Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate

A metaanalysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this metaanalysis was to evaluate the association between nonsurgical factors and survival rate of digital replantation. A computer search of MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE and CNKI databases was conducted to identify literatures for digital replantation, with the keywords of “digit,” “finger” and “replantation” from their inception to June 10, 2014. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted independently by two authors using piloted forms. Review Manager 5.2 software was used for data analysis. The effect of some nonsurgical factors (gender, age, amputated finger, injury mechanisms, ischemia time and the way of preservation) on the survival rate of digital replantation was assessed. The metaanalysis result suggested that gender and ischemia time had no significant influence on the survival rate of amputation replantation. However, the survival rate of digital replantation of adults was significantly higher than that of children. The guillotine injury of a finger was easier to replant successfully than the crush and avulsion. The little finger was more difficult for replantation than thumb. Survival rate of fingers stored in low temperature was higher than that in common temperature. The present metaanalysis suggested that age, injury mechanism, amputated finger and the way of preservation were significantly associated with the survival rate of digital replantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilhelmi BJ, Lee WP, Pagenstert GI, May JW Jr. Replantation in the mutilated hand. Hand Clin 2003;19:89–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;42:374–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen YC, Chan FC, Hsu CC, Lin YT, Chen CT, Lin CH. Fingertip replantation without venous anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70:284–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang LH, Zhang GQ. Use of digital subtraction angiography for assessment of digital replantation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2012;13:209–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu ZB. Multiple Factors Analysis on Survival Rate of Digital Replantation [Master’s Thesis]. Central South University; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scheker LR, Becker GW. Distal finger replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36:521–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaivanichsiri P, Rattanasrithong P. Type of injury and number of anastomosed vessels: Impact on digital replantation. Microsurgery 2006;26:151–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, Abe Y, Dhawan V. Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin CH, Aydyn N, Lin YT, Hsu CT, Lin CH, Yeh JT. Hand and finger replantation after protracted ischemia (more than 24 hours). Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:286–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adani R, Pataia E, Tarallo L, Mugnai R. Results of replantation of 33 ring avulsion amputations. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:947–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Braga-Silva J. Single digit replantations in ambulatory surgery 85 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2001;46:74–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chai Y, Kang Q, Yang Q, Zeng B. Replantation of amputated finger composite tissues with microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2008;28:314–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasuo T, Nishi G, Tsuchiya D, Otsuka T. Fingertip replantations: Importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results. Hand Surg 2009;14:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito H, Sasaki K, Morioka K, Nozaki M. Fingertip amputation salvage on arterial anastomosis alone: An investigation of its limitations. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:302–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Janezic TF, Arnez ZM, Solinc M, Zaletel-Kragelj L. One hundred sixty-seven thumb replantations and revascularisations: Early microvascular results. Microsurgery 1996;17:259–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim KS, Eo SR, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. A new strategy of fingertip reattachment: Sequential use of microsurgical technique and pocketing of composite graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:73–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim WK, Lim JH, Han SK. Fingertip replantations: Clinical evaluation of 135 digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:470–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Puhaindran ME, Paavilainen P, Tan DM, Peng YP, Lim AY. Dermal pocketing following distal finger replantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1318–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi D, Qi J, Li D, Zhu L, Jin W, Cai D. Fingertip replantation at or beyond the nail base in children. Microsurgery 2010;30:380–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tark KC, Kim YW, Lee YH, Lew JD. Replantation and revascularization of hands: Clinical analysis and functional results of 261 cases. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14:17–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Fingertip replantation: Technical considerations and outcome analysis of 24 consecutive fingertip replantations. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:237–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 2000;31:33–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. He Y. Analysis on Influencing Factors of Survival Rate of Replantation of Severed Cut-Fingers with Logistic Regression [Master’s Thesis]. Dali University; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ren ZP, Liu YH, Liu D, Liang YH. The related factors affecting the survival rate of fingertip replantation. Hebei Med J (Chin) 2012;34:2790–1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hamilton RB, O’Brien BM, Morrison A, MacLeod AM. Survival factors in replantation and revascularization of the amputated thumb-10 years experience. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:163–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zumiotti A, Ferreira MC. Replantation ofdigits: Factors influencing survival and functional results. Microsurgery 1994;15:18–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006;10:124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang FC, Zhao JM, Yang Z, Sha K. The analysis on the risk factors of distal finger replantation. Guangxi Med J (Chin) 2003;25:3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Choi MS, Lee JH, Ki SH, Ahn HC. Trends in digital replantation. Curr Orthop Pract 2012;23:284–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:723–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Southard JH, Belzer FO. Organ preservation. Annu Rev Med 1995;46:235–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, H., Wei, L., Liang, B. et al. Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate. IJOO 49, 265–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156185

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156185

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation