Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Abdominal Radiology
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2021

18.09.2020 | Review

Locally advanced gallbladder cancer: a review of the criteria and role of imaging

verfasst von: Pankaj Gupta, Kesha Meghashyam, Yashi Marodia, Vikas Gupta, Rajender Basher, Chandan Krushna Das, Thakur Deen Yadav, Santhosh Irrinki, Ritambhra Nada, Usha Dutta

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is among one of the gastrointestinal malignancies with extremely dismal prognosis. This is due to the advanced stage at presentation. Majority of the patients with GBC are not considered candidates for surgery because of the locally advanced disease or metastases. However, with the accumulating evidence regarding the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, there is a need to correctly identify a subset of patients with locally advanced GBC who will benefit maximally from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and will be successfully downstaged to receive curative (R0) surgery. In this context, there is a lack of consensus and different groups have resorted to criteria for locally advanced disease eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on personal or institutional experiences. Imaging plays a critical role in the evaluation of patients with GBC as it helps stratify patients into resectable and unresectable. Imaging also has the potential to identify patients with locally advanced GBC and hence facilitate neoadjuvant chemotherapy and improve outcomes. In this review, we evaluate the various criteria for locally advanced GBC and the role of imaging in this scenario.
Literatur
1.
Hundal R, Shaffer EA (2014) Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol 6:99-109.
2.
Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC, Sharma ID (2013) Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Lancet Oncol4(3):167-176.
3.
Boerma EJ (1994) Towards an oncological resection of gall bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol20(5):537-544.
4.
Glazer ES, Liu P, Abdalla EK, Curley SA (2012) Neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant therapy increases survival after biliary tract cancer resection with wide negative margins. J Gastrointest Surg16(9):1666-1671.
5.
Sirohi B, Mitra A, Jagannath P, Singh A, Ramadvar M, Kulkarni S, et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gallbladder cancer. Future Oncol11(10):1501-1509.
6.
de Aretxabala X, Losada H, Mora J, Roa I, Burgos L, Yáñez E, et al (2004) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancer] Rev Med Chil.132(1):51-57.
7.
Selvakumar VP, Zaidi S, Pande P, Goel A, Kumar K (2015) Resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the gallbladder: a retrospective study. Indian J Surg Oncol.6(1):16-19.
8.
Engineer R, Goel M, Chopra S, Patil P, Purandare N, Rangarajan V, et al (2016) Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Gallbladder Cancers: A New Paradigm. Ann Surg Oncol.23(9):3009-3015.
9.
Li B, Xu XX, Du Y, Yang HF, Li Y, Zhang Q, et al (2013) Computed tomography for assessing resectability of gallbladder carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Imaging.37(2):327-333.
10.
Kim JH, Kim TK, Eun HW, Kim BS, Lee MG, Kim PN, et al (2002) Preoperative evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma: efficacy of combined use of MR imaging, MR cholangiography, and contrast-enhanced dual-phase three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging.16(6):676-684.
11.
Lai CH, Lau WY (2008) Gallbladder cancer–a comprehensive review. Surgeon.6(2):101-110.
12.
Kaushik SP. Current perspectives in gallbladder carcinoma (2001) J Gastroenterol Hepatol.16(8):848-854.
13.
Kapoor VK, Pradeep R, Haribhakti, SP, Sikora SS, Kaushik SP (1996) Early carcinoma of the gallbladder: an elusive disease. J Surg Oncol.62(4):284-287.
14.
Jin K, Lan H, Zhu T, Ke K, Teng L (2011) Gallbladder carcinoma incidentally encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how to deal with it. Clin Transl Oncol. 13(1):25-33.
15.
Fahim RB, Mcdonald JR, Richards JC, Farris DO (1962) Carcinoma of the gallbladder: a study of its modes of spread. Ann Surg.;156(1):114-124.
16.
Kondo S, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, et al (2002) Mode of tumor spread and surgical strategy in gallbladder carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg.387(5-6):222-228.
17.
Pandey M, Pathak AK, Gautam A, Aryya NC, Shukla VK (2001) Carcinoma of the gallbladder: a retrospective review of 99 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46(6):1145-1151.
18.
Gupta P, Kumar S, Sharma V, Mandavdhare H, Dhaka N, Sinha SK, et al (2019) Common and uncommon imaging features of abdominal tuberculosis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol.;63(3):329-339.
19.
Kumar S, Gupta P, Sharma V, Mandavdhare H, Bhatia A, Sinha S, et al (2019). Role of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Omentum in Diagnosis of Abdominal Tuberculosis. Surg Infect (Larchmt).;20(1):91-94.
20.
Ahamed Z R, Shah J, Agarwala R, Kumar-M P, Mandavdhare HS, Gupta P, et al (2019) Controversies in classification of peritoneal tuberculosis and a proposal for clinico-radiological classification. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther.17(8):547-555.
21.
Meyers MA, McSweeney J (1972) Secondary neoplasms of the bowel. Radiology 105: 1–11.
22.
Willis RA: The Spread of Tumours in the Human Body. Second edition. Butterworth and Co, London, 1952
23.
Gupta P, Rana S, Agarwal P. Peritoneal tuberculosis or carcinomatosis: A diagnostic conundrum (2018) Int J Mycobacteriol.;7(2):198-199.
24.
Agarwal AK, Kalayarasan R, Javed A, Gupta N, Nag HH (2013) The role of staging laparoscopy in primary gall bladder cancer–an analysis of 409 patients: a prospective study to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy in the management of gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg.;258(2):318-323.
25.
Gupta P, Kumar M, Sharma V, Dutta U, Sandhu MS (2020) Evaluation of gallbladder wall thickening: a multimodality imaging approach. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol.;1-11.
26.
Rodríguez-Fernández A, Gómez-Río M, Medina-Benítez A, Moral JV, Ramos-Font C, Ramia-Angel JM, et al (2006) Application of modern imaging methods in diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol.;93(8):650-664.
27.
Bach AM, Loring LA, Hann LE, Illescas FF, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1998) Gallbladder cancer: can ulrasonography evaluate extent of disease? J Ultrasound Med.;17:303–309
28.
Tsuchiya Y (1991) Early carcinoma of the gallbladder: macroscopic features and US findings. Radiology.;179:171–175.
29.
Kalra N, Suri S, Gupta R, Natarajan SK, Khandelwal N, Wig JD, et al (2006) MDCT in the staging of gallbladder carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol.186(3):758-762.
30.
Furlan A, Ferris JV, Hosseinzadeh K, Borhani AA (2008) Gallbladder carcinoma update: multimodality imaging evaluation, staging, and treatment options. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191(5):1440-1447.
31.
Kim SJ, Lee JM, Lee JY, Choi JY, Kim SH, Han JK, et al (2008) Accuracy of preoperative T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol.190(1):74-80.
32.
Tseng JH, Wan YL, Hung CF, Ng KK, Pan KT, Chou AS, et al (2002) Diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma. Evaluation with dynamic MR imaging. Clin Imaging.;26(3):177-182.
33.
de Savornin Lohman EAJ, de Bitter TJJ, van Laarhoven CJHM, Hermans JJ, de Haas RJ, de Reuver PR (2019) The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for the detection of lymph node metastases in gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol.;110:156-162.
34.
Valle JW, Borbath I, Khan SA, Huguet F, Gruenberger T, Arnold D (2016) ESMO Guidelines Committee. Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol.;27(suppl 5):v28-v37.
35.
Lee SW, Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, et al (2010) Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 45(5):560-566.
36.
Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Arya S, Shrikhande SV, Hawaldar R, Purandare N, et al (2008) Does PET-CT scan have a role prior to radical re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer?. HPB (Oxford).10(6):439-445.
37.
Patkar S, Chaturvedi A, Goel M, Rangarajan V, Sharma A, Engineer R (2020) Role of positron emission tomography-contrast enhanced computed tomography in locally advanced gallbladder cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 27(4):164-170.
38.
Goel S, Aggarwal A, Iqbal A, Gupta M, Rao A, Singh S, et al (2020) 18-FDG PET-CT should be included in preoperative staging of gall bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;S0748-7983(20)30412-1.
39.
Koh T, Taniguchi H, Yamaguchi A, Kunishima S, Yamagishi H (2003) Differential diagnosis of gallbladder cancer using positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-labeled fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET). J Surg Oncol. 84(2):74-81.
40.
Lee SW, Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, et al (2010) Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 45(5):560-566.
41.
Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Arya S, Shrikhande SV, Hawaldar R, Purandare N, et al (2008) Does PET-CT scan have a role prior to radical re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer?. HPB (Oxford).;10(6):439-445.
42.
Kumar R, Sharma P, Kumari A, Halanaik D, Malhotra A (2012) Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrent gallbladder carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med.37(5):431-435.
43.
Acharya MR, Patkar S, Parray A, Goel M (2019) Management of gallbladder cancer in India. Chin Clin Oncol. 8(4):35.
44.
Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjödén PO, Jacobsson G, Sellström H, Enander LK, et al (1996). Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol. 7(6):593-600.
45.
Goetze TO, Paolucci V (2008) Benefits of reoperation of T2 and more advanced incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German registry. Ann Surg. 247(1):104-108.
46.
Creasy JM, Goldman DA, Dudeja V, et al (2017) Systemic Chemotherapy Combined with Resection for Locally Advanced Gallbladder Carcinoma: Surgical and Survival Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg.224(5):906-916.
47.
Chaudhari VA, Ostwal V, Patkar S, Sahu A, Toshniwal A, Ramaswamy A, et al (2018) Outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in “locally advanced/borderline resectable” gallbladder cancer: the need to define indications. HPB (Oxford).;20(9):841-847.
48.
Kato A, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, Yoshidome H, Yoshitomi H, Furukawa K, et al. (2013) Surgical resection after downsizing chemotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective single-center study. Ann Surg Oncol20(1):318-324.
49.
Birnbaum DJ, Viganò L, Ferrero A, Langella S, Russolillo N, Capussotti L (2014) Locally advanced gallbladder cancer: which patients benefit from resection?. Eur J Surg Oncol.40(8):1008-1015.
50.
Aloia TA, Járufe N, Javle M, Maithel SK, Roa JC, Adsay V, et al (2015) Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford).;17(8):681-690.
51.
Agrawal S, Mohan L, Mourya C, Neyaz Z, Saxena R (2016) Radiological Downstaging with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer Cases. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 17(4):2137-2140.
52.
Villaruz LC, Socinski MA (2013). The clinical viewpoint: definitions, limitations of RECIST, practical considerations of measurement. Clin Cancer Res. 19(10):2629-2636.
Metadaten
Titel
Locally advanced gallbladder cancer: a review of the criteria and role of imaging
verfasst von
Pankaj Gupta
Kesha Meghashyam
Yashi Marodia
Vikas Gupta
Rajender Basher
Chandan Krushna Das
Thakur Deen Yadav
Santhosh Irrinki
Ritambhra Nada
Usha Dutta
Publikationsdatum
18.09.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02756-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Abdominal Radiology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Hollow Organ GI

Improving the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging

Pelvis

Pretreatment MR-based radiomics nomogram as potential imaging biomarker for individualized assessment of perineural invasion status in rectal cancer

Review

Abdominal and pelvic 18F-FDG PET/MR: a review of current and emerging oncologic applications

Hepatobiliary

Effect of sarcopenia on systemic targeted therapy response in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatobiliary

How frequently does hepatocellular carcinoma develop in at-risk patients with a negative liver MRI examination with intravenous Gadobenate dimeglumine?

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Tobacco pouch appearance: HSG sign of tubercular salphingitis

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

13.04.2024 | Klinik aktuell | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

29.03.2024 | Diagnostische Radiologie | Nachrichten

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie
weitere anzeigen

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen