Next Article in Journal
Ketamine Alters Functional Plasticity of Astroglia: An Implication for Antidepressant Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Diabetic Retinopathy in Children with Type 1 Diabetes—Occurrence and Screening Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Coronavirus RNA-Processing Enzymes in Innate Immune Evasion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluorescence Lifetime Changes Induced by Laser Irradiation: A Preclinical Study towards the Evaluation of Retinal Metabolic States
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/life11060572
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness and Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

by
Yoshihito Sakanishi
*,
Syu Morita
,
Keitaro Mashimo
,
Kazunori Tamaki
and
Nobuyuki Ebihara
Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu City, Chiba 279-0021, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(6), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060572
Submission received: 20 May 2021 / Revised: 7 June 2021 / Accepted: 15 June 2021 / Published: 17 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Retinal Disease and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We aimed to investigate the relationship between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) and treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) for macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients with treatment-naive BRVO-ME who underwent IVA treatment between March 2016 and February 2017. There was no significant difference in visual acuity within 6 months (0.29 ± 0.20 vs. 0.27 ± 0.19, p = 0.338), the mean central foveal thickness improvement (332.0 ± 162.2 μm vs. 303.9 ± 166.6 μm, p = 0.492), and the mean number of IVA injections (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 times, p = 0.658) between the SCT thickened (n = 26 patients, 26 eyes) and SCT non-thickened groups (n = 20 patients, 20 eyes). The rate of ME recurrence was significantly lower in the SCT decreased group (6/17 eyes (35.2%) vs. 19/30 eyes (63.3%); p = 0.038). In conclusion, pretreatment choroidal thickening does not affect the therapeutic effect of IVA for BRVO, but ME recurrence was lower in cases of treatment-related choroidal thinning. Thus, changes in SCT may be a therapeutic indicator of IVA for acute BRVO.

1. Introduction

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO), the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy, is a vascular occlusion disease that may cause macular edema (ME), which could ultimately lead to visual loss [1,2,3]. RVO is thought to be associated with hypertension, which affects overall metabolism [4]. RVO is classified according to the vascular occlusion site, either branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion. Previously, BRVO was primarily treated with retinal photocoagulation based on the results of large-scale studies, but this treatment had limited efficacy [5]. As such, other treatment modalities were introduced, including triamcinolone injection [6] and, more recently, intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), with the latter currently being the mainstream treatment modality owing to its good results [7,8,9,10,11]. The anti-VEGF drugs approved for BRVO-ME include ranibizumab and aflibercept. Generally, the intravitreal VEGF level in RVO eyes is higher than that in normal eyes [12]. VEGF is believed to be involved in the formation of pathological conditions, which is supported by the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on BRVO-ME. Further, VEGF has a vascular permeability-enhancing effect [13,14]. There are abundant blood vessels not only in the retina, but also the choroid, and studies have shown that choroidal blood flow and thickness influences the outcomes of RVO [15,16,17]. Choroidal thickening in RVO is primarily caused by choroidal vascular hyperpermeability from the increase in intraocular VEGF [18] and by the increase in intraocular nitric oxide [19]. In other words, the change in choroidal thickness may be one of the indicators of intraocular VEGF concentration in eyes with RVO. However, there are no reports on the impact of choroid thickness on the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVA) for BRVO-ME. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) and treatment outcomes of IVA for ME due to BRVO. We discovered that pretreatment of choroidal thickening does not affect the therapeutic effect of IVA for BRVO, but ME recurrence was lower in cases of treatment-related choroidal thinning.

2. Materials and Methods

The subjects were treatment-naive BRVO-ME patients who visited the Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu City, Japan between March 2016 and February 2017, and were treated with IVA for more than 6 months. The eligibility criteria were acute BRVO within 6 months after onset, decimal visual acuity of ≤0.7, and no cataract affecting visual acuity. The exclusion criteria were history of other macular disease, history of vitreous surgery, and history of retinal photocoagulation. Data for the analysis were collected from the patients’ medical records.
The observation period was 6 months, and the injection protocol was IVA once during the induction period and reinjection for ME recurrence or if the central foveal thickness (CFT) remained above 300 μm. Ophthalmic examination was conducted once monthly. The CFT and SCT were measured via optical coherence tomography (OCT) using CIRRUS HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). CFT was measured at five lines, and SCT was measured at enhanced depth imaging mode. All OCT measurements were performed between 14:00 and 16:00 to lower the effects of diurnal choroidal variation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using a decimal acuity chart and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
Patients whose SCT of the affected eye was thicker by ≥5% than that of the unaffected eye at baseline were categorized into the SCT thickened group, otherwise they were categorized into the non-thickened group. The number of injections, improvement of BCVA, and CFT for 6 months were examined in each group. In addition, the patients were also divided into two groups according to an SCT decrease of ≥5% in the affected eye at 6 months after the first injection compared with that at baseline (i.e., SCT decreased group and SCT non-decreased group). The amount of BCVA improvement, CFT improvement, and rate of ME recurrence within 6 months were also assessed in these groups.
Between-group comparisons according to SCT thickness were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. For between-group comparisons, according to SCT decrease, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess changes in BCVA and CFT, and the Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the presence of ME recurrence. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

In total, 46 patients were included in the analysis. Of them, 26 patients (26 eyes; mean age, 66.3 ± 9.7 years; 12 males, 14 females) were categorized into the SCT thickened group and 20 (20 eyes; mean age, 66.3 ± 11.4 years; 9 males, 11 females) into the SCT non-thickened group. Table 1 shows the baseline patient characteristics. There were no significant between-group differences in patient characteristics except for SCT. The mean change in BCVA (logMAR 0.29 ± 0.20 vs. logMAR 0.27 ± 0.19, p = 0.338, Figure 1a), CFT (332.0 ± 162.2 μm vs. 303.9 ± 166.6 μm, p = 0.492, Figure 1b), and number of injections (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 times, p = 0.658) within 6 months were also not significant between the SCT thickened and the SCT non-thickened groups.
Similar results were obtained in the comparison between the SCT decreased group and the SCT non-decreased group. There were significant differences in the change of BCVA determined by logMAR (0.28 ± 0.14 vs. 0.27 ± 0.26, p = 0.898, Figure 2a), central foveal thickness (340.7 ± 159.2 μm vs. 280.5 ± 167.4 μm, p = 0.230, Figure 2b), and incidence rate of ME recurrence (11/30 eyes (36.7%) vs. 11/16 eyes (68.8%), p = 0.038) within 6 months between the two groups.

4. Discussion

Choroidal thickness at baseline has been reported to be a predictor of the treatment outcomes of IVA for BRVO [16,17]. The results of this study show that pretreatment SCT did not influence the efficacy of IVA, but the risk of ME recurrence was lower in cases where SCT was thinned during the course of treatment.
Hypertension is known to be involved in the onset of RVO, and its relationship to arteriosclerosis has been acknowledged [4]. Hypertension itself is known to affect the choroid [20], but to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the effect of treatment for RVO and choroidal thickness, as in our study.
Choroidal thickening in RVO is primarily caused by choroidal vascular hyperpermeability from the increase in intraocular VEGF [18] and nitric oxide [19]. Thus, changes in choroidal thickness may be an indicator of intraocular VEGF concentration in eyes with RVO. There have been several reports regarding the relationship between intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF drug and choroid thickness and blood flow in BRVO. Okamoto et al. reported that treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) for BRVO resulted in higher recurrence in patients with thicker foveal choroidal thickness at baseline [16]. In contrast, we found no association between baseline SCT and the number of injections. The difference may be due to the length of the observation period. Okamoto et al. reported the results of a 2-month follow-up, whereas our findings are from a 6-month follow-up.
Hasegawa et al. reported that in IVR treatment in BRVO, the responsive cases had a thicker SCT at baseline in the affected eye than they did in the unaffected eye, whereas there were no significant differences in SCT between the unaffected and affected eyes in the refractory cases [17]. Collectively, these studies indicate that the intraocular VEGF level may be low in patients with treatment resistance and that microaneurysm (MA) had a greater influence than VEGF in refractory cases. A high rate of MA occurring 3 to 6 months after the onset of RVO has been reported [21]. In contrast to the study by Hasegawa et al., all patients in the current study had acute BRVO without MA at baseline and, importantly, SCT at baseline did not influence the efficacy of IVA.
The relationship between intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB), an anti-VEGF drug, and choroid thickness remains unclear. One study reported that IVB did not significantly reduce choroidal thickness [22], whereas some studies also reported that choroidal volume is significantly decreased after IVB [23,24]. To our knowledge, there are no reports of choroidal changes in IVA treatment of RVO. However, there are several reports of choroidal changes in IVA treatment of age-related macular degeneration [25,26,27], but the findings have been conflicting. Although some studies found no relationship between the effectiveness of IVA treatment for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and choroidal change [25,26], Koizumi et al. reported that choroidal changes are associated with the effectiveness of IVA treatment for AMD [27].
IVA has been suggested to reduce choroidal thickness, but it can also be argued that the thinning of the choroid is natural considering the depth of IVA penetration, regardless of the disease. In this study, ME was more likely to be managed with a single injection in patients whose SCT was thinner after IVA treatment than it was before treatment. This means that the effect of IVA includes thinning of the choroid. In contrast, patients who required reinjection because of edema recurrence after injection showed no significant decrease in choroid thickness after treatment. Increased VEGF levels cause choroid thickening through increased nitric oxide production [20]. Thus, ME may recur and choroidal thickness may not diminish in cases in which VEGF levels did not continue to decline after injection. The relationship between ME and choroid thickness can be clarified by investigating the relationship between the timing of ME recurrence and the change in choroidal thickness.
This study has some limitations, including its retrospective design and the small sample size. In addition, this study is concerned with choroidal thickness. However, because choroidal thickness markedly varies among individuals, it cannot be compared between individuals. Moreover, choroidal thickness varies daily [28,29] and decreases with age [30]. However, the same cases were examined to reduce the effect of diurnal variation and age. Comparisons were also made between the affected and unaffected eye per patient. Further large-scale studies of choroidal thickness according to the examination time are needed. In addition, given that the degree of penetration into the choroid differs among the anti-VEGF drugs, further research on IVA is necessary.

5. Conclusions

The baseline choroid thickness and change of choroid thickness did not affect treatment outcomes of IVA for acute BRVO. However, the rate of ME recurrence was lower in patients in whom choroidal thinning was related to treatment. Thus, changes in choroidal thickness may be an indicator of the therapeutic effect of IVA for acute BRVO.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.; methodology, Y.S.; software, Y.S.; validation, Y.S., S.M. and N.E.; formal analysis, Y.S.; investigation, K.M.; resources, K.M.; data curation, K.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, S.M.; visualization, K.T.; supervision, N.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital (protocol code 2014-047; date of approval, 15 November 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital for many helpful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitchell, P.; Smith, W.; Chang, A. Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1996, 114, 1243–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Klein, R.; Klein, B.E.; Moss, S.E.; Meuer, S.M. The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2000, 98, 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rogers, S.; McIntosh, R.L.; Cheung, N.; Lim, L.; Wang, J.J.; Mitchell, P.; Kowalski, J.W.; Nguyen, H.; Wong, T.Y. International Eye Disease Consortium. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: Pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Yasuda, M.; Kiyohara, Y.; Arakawa, S.; Hata, Y.; Yonemoto, K.; Doi, Y.; Iida, M.; Ishibashi, T. Prevalence and systemic risk factors for retinal vein occlusion in a general Japanese population: The Hisayama study. Investig. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 3205–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. BVOS: Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1984, 98, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ip, M.S.; Scott, I.U.; VanVeldhuisen, P.C.; Oden, N.L.; Blodi, B.A.; Fisher, M.; Singerman, L.J.; Tolentino, M.; Chan, C.K.; Gonzalez, V.H.; et al. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: The Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study Report 6. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009, 127, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Campochiaro, P.A.; Heier, J.S.; Feiner, L.; Gray, S.; Saroj, N.; Rundle, A.C.; Murahashi, W.Y.; Rubio, R.G.; BRAVO Investigators. Ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: Six-month primary end point results of a phase III study. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 1102–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sakanishi, Y.; Lee, A.; Usui-Ouchi, A.; Ito, R.; Ebihara, N. Twelve-month outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion treated with low-frequency intravitreal ranibizumab. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 10, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Brown, D.M.; Campochiaro, P.A.; Bhisitkul, R.B.; Ho, A.C.; Gray, S.; Saroj, N.; Adamis, A.P.; Rubio, R.G.; Murahashi, W.Y. Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month outcomes of a phase III study. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1594–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Campochiaro, P.A.; Clark, W.L.; Boyer, D.S.; Heier, J.S.; Brown, D.M.; Vitti, R.; Kazmi, H.; Berliner, A.J.; Erickson, K.; Chu, K.W.; et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: The 24-week results of the VIBRANT study. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.K.; Huang, T.L.; Su, P.Y.; Chang, P.Y.; Tseng, Y.Y. Intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients. Eye Sci. 2015, 30, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Noma, H.; Minamoto, A.; Funatsu, H.; Tsukamoto, H.; Nakano, K.; Yamashita, H.; Mishima, H.K. Intravitreal levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 are correlated with macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2006, 244, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dvorak, H.F.; Brown, L.F.; Detmar, M.; Dvorak, A.M. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 1995, 146, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Weis, S.M.; Cheresh, D.A. Pathophysiological consequences of VEGF-induced vascular permeability. Nature 2005, 437, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shin, Y.U.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, B.R. Choroidal maps in different types of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 160, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Okamoto, M.; Yamashita, M.; Sakamoto, T.; Ogata, N. Choroidal blood flow and thickness as predictors for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina 2018, 38, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hasegawa, T.; Kawano, T.; Maruko, I.; Koizumi, H.; Iida, T. Clinical findings of eyes with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab. Retina 2018, 38, 1347–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsuiki, E.; Suzuma, K.; Ueki, R.; Maekawa, Y.; Kitaoka, T. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central retinal vein occlusion. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 156, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mrejen, S.; Spaide, R.F. Optical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2013, 58, 387–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Konstantinidis, L.; Guex-Crosier, Y. Hypertension and the eye. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 27, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tomiyasu, T.; Hirano, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Suzuki, N.; Nishiyama, T.; Uemura, A.; Yasukawa, T.; Ogura, Y. Microaneurysms cause refractory macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kang, H.M.; Choi, J.H.; Koh, H.J.; Lee, C.S.; Lee, S.C. Significant reduction of peripapillary choroidal thickness in patients with unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina 2018, 38, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chung, Y.K.; Shin, J.A.; Park, Y.H. Choroidal volume in branch retinal vein occlusion before and after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. Retina 2015, 35, 1234–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, K.H.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, J.J.; Park, S.W.; Byon, I.S.; Lee, J.E. Regional choroidal thickness changes in branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema. Ophthalmologica 2015, 234, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Daizumoto, E.; Mitamura, Y.; Sano, H.; Akaiwa, K.; Niki, M.; Yamanaka, C.; Kinoshita, T.; Egawa, M.; Sonoda, S.; Sakamoto, T. Changes of choroidal structure after intravitreal aflibercept therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gharbiya, M.; Giustolisi, R.; Marchiori, J.; Bruscolini, A.; Mallone, F.; Fameli, V.; Nebbioso, M.; Abdolrahimzadeh, S. Comparison of short-term choroidal thickness and retinal morphological changes after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy with ranibizumab or aflibercept in treatment-naïve eyes. Curr. Eye Res. 2018, 43, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Koizumi, H.; Kano, M.; Yamamoto, A.; Saito, M.; Maruko, I.; Sekiryu, T.; Okada, A.A.; Idea, T. Subfoveal choroidal thickness during aflibercept therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Twelve-month results. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, J.S.; Flitcroft, D.I.; Ying, G.; Francis, E.L.; Schmid, G.F.; Quinn, G.E.; Stone, R.A. In vivo human choroidal thickness measurements: Evidence for diurnal fluctuations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tan, C.S.; Ouyang, Y.; Ruiz, H.; Sadda, S.R. Diurnal variation of choroidal thickness in normal, healthy subjects measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, W.B.; Xu, L.; Jonas, J.B.; Shao, L.; Du, K.F.; Wang, S.; Chen, C.X.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhou, J.Q.; et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: The Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 11 00572 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Comparison of change in best-corrected visual acuity between the SCT thickened and the SCT non-thickened groups. (b) Comparison of change in central foveal thickness between the SCT thickened and the SCT non-thickened groups.
Figure 1. (a) Comparison of change in best-corrected visual acuity between the SCT thickened and the SCT non-thickened groups. (b) Comparison of change in central foveal thickness between the SCT thickened and the SCT non-thickened groups.
Life 11 00572 g001
Life 11 00572 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Comparison of change in best-corrected visual acuity between the SCT decreased and SCT non-decreased groups. (b) Comparison of change in central foveal thickness between the SCT decreased and SCT non-decreased groups.
Figure 2. (a) Comparison of change in best-corrected visual acuity between the SCT decreased and SCT non-decreased groups. (b) Comparison of change in central foveal thickness between the SCT decreased and SCT non-decreased groups.
Life 11 00572 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics according to SCT thickness group.
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics according to SCT thickness group.
SCT Thickened GroupSCT Non-Thickened Group
n = 26n = 20p-Value
Age (years)66.3 ± 9.766.3 ± 11.40.842
Sex (male/female)12/149/111.000
HT (+/−)16/1014/61.000
Right eye/left eye15/118/121.000
BCVA (logMAR)0.41 ± 0.190.31 ± 0.230.143
CFT (μm)564.3 ± 175.2516.7 ± 135.40.236
SCT (μm) Affected eye266.7 ± 59.1213.5 ± 54.80.004
Unaffected eye207.7 ± 54.5236.6 ± 58.20.074
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; HT, hypertension; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; CFT, central foveal thickness; SCT, subfoveal choroidal thickness.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakanishi, Y.; Morita, S.; Mashimo, K.; Tamaki, K.; Ebihara, N. Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness and Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Life 2021, 11, 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060572

AMA Style

Sakanishi Y, Morita S, Mashimo K, Tamaki K, Ebihara N. Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness and Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Life. 2021; 11(6):572. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060572

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakanishi, Yoshihito, Syu Morita, Keitaro Mashimo, Kazunori Tamaki, and Nobuyuki Ebihara. 2021. "Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness and Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion" Life 11, no. 6: 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060572

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop