Personal Factors that Affect the Satisfaction of Female Patients Undergoing Esthetic Suture after Typical Thyroidectomy

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background In esthetic surgery, understanding the factors that influence patient satisfaction is important for successful practice. We hypothesize that the factors that influence patient satisfaction include not only aesthetic and functional outcomes, but also personal factors such as the level of familiarity with factors affecting wound healing and expectations regarding aesthetic outcome.

Methods One hundred patients who underwent esthetic closure after thyroidectomy were included in this study. In order to evaluate the individual characteristics of the patients, a preoperative survey was administered to the patients. We estimated the patient satisfaction six months postoperatively and assessed the aesthetic and functional outcomes using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

Results According to the results of correlation analysis, level of familiarity with wound healing factors had a positive correlation with satisfaction. High expectations, pain, itching, and high observer scale score had negative correlations with satisfaction. The factors that were correlated with satisfaction were included in the multiple regression analysis. Level of familiarity with wound healing factors was found to have a positive relationship with satisfaction, while itching and observer scale were found to have a negative relationship with satisfaction. After excluding 10 patients who had hypertrophic scars, only level of familiarity with wound healing factors and expectations affected satisfaction.

Conclusions The level of familiarity with factors affecting wound healing and expectations were found to independently affect satisfaction. Improving patients' level of familiarity with wound healing factors and reducing their expectations by providing suitable preoperative education has the potential to improve patient satisfaction.

This article was presented at the 70th Congress of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons on November 10, 2012 in Seoul, Korea.

Publication History

Received: 13 March 2013

Accepted: 04 June 2013

Article published online:
01 May 2022

© 2013. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Stewart MG, Porter JP. Outcomes research and facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18: 73-76
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr WF, Anderson S. et al. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001; 3: 198-201
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Reich J. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with the results of esthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55: 5-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Clapham PJ, Pushman AG, Chung KC. A systematic review of applying patient satisfaction outcomes in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1826-1833
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Broughton 2nd G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Wound healing: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1e-S-32e-S
  Google Scholar
• 6 Ware Jr JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR. et al. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 1983; 6: 247-263
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Chung KC, Hamill JB, Kim HM. et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction in an outpatient plastic surgery clinic. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42: 56-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Olson RE, Laskin DM. Expectations of patients from orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 283-285
  Google Scholar
• 9 Kim JH, Sung JY, Kim YH. et al. Risk factors for hypertrophic surgical scar development after thyroidectomy. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20: 304-310
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Mira JJ, Tomas O, Virtudes-Perez M. et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009; 145: 536-541
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Ying AK, Huh W, Bottomley S. et al. Thyroid cancer in young adults. Semin Oncol 2009; 36: 258-274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ridgway DM, Mahmood F, Moore L. et al. A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89: 242-246
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Selvadurai D, Wildin C, Treharne G. et al. Randomised trial of subcuticular suture versus metal clips for wound closure after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79: 303-306
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Amin M, Glynn F, Timon C. Randomized trial of tissue adhesive vs staples in thyroidectomy integrating patient satisfaction and Manchester score. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140: 703-708
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA. et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1960-1965
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ. et al. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 514-522
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Powers PS, Sarkar S, Goldgof DB. et al. Scar assessment: current problems and future solutions. J Burn Care Rehabil 1999; 20: 54-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar