Abstract
The Adaptive Visual Analog Scales is a freely available computer software package designed to be a flexible tool for the creation, administration, and automated scoring of both continuous and discrete visual analog scale formats. The continuous format is a series of individual items that are rated along a solid line and scored as a percentage of distance from one of the two anchors of the rating line. The discrete format is a series of individual items that use a specific number of ordinal choices for rating each item. This software offers separate options for the creation and use of standardized instructions, practice sessions, and rating administration, all of which can be customized by the investigator. A unique participant/patient ID is used to store scores for each item, and individual data from each administration are automatically appended to that scale’s data storage file. This software provides flexible, time-saving access for data management and/or importing data into statistical packages. This tool can be adapted so as to gather ratings for a wide range of clinical and research uses and is freely available at www.nrlc-group.net.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahearn, E. P. (1997). The use of visual analog scales in mood disorders: A critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 31, 569–579.
Aitken, R. C. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62, 989–993.
Bond, A., & Lader, M. H. (1974). The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 47, 211–218.
Brunier, G., & Graydon, J. (1996). A comparison of two methods of measuring fatigue in patients on chronic haemodialysis: Visual analogue vs. Likert scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 33, 338–348.
Casey, R., Tarride, J. E., Keresteci, M. A., & Torrance, G. W. (2006). The Erectile Function Visual Analog Scale (EF-VAS): A disease-specific utility instrument for the assessment of erectile function. Canadian Journal of Urology, 13, 3016–3025.
Champney, H. (1941). The measurement of parent behavior. Child Development, 12, 131–166.
Choiniere, M., Auger, F. A., & Latarjet, J. (1994). Visual analogue thermometer: A valid and useful instrument for measuring pain in burned patients. Burns, 20, 229–235.
Cleare, A. J., & Bond, A. J. (1995). The effect of tryptophan depletion and enhancement on subjective and behavioral aggression in normal male subjects. Psychopharmacology, 118, 72–81.
Dougherty, D. M., Dew, R. E., Mathias, C. W., Marsh, D. M., Addicott, M. A., & Barratt, E. S. (2007). Impulsive and premeditated subtypes of aggression in conduct disorder: Differences in time estimation. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 574–582.
Flynn, D., van Schaik, P., & van Wersch, A. (2004). A comparison of multi-item Likert and visual analogue scales for the assessment of transactionally defined coping function. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 49–58.
Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 83–102.
Gallagher, E. J., Bijur, P. E., Latimer, C., & Silver, W. (2002). Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20, 287–290.
Guyatt, G. H., Townsend, M., Berman, L. B., & Keller, J. L. (1987). A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 1129–1133.
Hayes, M. H. S., & Patterson, D. G. (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98–99.
Holmes, S., & Dickerson, J. (1987). The quality of life: Design and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for use with cancer patients. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 24, 15–24.
Huskisson, E. C. (1983). Visual analogue scales. In R. Melzack (Ed.), Pain measurement and assessment (pp. 33–40). New York: Raven.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Likert, R. (1963). The human organization: Its management and value. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Millis, S. R., Jain, S. S., Eyles, M., Tulsky, D., Nadler, S. F., Foye, P. M., & DeLisa, J. A. (2001). Visual analog scale to rate physician- patient rapport. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80, 324.
Nyren, O. (1988). Visual analogue scale. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques (pp. 490–492). New York: Pergamon.
Ohnhaus, E. E., & Adler, R. (1975). Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain, 1, 379–384.
Pfennings, L., Cohen, L., & van der Ploeg, H. (1995). Preconditions for sensitivity in measuring change: Visual analogue scales compared to rating scales in a Likert format. Psychological Reports, 77, 475–480.
Reips, U.-D., & Funke, F. (2008). Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 699–704.
Scott, J., & Huskisson, E. C. (1976). Graphic representation of pain. Pain, 2, 175–184.
Steiner, M., & Steiner, D. L. (2005). Validation of a revised visual analog scale for premenstrual mood symptoms: Results from prospective and retrospective trials. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 327–332.
Uebersax, J. S. (2006). Likert scales: Dispelling the confusion. Statistical Methods for Rater Agreement Web site. Available at ourworld .compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/likert2.htm. Accessed December 18, 2007.
van Laerhoven, H., van der Zaag-Loonen, H. J., & Derkx, B. H. (2004). A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children’s questionnaires. Acta Paediatrica, 93, 830–835.
Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 227–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was sponsored by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-AA014988, R21-DA020993, R01-MH077684, and T32-AA007565). D.M.D. gratefully acknowledges support from the William and Marguerite Wurzbach Distinguished Professorship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsh-Richard, D.M., Hatzis, E.S., Mathias, C.W. et al. Adaptive Visual Analog Scales (AVAS): A modifiable software program for the creation, administration, and scoring of visual analog scales. Behavior Research Methods 41, 99–106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.99
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.99