Next Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Imaging in Patients with Early Breast Cancer After Initial Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Overwhelming Research and Clinical Evidence of Exercise Medicine Efficacy in Cancer Management—Translation into Practice Is the Challenge before Us
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Barriers to Participation in Clinical Trials: a Physician Survey

1
Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
2
Department of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
3
Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25(2), 119-125; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3857
Submission received: 11 January 2018 / Revised: 1 February 2018 / Accepted: 2 March 2018 / Published: 1 April 2018

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are vital for evidence-based cancer care. Oncologist engagement in clinical trials has an effect on patient recruitment, which in turn can affect trial success. Identifying barriers to clinical trial participation might enable interventions that could help to increase physician participation. Methods: To assess factors affecting physician engagement in oncology trials, a national survey was conducted using the online SurveyMonkey tool (SurveyMonkey, San Mateo, CA, U.S.A.; http://www.surveymonkey.com). Physicians associated with the Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network and the Canadian Cancer Trials Group were asked about their specialty, years of experience, barriers to participation, and motivating interventions, which included an open-ended question inviting survey takers to suggest interventions. Results: The survey collected 207 anonymous responses. Respondents were predominantly medical oncologists (46.4%), followed by radiation oncologists (24.6%). Almost 70% of the respondents had more than 10 years of experience. Significant time constraints included extra paperwork (77%), patient education (54%), and extended follow-up or clinic visits (53%). Timing of events within trials was also a barrier to participation (55%). Most respondents favoured clinical work credits (72%), academic credits (67%), a clinical trial alert system (75%), a regular meeting to review trial protocols (65%), and a screening log to aid in patient accrual (67%) as motivational strategies. Suggested interventions included increased support staff, streamlined regulatory burden, and provision of greater funding for trials and easier access to ancillary services. Conclusions: The present study confirms that Canadian oncologists are willing to participate in clinical research, but face multiple barriers to trial participation. Those barriers could be mitigated by the implementation of several interventions identified in the study.
Keywords: clinical trials; health operations research; cross-sectional studies; physician engagement surveys; oncologists; trial participation; barriers; motivating interventions clinical trials; health operations research; cross-sectional studies; physician engagement surveys; oncologists; trial participation; barriers; motivating interventions

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmud, A.; Zalay, O.; Springer, A.; Arts, K.; Eisenhauer, E. Barriers to Participation in Clinical Trials: a Physician Survey. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, 119-125. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3857

AMA Style

Mahmud A, Zalay O, Springer A, Arts K, Eisenhauer E. Barriers to Participation in Clinical Trials: a Physician Survey. Current Oncology. 2018; 25(2):119-125. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmud, A., O. Zalay, A. Springer, K. Arts, and E. Eisenhauer. 2018. "Barriers to Participation in Clinical Trials: a Physician Survey" Current Oncology 25, no. 2: 119-125. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3857

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop