Psychometric Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Tinnitus Functional Index

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background:

The effects of treatments on tinnitus have been difficult to quantify. The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) has been proposed as a standard questionnaire for measurement of tinnitus treatment outcomes. For a questionnaire to achieve wide acceptance, its psychometric properties need to be confirmed in different populations.

Objective:

To determine if the TFI is a reliable and valid measure of tinnitus, and if its psychometric properties are suitable for use as an outcome measure.

Research Design:

A psychometric evaluation of the TFI from secondary data obtained from a cross-sectional clinic survey and a clinical trial undertaken in New Zealand.

Study Sample:

Confirmatory factor analysis and evaluation of internal consistency reliability were undertaken on a sample of 318 patients with the primary complaint of tinnitus. In a separate sample of 40 research volunteers, test–retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity were evaluated. Both samples consisted of predominantly older Caucasian male patients with tinnitus.

Results:

The internal structure of the original US TFI was confirmed. The Cronbach’s Alpha and Intraclass correlation coefficients were >0.7 for the TFI overall and each of its subscales, indicating high internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Strong Pearson correlations with the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire and tinnitus numerical rating scales indicated excellent convergent validity, and a moderate correlation with the Hearing Handicap Inventory, indicated moderate divergent validity. Evaluation of the clinical trial showed good test–retest reliability and agreement between no-treatment baselines with a smallest detectable change of 4.8 points.

Conclusions:

The TFI is a reliable and valid measure of tinnitus severity in the population tested and is responsive to treatment-related change. Further research as to the TFI’s responsiveness to treatment is needed across different populations.

Elements of this research were presented at the 8th International Tinnitus Research Initiative Conference in March 2014 in Auckland, New Zealand.

Declaration of Interest: Grant D. Searchfield was one of the authors involved in the development of the Tinnitus Functional Index.

• REFERENCES

• Bentler PM. 1990; Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107 (02) 238-246
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downey RG, King C. 1998; Missing data in Likert ratings: a comparison of replacement methods. J Gen Psychol 125 (02) 175-191
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. 2016; a Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res 335: 220-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. 2016; b Response to letter: psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res 335: 237-238
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folmer RL. 2016; Reply to: psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res 335: 236
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Griest S, Thielman E, McMillan G, Kaelin C, Carlson KF. 2016; Tinnitus functional index: development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res 334: 58-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry JA, Thielman E, Zaugg T. 2016; Reply to: Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res 335: 220-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman HJ, Reed GW. 2004. Chapter three: epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Snow JB. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. New York, United States: BC Decker Inc;
  Google Scholar
• Holmes S, Padgham ND. 2009; Review paper: more than ringing in the ears: a review of tinnitus and its psychosocial impact. J Clin Nurs 18 (21) 2927-2937
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes S, Padgham ND. 2011; “Ringing in the ears”: narrative review of tinnitus and its impact. Biol Res Nurs 13 (01) 97-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. 1998; Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3: 424
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Kamalski DM, Hoekstra CE, van Zanten BG, Grolman W, Rovers MM. 2010; Measuring disease-specific health-related quality of life to evaluate treatment outcomes in tinnitus patients: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143 (02) 181-185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Russell D, Jordan H. 1990; The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear 11 (06) 434-445
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landgrebe M, Azevedo A, Baguley D. 2012; Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: a proposal for an international standard. J Psychosom Res 73 (02) 112-121
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langguth B. 2011; A review of tinnitus symptoms beyond ‘ringing in the ears’: a call to action. Curr Med Res Opin 27 (08) 1635-1643
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langguth B, Goodey R, Azevedo A. 2007; Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006. Prog Brain Res 166: 525-536
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langguth B, Searchfield G, Biesinger E, Greimel K. 2011. History and Questionnaires. In: Moller A, Langguth B, Ridder DD, Kleinjung T. Textbook of Tinnitus. New York: Springer; 387-404
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Lohr KN. 2002; Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 11 (03) 193-205
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meikle MB. 2002; A conceptual framework to aid the diagnosis and treatment of severe tinnitus. Aust NZ J Audiol 24: 59-67
  Google Scholar
• Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE. 2012; The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear 33 (02) 153-176
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meikle MB, Stewart BJ, Griest SE, Henry JA. 2008; Tinnitus outcomes assessment. Trends Amplif 12 (03) 223-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meikle MB, Stewart BJ, Griest SE, Martin WH, Henry JA, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Newman CW, Sandridge SA. 2007; Assessment of tinnitus: measurement of treatment outcomes. Prog Brain Res 166: 511-521
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Møller AR. 2011. Introduction. In: Moller A, Langguth B, DeRidder D, Kleinjung T. Textbook of Tinnitus. New York, NY: Springer; 3-7
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Newman CW, Sandridge SA. 2004. Tinnitus Questionnaires. In: Snow JB. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. New York: BC Decker Inc; 237-254
  Google Scholar
• Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP. 1998; Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 9 (02) 153-160
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. 1990; The hearing handicap inventory for adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear 11 (06) 430-433
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabau S, Wouters K, Van de Heyning P. 2014; Validation and translation of the Dutch tinnitus functional index. B-ENT 10 (04) 251-258
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Core Team 2015 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosseel Y. 2012; lavaan: an R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J Stat Softw 48 (02) 1-36 http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez L, Stephens D. 1997; A tinnitus problem questionnaire in a clinic population. Ear Hear 18 (03) 210-217
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler PM. 1994. Corrections in test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye AE, Clogg CC. Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 399-419
  Google Scholar
• Scott KM, Sarfati D, Tobias MI, Haslett SJ. 2000; A challenge to the cross-cultural validity of the SF-36 health survey: factor structure in Maori, Pacific and New Zealand European ethnic groups. Soc Sci Med 51 (11) 1655-1664
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Searchfield GD. 2014; Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework. Front Neurol 5: 271
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Searchfield GD, Jerram C. 2010; Tinnitus assessment. N Z Med J 123: 101-111
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Searchfield GD, Jerram C, Wise K, Raymond S. 2007; The impact of hearing loss on tinnitus severity. Aust NZ J Audiol 29: 67-76
  Google Scholar
• Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD, Stinear CM. 2014; Randomized trial of transcranial direct current stimulation and hearing aids for tinnitus management. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28 (05) 410-419
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheskin DJ. 2004. Test 28: the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 945-1025
  Google Scholar
• Shi L. 2008. a Measurements in Health Services Research. Health Services Research Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Delmar Learning; 288-322
  Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand 2015 National Population Estimates. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/estimates_and_projections.aspx . Accessed June 30, 2015
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steiger JH, Lind JC. 1980 Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. 2007; Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60 (01) 34-42
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tucker LR, Lewis C. 1973; A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38: 1-10
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH. 2014; Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151: S1-S40
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler RS, Baker LJ. 1983; Difficulties experienced by tinnitus sufferers. J Speech Hear Disord 48 (02) 150-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler R, Ji H, Perreau A, Witt S, Noble W, Coelho C. 2014; Development and validation of the tinnitus primary function questionnaire. Am J Audiol 23 (03) 260-272
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vernon J, Griest S, Press L. 1992; Plight of unreturned tinnitus questionnaires. Brit J Audiol 26 (02) 137-138
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yong AG, Pearce S. 2013; A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 9: 79-94
  Google Scholar
• Yu CH. 2001; An introduction to computing and interpreting Cronbach Coefficient Alpha in SAS. Proceedings of 26th SAS User Group International Conference 22-25
  Google Scholar
• Wu BP, Searchfield G, Exeter DJ, Lee A. 2015; Tinnitus prevalence in New Zealand. N Z Med J 128 1423 24-34
  PubMedGoogle Scholar