Abstract
The psychometric function, relating the subject’s response to the physical stimulus, is fundamental to psychophysics. This paper examines various psychometric function topics, many inspired by this special symposium issue ofPerception & Psychophysics: What are the relative merits of objective yes/no versus forced choice tasks (including threshold variance)? What are the relative merits of adaptive versus constant stimuli methods? What are the relative merits of likelihood versus up-down staircase adaptive methods? Is 2AFC free of substantial bias? Is there no efficient adaptive method for objective yes/no tasks? Should adaptive methods aim for 90% correct? Can adding more responses to forced choice and objective yes/no tasks reduce the threshold variance? What is the best way to deal with lapses? How is the Weibull function intimately related to thed’ function? What causes bias in the likelihood goodness-of-fit? What causes bias in slope estimates from adaptive methods? How good are nonparametric methods for estimating psychometric function parameters? Of what value is the psychometric function slope? How are various psychometric functions related to each other? The resolution of many of these issues is surprising.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bevington, P. R. (1969).Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Carney, T., Tyler, C. W., Watson, A. B., Makous, W., Beutter, B., Chen, C. C., Norcia, A. M., & Klein, S. A. (2000). Modelfest: Year one results and plans for future years. In B. E. Rogowitz, & T. N. Papas (Eds.),Human vision and electronic imaging V (Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3959, pp. 140–151). Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.
Emerson, P. L. (1986). Observations on a maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods of forced-choice sequential threshold estimation.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 151–153.
Finney, D. J. (1971).Probit analysis (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foley, J. M. (1994). Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: Masking experiments require a new model.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,11, 1710–1719.
Foster, D. H., & Bischof, W. F. (1991). Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators.Psychological Bulletin,109, 152–159.
Gourevitch, V., & Galanter, E. (1967). A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions.Psychometrika,32, 25–33.
Green, D. M. (1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,87, 2662–2674.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Los Altos, CA: Peninsula Press.
Hacker, M. J., & Ratcliff, R. (1979). A revised table ofd′ forM-alternative forced choice.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 168–170.
Hall, J. L. (1968). Maximum-likelihood sequential procedure for estimation of psychometric functions [Abstract].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,44, 370.
Hall, J. L. (1983). A procedure for detecting variability of psychophysical thresholds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 663–667.
Kaernbach, C. (1990). A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,88, 2645–2655.
Kaernbach, C. (2001a). Adaptive threshold estimation with unforcedchoice tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1377–1388.
Kaernbach, C. (2001b). Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1389–1398.
King-Smith, P. E. (1984). Efficient threshold estimates from yes/no procedures using few (about 10) trials.American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics,81, 119.
King-Smith, P. E., Grigsby, S. S., Vingrys, A. J., Benes, S. C., & Supowit, A. (1994). Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.Vision Research,34, 885–912.
King-Smith, P. E., & Rose, D. (1997). Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function.Vision Research,37, 1595–1604.
Klein, S. A. (1985). Double-judgment psychophysics: Problems and solutions.Journal of the Optical Society of America,2, 1560–1585.
Klein, S. A. (1992). An Excel macro for transformed and weighted averaging.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,24, 90–96.
Klein, S. A. (2002).Measuring the psychometric function. Manuscript in preparation.
Klein, S. A., & Stromeyer, C. F., III (1980). On inhibition between spatial frequency channels: Adaptation to complex gratings.Vision Research,20 459–466.
Klein, S. A., Stromeyer, C. F., III, & Ganz, L. (1974). The simultaneous spatial frequency shift: A dissociation between the detection and perception of gratings.Vision Research,15, 899–910.
Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.Vision Research,39, 2729–2737.
Leek, M. R. (2001). Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1279–1292.
Leek, M. R., Hanna, T. E., & Marshall, L. (1991). An interleaved tracking procedure to monitor unstable psychometric functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,90, 1385–1397.
Leek, M. R., Hanna, T. E., & Marshall, L. (1992). Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures.Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 247–256.
Linschoten, M. R., Harvey, L. O., Jr., Eller, P. M., & Jafek, B. W. (2001). Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1330–1347.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manny, R. E., & Klein, S. A. (1985). A three-alternative tracking paradigm to measure Vernier acuity of older infants.Vision Research,25, 1245–1252.
McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A., & Teller, D. A. (1985). Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 286–298.
Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2001). On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber Method.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1399–1420.
Pelli, D. G. (1985). Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 1508–1532.
Pelli, D. G. (1987). The ideal psychometric procedures [Abstract].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,28 (Suppl.), 366.
Pentland, A. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 377–379.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992).Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strasburger, H. (2001a). Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1348–1355.
Strasburger, H. (2001b). Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1356–1376.
Stromeyer, C. F., III, & Klein, S. A. (1974). Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms.Vision Research,14, 1409–1420.
Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficiency estimates on probability functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,41, 782–787.
Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures.Vision Research,35, 2503–2522.
Treutwein, B., & Strasburger, H. (1999). Fitting the psychometric function.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 87–106.
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 113–120.
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001a). The psychometric function I: Fitting, sampling, and goodness-of-fit.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1293–1313.
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001b). The psychometric function II: Bootstrap based confidence intervals and sampling.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1314–1329.
Yu, C., Klein, S. A., & Levi, D. M. (2001).Psychophysical measurement and modeling of iso- and cross-surround modulation of the foveal TvC function. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant R01EY04776 from the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, S.A. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 1421–1455 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194552
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194552