The usefulness of pedicled perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction after breast conserving surgery in Korean women

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background The emergence of breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy as the treatment of choice for early stage breast cancer has resulted in greater focus on oncoplastic breast surgery. The use of perforator flaps has particularly gained in reputation for its effectiveness in the reconstruction of partial breast defects in Korean women. Herein, we present our experience with the use of thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) and lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flaps.

Methods This study included 33 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using TDAP or LICAP flaps at our hospital from January 2011 to December 2014. Data from patient medical records, and patient satisfaction surveys, which were conducted 12 months postoperatively, were retrospectively evaluated.

Results TDAP and LICAP flap-based reconstructions were performed in 14 and 19 patients, respectively. Five patients developed complications that required additional intervention. Overall patient satisfaction was observed to be excellent in 15 (46%) patients, and good in 12 (36%).

Conclusions Based on our experience, oncoplastic breast surgery using TDAP or LICAP flap is an effective remodeling technique for small-to-moderate breast defects in Korean women with smaller breasts.

Publication History

Received: 24 July 2017

Accepted: 10 October 2017

Article published online:
03 April 2022

© 2018. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Zumsteg ZS, Morrow M, Arnold B. et al. Breast-conserving therapy achieves locoregional outcomes comparable to mastectomy in women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3469-76
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1227-32
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H. et al. Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008; 134: 1311-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda E. et al. Immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction with perforator flaps: new challenges in the era of partial mastectomy reconstruction?. Breast 2011; 20: 233-40
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. et al. Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 531-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Yang JD, Lee JW, Kim WW. et al. Oncoplastic surgical techniques for personalized breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patient with small to moderate sized breast. J Breast Cancer 2011; 14: 253-61
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Yang JD, Kim MC, Lee JW. et al. Usefulness of oncoplastic volume replacement techniques after breast conserving surgery in small to moderate-sized breasts. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39: 489-96
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Yang JD, Lee JW, Cho YK. et al. Surgical techniques for personalized oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (part 2): volume replacement. J Breast Cancer 2012; 15: 7-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hamdi M, De Frene B. Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2006; 20: 73-8
  Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
• 10 Hamdi M, Rasheed MZ. Advances in autologous breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2012; 39: 477-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, de Frene B. et al. The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 644-52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Santanelli F, Longo B, Germano S. et al. Total breast reconstruction using the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap without implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 251-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 D’Aniello C, Grimaldi L, Barbato A. et al. Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999; 33: 419-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A. et al. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41: 471-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Hamdi M, Spano A, Van Landuyt K. et al. The lateral intercostal artery perforators: anatomical study and clinical application in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 389-96
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK. et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1456-61
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Hamdi M, Salgarello M, Barone-Adesi L. et al. Use of the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap with implant in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61: 143-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 McCulley SJ, Schaverien MV, Tan VK. et al. Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68: 686-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar