Brief Reports Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2003; 9(10): 2370-2373
Published online Oct 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i10.2370
Selection and evaluation of three interventional procedures for achalasia based on long-term follow-up
Ying-Sheng Cheng, Ming-Hua Li, Qi-Xin Zhuang, Ke-Zhong Shang, Department of Radiology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China
Wei-Xiong Chen, Ni-Wei Chen, Department of Gastroenterology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Key Medical Research and Development Program of China during the 9th Five-year Plan Period (No.96-907-03-04), Shanghai Nature Science Funds (No.02Z1314073), Shanghai Medical Development Funds (No.00419)
Correspondence to: Dr. Ying-Sheng Cheng, Department of Radiology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China. chengys@sh163.net
Telephone: +86-21-64368920 Fax: +86-21-64701361
Received: May 13, 2003
Revised: May 25, 2003
Accepted: June 2, 2003
Published online: October 15, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To determine the best method out of the three types of interventional procedure for achalasia based on a long-term follow-up.

METHODS: The study cohort was comprised of 133 patients of achalasia. Among them, 60 patients were treated under fluoroscopy with pneumatic dilation (group A), 8 patients with permanent uncovered or antireflux covered metal stent dilation (group B), and 65 patients with temporary partially covered metal stent dilation (group C).

RESULTS: One hundred and thirty dilations were performed on the 60 patients of group A (mean 2.2 times per case). The mean diameter of the strictured cardia was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm before dilation and 10.6 ± 3.8 mm after dilation. The mean dysphagia score was 2.7 ± 1.4 before dilation and 0.9 ± 0.3 after dilation. Complications in group A were chest pain (n = 30), reflux (n = 16), and bleeding (n = 6). Thirty-six patients (60%) in group A exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 12-month follow-up, and 45 patients (90%) out of 50 exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 36-month follow-up. Five uncovered and 3 antireflux covered expandable metal stents were permanently placed in the 8 patients of group B. The mean diameter of the strictured cardia was 3.4 ± 1.9 mm before dilation and 19.5 ± 1.1 mm after dilation. The mean dysphagia score was 2.6 ± 1.3 before dilation and 0.4 ± 0.1 after dilation. Complications in group B were chest pain (n = 6), reflux (n = 5), bleeding (n = 3), and hyperplasia of granulation tissue (n = 3). Four patients (50%) in group B exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 12-month follow-up, and 2 case (66.7%) out of 3 patients exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 36-month follow-up. Sixty-five partially covered expandable metal stents were temporarily placed in the 65 patients of group C and withdrawn after 3-7 d via gastroscopy. The mean diameter of the strictured cardia was 3.3 ± 2.3 mm before dilation and 18.9 ± 3.5 mm after dilation. The mean dysphagia score was 2.4 ± 1.3 before dilation and 0.5 ± 0.2 after dilation. Complications in group C were chest pain (n = 26), reflux (n = 13), and bleeding (n = 8). 6 patients (9.2%) out of 65 exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 12-month follow-up, and 8 patients (14.5%) out of 55 exhibited dysphagia relapse during a 36-month follow-up. All the stents were inserted and withdrawn successfully. The follow-up in groups A-C lasted 12-96 months.

CONCLUSION: Temporary partially covered metal stent dilation is one of the best methods with interventional procedure for achalasia in terms of long-term follow-up.




INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is the most common primary motility disorder of the esophagus. Three interventional procedures are used clinically for achalasia, namely pneumatic dilation, permanent metal stent dilation, and temporary metal stent dilation. These methods provide excellent immediate therapeutic efficacy, but their long-term results are unknow[1,2]. Therefore, we formulated several treatment plans for patients with achalasia from July 1994 to May 2002 and evaluated them in terms of long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials

The subjects were 133 patients (77 males, 56 females; aged 12-84 years, mean 48.3 years) with symptoms of dysphagia. A dysphagia score was assessed by the quality of swallowing[1,2]: grade 0 for normal swallowing, grade 1 for swallowing most solid food, grade 2 for swallowing semisolids, grade 3 for swallowing liquid food, and grade 4 for complete dysphagia. Based on different methods of interventional procedure, the patients were divided into three groups as follows. In 60 patients with pneumatic dilation (group A), the mean dysphagia score was 2.7 ± 1.4, and the mean diameter of the narrowest region of the cardia was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm. In 8 patients with permanent uncovered or antireflux covered metal stent dilation (group B), the mean dysphagia score was 2.6 ± 1.3, and the mean diameter of the narrowest region of the cardia was 3.4 ± 1.9 mm. In 65 patients with temporary partially covered metal internal stent dilation (group C), the mean dysphagia score was 2.4 ± 1.3, and the mean diameter of the narrowest region of the cardia was 3.1 ± 2.3 mm. The course of disease in all the patients was 1-10 years (mean 5.4 ± 4.4 years). All the patients were examined by barium-meal radiography of the upper digestive tract and gastroscope or esophageal intracavity manometric method.

Methods

Preoperative preparation involved an empty stomach for at least 4 hours and examination of the bleeding and clotting times. The device used was an SY dumbbell-like catheter (manufactured in Jinan, Shandong, China). The metal stent for achalasia was a nitinol stent (developed by Zhiye Medical Equipment Research Institute, Changzhou, China, and Youyan Yijin Advanced Materials Co.Ltd, Beijing, China). Uncovered and antireflux covered metal stents were used in group B, partially covered metal stents were used in group C. The body of partially covered stents was covered with intracavity silica gel. The areas within 2 cm of both ends of partially covered stents were not covered. Stents were 6-10 cm in length and 16-30 mm in diameter.

The patients in which pneumatic dilation was used were placed in lying on the side or sitting position. Topical anesthesia of the pharynx was administered before the procedure. A guidewire was inserted through the mouth and passed through the stricture section under fluoroscopy. A catheter with a diameter of 28 mm was passed through the region of achalasia of the esophagus via the guidewire, which aligned the center of saccule with the most strictured point. The saccule was injected using an injector with dilated contrast medium or gas. Under fluoroscopy, and according to the pain reaction of the patient, pressurization was applied to gradually dilation of the saccule. The back of saccule was dumbbell-shaped. When further pressurization flattened the surface of saccule or when the pressure did not change as pressurization was applied, pressurization was suspended and the piston was closed off. The pressure of saccule was maintained for 5-30 min, after which the piston was released. After the pressure of saccule had been reduced for 5 min, pressurization was again applied. Typically each treatment involved 3-5 dilations, after which the catheter was withdrawn. The second and third treatments with graded pneumatic dilation were carried out using dilators with diameters of 30 mm and 32 mm, respectively, in some of the patients every 2 weeks until clinical symptoms disappeared and the patients returned to a nomal diet.

When stents were placed in groups B and C, the sites of thoracic vertebra and spine were determined by barium-meal radiography to facilitate the stent placement. Patients were placed in a sitting position or lying on the side, and false teeth were removed and a teeth bracket was mounted. A 260-cm-long exchange guidewire was firstly led into the stomach. The stent was installed on the propeller whose front end was covered with sterilized liquid paraffin. Guided by the guidewire, the propeller on which the stent was mounted was moved through the segment with lesions. Under fluoroscopic control, the outer sheath was slowly withdrawn and the stent expanded under its own tension. After a stent was placed, esophageal radiography was performed to observe the patency of the esophagus. In group C, 500-1000 mL of ice-cold water was injected 3-7 d after stent placement via a bioptic hole under gastroscope, which caused the stent to retract and reduce its diameter. Bioptic pliers were then used to withdraw the stent with the help of a gastroscope. Gastroscopy was performed again to detect complications, such as bleeding, mucosa tearing, and esophageal perforation. The patients returned to the ward and consumed cold drinks and snacks for 2 d before returning to a normal diet. It was preferable for patients to eat solid food since the natural expansion of food reduced retraction of the esophagus.

The criteria for therapeutic efficacy were as follows: the diameter of the narrowest region of the esophagus before and after dilation, and the dysphagia score before and after dilation. Postoperative treatment of pneumatic dilation, barium-meal radiography of the esophagus was performed immediately after interventional procedure to check the esophagus patency and perforation and submucous hematomas. Patients drank fluids for 2 h after interventional procedure and were treated with antibiotics, antacid drugs, and analgesics. In groups B and C, after stent placement, barium-meal radiography was used to observe the patency of the esophagus. Patients ate semisolid food on the day after interventional procedure and were treated with antibiotics and antacid drugs. In group C, esophageal radiography was performed within 1 week after stent removal to observe the patency of the esophagus. The follow-up time was 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 3 years by telephone or clinic visit.

All the data were expressed as the mean ± SD, and the paired t-test was used for statistical comparisons before and after interventional procedure within a group.

RESULTS

The 60 patients in group A involved 130 dilations (mean 2.2 times per case), of which 29 patients had three graded dilations of increasing diameter, 12 patients had two graded dilations of increasing diameter, and 19 patients had one dilation. In 8 patients of group B, 5 uncovered and 3 antireflux covered stents were successfully placed. In group C, 65 partially covered stents were placed and removed under gastroscope guidance 3-7 d after intervertional procedure. The success rate of stent placement and removal was 100%. The differences in the cardia diameter before and after the three methods of interventional procedure and the dysphagia scores (Table 1) were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The incidence of complications in the three interventional procedures is presented in Table 2 and the rate of dysphagia recurrence during follow-up is shown in Table 3. The follow-up period for the three interventional procedures was 12-96 months.

Table 1 Diameter of the narrowest cardia region before and after treatment with three interventional procedures, and dys-phagia score.
GroupDiameter of cardia before and after treatment (mm)Dysphagia score before and after treatment (grade)
A3.2 ± 2.110.6 ± 3.8b2.7 ± 1.40.9 ± 0.3b
B3.4 ± 1.919.5 ± 1.1b2.6 ± 1.30.4 ± 0.1b
C3.1 ± 2.318.9 ± 3.5b2.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.2b
Table 2 Incidence of complications following treatment with three interventional procedures (%).
GroupPain (n)Reflux (n)Bleeding (n)Hyperplasia of granulation tissue (n)
A50.0% (30/60)26.7% (16/60)10.0% (6/60)-
B62.5% (5/8)62.5% (5/8)37.5% (3/8)37.5% (3/8)
C40.0% (26/65)20.0% (13/65)12.3% (8/65)-
Table 3 Relapse rate of dysphagia during follow-up.
GroupFollow-up > 12 months
Follow-up > 36 months
Follow-up (n)Relapse of dysphagia (n)Relapse rate (%)Follow-up (n)Relapse of dysphagia (n)Relapse rate (%)
A603660%504590%
B8450%3266.7%
C6569.2%55814.5%
DISCUSSION
Techniques of interventional procedures

The techniques used to treat achalasia, such as surgery, bougienage, pneumatic dilation, botulinum toxin injection, permanently uncovered or antireflux covered metal stent dilation and temporary partially covered metal stent dilation, had advantages and drawbacks[1-5]. Bougienage is now uncommon since it has poor therapeutic efficacy and many complications. The use of surgery is declining due to the associated large lesion, a high risk, and high recurrence rate. Pneumatic dilation was first introduced in the plasty of hematostenosis, as its reliable therapeutic efficacy led to its gradual application to other plasty operations. Remarkable results were achieved when it was used in benign gastrointestinal strictures, and later it was widely used in the nonsurgical treatment of achalasia, exhibiting remarkable therapeutic efficacy. Many authors[6-15] have reported that graded dilation is better than single dilation in therapeutic efficacy, and our experience has confirmed this. Botulinum toxin injection in achalasia had a short term therapentic efficacy, dysphagia was relapsed witnin 6 months.

Permanent metal stent dilation is primarily used in the treatment of malignant gastrointestinal stricture and obstruction, and exhibits remarkable palliative therapeutic efficacy. Cwikiel et al[1] reported an experimental and clinical study of the treatment of benign esophageal stricture with expandable metal stents. We used uncovered stents in five patients with achalasia in order to reduce the occurrence rate of stent migration. After stent placement, dilation was excellent and dysphagia disappeared, thus achieving the goal of treatment. However, it was accompanied by new problems such as gastroesophageal reflux, recurrence of stricture (hyperplasia of granulation tissue). The reflux could be treated with drugs, but this took a long time. Recurrence of stricture could be reduced by heat cauterization under gastroscope, but it could easily reccur. So we used antireflux covered stent, compication of gastroesophageal reflux and hyperplasia of granulation tissue were not found, but many unexpected results occurred. These difficulties led to the use of a temporary partially covered metal stent dilation. Clinicians and patients have gradually accepted and now prefer to use temporary partially covered metal stent dilation due to its fewer complications and excellent therapeutic efficacy[16-22].

Long-term follow-up

Dysphagia recurred in 60% of the patients at a 12-month follow-up, and in 90% of the patients at a 36-months follow-up, demonstrating that pneumatic dilation of achalasia has excellent immediate therapeutic efficacy but its long-term therapeutic efficacy is poor[23-44]. Firstly, this was associated with the diameter of the saccule. Kadakia et al[10] suggested that the saccule diameter in pneumatic dilation should be 35-45 mm, but the incidence of complications was very high (e.g., 15% had esophageal perforation). We used saccules with diameters of 28-32 mm in order to reduce the incidence of serious complications, but their long-term therapeutic efficacy was not satisfactory. Secondly, the therapeutic efficacy was associated with the frequency of dilation. One dilation did not produce excellent therapeutic efficacy, since it was affected by various factors. For example, whether the saccule was correctly located, whether pressure applied to the saccule reached the stipulated index, and variations in the anatomy of the cardia. It was suggested that three graded dilations should be used to achieve the treatment goal. Thirdly, the therapeutic efficacy was associated with the course of the disease. If this was very short, the cardiac muscularis was not fleshy and elastic. If this was very long, the cardiac muscularis was fleshy and not elastic. We used permanently uncovered stent dilation in five patients with achalasia and achieved excellent immediate therapeutic efficacy, but its long-term therapeutic efficacy was poor. This was mainly due to the frequent occurrence of serious gastroesophageal reflux and hyperplasia of granulation tissue. After a 12-month follow-up the stent could not be removed in three patients, and hence we had to resect and reconstruct the esophageal cardia. Therefore, permanently uncovered metal stent dilation was unsuitable for patients with achalasia[45-48]. Temporary partially covered metal stent dilation had excellent immediate and long-term therapeutic efficacy. First, the design of the stent coincided with the specific physiological structure of the cardia and the specific pathological manifestations of achalasia. The epicardia is a part of the expanded esophagus and the lower cardiac part is a very large gastric cavity. If a stent is not well designed, it will lose its therapeutic efficacy, and moreover, the rate of stent migrations will increase. To avoid these problems, we designed a special stent for achalasia. The stent was partially covered with a membrane covering the inner wall of the stent but not covering the area within 2 cm of the stent outlet. The upper outlet of the stent was a large horn, which increased the stability of the stent but made it difficult to extract. Second, the diameter of the stents used in this group was 20-30 mm. By expanding the stent, the cardia could be returned nearly to the maximum diameter of the normally dilated esophageal lumen. The most appropriate stent diameter was that which could expand the cardia stricture while not cause gastroesophageal reflux. This needs to be investigated further. Thirdly, the internal metal stent expansion procedure took a long time, and the stent was placed for 3-7 d. Why the therapeutic efficacy of temporary partially covered stent dilation was better than that of pneumatic dilation? We considered that this was mainly due to the stent expansion which caused chronic tearing of the cardia muscularis. The stent gradually expanded with body temperature, taking 12-24 h to reach 36 °C, for it to reach the expected diameter. Therefore, the cardia muscularis was torn regularly with relatively few scars formed and a very low incidence of restenosis when it was repaired. In pneumatic dilation the tearing of cardia muscularis was acute and irregular with many scars formed when it was repaired. Therefore, restenosis was common and the long-term therapeutic efficacy was poor. This might explain why the therapeutic efficacy of temporary partially covered metal stent dilation was better in the treatment of achalasia than that of pneumatic dilation.

Developments in biologically degradable stents for the esophagus which are degraded within 2 months, would provide the advantages of a long retention time without the need for stent removal. This would provide another interventional procedure for patients with achalasia. We compared three methods of interventional procedure for patients with achalasia and took the following factors into consideration such as extent of lesion, incidence of complications, therapeutic efficacy, and degree of patient acceptance. We found that in the treatment of benign gastrointestinal stricture, the use of temporary partially covered metal internal stent dilation was preferred due to its superior long-term therapeutic efficacy.

Footnotes

Edited by Zhang JZ and Wang XL

References
1.  Cwikiel W, Willén R, Stridbeck H, Lillo-Gil R, von Holstein CS. Self-expanding stent in the treatment of benign esophageal strictures: experimental study in pigs and presentation of clinical cases. Radiology. 1993;187:667-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Song HY, Park SI, Do YS, Yoon HK, Sung KB, Sohn KH, Min YI. Expandable metallic stent placement in patients with benign esophageal strictures: results of long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1997;203:131-136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Kadakia SC, Wong RK. Graded pneumatic dilation using Rigiflex achalasia dilators in patients with primary esophageal achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:34-38.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Current therapies for achalasia: comparison and efficacy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27:21-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Peracchia A, Bonavina L. Achalasia: dilation, injection or surgery? Can J Gastroenterol. 2000;14:441-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Hoogerwerf WA, Pasricha PJ. Achalasia: treatment options revisited. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000;14:406-409.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Massey BT. Management of idiopathic achalasia: short-term and long-term outcomes. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2000;2:196-200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Scarpignato C. New therapeutic modalities for benign oesophageal disease: an overview. Dig Liver Dis. 2001;33:260-265.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Urbach DR, Hansen PD, Khajanchee YS, Swanstrom LL. A decision analysis of the optimal initial approach to achalasia: laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication, thoracoscopic Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilatation, or botulinum toxin injection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5:192-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Kadakia SC, Wong RK. Pneumatic balloon dilation for esophageal achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001;11:325-346, vii.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Bittinger M, Wienbeck M. Pneumatic dilation in achalasia. Can J Gastroenterol. 2001;15:195-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Da Silveira EB, Rogers AI. Achalasia: a review of therapeutic options and outcomes. Compr Ther. 2002;28:15-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Trifan A, Stanciu C. Treatment of achalasia: an update. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2000;104:11-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Chen WX, Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Li MH, Zhuang QX, Chen NW, Xu JR, Shang KZ. Interventional therapy of achalasia with tem-porary metal internal stent dilatation and its intermediate and long term follow-up. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:896-899.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Li MH, Shang KZ, Chen WX, Chen NW, Chu YD, Zhuang QX. Interventional procedure for benign or malignant stricture or obstruction of upper gastrointestinal tract. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:1354-1360.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Chen WX, Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Li MH, Shang KZ, Zhuang QX, Chen NW. Metal stent dilation in the treatment of benign esoph-ageal stricture by interventional procedure: a follow-up study. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2002;10:333-336.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Bansal R, Nostrant TT, Scheiman JM, Koshy S, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Chey WD. Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin versus pneumatic balloon dilation for treatment of primary achalasia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36:209-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Scatton O, Gaudric M, Massault PP, Chaussade S, Houssin D, Dousset B. [Conservative management of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilatation for achalasia]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2002;26:883-887.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Khan AA, Shah SW, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafqat F. Efficacy of Rigiflex balloon dilatation in 12 children with achalasia: a 6-month prospective study showing weight gain and symptomatic improvement. Dis Esophagus. 2002;15:167-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Sabharwal T, Cowling M, Dussek J, Owen W, Adam A. Balloon dilation for achalasia of the cardia: experience in 76 patients. Radiology. 2002;224:719-724.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  O'Connor JB, Singer ME, Imperiale TF, Vaezi MF, Richter JE. The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:1516-1525.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  West RL, Hirsch DP, Bartelsman JF, de Borst J, Ferwerda G, Tytgat GN, Boeckxstaens GE. Long term results of pneumatic dilation in achalasia followed for more than 5 years. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1346-1351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Upadhyaya M, Fataar S, Sajwany MJ. Achalasia of the cardia: experience with hydrostatic balloon dilatation in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:409-412.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Achkar E, Richter JE. Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment. Gut. 2002;50:765-770.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Penagini R, Cantù P, Mangano M, Colombo P, Bianchi PA. Long-term effects of pneumatic dilatation on symptoms and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in achalasia. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:380-384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Babu R, Grier D, Cusick E, Spicer RD. Pneumatic dilatation for childhood achalasia. Pediatr Surg Int. 2001;17:505-507.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Becker K, Biesenbach S, Erckenbrecht JF, Frieling T. Effect of balloon compliance on symptomatic success of pneumatic dilation in achalasia patients. Z Gastroenterol. 2001;39:831-836.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Diener U, Patti MG, Molena D, Tamburini A, Fisichella PM, Whang K, Way LW. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy relieves dysphagia in patients with achalasia and low LES pressure following pneumatic dilatation. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:687-690.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Swift GL, Smith PM, McKirdy HC, Lowndes RH. Vector volume analysis of the lower esophageal sphincter in achalasia and the effect of balloon dilation. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:54-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Hep A, Dolina J, Dite P, Plottová Z, Válek V, Kala Z, Prásek J. Restoration of propulsive peristalsis of the esophagus in achalasia. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1203-1204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Hunt DR, Wills VL, Weis B, Jorgensen JO, DeCarle DJ, Coo IJ. Management of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:411-415.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Morino M, Rebecchi F. Pneumatic dilatation and laparoscopic cardiomyotomy in the management of achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:870-871.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Rajput S, Nandwani SK, Phadke AY, Bhandarkar PV, Abraham P, Tilve GH. Predictors of response to pneumatic dilatation in achalasia cardia. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2000;19:126-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Hamza AF, Awad HA, Hussein O. Cardiac achalasia in children. Dilatation or surgery? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999;9:299-302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Ponce J, Juan M, Garrigues V, Pascual S, Berenguer J. Efficacy and safety of cardiomyotomy in patients with achalasia after failure of pneumatic dilatation. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:2277-2282.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Gideon RM, Castell DO, Yarze J. Prospective randomized comparison of pneumatic dilatation technique in patients with idiopathic achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1853-1857.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Singh V, Duseja A, Kumar A, Kumar P, Rai HS, Singh K. Balloon dilatation in achalasia cardia. Trop Gastroenterol. 1999;20:68-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Khan AA, Shah SW, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafqat F, Castell DO. Massively dilated esophagus in achalasia: response to pneumatic balloon dilation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2363-2366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Richter JE. Assessment of esophageal emptying post-pneumatic dilation: use of the timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1802-1807.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Metman EH, Lagasse JP, d'Alteroche L, Picon L, Scotto B, Barbieux JP. Risk factors for immediate complications after progressive pneumatic dilation for achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1179-1185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Lisý J, Hetková M, Snajdauf J, Vyhnánek M, Tůma S. Long-term outcomes of balloon dilation of esophageal strictures in children. Acad Radiol. 1998;5:832-835.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Katz PO, Gilbert J, Castell DO. Pneumatic dilatation is effective long-term treatment for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:1973-1977.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Khan AA, Shah SW, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafqat F, Castell DO. Pneumatic balloon dilation in achalasia: a prospective comparison of balloon distention time. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1064-1067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Mukherjee S, Kaplan DS, Parasher G, Sipple MS. Expandable metal stents in achalasia--is there a role? Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2185-2188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Lee JG, Hsu R, Leung JW. Are self-expanding metal mesh stents useful in the treatment of benign esophageal stenoses and fistulas? An experience of four cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1920-1925.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  De Palma GD, Catanzano C. Removable self-expanding metal stents: a pilot study for treatment of achalasia of the esophagus. Endoscopy. 1998;30:S95-S96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Mukherjee S, Kaplan DS, Parasher G, Sipple MS. Expandable metal stents in achalasia--is there a role? Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2185-2188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  De Palma GD, Iovino P, Masone S, Persico M, Persico G. Self-expanding metal stents for endoscopic treatment of esophageal achalasia unresponsive to conventional treatments. Long-term results in eight patients. Endoscopy. 2001;33:1027-1030.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]