Abstract
The aim of this metaanalysis was to evaluate the association between nonsurgical factors and survival rate of digital replantation. A computer search of MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE and CNKI databases was conducted to identify literatures for digital replantation, with the keywords of “digit,” “finger” and “replantation” from their inception to June 10, 2014. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted independently by two authors using piloted forms. Review Manager 5.2 software was used for data analysis. The effect of some nonsurgical factors (gender, age, amputated finger, injury mechanisms, ischemia time and the way of preservation) on the survival rate of digital replantation was assessed. The metaanalysis result suggested that gender and ischemia time had no significant influence on the survival rate of amputation replantation. However, the survival rate of digital replantation of adults was significantly higher than that of children. The guillotine injury of a finger was easier to replant successfully than the crush and avulsion. The little finger was more difficult for replantation than thumb. Survival rate of fingers stored in low temperature was higher than that in common temperature. The present metaanalysis suggested that age, injury mechanism, amputated finger and the way of preservation were significantly associated with the survival rate of digital replantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilhelmi BJ, Lee WP, Pagenstert GI, May JW Jr. Replantation in the mutilated hand. Hand Clin 2003;19:89–120.
Komatsu S, Tamai S. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;42:374–7.
Chen YC, Chan FC, Hsu CC, Lin YT, Chen CT, Lin CH. Fingertip replantation without venous anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70:284–8.
Wang LH, Zhang GQ. Use of digital subtraction angiography for assessment of digital replantation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2012;13:209–12.
Zhu ZB. Multiple Factors Analysis on Survival Rate of Digital Replantation [Master’s Thesis]. Central South University; 2011.
Scheker LR, Becker GW. Distal finger replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36:521–8.
Chaivanichsiri P, Rattanasrithong P. Type of injury and number of anastomosed vessels: Impact on digital replantation. Microsurgery 2006;26:151–4.
Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, Abe Y, Dhawan V. Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1151–8.
Lin CH, Aydyn N, Lin YT, Hsu CT, Lin CH, Yeh JT. Hand and finger replantation after protracted ischemia (more than 24 hours). Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:286–90.
Adani R, Pataia E, Tarallo L, Mugnai R. Results of replantation of 33 ring avulsion amputations. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:947–56.
Braga-Silva J. Single digit replantations in ambulatory surgery 85 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2001;46:74–83.
Chai Y, Kang Q, Yang Q, Zeng B. Replantation of amputated finger composite tissues with microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2008;28:314–20.
Hasuo T, Nishi G, Tsuchiya D, Otsuka T. Fingertip replantations: Importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results. Hand Surg 2009;14:1–6.
Ito H, Sasaki K, Morioka K, Nozaki M. Fingertip amputation salvage on arterial anastomosis alone: An investigation of its limitations. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:302–5.
Janezic TF, Arnez ZM, Solinc M, Zaletel-Kragelj L. One hundred sixty-seven thumb replantations and revascularisations: Early microvascular results. Microsurgery 1996;17:259–63.
Kim KS, Eo SR, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. A new strategy of fingertip reattachment: Sequential use of microsurgical technique and pocketing of composite graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:73–9.
Kim WK, Lim JH, Han SK. Fingertip replantations: Clinical evaluation of 135 digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:470–6.
Puhaindran ME, Paavilainen P, Tan DM, Peng YP, Lim AY. Dermal pocketing following distal finger replantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1318–22.
Shi D, Qi J, Li D, Zhu L, Jin W, Cai D. Fingertip replantation at or beyond the nail base in children. Microsurgery 2010;30:380–5.
Tark KC, Kim YW, Lee YH, Lew JD. Replantation and revascularization of hands: Clinical analysis and functional results of 261 cases. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14:17–27.
Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Fingertip replantation: Technical considerations and outcome analysis of 24 consecutive fingertip replantations. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:237–45.
Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 2000;31:33–40.
He Y. Analysis on Influencing Factors of Survival Rate of Replantation of Severed Cut-Fingers with Logistic Regression [Master’s Thesis]. Dali University; 2010.
Ren ZP, Liu YH, Liu D, Liang YH. The related factors affecting the survival rate of fingertip replantation. Hebei Med J (Chin) 2012;34:2790–1.
Hamilton RB, O’Brien BM, Morrison A, MacLeod AM. Survival factors in replantation and revascularization of the amputated thumb-10 years experience. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:163–73.
Zumiotti A, Ferreira MC. Replantation ofdigits: Factors influencing survival and functional results. Microsurgery 1994;15:18–21.
Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006;10:124–9.
Yang FC, Zhao JM, Yang Z, Sha K. The analysis on the risk factors of distal finger replantation. Guangxi Med J (Chin) 2003;25:3.
Choi MS, Lee JH, Ki SH, Ahn HC. Trends in digital replantation. Curr Orthop Pract 2012;23:284–8.
Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:723–37.
Southard JH, Belzer FO. Organ preservation. Annu Rev Med 1995;46:235–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, H., Wei, L., Liang, B. et al. Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate. IJOO 49, 265–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156185
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156185