Appl Clin Inform 2017; 08(02): 337-347
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-RA-0153
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Examining Perceptions of Computerized Physician Order Entry in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Kristyn S. Beam
1   Department of Pediatrics, Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts Medical Center
,
Megan Cardoso
1   Department of Pediatrics, Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts Medical Center
,
Megan Sweeney
2   Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center
,
Geoff Binney
3   Department of Neonatology, Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts Medical Center
,
Saul N. Weingart
2   Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 11 September 2016

accepted: 27 January 2017

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Background: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) is a technology with potential to transform care delivery. While CPOE systems have been studied in adult populations, less is known about the implementation of CPOE in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and perceptions of nurses and physicians using the system.

Objective: To examine perceptions of clinicians before and after CPOE implementation in the NICU of a pediatric hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of clinicians working in a Level III NICU was conducted. The survey was distributed before and after CPOE implementation. Participants were asked about their perception of CPOE on patient care delivery, implementation of the system, and effect on job satisfaction. A qualitative section inquired about additional concerns surrounding implementation. Responses were tabulated and analyzed using the Chi-square test.

Results: The survey was distributed to 158 clinicians with a 47% response rate for pre-implementation and 45% for post-implementation. Clinicians understood why CPOE was implemented, but felt there was incomplete technical training. The expectation for increased job satisfaction and ability to recruit high-quality staff was high. However, there was concern about the ability to deliver appropriate treatments before and after implementation. Physicians were more optimistic about CPOE implementation than nurses who remained concerned that workflow may be altered.

Conclusions: Introducing CPOE is a potentially risky endeavor and must be done carefully to mitigate harm. Although high expectations of the system can be met, it is important to attend to differing expectations among clinicians with varied levels of comfort with technology. Interdisciplinary collaboration is critical in planning a functioning CPOE to ensure that efficient workflow is maintained and appropriate supports for individuals with a lower degree of technical literacy is available.

Citation: Beam KS, Cardoso M, Sweeney M, Binney G, Weingart SN. Examining perceptions of computerized physician order entry in a neonatal intensive care unit. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 337–347 https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-09-RA-0153

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The evaluation was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Participation was voluntary and the study was deemed exempt from review as a quality improvement project by the Institutional Review Board at Tufts Medical Center.


 
  • References

  • 1 Manias E, Kinney S, Cranswick N, Williams A, Borrott N. Interventions to reduce medication errors in pediatric intensive care. Ann Pharmacother 2014; 48 (10) 1313-1331. doi: 10.1177/1060028014543795. PubMed PMID: 25059205.
  • 2 Cartmill RS, Walker JM, Blosky MA, Brown RL, Djurkovic S, Dunham DB, Gardill D, Haupt MT, Parry D, Wetterneck TB, Wood KE, Carayon P. Impact of electronic order management on the timeliness of antibiotic administration in critical care patients. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (11) 782-791. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.011. PubMed PMID: 22947701.
  • 3 Chapman AK, Lehmann CU, Donohue PK, Aucott SW. Implementation of computerized provider order entry in a neonatal intensive care unit: Impact on admission workflow. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (05) 291-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.12.006. PubMed PMID: 22226728.
  • 4 Chedoe I, Molendijk HA, Dittrich ST, Jansman FG, Harting JW, Brouwers JR, Taxis K. Incidence and nature of medication errors in neonatal intensive care with strategies to improve safety: a review of the current literature. Drug Saf 2007; 30 (06) 503-513. PubMed PMID: 17536876.
  • 5 Wang JK, Herzog NS, Kaushal R, Park C, Mochizuki C, Weingarten SR. Prevention of pediatric medication errors by hospital pharmacists and the potential benefit of computerized physician order entry. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (01) e77-e85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006–0034. PubMed PMID: 17200262.
  • 6 Westbrook JI, Li L, Georgiou A, Paoloni R, Cullen J. Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre-post, time and motion study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (06) 1150-1158. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012–001414. PubMed PMID: 23715803; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3822109.
  • 7 Ayatollahi H, Roozbehi M, Haghani H. Physicians’ and Nurses’ Opinions about the Impact of a Computerized Provider Order Entry System on Their Workflow. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 12: 1g. PubMed PMID: 26604876; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4632876.
  • 8 Wakefield DS, Halbesleben JR, Ward MM, Qiu Q, Brokel J, Crandall D. Development of a measure of clinical information systems expectations and experiences. Med Care 2007; 45 (09) 884-890. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180653625. PubMed PMID: 17712259.
  • 9 Chuo J, Hicks RW. Computer-related medication errors in neonatal intensive care units. Clin Perinatol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 01) 119-139 ix. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.11.005. PubMed PMID: 18280879.
  • 10 Kunac DL, Reith DM. Identification of priorities for medication safety in neonatal intensive care. Drug Saf 2005; 28 (03) 251-261. PubMed PMID: 15733029.
  • 11 Cordero L, Kuehn L, Kumar RR, Mekhjian HS. Impact of computerized physician order entry on clinical practice in a newborn intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2004; 24 (02) 88-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211000. PubMed PMID: 14872207.
  • 12 Khajouei R, Wierenga PC, Hasman A, Jaspers MW. Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow, efficiency and medication safety. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (05) 297-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.009. PubMed PMID: 21419695.
  • 13 Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163 (12) 1409-1416. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409. PubMed PMID: 12824090.
  • 14 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, Strom BL. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293 (10) 1197-1203. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197. PubMed PMID: 15755942.
  • 15 Kim GR, Miller MR, Ardolino MA, Smith JE, Lee DC, Lehmann CU. Capture and classification of problems during CPOE deployment in an academic pediatric center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007: 414-417. PubMed PMID: 18693869; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2655829.
  • 16 Keene A, Ashton L, Shure D, Napoleone D, Katyal C, Bellin E. Mortality before and after initiation of a computerized physician order entry system in a critically ill pediatric population. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007; 8 (03) 268-271. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000260781.78277.D9. PubMed PMID: 17417119.
  • 17 Longhurst CA, Parast L, Sandborg CI, Widen E, Sullivan J, Hahn JS, Dawes CG, Sharek PJ. Decrease in hospital-wide mortality rate after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (01) 14-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009–3271. PubMed PMID: 20439590.
  • 18 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RS, Watson RS, Nguyen TC, Bayir H, Orr RA. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (06) 1506-1512. Erratum in: Pediatrics 2006; 117(2)594. PubMed PMID: 16322178.