Next Article in Journal
Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: New Opportunities Linked to Rheumatologist Involvement
Next Article in Special Issue
Asphericity of Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Innovative Predictor of Outcome in Everolimus Treatment?
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Deep Learning Network Parameters Using Uniform Experimental Design for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diagnostic Use of Post-therapy 131I-Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Consolidation Therapy for Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma

1
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan
2
Department of Pediatrics, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2020, 10(9), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090663
Submission received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 23 August 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 / Published: 2 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Theranostic Agents)

Abstract

:
123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG) scintigraphy is used for evaluating disease extent in children with neuroblastoma. 131I-mIBG therapy has been used for evaluation in children with high-risk neuroblastoma, and post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy may detect more lesions compared with diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. However, no studies have yet revealed the detection rate of hidden mIBG-avid lesions on post-therapy 131I-mIBG whole-body scan (WBS) and SPECT images in neuroblastoma children without mIBG-avid lesions as demonstrated by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. We retrospectively examined the diagnostic utility of post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy in children who received 131I-mIBG as consolidation therapy. Nineteen children with complete response to primary therapy were examined. Post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy was performed four days after injection. The post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy, 4 children exhibited abnormal uptake on the WBS. Post-therapy 131I-mIBG SPECT/CT provided additional information in 2 cases. In total, 6 children exhibited abnormal uptake. The site of abnormal accumulation was on the recurrence site in one case, operation sites in five cases, and bone metastasis in one case. Post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy could detect residual disease that was not recognized using diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in 32% of children with high-risk neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma. The diagnostic use of post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy can provide valuable information for detecting residual disease.

1. Introduction

123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG) scintigraphy has been used for evaluating disease extent in children with neuroblastoma, and 131I-mIBG therapy has been used for children with high-risk neuroblastoma and mIBG-avid lesions [1,2,3]. Consolidation therapy incorporating high-dose 131I-mIBG has yielded good overall and event-free survival in children with high-risk neuroblastoma with complete response (CR) to primary therapy as demonstrated by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy [4,5].
The accurate evaluation of the remaining mIBG-avid lesions on diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy is important for deciding sites of the tumor bed, gross residual disease, and mIBG-avid bone metastases, which are to receive external radiation therapy in consolidation therapy [6,7,8]. Post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy may detect more lesions compared with diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in children with neuroblastoma [9]. This may be due to different kinetics, the presence of a higher amount of carriers, and delayed scanning time [10,11,12]. Patients with sustained CR had residual avid lesions in post-therapy 131I-mIBG scan as demonstrated in the 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. Johnson et al. demonstrated that five of five relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma patients with CR by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy showed abnormal uptake in post-therapy 131I-mIBG whole-body scan (WBS) images [13]. Suh et al. demonstrated that three of fifteen newly diagnosed neuroblastoma patients with CR by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy showed abnormal uptake in post-therapy 131I-mIBG images [5]. The percentage varies depending on the study; high-risk neuroblastoma patients have hidden mIBG-avid lesions, which is under the level of detection by diagnostic 123I-mIBG images.
Post-therapy 131I-mIBG single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/ computed tomography (CT) images can provide additional diagnostic information over planar images [14]. However, no studies have yet revealed the detection rate of hidden mIBG-avid lesions in post-therapy 131I-mIBG SPECT/CT in children with high-risk neuroblastoma with CR to primary therapy as demonstrated by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. Herein, we retrospectively examined the diagnostic utility of post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy using WBS and 131I-mIBG SPECT/CT images in children who received 131I-mIBG as consolidation therapy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations and Registration

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Committee for Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The Institutional Review Board of Kanazawa University Hospital approved the study (UMIN000002530, the approval date was September 11 in 2009 and UMIN000025045, the approval date was December 1 in 2016). Written informed consent was obtained in writing from participants and/or their guardians prior to registration.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

The study’s inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who were either newly diagnosed or had relapsed to high-risk neuroblastoma in accordance with Children’s Oncology Group (COG) or International Neuroblastoma Risk Group classification; (2) patients who had one or more lesions at initial presentation or relapse that accumulated 123I-mIBG; (3) patients who had no 123I-mIBG avid lesion at 131I-mIBG therapy; (4) an availability of cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood stem cells, cord blood, or other stem cell sources; (5) patients who had adequate organ function and a life expectancy of at least 3 months; and (6) patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate more than 30 mL/min/1.73m2.
From December 2009 to March 2019, 19 children had CR to primary therapy as determined by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. The disease stage was determined according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS). The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) presently defines high-risk neuroblastoma as (1) Stage 2A or 2B disease with MYCN amplification, (2) Stage 3 disease with MYCN amplification, (3) Stage 3 disease in children aged 18 months or older with no MYCN amplification but unfavorable histopathology, (4) Stage 4 disease in children aged younger than 12 months with MYCN amplification, (5) Stage 4 disease in children aged 12–18 months with MYCN amplification and/or diploidy and/or unfavorable histology, (6) Stage 4 disease in children aged 18 months or older, or (7) Stage 4S disease with MYCN amplification.

2.3. Treatment

131I-mIBG therapy was planned on the basis of draft guidelines on the appropriate use of 131I-mIBG radiotherapy for neuroendocrine tumors by the Guideline Drafting Committee for Radiotherapy with 131I-mIBG, the Committee for Nuclear Oncology and Immunology, the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the procedure guidelines for 131I-mIBG therapy from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) [2,15]. In a radiation isolation room of Kanazawa University Hospital, all children received 131I-mIBG (Izotop, Budapest, Hungary, from December 2009 to January 2012, and POLATOM, Otwock, Poland, from November 2012 to March 2019) therapy without acute severe adverse effects.

2.4. Imaging

Before 131I-mIBG treatment, 123I-mIBG WBSs and combined SPECT/CT (SymbiaT6, Siemens Medical Solutions, Tokyo, Japan, from December 2009 to March 2016, and Discovery NM/CT 670 Q. Suite Pro, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan, from April 2016 to March 2019) were performed 24 h after intravenous injection of 123I-mIBG (FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Anterior and posterior WBSs were performed at a speed of 12 cm/min using a 256 × 1024 matrix and a 159-keV photopeak with a 15% window. SPECT data were acquired with a 128 × 128 matrix and 60 projections (20 s per view). Following SPECT data acquisition, CT transmission scanning for topography was performed. SPECT and CT were acquired during shallow breathing with the patient lying quietly in the supine position. The interval between SPECT and CT was of a few minutes. SPECT was reconstructed using a three-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization algorithm with resolution recovery, scatter correction, and CT-based attenuation correction. SPECT and CT data were analyzed and co-registered using a workstation (Syngo Acquisition Workplace for SymbiaT6 and Xeleris 3.1 for Discovery NM/CT 670 Q. Suite Pro).
Post-therapy 131I-mIBG WBSs and SPECT/CT were performed four days after injection with 131I-mIBG. Anterior and posterior WBSs were performed at a speed of 15 cm/min using a 256 × 1024 matrix and a 364-keV photopeak with a 20% window. SPECT data were acquired with a 128 × 128 matrix and 60 projections (20 s per view). SPECT and CT were reconstructed in the same way as 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. Board-certified physicians of nuclear medicine with 9, 13, and 16 years of experience reviewed WBSs and SPECT/CT images on both of 123I-mIBG and 131I-mIBG scintigraphy for detecting residual disease with clinical information.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP software (Version 14.0.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Differences in abnormal uptake between 123I-mIBG and 131I-mIBG scintigraphy were calculated using student’s t-testing. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

There were 18 children with high-risk neuroblastoma and one child with high-risk ganglioneuroblastoma with CR to primary therapy in diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy (sex: male = 7 and female = 12; age: 7.4 ± 3.8 years (range: 1–16)). Nine children were initially diagnosed (n = 9; age, 5.9 ± 4.7 years), and 10 children had recurrent neuroblastoma (n = 10; age: 8.8 ± 1.9 years). Two children had stage III disease and 17 had stage IV disease according to the INSS. MYCN amplification was positive in 11 children and negative in 8 children.
The administration dose of 131I-mIBG was as follows: high-dose (666 MBq/kg, n = 16), and intermediate-dose (444–555 MBq/kg, n = 3). The dose of 131I-mIBG was reduced to intermediate in two children due to the upper limit of radioisotope use in our university hospital. One child received a reduced 131I-mIBG dose due to decreased renal function and was categorized as an intermediate dose of 131I-mIBG.
On post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy, 4 of 19 children (21%) exhibited definite abnormal uptake on the WBS. Post-therapy 131I-mIBG SPECT/CT provided additional information in 2 of the 19 children (11%), which was the presence of suspicious findings on WBS images. A significant difference was noted in the number of abnormal uptakes between 123I-mIBG (0/19, 0%) and post-therapy 131I-mIBG (6/19, 32%) scintigraphy (p = 0.0075). The representation of this abnormal uptake is shown in Figure 1; Figure 2. The site of abnormal accumulation was at the recurrence site in one case, at operation sites in five cases, and at the bone metastasis site in one case. The diagnosis differed between readers in 1 case (5%), and they discussed and decided the score in mutual agreement.

4. Discussion

Post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy could detect residual mIBG-avid lesions that were not detected using diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in children with high-risk neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma.
Post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy detected one or two occulted mIBG-avid lesions in 32% of patients with neuroblastoma in the present study. Post-therapy 131I-mIBG SPECT/CT was useful to detect two mIBG-avid lesions, which correlated with the presence of suspicious findings on WBS images. Our data was compatible with data from previous studies demonstrating improved lesion detectability with post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy compared with that of diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in patients with neuroblastoma with mIBG-avid lesions. For patients with neuroblastoma with mIBG-avid lesions in the diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy, Yang et al. demonstrated that post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy revealed additional lesions compared with 123I-mIBG scintigraphy (total mIBG-avid lesions: 716 vs. 532 lesions) in 56 patients (44%) [16]. Hickeson et al. showed that 210 lesions were detected on the post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy compared with 151 on the 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in 16 patients (89%) [17]. For the patients with neuroblastoma without mIBG-avid lesions on diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy, post-therapy 131I-mIBG WBS images detected occult lesions in five of five (100%) [13] and post-therapy 131I-mIBG scan with no information about SPECT in three of fifteen (20%) patients [5]. This study found that the detection rate of 32% in patients without mIBG-avid lesions was less compared to that in most reports on patients with mIBG-avid lesions using 123I-mIBG scintigraphy.
The accurate evaluation of remaining mIBG-avid sites is critical in deciding the metastatic site. External irradiation is superior to local control of the primary site and mIBG-avid sites present after induction chemotherapy and resection [18,19]. Patients with few mIBG-avid lesions have a higher chance of being treated using external radiotherapy. In our study, one patient had occulted mIBG-avid bone metastasis, and five patients had occulted mIBG uptake in the primary site. This occulted uptake reflecting tumor activity might be important in planning total dose administered, fractionation, and field arrangement of external radiation. In the current study, following 131I-mIBG therapy, most patients returned to their referring hospitals to receive different additional following treatment, including high-dose chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, maintenance therapy, surgery, and external radiation therapy, according to the judgment of the attending physician. We could not determine which additional treatment was required for the remaining mIBG-avid sites in the current study. Further studies are needed for investigating how the additional information yielded by post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy in patients without 123I-mIBG-avid lesions affects relapse-free survival.
131I-mIBG as consolidation therapy can be used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. As a therapeutic option, we propose high-dose 131I-mIBG therapy as consolidation therapy with present multimodality treatments. However, our study was retrospective in design, and the number of patients was small; thus, a multicenter prospective study is warranted for confirming the utility. Diagnostically, 131I-mIBG scintigraphy could confirm the activity of lesions that were not detected on diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy but were suspected with other imaging modalities, such as CT and magnetic resonance imaging. Accurate detection of remaining mIBG-avid lesions is clinically important to suggest which sites should be treated using external radiation therapy.

5. Conclusions

Post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy could detect residual disease that was not recognized by diagnostic 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in 32% of children with high-risk neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma. Post-therapy SPECT/CT was useful to detect mIBG-avid lesions, which correlated with presence of suspicious findings on WBS images. The diagnostic use of post-therapy 131I-mIBG scintigraphy can provide valuable information for detecting residual disease.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the recruitment and initiation of patients into the clinical trial and collected data. H.W., D.K., A.I., R.A., and R.K. contributed to the experimental design and data analysis. All authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

S.K. and A.I. have a funded research project collaboration with FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. H.W. was founded by Grants-in-Aid for scientific research (No. 20K08128) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pfluger, T.; Piccardo, A. Neuroblastoma: MIBG Imaging and New Tracers. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2017, 47, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Giammarile, F.; Chiti, A.; Lassmann, M.; Brans, B.; Flux, G.; EANM. EANM procedure guidelines for 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) therapy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Parisi, M.T.; Eslamy, H.; Park, J.R.; Shulkin, B.L.; Yanik, G.A. 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine Theranostics in Neuroblastoma: Historical Perspectives; Practical Applications. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2016, 46, 184–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, J.W.; Lee, S.; Cho, H.W.; Ma, Y.; Yoo, K.H.; Sung, K.W.; Koo, H.H.; Cho, E.J.; Lee, S.K.; Lim, D.H. Incorporation of high-dose 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment into tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma: Results of the SMC NB-2009 study. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Suh, J.K.; Koh, K.N.; Min, S.Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, H.; Im, H.J.; Namgoong, J.M.; Kim, D.Y.; Ahn, S.D.; Lee, J.J.; et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of treatment strategy of tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in combination with 131I-MIBG therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr. Transplant. 2020, 24, e13658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hishiki, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Ohira, M.; Kamijo, T.; Shichino, H.; Kuroda, T.; Yoneda, A.; Soejima, T.; Nakazawa, A.; Takimoto, T.; et al. Results of a phase II trial for high-risk neuroblastoma treatment protocol JN-H-07: A report from the Japan Childhood Cancer Group Neuroblastoma Committee (JNBSG). Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 23, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Haas-Kogan, D.A.; Swift, P.S.; Selch, M.; Haase, G.M.; Seeger, R.C.; Gerbing, R.B.; Stram, D.O.; Matthay, K.K. Impact of radiotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma: A Children’s Cancer Group study. Int. J. Radiat Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003, 56, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Panandiker, A.S.P.; McGregor, L.; Krasin, M.J.; Wu, S.J.; Xiong, X.P.; Merchant, T.E. Locoregional Tumor Progression after Radiation Therapy Influences Overall Survival in Pediatric Patients with Neuroblastoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2010, 76, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Giammarile, F.; Lumbroso, J.; Ricard, M.; Aubert, B.; Hartmann, O.; Schlumberger, M.; Parmentier, C. Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine in neuroblastoma: Influence of high dose on tumour site detection. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1995, 22, 1180–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kayano, D.; Taki, J.; Fukuoka, M.; Wakabayashi, H.; Inaki, A.; Nakamura, A.; Kinuya, S. Low-dose 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine diagnostic scan is inferior to 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine posttreatment scan in detection of malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2011, 32, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Monsieurs, M.; Brans, B.; Bacher, K.; Dierckx, R.; Thierens, H. Patient dosimetry for 131I-MIBG therapy for neuroendocrine tumours based on 123I-MIBG scans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2002, 29, 1581–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, B.; Zhuang, H.; Servaes, S. Comparison of [123I]MIBG and [131I]MIBG for imaging of neuroblastoma and other neural crest tumors. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2013, 57, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Johnson, K.; McGlynn, B.; Saggio, J.; Baniewicz, D.; Zhuang, H.; Maris, J.M.; Mosse, Y.P. Safety and efficacy of tandem 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine infusions in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2011, 57, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fukuoka, M.; Taki, J.; Mochizuki, T.; Kinuya, S. Comparison of diagnostic value of I-123 MIBG and high-dose I-131 MIBG scintigraphy including incremental value of SPECT/CT over planar image in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and neuroblastoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2011, 36, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kinuya, S.; Yoshinaga, K.; Higuchi, T.; Jinguji, M.; Kurihara, H.; Kawamoto, H. Draft guidelines regarding appropriate use of (131)I-MIBG radiotherapy for neuroendocrine tumors: Guideline Drafting Committee for Radiotherapy with (131)I-MIBG, Committee for Nuclear Oncology and Immunology, The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2015, 29, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, J.; Codreanu, I.; Servaes, S.; Zhuang, H. I-131 MIBG post-therapy scan is more sensitive than I-123 MIBG pretherapy scan in the evaluation of metastatic neuroblastoma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2012, 33, 1134–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hickeson, M.P.; Charron, M.; Maris, J.M.; Brophy, P.; Kang, T.I.; Zhuang, H.; Khan, J.; Nevrotski, T. Biodistribution of post-therapeutic versus diagnostic (131)I-MIBG scans in children with neuroblastoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2004, 42, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nakagawara, A.; Li, Y.; Izumi, H.; Muramori, K.; Inada, H.; Nishi, M. Neuroblastoma. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 48, 214–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mazloom, A.; Louis, C.U.; Nuchtern, J.; Kim, E.; Russell, H.; Allen-Rhoades, W.; Krance, R.; Paulino, A.C. Radiation therapy to the primary and postinduction chemotherapy MIBG-avid sites in high-risk neuroblastoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014, 90, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Eleven-year-old male with high-risk neuroblastoma. (a) Whole-body 123I-mIBG scintigraphy one day after injection shows no abnormal uptake. (b) Whole-body 131I-mIBG scintigraphy four days after injection shows definite abnormal uptake (arrows). (c) CT, SPECT, and fused SPECT/CT images demonstrate the uptake at the operation site and at L3. mIBG, meta-iodobenzylguanidine; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; CT, computed tomography; L3, third lumber vertebra.
Figure 1. Eleven-year-old male with high-risk neuroblastoma. (a) Whole-body 123I-mIBG scintigraphy one day after injection shows no abnormal uptake. (b) Whole-body 131I-mIBG scintigraphy four days after injection shows definite abnormal uptake (arrows). (c) CT, SPECT, and fused SPECT/CT images demonstrate the uptake at the operation site and at L3. mIBG, meta-iodobenzylguanidine; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; CT, computed tomography; L3, third lumber vertebra.
Diagnostics 10 00663 g001
Figure 2. Six-year-old male with high-risk neuroblastoma. (a) Whole-body 123I-mIBG scintigraphy one day after injection shows abnormal uptake on the right humerus at relapse (arrows). (b) The uptake disappears before 131I-mIBG therapy on the whole-body 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. (c) Whole-body 131I-mIBG scintigraphy four days after injection shows faint uptake at the relapse site on the right humerus (arrow). (d) CT, SPECT, and fused SPECT/CT images demonstrate the uptake at the relapse site on the right humerus. mIBG, meta-iodobenzylguanidine; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; CT, computed tomography.
Figure 2. Six-year-old male with high-risk neuroblastoma. (a) Whole-body 123I-mIBG scintigraphy one day after injection shows abnormal uptake on the right humerus at relapse (arrows). (b) The uptake disappears before 131I-mIBG therapy on the whole-body 123I-mIBG scintigraphy. (c) Whole-body 131I-mIBG scintigraphy four days after injection shows faint uptake at the relapse site on the right humerus (arrow). (d) CT, SPECT, and fused SPECT/CT images demonstrate the uptake at the relapse site on the right humerus. mIBG, meta-iodobenzylguanidine; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; CT, computed tomography.
Diagnostics 10 00663 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wakabayashi, H.; Kayano, D.; Inaki, A.; Araki, R.; Kuroda, R.; Akatani, N.; Yamase, T.; Watanabe, S.; Hiromasa, T.; Kunita, Y.; et al. Diagnostic Use of Post-therapy 131I-Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Consolidation Therapy for Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090663

AMA Style

Wakabayashi H, Kayano D, Inaki A, Araki R, Kuroda R, Akatani N, Yamase T, Watanabe S, Hiromasa T, Kunita Y, et al. Diagnostic Use of Post-therapy 131I-Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Consolidation Therapy for Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(9):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wakabayashi, Hiroshi, Daiki Kayano, Anri Inaki, Raita Araki, Rie Kuroda, Norihito Akatani, Takafumi Yamase, Satoru Watanabe, Tomo Hiromasa, Yuji Kunita, and et al. 2020. "Diagnostic Use of Post-therapy 131I-Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Consolidation Therapy for Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma" Diagnostics 10, no. 9: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop