Dysphagia in the high-risk infant: potential factors and mechanisms1, 2, 3

https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.110106Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

ABSTRACT

Neonatal dysphagia, or abnormalities of swallowing, represent a major global problem, and consequences of dysfunctional feeding patterns carry over into infancy and toddler age groups. Growth, development, and independent feeding skills are all delayed among high-risk infants. Such a group comprises premature birth, low-birth-weight, congenital anomalies, perinatal asphyxia, postsurgical, and sepsis categories. The conflict between pathophysiologic and pragmatic feeding strategies remains a major conundrum and is largely due to a lack of validated diagnostic approaches amid heterogeneity of the patient phenotype. Thus, well-tested feeding management strategies that can be generalizable are lacking. Furthermore, the aerodigestive symptoms and signs, potential risk factors, and contributory etiologies remain nonspecific. This article presents mechanistic evidence related to the pathophysiologic basis of neonatal dysphagia as well as potential opportunities to improve feeding abilities and long-term development.

Keywords

dysphagia
feeding disorders
neonate
aerodigestive reflexes
gastroesophageal reflux

ABBREVIATIONS

GER
gastroesophageal reflux
GERD
gastroesophageal reflux disease
LES
lower esophageal sphincter
NICU
neonatal intensive care unit
UES
upper esophageal sphincter

Cited by (0)

1

Presented at the meeting “Evaluating the Evidence to Support Guidelines for the Nutritional Care of Preterm Infants: The Pre-B Project” held at the USDA/Agricultural Research Service Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 31 July–1 August 2014.

2

Supported by The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the NIH under award 2R01068158 (SJ) and 2P01068051 (SJ and Reza Shaker) and the Research Institute at the Nationwide Children's Hospital.

3

The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.