Ann Dermatol. 2017 Dec;29(6):794-795. English.
Published online Oct 30, 2017.
Copyright © 2017 The Korean Dermatological Association and The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology
Brief Communication

Paradoxical Flare of Psoriasis after Ustekinumab Therapy

Ho Yeol Lee, Cheong Ha Woo and Sik Haw
    • Department of Dermatology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Goyang, Korea.
Received January 12, 2016; Revised September 24, 2016; Accepted October 24, 2016.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Dear Editor:

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, and immune-mediated disease with a high morbidity rate in affected patients. The advent of biologics that target specific molecules in the immune system has revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. Ustekinumab, one of most recent biological agents approved for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-231. Excellent results of ustekinumab therapy for severe psoriasis have been reported in several cases, with remarkable improvement and no severe adverse effects2. However, we experienced a case of paradoxical flare of psoriasis after ustekinumab therapy.

A 24-year-old male patient had suffered from psoriasis vulgaris for 7 years. Although he had been treated with conventional treatment such as narrow band ultraviolet B (NBUVB) phototherapy, acitretin, methotrexate, and cyclosporine, his lesions had not improved sufficiently. He complained of side effects including dry mouth, nausea, and abdominal discomfort when he was treated with methotrexate or cyclosporine. The treatment was changed to subcutaneous injection of ustekinumab 45 mg according to the conventional dosing schedule. His lesions markedly improved after the first injection (Fig. 1), but slowly reappeared after the third injection. The day following the fourth injection, his skin lesions suddenly expanded to multiple, scaly erythematous plaques on face, trunk, and extremities (Fig. 2). The treatment was changed to systemic steroid and NBUVB phototherapy and his lesions came under control. However, after 2 weeks of flare phenomenon, he discontinued treatments arbitrarily and did not visit our department again.

Fig. 1
Before the second ustekinumab injection. Skin lesion was dramatically improved.

Fig. 2
(A, B) Paradoxical flare of plaque type psoriasis after the fourth injection.

There have been only two previous case reports of paradoxical flare after ustekinumab therapy. Wenk et al.3 first reported a case of paradoxical flare of psoriasis after ustekinumab injection, in which the patient experienced worsening of skin lesions whenever she was injected. Her flares were reportedly controlled with topical steroid and acitretin. Hay and Pan4 reported a paradoxical flare of psoriasis triggered after the second injection of ustekinumab, with progressively worsening plaque type psoriatic lesions leading to pustulation. They injected a subcutaneous loading dose of adalimumab 80 mg and subsequent dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks. Unlike our case, these prior cases featured an altered morphology from plaque type psoriasis to pustular type psoriasis after ustakinumab injection. Furthermore, while our case showed good response after secondary injection, previously reported cases did not experience any effect of ustekinumab therapy.

The pathophysiology of paradoxical phenomenon remains unknown. However, it is hypothesized that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor possibly induces psoriasis because of cytokine imbalance, such as increasing plasmacytoid dendritic cell interferon-alpha (IFN-α) production, which is normally suppressed by TNF-α5. Ustekinumab blocks IL-23 activity and may decrease IL-23 and T helper 17 cell-induced TNF-α. IFN-α worsens psoriasis by promoting increased T-cell activation and decreased TNF-α3, 4, 5. This theory is based on induction or worsening after treatment with IFN-α; however, it is insufficient to explain this phenomenon and the reason for a good response after secondary injection, in our case. Further study of additional cases is needed to clearly elucidate the mechanism involved in paradoxical flare after ustekinumab therapy.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

    1. Benson JM, Sachs CW, Treacy G, Zhou H, Pendley CE, Brodmerkel CM, et al. Therapeutic targeting of the IL-12/23 pathways: generation and characterization of ustekinumab. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:615–624.
    1. Famenini S, Wu JJ. The safety of ustekinumab in psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol 2012;11:907–910.
    1. Wenk KS, Claros JM, Ehrlich A. Flare of pustular psoriasis after initiating ustekinumab therapy. J Dermatolog Treat 2012;23:212–214.
    1. Hay RA, Pan JY. Paradoxical flare of pustular psoriasis triggered by ustekinumab, which responded to adalimumab therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2014;39:751–752.
    1. Ko JM, Gottlieb AB, Kerbleski JF. Induction and exacerbation of psoriasis with TNF-blockade therapy: a review and analysis of 127 cases. J Dermatolog Treat 2009;20:100–108.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

PERMALINK