibly cardiac regeneration [68]. This finding implies that heart-specific lncRNAs have ample possibilities as targeting molecules and biomarkers relevant to cardiac development and disease.

11. Future Prospects

We have just started the era of “non-coding”. We are looking forward to see more and more reports on the roles of non-coding RNAs (miRNAs and lncRNAs) in the regulation of a variety of essential biological processes, including cardiovascular biology and disease. It is an exciting time to investigate the function of non-coding RNAs, and advanced technology development will certainly propel the research field forward. Many efficient techniques to manipulate miRNA levels in vitro and in vivo, such as antagomirs and miRNA mimics, have been developed for loss- and gain-of-function studies. Additionally, the rAAV9 vector has been demonstrated to have high affinity for myocardium [82], providing a powerful tool for delivering miRNA- and lncRNA-related therapeutic molecules specifically to the heart through intravenous injections. With efficient strategies for gain- and loss-of-function investigations, more fruitful work about the molecular mechanism and therapeutic application of non-coding RNAs in cardiovascular disease will emerge. We are confident that non-coding RNAs will take the central stage of cardiovascular medicine in the foreseeable future. Non-coding RNAs represent potential therapeutic targets for cardiac disease as well as attractive candidate biomarkers to be used in the clinic.

Acknowledgments

Work in Wang’s laboratory was supported by the March of Dimes Foundation, Muscular Dystrophy Association and National Institutes of Health (HL085635, HL116919).

Author Contributions

Both Wang and Kataoka contribute to the writing and editing of the manuscript

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Espinoza-Lewis, R.A.; Wang, D.Z. MicroRNAs in heart development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2012, 100, 279–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ulitsky, I.; Bartel, D.P. LincRNAs: Genomics, evolution, and mechanisms. Cell 2013, 154, 26–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morris, K.V.; Mattick, J.S. The rise of regulatory RNA. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 423–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bernstein, E.; Kim, S.Y.; Carmell, M.A.; Murchison, E.P.; Alcorn, H.; Li, M.Z.; Mills, A.A.; Elledge, S.J.; Anderson, K.V.; Hannon, G.J. Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, Y.; Ransom, J.F.; Li, A.; Vedantham, V.; von Drehle, M.; Muth, A.N.; Tsuchihashi, T.; McManus, M.T.; Schwartz, R.J.; Srivastava, D. Dysregulation of cardiogenesis, cardiac conduction, and cell cycle in mice lacking miRNA-1–2. Cell 2007, 129, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.F.; Murchison, E.P.; Tang, R.; Callis, T.E.; Tatsuguchi, M.; Deng, Z.; Rojas, M.; Hammond, S.M.; Schneider, M.D.; Selzman, C.H.; et al. Targeted deletion of Dicer in the heart leads to dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2111–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heidersbach, A.; Saxby, C.; Carver-Moore, K.; Huang, Y.; Ang, Y.S.; de Jong, P.J.; Ivey, K.N.; Srivastava, D. MicroRNA-1 regulates sarcomere formation and suppresses smooth muscle gene expression in the mammalian heart. Elife(Cambridge) 2013, 2, e01323. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wei, Y.; Peng, S.; Wu, M.; Sachidanandam, R.; Tu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Falce, C.; Sobie, E.A.; Lebeche, D.; Zhao, Y. Multifaceted roles of miR-1s in repressing the fetal gene program in the heart. Cell. Res. 2014, 24, 278–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eulalio, A.; Mano, M.; Dal Ferro, M.; Zentilin, L.; Sinagra, G.; Zacchigna, S.; Giacca, M. Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration. Nature 2012, 492, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Huang, Z.P.; Seok, H.Y.; Ding, J.; Kataoka, M.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, X.; Wang, G.; Lin, Z.; Wang, S.; et al. mir-17–92 cluster is required for and sufficient to induce cardiomyocyte proliferation in postnatal and adult hearts. Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Porrello, E.R.; Johnson, B.A.; Aurora, A.B.; Simpson, E.; Nam, Y.J.; Matkovich, S.J.; Dorn, G.W.; van Rooij, E.; Olson, E.N. MiR-15 family regulates postnatal mitotic arrest of cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, 670–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Rooij, E.; Sutherland, L.B.; Liu, N.; Williams, A.H.; McAnally, J.; Gerard, R.D.; Richardson, J.A.; Olson, E.N. A signature pattern of stress-responsive microRNAs that can evoke cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18255–18260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Porrello, E.R.; Mahmoud, A.I.; Simpson, E.; Johnson, B.A.; Grinsfelder, D.; Canseco, D.; Mammen, P.P.; Rothermel, B.A.; Olson, E.N.; Sadek, H.A. Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cimmino, A.; Calin, G.A.; Fabbri, M.; Iorio, M.V.; Ferracin, M.; Shimizu, M.; Wojcik, S.E.; Aqeilan, R.I.; Zupo, S.; Dono, M.; et al. miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13944–13949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ieda, M.; Fu, J.D.; Delgado-Olguin, P.; Vedantham, V.; Hayashi, Y.; Bruneau, B.G.; Srivastava, D. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 2010, 142, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qian, L.; Huang, Y.; Spencer, C.I.; Foley, A.; Vedantham, V.; Liu, L.; Conway, S.J.; Fu, J.D.; Srivastava, D. In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature 2012, 485, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Song, K.; Nam, Y.J.; Luo, X.; Qi, X.; Tan, W.; Huang, G.N.; Acharya, A.; Smith, C.L.; Tallquist, M.D.; Neilson, E.G.; et al. Heart repair by reprogramming non-myocytes with cardiac transcription factors. Nature 2012, 485, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jayawardena, T.M.; Egemnazarov, B.; Finch, E.A.; Zhang, L.; Payne, J.A.; Pandya, K.; Zhang, Z.; Rosenberg, P.; Mirotsou, M.; Dzau, V.J. MicroRNA-mediated in vitro and in vivo direct reprogramming of cardiac fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 1465–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nam, Y.J.; Song, K.; Luo, X.; Daniel, E.; Lambeth, K.; West, K.; Hill, J.A.; DiMaio, J.M.; Baker, L.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; et al. Reprogramming of human fibroblasts toward a cardiac fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5588–5593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, D.; Chang, P.S.; Wang, Z.; Sutherland, L.; Richardson, J.A.; Small, E.; Krieg, P.A.; Olson, E.N. Activation of cardiac gene expression by myocardin, a transcriptional cofactor for serum response factor. Cell 2001, 105, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Small, E.M.; Olson, E.N. Pervasive roles of microRNAs in cardiovascular biology. Nature 2011, 469, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tatsuguchi, M.; Seok, H.Y.; Callis, T.E.; Thomson, J.M.; Chen, J.F.; Newman, M.; Rojas, M.; Hammond, S.M.; Wang, D.Z. Expression of microRNAs is dynamically regulated during cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2007, 42, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, J.; Wang, D.Z. microRNAs in cardiovascular development. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012, 52, 949–957. [Google Scholar]
  24. Thum, T.; Gross, C.; Fiedler, J.; Fischer, T.; Kissler, S.; Bussen, M.; Galuppo, P.; Just, S.; Rottbauer, W.; Frantz, S.; et al. MicroRNA-21 contributes to myocardial disease by stimulating MAP kinase signalling in fibroblasts. Nature 2008, 456, 980–984. [Google Scholar]
  25. Patrick, D.M.; Montgomery, R.L.; Qi, X.; Obad, S.; Kauppinen, S.; Hill, J.A.; van Rooij, E.; Olson, E.N. Stress-Dependent cardiac remodeling occurs in the absence of microRNA-21 in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 3912–3916. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bang, C.; Batkai, S.; Dangwal, S.; Gupta, S.K.; Foinquinos, A.; Holzmann, A.; Just, A.; Remke, J.; Zimmer, K.; Zeug, A.; et al. Cardiac fibroblast-derived microRNA passenger strand-enriched exosomes mediate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Clin. Invest. 2014, 124, 2136–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, Z.; Murtaza, I.; Wang, K.; Jiao, J.; Gao, J.; Li, P.F. MiR-23a functions downstream of NFATc3 to regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12103–12108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, Z.P.; Chen, J.; Seok, H.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Kataoka, M.; Hu, X.; Wang, D.Z. MicroRNA-22 regulates cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in response to stress. Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gurha, P.; Abreu-Goodger, C.; Wang, T.; Ramirez, M.O.; Drumond, A.L.; van Dongen, S.; Chen, Y.; Bartonicek, N.; Enright, A.J.; Lee, B.; et al. Targeted deletion of microRNA-22 promotes stress-induced cardiac dilation and contractile dysfunction. Circulation 2012, 125, 2751–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Seok, H.Y.; Chen, J.; Kataoka, M.; Huang, Z.P.; Ding, J.; Yan, J.; Hu, X.; Wang, D.Z. Loss of MicroRNA-155 protects the heart from pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kishore, R.; Verma, S.K.; Mackie, A.R.; Vaughan, E.E.; Abramova, T.V.; Aiko, I.; Krishnamurthy, P. Bone marrow progenitor cell therapy-mediated paracrine regulation of cardiac miRNA-155 modulates fibrotic response in diabetic hearts. PLoS One 2013, 8, e60161. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shi-Wen, X.; Leask, A.; Abraham, D. Regulation and function of connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 in tissue repair, scarring and fibrosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008, 19, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Duisters, R.F.; Tijsen, A.J.; Schroen, B.; Leenders, J.J.; Lentink, V.; van der Made, I.; Herias, V.; van Leeuwen, R.E.; Schellings, M.W.; Barenbrug, P.; et al. miR-133 and miR-30 regulate connective tissue growth factor: Implications for a role of microRNAs in myocardial matrix remodeling. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Rooij, E.; Sutherland, L.B.; Thatcher, J.E.; DiMaio, J.M.; Naseem, R.H.; Marshall, W.S.; Hill, J.A.; Olson, E.N. Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13027–13032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, S.; Aurora, A.B.; Johnson, B.A.; Qi, X.; McAnally, J.; Hill, J.A.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. The endothelial-specific microRNA miR-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2008, 15, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fiedler, J.; Jazbutyte, V.; Kirchmaier, B.C.; Gupta, S.K.; Lorenzen, J.; Hartmann, D.; Galuppo, P.; Kneitz, S.; Pena, J.T.; Sohn-Lee, C.; et al. MicroRNA-24 regulates vascularity after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2011, 124, 720–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, R.C.; Tao, J.; Guo, Y.B.; Wu, H.D.; Liu, R.F.; Bai, Y.; Lv, Z.Z.; Luo, G.Z.; Li, L.L.; Wang, M.; et al. In vivo suppression of microRNA-24 prevents the transition toward decompensated hypertrophy in aortic-constricted mice. Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, S.; Huang, M.; Li, Z.; Jia, F.; Ghosh, Z.; Lijkwan, M.A.; Fasanaro, P.; Sun, N.; Wang, X.; Martelli, F.; et al. MicroRNA-210 as a novel therapy for treatment of ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2010, 122 (11 Suppl.), S124–S131. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bonauer, A.; Carmona, G.; Iwasaki, M.; Mione, M.; Koyanagi, M.; Fischer, A.; Burchfield, J.; Fox, H.; Doebele, C.; Ohtani, K.; et al. microRNA-92a controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues in mice. Science 2009, 324, 1710–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, S.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Krall, T.J.; Delphin, E.S.; Zhang, C. MicroRNA expression signature and the role of microRNA-21 in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 29514–29525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ren, X.P.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Sartor, M.A.; Qian, J.; Jones, K.; Nicolaou, P.; Pritchard, T.J.; Fan, G.C. MicroRNA-320 is involved in the regulation of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury by targeting heat-shock protein 20. Circulation 2009, 119, 2357–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, B.; Lin, H.; Xiao, J.; Lu, Y.; Luo, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C.; Bai, Y.; Wang, H.; et al. The muscle-specific microRNA miR-1 regulates cardiac arrhythmogenic potential by targeting GJA1 and KCNJ2. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Callis, T.E.; Pandya, K.; Seok, H.Y.; Tang, R.H.; Tatsuguchi, M.; Huang, Z.P.; Chen, J.F.; Deng, Z.; Gunn, B.; Shumate, J.; et al. microRNA-208a is a regulator of cardiac hypertrophy and conduction in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2009, 119, 2772–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, X.; Ba, Y.; Ma, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other disease. Cell. Res. 2008, 18, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mitchell, P.S.; Parkin, R.K.; Kroh, E.M.; Fritz, B.R.; Wyman, S.K.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Peterson, A.; Noteboom, J.; O'Briant, K.C.; Allen, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10513–10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Matsumoto, S.; Sakata, Y.; Suna, S.; Nakatani, D.; Usami, M.; Hara, M.; Kitamura, T.; Hamasaki, T.; Nanto, S.; Kawahara, Y.; et al. Circulating p53-responsive microRNAs are predictive ndicators of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 2013, 113, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Peng, L.; Chun-guang, Q.; Bei-fang, L.; Xue-zhi, D.; Zi-hao, W.; Yun-fu, L.; Yan-ping, D.; Yang-gui, L.; Wei-guo, L.; Tian-yong, H.; et al. Clinical impact ofcirculating miR-133, miR-1291 and miR-663b in plasma of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Diagn. Pathol. 2014, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, F.; Lv, P.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Ma, X.; Meng, W.; Meng, X.; Dong, S. Predictive value of circulating miR-328 and miR-134 for acute myocardial infarction. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 394, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McManus, D.D.; Lin, H.; Tanriverdi, K.; Quercio, M.; Yin, X.; Larson, M.G.; Ellinor, P.T.; Levy, D.; Freedman, J.E.; Benjamin, E.J. Relations between circulating microRNAs and atrial fibrillation: Data from the Framingham Offspring Study. Heart Rhythm 2014, 11, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krutzfeldt, J.; Rajewsky, N.; Braich, R.; Rajeev, K.G.; Tuschl, T.; Manoharan, M.; Stoffel, M. Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature 2005, 438, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sehm, T.; Sachse, C.; Frenzel, C.; Echeverri, K. miR-196 is an essential early-stage regulator of tail regeneration, upstream of key spinal cord patterning events. Dev. Biol. 2009, 334, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zeng, L.; Carter, A.D.; Childs, S.J. miR-145 directs intestinal maturation in zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 17793–17798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Terentyev, D.; Belevych, A.E.; Terentyeva, R.; Martin, M.M.; Malana, G.E.; Kuhn, D.E.; Abdellatif, M.; Feldman, D.S.; Elton, T.S.; Györke, S. miR-1overexpression enhances Ca(2+) release and promotes cardiac arrhythmogenesis by targeting PP2A regulatory subunit B56alpha and causing CaMKII-dependent hyperphosphorylation of RyR2. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Carè, A.; Catalucci, D.; Felicetti, F.; Bonci, D.; Addario, A.; Gallo, P.; Bang, M.L.; Segnalini, P.; Gu, Y.; Dalton, N.D.; et al. MicroRNA-133 controls cardiac hypertrophy. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wahlquist, C.; Jeong, D.; Rojas-Muñoz, A.; Kho, C.; Lee, A.; Mitsuyama, S.; van Mil, A.; Park, W.J.; Sluijter, J.P.; Doevendans, P.A.; et al. Inhibition of miR-25 improves cardiac contractility in the failing heart. Nature 2014, 508, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luo, X.; Pan, Z.; Shan, H.; Xiao, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, N.; Lin, H.; Xiao, L.; Maguy, A.; Qi, X.Y.; et al. MicroRNA-26 governs profibrillatory inward-rectifier potassium current changes in atrial fibrillation. J. Clin. Invest. 2013, 123, 1939–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bernardo, B.C.; Gao, X.M.; Winbanks, C.E.; Boey, E.J.; Tham, Y.K.; Kiriazis, H.; Gregorevic, P.; Obad, S.; Kauppinen, S.; Du, X.J.; et al. Therapeutic inhibition of the miR-34 family attenuates pathological cardiac remodeling and improves heart function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 17615–17620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Boon, R.A.; Iekushi, K.; Lechner, S.; Seeger, T.; Fischer, A.; Heydt, S.; Kaluza, D.; Tréguer, K.; Carmona, G.; Bonauer, A.; et al. MicroRNA-34a regulates cardiac ageing and function. Nature 2013, 495, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ucar, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Fiedler, J.; Erikci, E.; Kardasinski, M.; Batkai, S.; Dangwal, S.; Kumarswamy, R.; Bang, C.; Holzmann, A.; et al. The miRNA-212/132 family regulates both cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte autophagy. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Aurora, A.B.; Mahmoud, A.I.; Luo, X.; Johnson, B.A.; van Rooij, E.; Matsuzaki, S.; Humphries, K.M.; Hill, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Sadek, H.A.; et al. MicroRNA-214 protects the mouse heart from ischemic injury by controlling Ca(2)(+) overload and cell death. J. Clin. Invest. 2012, 122, 1222–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, N.; Pan, Z.; Gao, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Shan, H.; Luo, X.; Bai, Y.; et al. MicroRNA-328 contributes to adverse electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2010, 122, 2378–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Small, E.M.; O’Rourke, J.R.; Moresi, V.; Sutherland, L.B.; McAnally, J.; Gerard, R.D.; Richardson, J.A.; Olson, E.N. Regulation of PI3-kinase/Akt signaling by mscle-enriched microRNA-486. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4218–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, J.X.; Jiao, J.Q.; Li, Q.; Long, B.; Wang, K.; Liu, J.P.; Li, Y.R.; Li, P.F. miR-499 regulates mitochondrial dynamics by targeting calcinuerin and dynamin-related protein-1. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kataoka, M.; Huang, Z.P.; Wang, D.Z. Build a braveheart: The missing linc (RNA). Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 1532–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Klattenhoff, C.A.; Scheuermann, J.C.; Surface, L.E.; Bradley, R.K.; Fields, P.A.; Steinhauser, M.L.; Ding, H.; Butty, V.L.; Torrey, L.; Haas, S.; et al. Braveheart, a long noncoding RNA required for cardiovascular lineage commitment. Cell 2013, 152, 570–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grote, P.; Wittler, L.; Hendrix, D.; Koch, F.; Währisch, S.; Beisaw, A.; Macura, K.; Bläss, G.; Kellis, M.; Werber, M.; et al. The tissue-specific lncRNA Fendrr is an essential regulator of heart and body wall development in the mouse. Dev. Cell. 2013, 24, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sauvageau, M.; Goff, L.A.; Lodato, S.; Bonev, B.; Groff, A.F.; Gerhardinger, C.; Sanchez-Gomez, D.B.; Hacisuleyman, E.; Li, E.; Spence, M.; et al. Multiple knockout mouse models reveal lincRNAs are required for life and brain development. Elife(Cambridge) 2013, 2, e01749. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ounzain, S.; Micheletti, R.; Beckmann, T.; Schroen, B.; Alexanian, M.; Pezzuto, I.; Crippa, S.; Nemir, M.; Sarre, A.; Johnson, R.; et al. Genome-Wide profiling of the cardiac transcriptome after myocardial infarction identifies novel heart-specific long non-coding RNAs. Eur. Heart J. 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kumarswamy, R.; Bauters, C.; Volkmann, I.; Maury, F.; Fetisch, J.; Holzmann, A.; Lemesle, G.; de Groote, P.; Pinet, F.; Thum, T. Circulating long noncoding RNA, LIPCAR, predicts survival in patients with heart failure. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 1569–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Michalik, K.M.; You, X.; Manavski, Y.; Doddaballapur, A.; Zörnig, M.; Braun, T.; John, D.; Ponomareva, Y.; Chen, W.; Uchida, S.; et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 regulates endothelial cell function and vessel growth. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 1389–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, K.C.; Yamada, K.A.; Patel, A.Y.; Topkara, V.K.; George, I.; Cheema, F.H.; Ewald, G.A.; Mann, D.L.; Nerbonne, J.M. Deep RNA sequencing reveals dynamic regulation of myocardial noncoding RNAs in failing human heart and remodeling with mechanical circulatory support. Circulation 2014, 129, 1009–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Broadbent, H.M.; Peden, J.F.; Lorkowski, S.; Goel, A.; Ongen, H.; Green, F.; Clarke, R.; Collins, R.; Franzosi, M.G.; Tognoni, G.; et al. Susceptibility to coronary artery disease and diabetes is encoded by distinct, tightly linked SNPs in the ANRIL locus on chromosome 9p. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008, 17, 806–814. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yap, K.L.; Li, S.; Muñoz-Cabello, A.M.; Raguz, S.; Zeng, L.; Mujtaba, S.; Gil, J.; Walsh, M.J.; Zhou, M.M. Molecular interplay of the noncoding RNA ANRIL and methylated histone H3 lysine 27 by polycomb CBX7 in transcriptional silencing of INK4a. Mol. Cell 2010, 38, 662–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ishii, N.; Ozaki, K.; Sato, H.; Mizuno, H.; Saito, S.; Takahashi, A.; Miyamoto, Y.; Ikegawa, S.; Kamatani, N.; Hori, M.; et al. Identification of a novel non-coding RNA, MIAT, that confers risk of myocardial infarction. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 51, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pandya, K.; Smithies, O. β-MyHC and cardiac hypertrophy: Size does matter. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, 609–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bergmann, O.; Bhardwaj, R.D.; Bernard, S.; Zdunek, S.; Barnabé-Heider, F.; Walsh, S.; Zupicich, J.; Alkass, K.; Buchholz, B.A.; Druid, H.; et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 2009, 324, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hsieh, P.C.; Segers, V.F.; Davis, M.E.; MacGillivray, C.; Gannon, J.; Molkentin, J.D.; Robbins, J.; Lee, R.T. Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 970–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Loewer, S.; Cabili, M.N.; Guttman, M.; Loh, Y.H.; Thomas, K.; Park, I.H.; Garber, M.; Curran, M.; Onder, T.; Agarwal, S.; et al. Large intergenic non-coding RNA-RoR modulates reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Cesana, M.; Cacchiarelli, D.; Legnini, I.; Santini, T.; Sthandier, O.; Chinappi, M.; Tramontano, A.; Bozzoni, I. A long noncoding RNA controls muscle differentiation by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA. Cell 2011, 147, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Legnini, I.; Morlando, M.; Mangiavacchi, A.; Fatica, A.; Bozzoni, I. A feedforward regulatory loop between HuR and the long noncoding RNA linc-MD1 controls early phases of myogenesis. Mol. Cell. 2014, 53, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, K.; Long, B.; Zhou, L.Y.; Liu, F.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Fan, Y.Y.; Li, P.F. CARL lncRNA inhibits anoxia-induced mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes by impairing miR-539-dependent PHB2 downregulation. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3596. [Google Scholar]
  82. Suckau, L.; Fechner, H.; Chemaly, E.; Krohn, S.; Hadri, L.; Kockskämper, J.; Westermann, D.; Bisping, E.; Ly, H.; Wang, X.; et al. Long-Term cardiac-targeted RNA interference for the treatment of heart failure restores cardiac function and reduces pathological hypertrophy. Circulation 2009, 119, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kataoka, M.; Wang, D.-Z. Non-Coding RNAs Including miRNAs and lncRNAs in Cardiovascular Biology and Disease. Cells 2014, 3, 883-898. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells3030883

AMA Style

Kataoka M, Wang D-Z. Non-Coding RNAs Including miRNAs and lncRNAs in Cardiovascular Biology and Disease. Cells. 2014; 3(3):883-898. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells3030883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kataoka, Masaharu, and Da-Zhi Wang. 2014. "Non-Coding RNAs Including miRNAs and lncRNAs in Cardiovascular Biology and Disease" Cells 3, no. 3: 883-898. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells3030883

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop