Nanoindentation Derived Mechanical Properties of the Corneoscleral Rim of the Human Eye

Article Preview

Abstract:

The corneoscleral rim of the eye represents a region with unique anatomical properties due to its location between the cornea and sclera / conjunctiva. It further has unique functional properties due to the location of adult corneal epithelial stem cells in the rim structure (limbus) itself. These stem cells are essential for the regeneration of the corneal epithelium and for preventing the conjunctival epithelium from growing onto the corneal surface, which could result in blindness. Survival and self-renewal properties of stem cells are known to depend on specific biological and biomechanical properties of its niche environment. We therefore aimed to measure the local mechanical properties of the human corneoscleral rim using a novel nanoindentation device (Bioindenter CSM Instruments, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) developed for soft tissues evaluation. Nanoindentation was performed using a spherical indenter of 0,5mm radius, a maximal load ranging between 20 μN to 30 μN and a penetration depth of several μm to 60μm. The hold period at maximum load was 180 seconds. Youngs modulus (E) was calculated using a Hertzian fit to the loading data. E of the central cornea was in the range of 19 kPa, while in the scleral region we found 17 kPa and the limbal rim region 10 kPa. Considerable creep relaxation occurred during the hold period at maximum load, which scaled with the elastic modulus of the different structures. These results reveal biomechanical properties of the corneoscleral rim with distinct mechanical properties for the three anatomical regions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

117-120

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Li W, Hayashida Y, Chen YT, Tseng SC. Niche regulation of corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus. Cell Res. 2007 Jan; 17(1): 26-36.

DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310137

Google Scholar

[2] Moers K, Steinberg T, Schlunck G, Reinhard T, Tomakidi P, Eberwein P. Substrate elasticity as biomechanical modulator of tissue homeostatic parameters in corneal keratinocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2013 Jul 15; 319(12): 1889-901.

DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.05.002

Google Scholar

[3] Last JA, Thomasy SM, Croasdale CR, Russell P, Murphy CJ. Compliance profile of the human cornea as measured by atomic force microscopy. Micron. 2012 Dec; 43(12): 1293-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2012.02.014

Google Scholar

[4] Dias J, Diakonis VF, Kankariya VP, Yoo SH, Ziebarth NM. Anterior and posterior corneal stroma elasticity after corneal collagen crosslinking treatment. Exp Eye Res. 2013 Aug 9; 116C: 58-62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.07.028

Google Scholar

[5] Field J S, Swain MV. A simple predictive model for spherical indentation. J Mater Res. 1993; 8: 297-306.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1993.0297

Google Scholar

[6] Oliver W C, Pharr G. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992: 1564-83.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1992.1564

Google Scholar

[7] Komai Y, Ushiki T. The three-dimensional organization of collagen fibrils in the human cornea and sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Jul; 32(8): 2244-58.

Google Scholar

[8] Galli M, Fornasiere E, Cugnoni J, L. Oyen M. Poroviscoelastic characterization of particle-reinforced gelatin gels using indentation and homogenization. J Mech Behavior Biomed Mater. 2011; 4: 610-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.01.009

Google Scholar

[9] Galli M, L Oyen M. Fast Identification of Poroelastic Parameters from Indentation Tests. CMES. 2009; vol. 48(3): 241-68.

Google Scholar