Patients with GERD are usually counseled on lifestyle changes that decrease the incidence of reflux, such as reducing fat in the diet. High dietary fat intake, particularly saturated fat, is associated with an increased risk of GERD symptoms and the likelihood of erosive esophagitis. These associations are independent of energy intake and therefore do not reflect a mere increase in total dietary intake. However, the effects are not completely independent of body mass index and are statistically significant only in overweight individuals. Other findings include a possible protective effect for high-fiber intake relative to GERD symptoms and a non-significant unfavorable trend for total energy intake[17].

An important role for dietary fat in causing temporary episodes of reflux is supported by studies of human volunteers that have shown increased frequency of tLESRs and increased esophageal acid exposure with high-fat consumption in both healthy volunteers[1819] as well as patients with GERD[2021]. Several food items have been associated with precipitating reflux symptoms in cross-sectional epidemiological surveys[22]. Previous case control studies reported a significant positive effect of fat intake on the rising rates of GERD and esophageal adenocarcinoma in the general population[23–25]. The fat content of the US food supply has increased 38% between 1909 and 1988[26]. These secular trends are consistent with the notion that high fat intake may be at least partially responsible for rising rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma, which were first observed in the late 1970s[17].

Sleep impairs esophageal acid clearance resulting in a prolongation of esophageal mucosal contact with acid[27]. Therefore avoiding meals two hours before lying down and sleeping with the head of the bed elevated prevents nocturnal acid reflux as nocturnal reflux portends a greater risk of erosive esophagitis and other GERD complications. Marked hyperglycemia has been shown to increase the frequency of tLESRs[28] and this may be a factor underlying the high rate of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Since tLESRs represent the major mechanism responsible for episodic reflux, patients with GERD without mucosal disease or with mild erosive disease could potentially benefit from anti-tLESR therapy alone. Yet, this therapy could also be of value to treat some more severe forms of erosive esophagitis in combination with acid suppressants.

γ-GABA-b agonists: GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter within the central nervous system, and GABA receptors are present at many sites within the central and peripheral nervous systems. GABA receptors are abundant pre-synaptically on vagal afferents in the dorsal medulla[29] and have been shown to inhibit neurotransmitter release in vagal nuclei[30]. Baclofen, a GABA analog, has recently been shown to be effective in reducing gastro-esophageal reflux[3132]. Unlike acid suppressing agents, baclofen reduces the frequency of tLESRs and decreases the number of gastro-duodenal reflux episodes[33]. The drug has several advantages over other agents tested to date. It is available in an oral formulation and appears to have no adverse effects on other aspects of esophageal motor function, such as basal LES pressure or acid clearance[34]. It also increases gastric pH in both GERD patients and controls even after repeated administrations. Since baclofen addresses a different factor in the pathophysiology of GERD, it can be used as add-on therapy in GERD patients with incomplete relief by acid suppression and/or in patients with more severe GERD[35]. However, baclofen has several limitations, including the need for frequent dosing due to its short half-life (3-4 h), and its limited absorption in the lower gastrointestinal tract, which precludes the development of a controlled-release formulation. The drug is nevertheless approved for treatment of spasticity, and its potential utility for the treatment of GERD has been demonstrated in clinical studies[3637].

Recently, its active stereoisomer R-baclofen, has been incorporated into an experimental prodrug, XP19986. XP19986 overcomes the pharmacokinetic limitations of baclofen; it can be administered in a controlled-release formulation that allows for once- or twice-daily dosing. A recent Phase 1 clinical trial assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of XP19986 dosed once (QD) or twice (BID) daily in healthy adult volunteers. The trial was conducted sequentially in four separate cohorts of 12 subjects, three of whom received placebo per cohort. Following an up-titration period, the first cohort received 30 mg QD of XP19986 for seven days, followed by 30 mg BID for seven days and ending with a down-titration period. Subsequent cohorts received 60 mg and 90 mg QD and BID following a similar protocol. The final group of subjects received 120 mg QD only. Subjects were monitored for adverse events, and blood and urine were sampled to determine pharmacokinetic profiles and bioavailability. The trial demonstrated that repeated QD dosing of XP19986 resulted in sustained levels of R-baclofen in blood over 24-h, which reached steady-state within three days. Repeated BID dosing reduced the steady-state peak-to-trough ratio of R-baclofen by approximately 50% compared to QD dosing. Exposure to R-baclofen increased linearly with dose. This clinical trial also indicated that XP19986 was well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence, dizziness and nausea that were generally mild in severity and generally increased in incidence compared to placebo with daily doses above 60 mg. In the 120 mg cohort, one subject experienced episodes of slurred speech and tremor, which are reported side effects of baclofen[38].

Cholecystokinin: The cholecystokinin A (CCK-A) receptor subtype is involved in the occurrence of tLESRs induced by gastric distension. Loxiglumide, a CCK-A antagonist, inhibits tLESRs and attenuates the fall in LES pressure following a meal, but has only modest effects on postprandial gastro-esophageal acid reflux[39].

Atropine: As mentioned earlier, the motor innervation to the LES and proximal gastric motor function is under cholinergic control[1]. Distension of the proximal stomach is a major stimulus for triggering tLESRs. Atropine, by acting centrally within the dorsal vagal complex, decreases the rate of tLESRs, despite the fact that it relaxes the proximal stomach and increases the degree of gastric distension under pressure-controlled conditions[40]. Anticholinergic agents are unlikely to have a therapeutic role because of the substantial deleterious effects on acid clearance[41].

Opioid receptor agonists: Opioid nerves have been demonstrated in the myenteric plexus of normal LES in humans[42] and opossum[43]. Morphine inhibits LES relaxation induced by swallowing and by balloon distension of the esophagus[44], thereby increasing residual LES pressure. On this basis, it seems likely that morphine might prevent reflux during tLESRs by rendering them incomplete. In one study[45] of patients with GERD, intravenous morphine inhibited tLESRs by 50%, and this effect was associated with a concomitant decrease in the rate of reflux episodes. Morphine also reduced the rate of tLESRs in normal subjects but by a lesser degree, and there was no decrease in the rate of reflux episodes, perhaps because the control rate was already relatively low. Interestingly, morphine did not appear to affect the residual pressure during tLESRs. The effect of morphine is completely blocked by naloxone, suggesting that it is mediated through &mgr;-receptors. The effect of morphine is presumably central, because the peripherally active opiate loperamide does not influence the rate of tLESRs[46]. The effect of morphine on transient LES relaxations is dependent on the decrease in volume of the proximal stomach. Pharmacological interventions which decrease fundic volume should result in control of transient LES relaxation-mediated gastro-esophageal reflux[47]. Unwanted effects, such as addiction and constipation, are major barriers to the use of opioids[34].

Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors: Nitric oxide is the major post-ganglionic inhibitory neurotransmitter to the LES[34]. Nitrergic neurons are also present in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, the source of pre-ganglionic motor neurons to the LES, and recent evidence suggests that there may be a novel nitrergic, pre-ganglionic, vagal pathway involved in LES relaxation[48]. It seems logical therefore, that blockade of nitric oxide synthesis might inhibit tLESRs. Indeed, in one study[49] the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME), inhibited the rate of tLESRs, and this effect was reversed by L-arginine but not D-arginine. Other studies have found that, in normal humans, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) inhibited tLESRs induced by gastric distension by more than 75%[50], but reduced meal-induced tLESRs by only 25%[51]. Chronic administration of nitric oxide substrate, L-arginine, prolongs the postprandial increase in tLESRs[52].

The therapeutic potential of nitric oxide inhibition remains to be determined. At present, no orally effective agents exist. Inhibition of nitric oxide is associated with effects on motility in other areas of the gastrointestinal tract as well as in the cardiovascular system, urinary bladder, and respiratory tract. Unless specific and well-targeted antagonists of neuronal nitric oxide synthesis can be developed, unwanted side effects are likely to preclude this pharmacologic approach to the treatment of GERD[34].

Endoscopic endo-luminal anti-reflux approaches have been recently introduced aiming to prevent acid reflux by construction of a functional or controlled barrier in the LES zone[53]. These endoscopic therapies offer the potential for significant symptomatic improvement while obviating many of the potential drawbacks associated with long-term medical therapy with acid suppressive or neutralizing medications, or the complications and side effects of anti-reflux surgery. These techniques include the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the EGJ (Stretta), injection of bulking agents (Enteryx), implantation of a bioprostheses into the LES (Gatekeeper), and suture plication of the proximal fundic folds (EndoCinch, NDOplicator)[54]. All these approaches are less invasive than antireflux surgery, and are performed in the outpatient setting. However, only limited data are available on their respective mechanisms of action[55]. Stretta increases the barrier between the stomach and the esophagus by either collagen deposition or disruption of vagally-mediated tLESRs[56]. The decrease in transient LES relaxation is presumably caused by either altering the mechanics of the cardia or interrupting afferent nerve transmission to the brainstem control mechanisms. Human and animal studies suggest that radiofrequency energy may decrease GERD symptoms[57] by decreasing the frequency of transient LES relaxations associated with reflux episodes, increasing the intra-gastric pressure needed to induce reflux, and hastening gastric emptying[58–61]. Another potential mechanism of the improved symptoms is decreased visceral sensitivity, as witnessed by the observation that the time needed to report symptoms during esophageal acid perfusion was significantly longer 6 mo after Stretta compared with baseline[62]. Although neurolysis with impairment of sensory afferent pathways is indeed a potential mechanism, other factors may include esophageal exposure to hydrogen ions, mucosal permeability, number and activation state of acid-sensitive nerve endings, and central processing of incoming sensory information. Radiofrequency energy delivery may influence several of these mechanisms as well as the compliance of the EGJ, increasing the resistance of the LES to a distending pressure[58] and decreasing the volume of refluxate during LES relaxations[57].

A variety of injectable agents have been studied for bulking the gastroesophageal junction, including Plexiglas microspheres, ethylene vinyl alcohol co-polymer (Enteryx), and hydrogel prosthesis (Gatekeeper). It is hypothesized that Enteryx leads to an increased barrier to reflux, whereas the hydrogel prosthesis may exert its effect by decreasing the aperture through which refluxate may flow, thus resulting in less proximal migration of the refluxate. Endoscopic plication is hypothesized to impede reflux by approximating tissue at or below the EGJ. The resulting effect of all these endoscopic techniques on LES pressure and 24-h intra-esophageal pH profiles is modest and complete normalization of acid exposure is uncommon. Nevertheless, all these techniques reduce GERD symptoms, improve quality of life, and decrease esophageal acid exposure and the need for anti-secretory medications[6364].

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) tightens the EGJ through a set of suture placations, resulting in significant increases in LES resting and post-deglutition relaxation pressures in both left lateral and upright positions and after gastric distention[65]. Post-fundoplication patients exhibit a diminished rate of tLESRs both at rest and during isobaric gastric distension compared with both normal controls and GERD subjects. Further, tLESRs in fundoplication patients are characterized by a higher residual pressure and a lower efficacy of facilitating gastric venting[66]. The reduction of tLESRs after a successful LF, is possibly due to disruption of the efferent vagal pathways to the LES. An adequate dissection of the EGJ alone prior to the actual fundoplication is sufficient to significantly disrupt the efferent pathway of this neural reflex, which may underscore the importance of performing a circumferential mobilization of the EGJ in all patients. Moreover, the wrap itself appears to further inhibit efferent neural impulses to the LES, thereby decreasing tLESRs[67].

Although the receptive field for triggering tLESRs is not completely clear[66], mechanoreceptors in the region of the gastric cardia are commonly implicated[1668]. On the basis of studies in ferrets[69], two types of mechanoreceptors have been proposed: receptors in series with smooth muscle fibers, responding to wall tension variation, and receptors in parallel with smooth muscle fibers, responding to elongation of the gastric wall. Both types of receptors are activated during gastric distension[7071]. However, after fundoplication the gastric cardia is situated within the fundic wrap, and has a reduced ability to stretch or elongate[72]. Thus an identical and constant distension stimulus likely leads to a diminished cardiac cross-sectional area compared with what would be observed if the same stimulus were applied in normal or GERD subjects. Reduced cross-sectional area would, in turn, result in decreased wall tension and elongation, thereby reducing the activation of both types of receptors potentially responsible for triggering tLESRs. Furthermore, because tLESR elicitation and gastric receptive relaxation are both mediated by the vagal nerve and since gastric accommodation is not affected by fundoplication[73], it is tempting to speculate that the vagal afferent field for triggering tLESRs is either independent of, or contained within a larger area responsible for elicitation of gastric receptive relaxation and that only the first is substantially reduced by fundoplication[66].

Postprandial epigastric fullness and bloating appear in 10%-80% of patients after Nissen fundoplication[7475], and an inability to relieve this discomfort by belching is frequently reported[76]. Beyond the reduction in the number of tLESRs, a significant reduction of the percentage of tLESRs associated with a common cavity phenomenon is also found in fundoplication patients[77], and this potentially explains the frequently reported symptoms related to increased amounts of intestinal gas[66].