CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45(05): 395-402
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01585
Review Article

Current status of simulation training in plastic surgery residency programs: A review

Jennifer E. Thomson
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
,
Grace Poudrier
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
,
John T. Stranix
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
,
Catherine C. Motosko
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
,
Alexes Hazen
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
› Author Affiliations

Increased emphasis on competency-based learning modules and widespread departure from traditional models of Halstedian apprenticeship have made surgical simulation an increasingly appealing component of medical education. Surgical simulators are available in numerous modalities, including virtual, synthetic, animal, and non-living models. The ideal surgical simulator would facilitate the acquisition and refinement of surgical skills prior to clinical application, by mimicking the size, color, texture, recoil, and environment of the operating room. Simulation training has proven helpful for advancing specific surgical skills and techniques, aiding in early and late resident learning curves. In this review, the current applications and potential benefits of incorporating simulation-based surgical training into residency curriculum are explored in depth, specifically in the context of plastic surgery. Despite the prevalence of simulation-based training models, there is a paucity of research on integration into resident programs. Current curriculums emphasize the ability to identify anatomical landmarks and procedural steps through virtual simulation. Although transfer of these skills to the operating room is promising, careful attention must be paid to mastery versus memorization. In the authors’ opinions, curriculums should involve step-wise employment of diverse models in different stages of training to assess milestones. To date, the simulation of tactile experience that is reminiscent of real-time clinical scenarios remains challenging, and a sophisticated model has yet to be established.



Publication History

Received: 27 October 2017

Accepted: 03 February 2018

Article published online:
03 April 2022

© 2019. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Lawrence WT. Simulation in plastic surgery training and education: the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 739-40
  • 2 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol 2004; 172: 378-81
  • 3 Sidhu RS, Park J, Brydges R. et al. Laboratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 343-9
  • 4 Ghanem AM, Hachach-Haram N, Leung CC. et al. A systematic review of evidence for education and training interventions in microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40: 312-9
  • 5 Agha RA, Fowler AJ. The role and validity of surgical simulation. Int Surg 2015; 100: 350-7
  • 6 Fonseca AL, Evans LV, Gusberg RJ. Open surgical simulation in residency training: a review of its status and a case for its incorporation. J Surg Educ 2013; 70: 129-37
  • 7 Liebert CA, Mazer L, Bereknyei Merrell S. et al. Student perceptions of a simulation-based flipped classroom for the surgery clerkship: a mixed-methods study. Surgery 2016; 160: 591-8
  • 8 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 2003; 23: 317-22
  • 9 Chan WY, Matteucci P, Southern SJ. Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: a review. Microsurgery 2007; 27: 494-9
  • 10 Guerreschi P, Qassemyar A, Thevenet J. et al. Reducing the number of animals used for microsurgery training programs by using a task-trainer simulator. Lab Anim 2014; 48: 72-7
  • 11 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA. et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 458-63
  • 12 Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J. et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 146-50
  • 13 Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP. et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009; 338: b1802
  • 14 Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER. et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27: 10-28
  • 15 Fann JI, Caffarelli AD, Georgette G. et al. Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 1486-91
  • 16 Theman TA, Labow BI. Is there bias against simulation in microsurgery training?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32: 540-5
  • 17 Immenroth M, Burger T, Brenner J. et al. Mental training in surgical education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 385-91
  • 18 Al-Bustani S, Halvorson EG. Status of microsurgical simulation training in plastic surgery: a survey of United States program directors. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76: 713-6
  • 19 Black SA, Nestel DF, Kneebone RL. et al. Assessment of surgical competence at carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia in a simulated operating theatre. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 511-6
  • 20 Clarke DB, Kureshi N, Hong M. et al. Simulation-based training for burr hole surgery instrument recognition. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16: 153
  • 21 da Cruz JS, Dos Reis ST, Cunha Frati RM. et al. Does warmup training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? A prospective randomized analysis. J Surg Educ 2016; 73: 974-8
  • 22 Schendel S, Montgomery K, Sorokin A. et al. A surgical simulator for planning and performing repair of cleft lips. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005; 33: 223-8
  • 23 Stern C, Oliker A, Napier Z. et al. Integration of surgical simulation in plastic surgery residency training. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 173: 497-9
  • 24 Oliker A, Napier Z, Deluccia N. et al. Step-based cognitive virtual surgery simulation: an innovative approach to surgical education. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 173: 325-7
  • 25 Linke R, Leichtle A, Sheikh F. et al. Assessment of skills using a virtual reality temporal bone surgery simulator. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013; 33: 273-81
  • 26 Mitchell NM, Cutting CB, King TW. et al. A real-time local flaps surgical simulator based on advances in computational algorithms for finite element models. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 445e-452e
  • 27 Zheng Y, Lu B, Zhang J. et al. CAD/CAM silicone simulator for teaching cheiloplasty: description of the technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53: 194-6
  • 28 Kazan R, Courteau B, Cyr S. et al. A novel mammoplasty part-task trainer for simulation of breast augmentation: description and evaluation. Simul Healthc 2016; 11: 60-4
  • 29 Lausada NR, Escudero E, Lamonega R. et al. Use of cryopreserved rat arteries for microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2005; 25: 500-1
  • 30 Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B. et al. Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32: 233-41
  • 31 Kligman BE, Haddock NT, Garfein ES. et al. Microsurgery trainer with quantitative feedback: a novel training tool for microvascular anastomosis and suggested training exercise. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 328e-330e
  • 32 Carey JN, Rommer E, Sheckter C. et al. Simulation of plastic surgery and microvascular procedures using perfused fresh human cadavers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67: e42-e48
  • 33 Sheckter CC, Kane JT, Minneti M. et al. Incorporation of fresh tissue surgical simulation into plastic surgery education: maximizing extraclinical surgical experience. J Surg Educ 2013; 70: 466-74
  • 34 Singh M, Ziolkowski N, Ramachandran S. et al. Development of a five-day basic microsurgery simulation training course: a cost analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 213-7
  • 35 Chang CH. Medical simulation is needed in anesthesia training to achieve patient’s safety. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013; 64: 204-11
  • 36 Stephenson LS, Gorsuch A, Hersh WR. et al. Participation in EHR based simulation improves recognition of patient safety issues. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 224
  • 37 Denadai R, Kirylko L. Teaching basic plastic surgical skills on an alternative synthetic bench model. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33: 458-61
  • 38 Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Kapoor A. et al. Improving operative performance using a laparoscopic hernia simulator. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 725-8
  • 39 Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV. et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 272-83
  • 40 Scott DJ, Dunnington GL. The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 213-21
  • 41 Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH. et al. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 166-79
  • 42 Cotin S, Delingette H, Ayache N. A hybrid elastic model allowing real-time cutting, deformations and force feedback for surgery training and simulation. Visual Comput 2000; 16: 437-52
  • 43 Vadodaria S, Watkin N, Thiessen F. et al. The first cleft palate simulator. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 259-61
  • 44 Rosen JM, Long SA, McGrath DM. et al. Simulation in plastic surgery training and education: the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 729-38
  • 45 Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 25-32
  • 46 Aboud E, Al-Mefty O, Yasargil MG. New laboratory model for neurosurgical training that simulates live surgery. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 1367-72
  • 47 Aboud ET, Krisht AF, O’Keeffe T. et al. Novel simulation for training trauma surgeons. J Trauma 2011; 71: 1484-90
  • 48 Garrett Jr HE. A human cadaveric circulation model. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33: 1128-30
  • 49 Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79 (10 Suppl) S70-81
  • 50 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The plastic surgery milestone project [Internet]. Chicago, IL: ACGME; c2015 [cited 2018 Feb 5]. Available from https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/PlasticSurgeryMilestones.pdf
  • 51 Gosman A, Mann K, Reid CM. et al. Implementing assessment methods in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 617e-623e