Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

  • Symposium - ACL
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the bioabsorbable, anchor related postoperative changes in rotator cuff surgery, which has become more popular recently. The purpose of the present study was to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to analyze the degradation of bioabsorbable anchors and to determine the incidences and characteristics of early postoperative reactions around the anchors and their mechanical failures.

Materials and Methods: Postoperative MRIs of 200 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were retrospectively analyzed. The tissue reactions around the bioanchors included fluid accumulations around the anchor, granulation tissue formation and changes in the condition of the surrounding osseous structure. The condition of the bioanchor itself was also examined, including whether the bioanchor failed mechanically. In the case of mechanical failure, the location of the failure was noted. Serial MRIs of 18 patients were available for analysis.

Results: The total number of medial row bioanchors was 124, while that of the lateral row was 338. A low signal intensity rim suggestive of sclerosis surrounded all lateral row bioanchors. Ninety three lateral row bioanchors (27%) showed a rim with signal intensity similar to or less than that of surrounding bone, which was granulation tissue or foreign body reaction (FBR). Similar signal intensity was seen around nine medial row bioanchors (7%). Fluid accumulation was seen around 4 lateral row bioanchors (1%) and around 14 medial row bioanchors (11%). Five lateral row bioanchors showed the breakage, while there was none in the medial row bioanchors. There were nine cases with a cuff re-tear (4.5%). There was no evidence of affection of glenohumeral articular surfaces or of osteolysis around any bioanchor. In serial MRI, there was no change in appearance of the bioanchors, but the granulation tissue or FBR around four bioanchors and the fluid around one bioanchor showed a decrease in successive MRI.

Conclusion: This study highlights the normal and adverse reactions to Bioabsorbable anchors that surgeons can expect to see on MRI after rotator cuff repairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaar TK, Schenck RC, Jr., Wirth MA, Rockwood CA, Jr. Complications of metallic suture anchors in shoulder surgery: A report of 8 cases. Arthroscopy 2001;17:31–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaenslen ES, Satterlee CC, Hinson GW. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of failed repairs of the rotator cuff. Relationship to operative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1391–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: Single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 2005;21:1307–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Konan S, Haddad FS. A clinical review of bioabsorbable interference screws and their adverse effects in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Knee 2009;16:6–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim KC, Shin HD, LeeWY, Han SC. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Double-row versus suture-bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pilge H, Spang J, Rose T, Wolter H, Woertler K, Imhoff AB. Osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable anchors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132:305–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhawan A, Ghodadra N, Karas V, Salata MJ, Cole BJ. Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1424–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozbaydar M, Elhassan B, Warner JJ. The use of anchors in shoulder surgery: A shift from metallic to bioabsorbable anchors. Arthroscopy 2007;23:1124–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan CK, Guisasola I, Machani B, Kemp G, Sinopidis C, Brownson P, et al. Arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder: A prospective randomized study of absorbable versus nonabsorbable suture anchors. Arthroscopy 2006;22:716–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goeminne S, Debeer P. Delayed migration of a metal suture anchor into the glenohumeral joint. Acta Orthop Belg 2010;76:834–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rhee YG, Lee DH, Chun IH, Bae SC. Glenohumeral arthropathy after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization. Arthroscopy 2004;20:402–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Major NM, Banks MC. MR imaging of complications of loose surgical tacks in the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:377–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tingart MJ, Bouxsein ML, Zurakowski D, Warner JP, Apreleva M. Three-dimensional distribution of bone density in the proximal humerus. Calcif Tissue Int 2003;73:531–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bostman OM. Intense granulomatous inflammatory lesions associated with absorbable internal fixation devices made of polyglycolide in ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992:193–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saikku-Backstrom A, Tulamo RM, Raiha JE, Kellomaki M, Toivonen T, Tormala P, et al. Intramedullary fixation of cortical bone osteotomies with absorbable self-reinforced fibrillated poly-96L/4D-lactide (SR-PLA96) rods in rabbits. Biomaterials 2001;22:33–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mocci A, Ettorre GC. MRI in ACL reconstructive surgery with PDLLA bioabsorbable interference screws: Evaluation of degradation and osteointegration processes of bioabsorbable screws. Radiol Med 2004; 107:47–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barber FA, Dockery WD. Long term absorption ofpoly-L-lactic Acid interference screws. Arthroscopy 2006;22:820–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28:4845–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB, 3rd, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 2006;27:324–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Briem D, Strametz S, Schroder K, Meenen NM, Lehmann W, Linhart W, et al. Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:671–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards DJ, Hoy G, Saies AD, Hayes MG. Adverse reactions to an absorbable shoulder fixation device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994;3:230–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Warden WH, Friedman R, Teresi LM, Jackson DW. Magnetic resonance imaging of bioabsorbale polylactic acid interference screws during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1999;15:474–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Warden WH, Chooljian D, Jackson DW. Ten-year magnetic resonance imaging followup of bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid interference screws after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2008;24:370.e1-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gonzalez-Lomas G, Cassilly RT, Remotti F, Levine WN. Is the etiology of pretibial cyst formation after absorbable interference screw use related to a foreign body reaction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1082–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barber FA. Biodegradable shoulder anchors have unique modes of failure. Arthroscopy 2007;23:316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kelly JD, 2nd. Disintegration of an absorbable rotator cuff anchor six weeks after implantation. Arthroscopy 2005;21:495–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Glueck D, Wilson TC, Johnson DL. Extensive osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor: A case report. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:742–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muller M, Kaab MJ, Villiger C, Holzach P. Osteolysis after open shoulder stabilization using a new bio-resorbable bone anchor: A prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Injury 2002;33 Suppl 2:B30–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Athwal GS, Shridharani SM, O’Driscoll SW. Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1840–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Myhr G. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of bioabsorbable interference screws used for fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1164–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to In-Ho Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pawaskar, A.C., Kekatpure, A., Cho, NS. et al. Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. IJOO 49, 164–170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152452

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152452

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation