CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26(02): 231-236
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.184418
Head & Neck

Diffusion-weighted imaging in extracranial head and neck schwannomas: A distinctive appearance

Abanti Das
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Ashu S Bhalla
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Raju Sharma
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Atin Kumar
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Alok Thakar
Department of Otolaryngorhinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Ankur Goyal
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of the extracranial schwannomas of head and neck. Materials and Methods: The MRI (including DWI) of 12 patients with pathologically proven head and neck schwannomas (4 men, 8 women, with mean age of 32.6 years; age range 16–50 years) were retrospectively evaluated. Images were analyzed for signal intensity and morphology on conventional sequences followed by the qualitative evaluation of DW images (DWI) and measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Results: Majority of the tumors were located in the parapharyngeal space (8/12). All but one showed heterogeneous appearance, with 10 tumors showing scattered areas of hemorrhage. Eight out of 12 tumors showed intensely hyperintense core surrounded by intermediate signal intensity peripheral rim (reverse target sign) on T2-weighted (T2W) images. On DWI, these eight tumors showed a distinctive appearance, resembling target sign on trace DWI and reverse target on ADC map. Out of the remaining four tumors, one showed uniformly restricted diffusion whereas three showed free diffusion. Mean ADC value in the central area of free diffusion was 2.277 × 10−3 mm2/s (range of 1.790 × 10−3 to 2.605 × 10−3 mm2/s) whereas in the peripheral area was 1.117 × 10−3 mm2/s (range of 0.656 × 10−3 to 1.701 × 10−3 mm2/s). Rest of the schwannomas showing free diffusion had a mean ADC value of 1.971 × 10−3 mm2/s. Conclusion: Majority of the head and neck schwannomas showed a characteristic appearance of free diffusion in the centre and restricted diffusion in the periphery of the mass.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2021

© 2016. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Colreavy MP, Lacy PD, Hughes J, Bouchier-Hayes D, Brennan P, O'Dwyer AJ,et al. Head and neck schwannomas-A10 year review. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:119-24.
  • 2 Das Gupta TK, Brasfield RD, Strong EW, Hajdu SI. Benign solitary schwannomas (neurilemomas). Cancer 1969;24:355-66.
  • 3 Cohen LM, Schwartz AM, Rockoff SD. Benign schwannomas: Pathologic basis of CT inhomogeneities. Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:141-3.
  • 4 Suh JS, Abenoza P, Galloway HR, Everson LI, Griffiths HJ. Peripheral (extracranial) nerve tumors: Correlation of MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology 1992;183:341-6.
  • 5 Jee WH, Oh SN, McCauley T, Ryu KN, Suh JS, Lee JH, et al. Extraaxialneurofibromas versus neurilemmomas: Discrimination with MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:629-33.
  • 6 Murphey MD, Smith WS, Smith SE, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT. From the archives of the AFIP. Imaging of musculoskeletal neurogenic tumors: Radiologic-pathologiccorrelation. Radiographics 1999;19:1253-80.
  • 7 Anil G, Tan TY. CT and MRI evaluation of nerve sheath tumors of cervical vagus nerve. Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:195-201.
  • 8 Sener RN. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of solid vestibular schwannomas. JComput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:249-52.
  • 9 Tan ACH, Tan CH, Nandini CL, Ng CY. Multimodality Imaging Features of Rectal Schwannoma. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012;41:476-8.
  • 10 Bayraktutan U, Kantarci M, Ozgokce M, Aydinli B, Atamanalp SS, Sipal S. Gastrointestinal: Benign cystic schwannoma localized in the gastroduodenal ligament; Arare case. JGastroenterol Hepatol 2012;27:985.
  • 11 van Rijswijk CS, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, Taminiau AH, Doornbos J, Bloem JL. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Characterization of Soft-Tissue Tumors. JMagn Reson Imaging 2002;15:302-7.
  • 12 Srinivasan A, Dvorak R, Perni K, Rohrer S, Mukherji SK. Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: Early experience. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:40-4.
  • 13 Khedr SA, Hassan MA, Abdelrazek NM, yehia Sakr A. Diagnostic impact of echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal neoplastic masses using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping as a quantitative assessment tool. Egyptian J Radiol Nuc Med 2012;43:219-26.
  • 14 Fayad LM, Blakeley J, Plotkin S, Widemann B, Jacobs MA. Whole Body MRI at 3T with Quantitative Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Sequences for the Characterization of Peripheral Lesions in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2 and Schwannomatosis. ISRN Radiol 2013:627932.
  • 15 Chhabra A, Thakkar RS, Andreisek G, Chalian M, Belzberg AJ, Blakeley J, et al. Anatomic MR Imaging and Functional Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Peripheral Nerve Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions. Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:802-7.
  • 16 Sumi M, Nakamura T. Head and neck tumors: Combined MRI assessment based on IVIM and TIC analyses for the differentiation of tumors of different histological types. Eur Radiol 2014;24:223-31.
  • 17 Demehri S, Belzberg A, Blakeley J, Fayad LM. Conventional and Functional MR Imaging of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Initial Experience. Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1615-20.
  • 18 Hughes MJ, Thomas JM, Fisher C, Moskovic EC. Imaging features of retroperitoneal and pelvic schwannomas. Clinical Radiology 2005;60:886-93.