Abstract
In divided-attention tasks with two classes of target stimuli, participants typically respond more quickly if both targets are presented simultaneously, as compared with single-target presentation (redundant-signals effect). Different explanations exist for this effect, including serial, parallel, and coactivation models of information processing. In two experiments, we investigated redundancy gains in simple and go/no-go responses to auditory-visual stimuli presented with an onset asynchrony. In Experiment 1, go/no-go discrimination was performed for near-threshold and suprathreshold stimuli. Response times in both the simple and go/no-go responses were well explained by a common coactivation model assuming linear superposition of modality-specific activation. In Experiment 2, the go/no-go task was made more difficult. Participants had to respond to high-frequency tones or right-tilted Gabor patches and to withhold their response for low tones and left-tilted Gabors. Redundancy gains were consistent with coactivation models; however, channel-specific buildup of evidence seems to occur at different speeds in the two tasks. Response times of 1 participant support a serial self-terminating model of modality-specific information processing. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bulmer, M. G. (1979). Principles of statistics. New York: Dover.
De Jong, R. (1995). The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 2–25.
Diederich, A. (1995). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 197–215. doi:10.1006/jmps.1995.1020
Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (1987). Intersensory facilitation in the motor component? A reaction time analysis. Psychological Research, 49, 23–29. doi:10.1007/BF00309199
Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (1991). A further test of the superposition model for the redundant-signals effect in bimodal detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 83–86.
Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica, 30, 412–431. (Original work published 1868) doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1
Eriksen, C. W. (1988). A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 191–193.
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155–160.
Fournier, L. R., & Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 538–550. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.538
Gondan, M. (2009). Testing the race model inequality in redundant stimuli with variable onset asynchrony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 575–579. doi:10.1037/ a0013620
Gondan, M., & Heckel, A. (2008). Testing the race inequality: A simple correction procedure for fast guesses. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 322–325. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.08.002
Gondan, M., Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2004). The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 307–313.
Gondan, M., Niederhaus, B., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2005). Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 713–726.
Gondan, M., Vorberg, D., & Greenlee, M. W. (2007). Modality shift effects mimic multisensory interactions: An event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 199–214. doi:10.1007/ s00221-007-0982-4
Good, I. J. (1973). What are degrees of freedom? American Statistician, 27, 227–228. doi:10.2307/3087407
Grice, G. R., & Canham, L. (1990). Redundancy phenomena are affected by response requirements. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 209–213.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 451–463.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Gwynne, J. W. (1984). Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 565–570.
Grice, G. R., & Reed, J. M. (1992). What makes targets redundant? Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 437–442.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Luria, R., & Meiran, N. (2005). Increased control demand results in serial processing. Evidence from dual-task performance. Psychological Science, 16, 833–840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01622.x
Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1983). Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science, 221, 389–391. doi:10.1126/science.6867718
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247–279. doi:10.1016/ 0010-0285(82)90010-X
Miller, J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 331–343.
Miller, J., & Lopes, A. (1991). Bias produced by fast guessing in distribution-based tests of race models. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 584–590.
Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 101–151. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00517-0
Murray, M. M., Molholm, S., Michel, C. M., Heslenfeld, D. J., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., et al. (2005). Grabbing your ear: Rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 963–974. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh197
Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574–590.
R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at www.r-project.org/.
Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (1998). Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology, 35, 755–759. doi:10.1017/S0048577298980714
Schwarz, W. (1989). A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 498–500.
Schwarz, W. (1994). Diffusion, superposition, and the redundant targets effect. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 504–520. doi:10.1006/jmps.1994.1036
Schwarz, W. (2006). On the relationship between the redundant signals effect and temporal order judgments: Parametric data and a new model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 558–573. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.558
Schweickert, R., Giorgini, M., & Dzhafarov, E. (2000). Selective influence and response time cumulative distribution functions in serial-parallel task networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 504–535. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1268
Stanford, T. R., Quessy, S., & Stein, B. E. (2005). Evaluating the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 6499–6508. doi:10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.5095-04.2005
Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., Di Russo, F., McDonald, J. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2005). Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1396–1409. doi:10.1162/0898929054985383
Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., McDonald, J. J., Di Russo, F., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 106–114. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00065-4
Tolhurst, D. J., Movshon, J. A., & Dean, A. F. (1983). The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Research, 23, 775–785. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(83)90200-6
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321–359. doi:10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1997). Serial exhaustive models can violate the race model inequality: Implications for architecture and capacity. Psychological Review, 104, 595–602. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.3.595
Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1997). Tests of race models for reaction time in experiments with asynchronous redundant signals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 367–381. doi:10.1006/jmps.1997.1181
Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 25/1–25/36). New York: Wiley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant GO 1855/1-1 to M.G. from the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gondan, M., Götze, C. & Greenlee, M.W. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1692–1709 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1692
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1692