Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strategy for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis depends essentially upon the magnitude and pattern of the deformity, and its potential for progression. Treatment options include observation, bracing and/or surgery. During the past decade, several studies have demonstrated that the natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can be positively affected by nonoperative treatment, especially bracing. Other forms of conservative treatment, such as chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation, acupuncture, exercise or other manual treatments, or diet and nutrition, have not yet been proven to be effective in controlling spinal deformity progression, and those with a natural history that is favorable at the completion of growth. Observation is appropriate treatment for small curves, curves that are at low risk of progression, and those with a natural history that is favorable at the completion of growth. Indications for brace treatment are a growing child presenting with a curve of 25°–40° or a curve less than 25° with documented progression. Curves of 20°–25° in patients with pronounced skeletal immaturity should also be treated. The purpose of this review is to provide information about conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Indications for conservative treatment, hours daily wear and complications of brace treatment as well as brace types are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fernandez-Filiberti R, Flynn J, Ramirez N, Trautmann M, Alegria M. Effectiveness of TLSO bracing in the conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:176–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nachemson A, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:815–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lonstein JE, Winter RB. The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A review of 1020 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:1207–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau E. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of nonoperative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:664–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olafsson Y, Saraste H, Soderlund V, Hoffsten M. Boston brace in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:524–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Asher MA, Burton DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 2006;1:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, Weinstein SL. Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:712–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Götze C, Liljenqvist UR, Slomka A, Götze HG, Steinbeck J. Quality of life and back pain: Outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:1456–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E, MacEwen GD. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:90–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve p rogression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A case-control study. Spine 2001;26:1449–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrios C, Pérez-Encinas C, Maruenda JI, Laguía M. Significant ventilatory functional restriction in adolescents with mild or moderate scoliosis during maximal exercise tolerance test. Spine 2005;30:1610–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chong K, Letts R, Cumming G. Influence of spinal curvature on exercise capacity. J Ped Orthop 1981;1:251–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D. Incidence and severity of back pain in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1983;8:749–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pehrsson K, Danielsson A, Nachemson A. Pulmonary function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A 25 year follow-up after surgery or start of brace treatment. Thorax 2001;56:388–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of Curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1061–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noonan KJ, Weinstein SL, Jacobson WC, Dolan LA. Use of the Milwaukee brace for progressive idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:557–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katz DE, Richards BS, Browne RH, Herring JA. A comparison between the Boston brace and the Charleston bending brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997;22:1302–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H. Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6 months follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carr WA, Moe JH, Winter RB, Lonstein JE. Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the Milwaukee brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:599–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, Elerson EE, BrintzenhofeSzoc KM, Katz DE, et al. Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1069–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maruyama T. Bracing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review of the literature of effective conservative treatment looking for end results 5 years after weaning. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:786–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss HR, Weiss G, Schaar HJ. Incidence of surgery in conservatively treated patients with scoliosis. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rigo M, Reiter CH, Weiss HR. Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An evidence-based review. Spine 2007;32:S91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lange JE, Steen H, Brox JN. Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2009;4:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiley JW, Thomson JD, Mitchell TM, Smith BG, Banta JV. Effectiveness of the Boston brace in treatment of large curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:2326–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Green NE. Part-time bracing of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME. The Boston Bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis: Follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine 1986;11:792–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Allington NJ, Bowen JR. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Treatment with the Wilmington brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1056–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peltonen J, Poussa M, Ylikoski M. Three year results of bracing in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:487–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsunaga S, Hayashi K, Naruo T, Nozoe S, Komiya S. Psychologic management of brace therapy for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:547–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:3027–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fayssoux RS, Cho RH, Herman MJ. A history of bracing for Idiopathic Scoliosis in North America. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:654–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bunge EM, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Biezen FC, Essink-Bot ML, de Koning HJ. Patients’ Preferences for Scoliosis Brace Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Spine 2010; 35:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Watts HG, Hall JE, Stanish W. The Boston brace system for the treatment of low thoracic and lumbar scoliosis by the use of a girdle without superstructure. Clin Orthop 1977;126:87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stagnara P, de Mauroy JC. Résultats à long terme du traitement orthopédique lyonnais. In: Actualités en rééducation fonctionnelle et réadaptation. Ed. Masson, Paris; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stagnara P, Desbrosses J. Scolioses essentielles pendant l’enfance et l’adolescence: Résultats des traitements orthopédiques et chirurgicaux. Rev Chir Orthop 1960;46:562–75.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weiss HR. Conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with physical therapy and orthoses. Orthopade 2003;32:146–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weiss HR, Rehabilitation of adolescent patients with scoliosis—what do we know? A review of the literature. Pediatr Rehabil 2003;6:183–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chêneau J. Orthese de scoliose, 1st Ed. Chêneau, J., Saint Orensm; 1990.

  41. Rigo M. Intra-observer reliability of a new classification correlating with brace treatment. Pediatr Rehabil 2004;7:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hidalgo AH. Nueva aportación del corsé de Málaga al pronóstico y tratamiento de la escoliosis. Ph.D. Thesis, Sevilla, Spain: Universidad de Sevilla;1993.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Negrini S, Marchini G. Efficacy of the symmetric, patientoriented, rigid, three-dimensional, active (SPoRT) concept of bracing for scoliosis: A prospective study of the Sforzesco versus Lyon brace. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:171–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Negrini S, Marchini G, Tomaello L. The Sforzesco brace and SPoRT concept (Symmetric, Patient-oriented, Rigid, Threedimensional) versus the Lyon brace and 3-point systems for bracing idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Inform 2006; 123:245–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Trivedi JM, Thomson JD. Results of Charleston bracing in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:277–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Price CT, Scott DS, Reed FE, Riddick MF. Nighttime bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston bending brace. Preliminary report. Spine 1990;15:1294–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Price CT, Scott DS, Reed FE, Sproul JT, Riddick MF. Nighttime bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston Bending Brace: Long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:703–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Kinnunen R, Poussa M. Effectiveness of the Providence nighttime bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative study of 36 female patients. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1139–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Howard A, Wright JG, Hedden D. A comparative study of TLSO, Charleston, and Milwaukee braces for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1998;23:2404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gepstein R, Leitner Y, Zohar E, Angel I, Shabat S, Pekarsky I, et al. Effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace in the treatment of single-curve idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:84–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Janicki J, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Thompson GH. A comparison of the thoracolumbosacral orthoses and providence orthosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Results using the new SRS inclusion and assessment criteria for bracing studies. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:369–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Federico DJ, Renshaw TS. Results of treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the Charleston Bending Brace. Spine 1990; 15:886–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. D’Amato CR, Griggs S, McCoy B. Nighttime bracing with the providence brace in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:2006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wong MS, Cheng JC, Lam TP, Ng BK, Sin SW, Lee-Shum SL, et al. The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2008;33:1360–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Coillard C, Vachon V, Circo AB, Beauséjour M, Rivard C H. Effectiveness of the SpineCor brace based on the new standardized criteria proposed by the scoliosis research society for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:375–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Coillard C, Leroux MA, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH. SpineCor–a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Posttreatment results. Eur Spine J 2003;12:141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Weiss HR, Bohr S, Jahnke A, Pleines S. Acupucture in the treatment of scoliosis - a single blind controlled pilot study. Scoliosis 2008;3:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cassella MC, Hall JE. Current treatment approaches in the nonoperative and operative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Phys Ther 1991;71:897–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Orthopaedic Service, Department of Child and Adolescent, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland

    Federico Canavese & André Kaelin

Authors
  1. Federico Canavese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André Kaelin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Canavese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canavese, F., Kaelin, A. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment. IJOO 45, 7–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.73655

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.73655

Key words

Search

Navigation