Abstract
The social cost of carbon – or marginal damage caused by an additional ton of carbon dioxide emissions – has been estimated by a U.S. government working group at $21/tCO2 in 2010. That calculation, however, omits many of the biggest risks associated with climate change, and downplays the impact of current emissions on future generations. Our reanalysis explores the effects of uncertainty about climate sensitivity, the shape of the damage function, and the discount rate. We show that the social cost of carbon is uncertain across a broad range, and could be much higher than $21/tCO2. In our case combining high climate sensitivity, high damages, and a low discount rate, the social cost of carbon could be almost $900/tCO2 in 2010, rising to $1,500/tCO2 in 2050.
The most ambitious scenarios for eliminating carbon dioxide emissions as rapidly as technologically feasible (reaching zero or negative net global emissions by the end of this century) require spending up to $150 to $500 per ton of reductions of carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. Using a reasonable set of alternative assumptions, therefore, the damages from a ton of carbon dioxide emissions in 2050 could exceed the cost of reducing emissions at the maximum technically feasible rate. Once this is the case, the exact value of the social cost of carbon loses importance: the clear policy prescription is to reduce emissions as rapidly as possible, and cost-effectiveness analysis offers better insights for climate policy than costbenefit analysis.
References
Ackerman, Frank, and Elizabeth A. Stanton ( 2010). The Social Cost of Carbon. Somerville, MA: Stockholm Environment Institute-U.S. Center, April 1. http://sei-us.org/publications/id/194.Search in Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth, W.R. Cline, K-G. Maler, M. Munasinghe, R. Squitieri, and J.E. Stiglitz (1996). Chapter 4 – Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency. In Climate Change 1995 - Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, ed. James P. Bruce, Hoesung Lee, and Erik F. Haites, 125–144. New York: IPCC and Cambridge University Press. http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/download/papers/1996_Intertemporal_Equity.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Barker, Terry, and Serban Scrieciu (2010). Modeling Low Climate Stabilization with E3MG: Towards a ‘New Economics’ Approach to Simulating Energy- Environment-Economy System Dynamics. Energy Journal 31 (Special Issue 1): 137–164. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/aenjournl/2010se1_5flow_5fstabilizationa06.htm10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-6Search in Google Scholar
Clarke, Leon, Jae Edmonds, Volker Krey, Richard Richels, Steven Rose, and Massimo Tavoni (2009). International Climate Policy Architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Economics 31 (December): S64–S81. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.013. http://emf.stanford.edu/files/res/2369/EMF22OverviewClarke.pdf10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.013Search in Google Scholar
DeLong, J. Bradford, and Konstantin Magin (2009). The U.S. Equity Return Premium: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (1) (January): 193–208. doi:10.1257/jep.23.1.193. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jecper/v23y2009i1p193-208.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Edenhofer, Ottmar, Brigitte Knopf, Terry Barker, Lavinia Baumstark, Elie Bellevrat, Bertrand Chateau, Patrick Criqui, et al. (2010). The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs. Energy Journal 31 (Special Issue 1): 11–48. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJVol31- NoSI-2. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/aenjournl/2010se1_5flow_5fstabilizationa02.htm10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-2Search in Google Scholar
Hanemann, W. Michael (2008). What is the Economic Cost of Climate Change? eScholarship. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar
Hope, Chris (2006a). The Marginal Impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: An Integrated Assessment Model Incorporating the IPCC’s Five Reasons for Concern. Integrated Assessment Journal 6 (1): 19–56. http://journals.sfu.ca/int_assess/index.php/iaj/article/viewArticle/227Search in Google Scholar
Hope, Chris (2006b). The Social Cost of Carbon: What Does It Actually Depend On? Climate Policy 6 (5): 565–572. doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685621.10.1080/14693062.2006.9685621Search in Google Scholar
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon (2010). Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/pdfs/smallmotors_tsd/sem_finalrule_appendix15a.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2008). Energy Technology Perspectives 2008: Scenarios & Strategies to 2050. Paris. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2008/etp2008.pdf.10.1787/9789264041431-enSearch in Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2010). Energy Technology Perspectives 2010: Scenarios & Strategies to 2050. Paris, July. http://www.iea.org/techno/etp/index.asp.Search in Google Scholar
Kitous, Alban, Patrick Criqui, Elie Bellevrat, and Bertrand Chateau (2010). Transformation Patterns of the Worldwide Energy System – Scenarios for the Century with the POLES Model. Energy Journal 31 (Special Issue 1): 49–82. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aen/journl/2010se1_low_stabilization-a03.html10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-3Search in Google Scholar
Kopp, Robert E., and Bryan K. Mignone (2011). The U.S. Government’s Social Cost of Carbon Estimates after their First Year: Pathways for Improvement. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2011-16, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2011-16.Search in Google Scholar
Kopp, Robert E., Alexander Golub, Nathaniel O. Keohane, and Chikara Onda (2011). The Influence of the Specification of Climate Change Damages on the Social Cost of Carbon. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2011-22, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2011-22.Search in Google Scholar
Magne, Bertrand, Socrates Kypreos, and Hal Turton (2010). Technology Options for Low Stabilization Pathways with MERGE. Energy Journal 31 (Special Issue 1): 83–108. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/research/sustainablesolutions/research/MitigationScenarios/adam/magne10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-4Search in Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company (2009). Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve. http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/pathways_low_carbon_economy.asp.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. (2007). Accompanying Notes and Documentation on Development of DICE-2007 Model: Notes on DICE-2007.v8 of September 21, 2007. New Haven, CT: Yale University. http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/Accom_Notes_100507.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. (2008). A Question of Balance: Economic Modeling of Global Warming. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D., and Joseph Boyer (2000). Warming the world: Economic models of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roe, G.H., and M.B. Baker (2007). Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable? Science 318 (5850) (October): 629–632. doi:10.1126/science.1144735.10.1126/science.1144735Search in Google Scholar
Sherwood, Steven C., and Matthew Huber (2010). An Adaptability Limit to Climate Change due to Heat Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (21) (May 25): 9552–9555. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913352107.10.1073/pnas.0913352107Search in Google Scholar
Stern, Nicholas (2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm.Search in Google Scholar
U.K. Department of Energy & Climate Change (2009). Carbon Valuation in U.K. Policy Appraisal: A Revised Aapproach. London: Climate Change Economics, DECC, July. http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/lc_uk/valuation/valuation.aspx.Search in Google Scholar
van Vuuren, Detlef P., Morna Isaac, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Elke Stehfest, and Jasper van Vliet (2010). Low Stabilization Scenarios and Implications for Major World Regions from an Integrated Assessment Perspective. Energy Journal 31 (Special Issue 1): 165–192. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aen/journl/2010se1_low_stabilization-a07.html10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-7Search in Google Scholar
van Vuuren, Detlef P., Jason Lowe, Elke Stehfest, Laila Gohar, Andries F. Hof, Chris Hope, Rachel Warren, Malte Meinshausen, and Gian-Kasper Plattner (2011). How Well Do Integrated Assessment Models Simulate Climate Change? Climatic Change 104 (2): 255–285. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9764-2. http://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v104y2011i2p255-285.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
van Vuuren, Detlef P., Elke Stehfest, Michel G. J. Elzen, Tom Kram, Jasper Vliet, Sebastiaan Deetman, Morna Isaac, et al. (2011). RCP2.6: Exploring the Possibility to Keep Global Mean Temperature Increase below 2°C. Climatic Change 109 (1–2) (August 5): 95–116. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3. http://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v109y2011i1p95-116.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (2009). On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1. http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v91y2009i1p1-19.html10.1162/rest.91.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. (2010). GHG Targets as Insurance Against Catastrophic Climate Damages. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16136.10.3386/w16136Search in Google Scholar
© 2012 Frank Ackerman et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
