Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2006; 12(17): 2793-2797
Published online May 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2793
Long-term survival of a case with multiple liver metastases from duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor drastically reduced by the treatment with imatinib and hepatectomy
Chouhei Sakakura, Akeo Hagiwara, Koji Soga, Koji Miyagawa, Susumu Nakashima, Tetsuji Yoshikawa, Shuichi Kin, Yuenn Nakase, Nobuki Yamaoka, Yoshihiko Sagara, Hisakazu Yamagishi, Department of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-dori, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-0841, Japan
Supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health and Welfare and from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, and by grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation and Inamori Foundation, Japan
Correspondence to: Chouhei Sakakura, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kawaramachi-dori, Kyoto 602, Japan. sakakura@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-75-2515527 Fax: +81-75-2515522
Received: May 9, 2005
Revised: June 1, 2005
Accepted: July 1, 2005
Published online: May 7, 2006

Abstract

Constitutive activation of KIT receptor tyrosine kinase is a critical factor in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). But there is little information on whether combination of imatinib mesylate (IM) and surgical treatment can prolong survival in the cases with unresectable multiple liver metastases. We report a case of postoperative recurrence of GIST treated by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor IM and surgical treatment. The initial complete response (CR) to treatment continued for 18 mo, but single liver metastasis showed regrowth in the left hepatic lobe during IM treatment. After partial resection of the recurrent tumor, postoperative course was uneventful and the patient has survived without recurrence for 24 mo. Currently, imatinib is the first-line therapy for non-resectable GISTs, but a single agent therapy often leads to tumor resistance. Even if tolerance to imatinib occurs, a combination of imatinib and surgical treatment can prolong survival in some cases as reported here. However, further studies on a large number of cases of recurrent GIST are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of IM treatment combined with surgery.

Key Words: GIST, Imatinib mesylate, Liver metastases



INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a group of mesenchymal neoplasms that arise from Cajal cells which are pacemaker cells of the gastrointestinal tract[1]. These tumors occur predominantly in middle-aged and older persons, and approximately 70% of the tumors are found in the stomach, 20%-30% are found in the small intestine, and less than 10% elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract[1,2]. Recent studies have shown that cells GISTs express a growth factor receptor with tyrosine kinase activity termed c-kit[2]. This gene product appears to be the most specific diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of GISTs[3]. The ligand for the c-kit receptor is the stem-cell factor, also known as the steel factor or c-kit ligand[4]. Mutations of c-kit that cause constitutive activation of the tyrosine kinase function of c-kit are detectable in most GISTs and appear to play a central part in their pathogenesis[2,5]. These mutations result in ligand-independent tyrosine kinase activity, autophosphorylation of c-kit, uncontrolled cell proliferation, and stimulation of downstream signaling pathways, including those involving phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinases. GISTs are notoriously unresponsive to conventional chemotherapy, and there is no effective therapy for the advanced, metastatic stage of this disease[6]. In this study, we used imatinib (STI571 or Glivec, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland)[7], an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of c-kit, for a patient with a GIST with multiple liver metastases.

CASE REPORT

In January 2003, a 37-year-old, previously healthy man, presented with mild abdominal discomfort and a large mass in the upper abdomen. Examination with upper gastrointestinal tract led to removal of the tumor in the second portion of the duodenum by means of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Clinical course of the operations (pancreaticoduodenectomy for the duodenal GIST and partial resection of recurrence tumor) and IM treatment are illustrated in Figure 1. The resected specimen is shown in Figure 2. In the second portion of the duodenum, a tumor of 5 cm in diameter was observed. Immunohistochemistry showed the tumor cells to be c-kit-positive, CD34-positive, SMA-negative, and S100-negative (Figure 3), indicating the tumor as a GIST. Histologic examination of the specimens revealed more than 20 cells per 10 high-power fields undergoing mitosis and identified the masses as a GIST. The diagnosis was confirmed by immunostaining for CD117, and c-kit mutation consisting of point mutation in exon 11 was detected in tumor DNA amplified by polymerase chain reaction[8]. Three months later, in April 2003, multiple recurrent tumors in the liver were detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET (Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Clinical course of the patient illustrating the operations (pancreaticoduodenectomy for duodenal GIST and partial resection of recurrence tumor) and IM treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Surgical specimen obtained by pancreaticoduodenectomy of the duodenal GIST.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Immunohistochemical analysis of the duodenal GIST. A: c-kit; B: CD34; C: S100; D: SMA.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Abdominal MRI showing multiple liver metastases and complete remission in response to imatinib therapy. Panel A: MRI images of the patient with multiple liver metastases after 3 mo of pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant duodenal GIST; Panel B: Follow-up MRI images after 1 mo of oral imatinib therapy at 400 mg daily.
Figure 5
Figure 5 PET scan of liver metastases before and after imatinib treatment. A: pretreatment with imatinib; B: posttreatment with imatinib.

The patient was then treated with imatinib after his written informed consent had been obtained. Treatment with four 100 mg capsules of imatinib once daily was started in May 2003. This dose was based on evaluations of the safety and tolerability of imatinib for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia[9]. Toxicity was assessed at follow-up visits every two to four weeks, and blood cell counts and blood chemistry were examined every one to two weeks. The response to treatment was assessed with dynamic MRI and PET with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose as a tracer.

When measured as the sum of the products of the two perpendicular axes of each of six large liver metastases, the size of the tumor one day before the start of imatinib treatment was 42 cm2, but subsequent MRI scans showed that the size of the tumor had been reduced to 1 cm2. No enhancement was seen on dynamic MRI obtained during the treatment, and many of the metastases became hypodense. Until October 2004, the tumors at all sites had continued to respond to the treatment, and the patient had remained clinically well. Multiple liver metastases and increased accumulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose were observed on the first PET obtained 4 d before the treatment with imatinib was started. One month after the treatment, PET scan showed no abnormal uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the liver. On the PET scan obtained after two months of the imatinib treatment, cold areas with less uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose than in the surrounding liver parenchyma were seen at the sites of liver metastases.

Although the response to treatment was initially CR and continued for 16 mo, single liver metastasis showed regrowth in the left lobe of the liver (S4) during the imatinib treatment. Other sites remained hypodense and no sign of recurrence was seen (Figure 6). Partial resection of recurrent tumor resulted a satisfactory postoperative course and the patient remains still alive without recurrence for 24 mo since the initial treatment with IM. The effect of IM treatment on other liver metastases besides the lesion of left hepatic lobe continued (Figures 6 and 7).

Figure 6
Figure 6 Abdominal CT and MRI showing recurrence of liver metastasis. A: CT; B: MRI.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Surgical specimen of partial hepatectomy for GIST recurrence. A: Operative findings; B: Resected specimens.

Mutation analysis of c-kit in exons 7, 11, and 13 was performed in the primary tumor as well as recurrent tumor as previously described[9]. Primary tumor showed the c-kit mutation at exon 11 codon 567-576 (AAT TAT GTT TAC ATA GAC CCA ACA CAA CTT → GAA), and an additional mutation was observed at exon 17 codon 820 GAT(Asp) to GGT(Gly) in recurrent tumor in the liver.

DISCUSSION

There is no effective therapy for unresectable or metastastic GIST, which is invariably fatal. The management of unresectable or metastatic GISTs has been difficult because they are resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiation.

Imatinib, a phenylaminopyrimidine derivative, is a small molecule that selectively inhibits the enzymatic activity of several tyrosine kinases, including ABL and the BCR-ABL fusion protein of chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This selective activity of imatinib suggests that its inhibition of the constitutively active mutant c-kit tyrosine kinase seen in GIST can be an effective therapy for these tumors. Our patient had a rapidly progressive metastatic GIST. He showed a complete metabolic response within one month after the start of imatinib treatment, as shown by negative findings on PET, which indicated reduced tumor viability. In this case, histopathological evaluation and serial MRI analysis could not be performed soon, but dramatic shrinkage of the metastastic liver tumors was observed within two months. The close relation between clinical outcome and the findings on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET scanning indicates that such scanning is a useful complement to standard anatomical imaging with CT or MRI for monitoring the therapeutic effect of imatinib in patients with GISTs. Side effects of imatinib include nausea, diarrhea, edema, leukocytopenia, GI tract bleeding, liver dysfunction and so on[10]. In our case, however, only mild liver dysfunction was observed, and treatment with imatinib could be continued safely. This effect continued for more than 16 mo and there has been no sign of the recurrence. However, recurrence was subsequently detected and partial resection of recurrent tumor was performed.

It has been reported that the initial phase II study of imatinib treatment for metastatic GIST reported long-lasting responses in patients who followed up for 13 mo. However, it has become evident with extended follow-up that tumor progression can occur despite initially positive responses to imatinib therapy. The median duration of the responses was 19 mo for a series of patients with 2-year progression-free survival rate of 38%, which is a substantial drop from 90% at a 1 year[11]. Similar to previously reported cases, our case showed recurrence 16 mo after initial treatment with IM in one of six metastatic lesions. Resectability was confirmed and hepatic resection of the recurrence was successfully performed. The combination of IM and surgical treatment can prolong survival as shown in our case. Therefore, if the recurrent tumor is resectable, a second operation combined with adjuvant therapy with IM should be performed. If tumor re-growth occurs, surgical treatment should thus be considered.

Several studies have reported the relationship between c-kit mutation and imatinib sensitivity[11-19]. Although the mechanism of tolerance to imatinib is still unclear, screening of kit mutation may be useful for prediction of the imatinib sensitivity and recurrence. Many kinds of c-kit mutations related to IM resistance have been reported[11,13-19]. In our case, a mutation in exon 11 of KIT was initially noted. After interruption of the treatment, an additional point mutation arose in exon 17 that caused resistance to imanitib. It has been postulated that the emergence of c-kit mutations that are resistant to imatinib-targeted therapy may account for these late treatment failures, and investigation into the biologic phenomena of imatinib resistance is an area of current research. As the mechanisms of recurrence and resistance to imatinib in GIST remains unclear, they should be investigated in detail from both the clinical and molecular biological point of view.

Imatinib is a recent and very promising treatment modality for the GIST, but complete surgical extirpation remains the only curative treatment of malignant GIST, as evidenced by our patient, who became disease-free only after resection. Even then, however, significant risk of recurrence remains, despite successful resection and imatinib treatment. Our patient’s favorable response to imatinib supports the concept that specific inhibition of tyrosine kinase is a clinically useful therapeutic intervention for tumors in which aberrant kinase signaling is critical.Depending on individual circumstances, we should choose the most desirable treatment modality, and the combination of surgical extirpation and imatinib therapy should help to improve the prognosis of GIST patients in some cases. Further studies are necessary to clarify the various mechanisms involved.

Footnotes

S- Editor Guo SY L- Editor Kumar M E- Editor Bai SH

References
1.  Miettinen MM, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Kovatich AJ, Lasota J. Calponin and h-caldesmon in soft tissue tumors: consistent h-caldesmon immunoreactivity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors indicates traits of smooth muscle differentiation. Mod Pathol. 1999;12:756-762.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, Kawano K, Hanada M, Kurata A, Takeda M. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998;279:577-580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3215]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3008]  [Article Influence: 115.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Sarlomo-Rikala M, Kovatich AJ, Barusevicius A, Miettinen M. CD117: a sensitive marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors that is more specific than CD34. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:728-734.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Zsebo KM, Wypych J, McNiece IK, Lu HS, Smith KA, Karkare SB, Sachdev RK, Yuschenkoff VN, Birkett NC, Williams LR. Identification, purification, and biological characterization of hematopoietic stem cell factor from buffalo rat liver--conditioned medium. Cell. 1990;63:195-201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 510]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 562]  [Article Influence: 16.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Lux ML, Rubin BP, Biase TL, Chen CJ, Maclure T, Demetri G, Xiao S, Singer S, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA. KIT extracellular and kinase domain mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:791-795.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 452]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 472]  [Article Influence: 19.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Plaat BE, Hollema H, Molenaar WM, Torn Broers GH, Pijpe J, Mastik MF, Hoekstra HJ, van den Berg E, Scheper RJ, van der Graaf WT. Soft tissue leiomyosarcomas and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: differences in clinical outcome and expression of multidrug resistance proteins. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3211-3220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, Ohno S, Segal GM, Fanning S, Zimmermann J, Lydon NB. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med. 1996;2:561-566.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2692]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2530]  [Article Influence: 90.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Druker BJ. David A. Karnofsky Award lecture. Imatinib as a paradigm of targeted therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:239s-245s.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Yasuoka R, Sakakura C, Shimomura K, Fujita Y, Nakanishi M, Aragane H, Hagiwara A, Bamba M, Abe T, Yamagishi H. Mutations in exon 11 of the c-kit gene in a myogenic tumor and a neurogenic tumor as well as in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Utility of c-kit mutation as a prognostic biomarker for gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor. Dig Surg. 2003;20:183-191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, Heinrich MC, Tuveson DA, Singer S, Janicek M. Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:472-480.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3203]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3001]  [Article Influence: 136.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, Blanke CD, von Mehren M, Joensuu H, McGreevey LS, Chen CJ, Van den Abbeele AD, Druker BJ. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4342-4349.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1782]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1599]  [Article Influence: 76.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Rossi G, Cavazza A, Marchioni A, Migaldi M, Bavieri M, Facciolongo N, Petruzzelli S, Longo L, Tamberi S, Crinò L. Kit expression in small cell carcinomas of the lung: effects of chemotherapy. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:1041-1047.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Bar-Sela G, Kuten A, Ben-Eliezer S, Gov-Ari E, Ben-Izhak O. Expression of HER2 and C-KIT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: implications for a new therapeutic approach. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:1035-1040.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Frolov A, Chahwan S, Ochs M, Arnoletti JP, Pan ZZ, Favorova O, Fletcher J, von Mehren M, Eisenberg B, Godwin AK. Response markers and the molecular mechanisms of action of Gleevec in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:699-709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Singer G, Schraml P, Belgard C, Raggi A, Dirnhofer S, Went P, Mihatsch MJ, Moch H. KIT in ovarian carcinoma: disillusion about a potential therapeutic target. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1009-1010.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Kurzrock R, Kantarjian HM, Druker BJ, Talpaz M. Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias: from basic mechanisms to molecular therapeutics. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:819-830.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 223]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 227]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Madani A, Kemmer K, Sweeney C, Corless C, Ulbright T, Heinrich M, Einhorn L. Expression of KIT and epidermal growth factor receptor in chemotherapy refractory non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:873-880.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Debiec-Rychter M, Cools J, Dumez H, Sciot R, Stul M, Mentens N, Vranckx H, Wasag B, Prenen H, Roesel J. Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and activity of the PKC412 inhibitor against imatinib-resistant mutants. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:270-279.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 375]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 366]  [Article Influence: 19.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Tamborini E, Bonadiman L, Greco A, Albertini V, Negri T, Gronchi A, Bertulli R, Colecchia M, Casali PG, Pierotti MA. A new mutation in the KIT ATP pocket causes acquired resistance to imatinib in a gastrointestinal stromal tumor patient. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:294-299.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 247]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 238]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]