Breast Auto-Augmentation: A Versatile Method of Breast Rehabilitation—A Retrospective Series of 107 Procedures

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background Breast auto-augmentation (BAA) using an inferior pedicle dermoglandular flap aims to redistribute the breast tissue in order to increase the fullness in the upper pole and enhance the central projection of the breast at the time of mastopexy in women who want to avoid implants. The procedure achieves mastopexy and an increase in breast volume.

Methods Between 2003 and 2014, 107 BAA procedures were performed in 53 patients (51 bilateral, 2 unilateral and 3 reoperations) with primary or secondary ptosis of the breast associated with loss of fullness in the upper pole (n=45) or undergoing explantation combined with capsulectomy (n=8). Six patients (11.3%) had prior mastopexy and 2 (3.7%) patients had prior reduction mammoplasty. The mean patients' age was 41 years (range, 19-66 years). All patients had preoperative and postoperative photographs and careful preoperative markings. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 9 years (mean, 6.6 months).

Results The range of elevation of the nipple was from 6 to 12 cm (mean, 8 cm). The wounds healed completely with no complications in 50 (94.3%) patients. Three patients had complications including 2 (3.7%) hematomas and 1 (1.9%) partial necrosis of the nipple-areola complex. Three (5.7%) patients were dissatisfied with the level of mastopexy achieved underwent a further procedure. No patient complained of scar hypertrophy.

Conclusions BAA is a versatile technique for women with small breasts associated with primary or secondary ptosis. It is also an effective technique for the salvage of breasts after capsulectomy and explantation.

Publication History

Received: 08 February 2015

Accepted: 13 April 2015

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2015. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 567e-583e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Mlodinow AS, Ver Halen JP, Lim S. et al. Predictors of readmission after breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional analysis of 5012 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71: 335-341
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Kirwan L. Breast autoaugmentation. Can J Plast Surg 2007; 15: 73-76
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kirwan L. FP315: lollipop mastopexy, combined periareolar and vertical mastopexy. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (Suppl. 02) A224
  Google Scholar
• 5 Botti G. Vertical scar mammaplasty: stable padding of the superior pole by means of posteriorly based pedicle autoprosthesis. Aesthet Surg J 1999; 19: 116-123
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 6 Graf R, Reis de Araujo LR, Rippel R. et al. Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy using the vertical scar and thoracic wall flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27: 6-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Lassus C. A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 373-380
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Benelli L. A new periareolar mammaplasty: the "round block" technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1990; 14: 93-100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kalenderof V, Tumerdem B, Aydin H. et al. Modification of vertical scar in vertical mammaplasty technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2001; 25: 40-42
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Honig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM. et al. Inferior pedicle autoaugmentation mastopexy after breast implant removal. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34: 447-454
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Honig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM. et al. Autoaugmentation mastopexy with an inferior-based pedicle. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 302-307
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Gurunluoglu R, Sacak B, Arton J. Outcomes analysis of patients undergoing autoaugmentation after breast implant removal. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 304-315
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Schulz CM. Around the world in 50 years: Charlie Brown's anniversary celebration. Kansas: Andrews McMeel Publishing; 1994
  Google Scholar
• 14 Kirwan L. Augmentation of the ptotic breast: Simultaneous periareolar mastopexy/breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 1999; 19: 34-39
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kirwan L. A classification and algorithm for treatment of breast ptosis. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22: 355-363
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Hammond DC. Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 890-901
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Hammond DC, Hidalgo D, Slavin S. et al. Revising the unsatisfactory breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 277-283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. The neopectoral pocket in revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28: 463-467
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Del Vecchio DA, Bucky LP. Breast augmentation using preexpansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 2441-2450
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Mu DL, Luan J, Mu L. et al. Breast augmentation by autologous fat injection grafting: management and clinical analysis of complications. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63: 124-127
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar