Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014

01.01.2014

Location and number of sutures placed for hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: does it matter?

verfasst von: Nabeel R. Obeid, Spencer Deese-Laurent, Bradley F. Schwack, Heekoung Youn, Marina S. Kurian, Christine Ren-Fielding, George A. Fielding

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

It has been demonstrated that hiatal hernia repair (HHR) during laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) decreases the rate of reoperation. However, the technical aspects (location and number of sutures) are not standardized. It is unknown whether such technical details are associated with differing rates of reoperation for band-related problems.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed from a single institution, including 2,301 patients undergoing LAGB with HHR from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Independent variables were number and location of sutures. Data collected included demographics, operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), follow-up time, postoperative BMI/%EWL, and rates of readmission/reoperation. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and Chi squared tests. Kaplan–Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression tests were used for follow-up data and reoperation rates, in order to account for differential length of follow-up and confounding variables.

Results

There was no difference in length of follow-up among all groups. The majority of patients had one suture (range 1–6; 55 %). Patients with fewer sutures had shorter OR time (1 suture 45 min vs. 4+ sutures 56 min, p < 0.0001). LOS, 30-day readmission, band-related reoperation, and postop BMI/%EWL were not statistically significant. Anterior suture placement (vs. posterior vs. both) was most common (61 %). OR time was shorter in those with anterior suture (41 min vs. posterior 56 min vs. both 59 min, p < 0.0001). Patients with posterior suture had a longer LOS (84 % 1 day vs. anterior 74 % 1 day vs. both 74 % 1 day, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day readmission, band-related reoperation, and postoperative BMI/%EWL.

Conclusions

Patients with fewer or anterior sutures have shorter OR times. However, 30-day readmission, band-related reoperation, and postoperative weight loss were unaffected by number or location of suture. The technical aspects of HHR did not appear to be associated with readmission or reoperation, and therefore a standardized approach may not be necessary.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson TD, Hutter MM (2012) Morbidity and effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, adjustable gastric band, and gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Adv Surg 46:255–268PubMedCrossRef Jackson TD, Hutter MM (2012) Morbidity and effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, adjustable gastric band, and gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Adv Surg 46:255–268PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakravartty S, Murgatroyd B, Ashton D, Patel A (2012) Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a matched comparison. Obes Surg 22:1695–1700PubMedCrossRef Chakravartty S, Murgatroyd B, Ashton D, Patel A (2012) Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a matched comparison. Obes Surg 22:1695–1700PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, Hartman JS, Hoyt DB (2009) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 250:631–641PubMed Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, Hartman JS, Hoyt DB (2009) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 250:631–641PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips E, Ponce J, Cunneen SA, Bhoyrul S, Gomez E, Ikramuddin S, Jacobs M, Kipnes M, Martin L, Marema RT, Pilcher J, Rosenthal R, Rubenstein R, Teixeira J, Trus T, Zundel N (2009) Safety and effectiveness of realize adjustable gastric band: 3-year prospective study in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:588–597PubMedCrossRef Phillips E, Ponce J, Cunneen SA, Bhoyrul S, Gomez E, Ikramuddin S, Jacobs M, Kipnes M, Martin L, Marema RT, Pilcher J, Rosenthal R, Rubenstein R, Teixeira J, Trus T, Zundel N (2009) Safety and effectiveness of realize adjustable gastric band: 3-year prospective study in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:588–597PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M (2005) A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg 15:820–826PubMedCrossRef O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, Anderson M (2005) A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg 15:820–826PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Lorenzo N, Furbetta F, Favretti F, Segato G, De Luca M, Micheletto G, Zappa M, De Meis P, Lattuada E, Paganelli M, Lucchese M, Basso N, Capizzi FD, Di Cosmo L, Mancuso V, Civitelli S, Gardinazzi A, Giardiello C, Veneziani A, Boni M, Borrelli V, Schettino A, Forestieri P, Pilone V, Camperchioli I, Lorenzo M (2010) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding via pars flaccida versus perigastric positioning: technique, complications, and results in 2,549 patients. Surg Endosc 24:1519–1523PubMedCrossRef Di Lorenzo N, Furbetta F, Favretti F, Segato G, De Luca M, Micheletto G, Zappa M, De Meis P, Lattuada E, Paganelli M, Lucchese M, Basso N, Capizzi FD, Di Cosmo L, Mancuso V, Civitelli S, Gardinazzi A, Giardiello C, Veneziani A, Boni M, Borrelli V, Schettino A, Forestieri P, Pilone V, Camperchioli I, Lorenzo M (2010) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding via pars flaccida versus perigastric positioning: technique, complications, and results in 2,549 patients. Surg Endosc 24:1519–1523PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ (2005) U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc 19:1631–1635PubMedCrossRef Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ (2005) U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc 19:1631–1635PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponce J, Fromm R, Paynter S (2006) Outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band repositioning for slippage or pouch dilation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:627–631PubMedCrossRef Ponce J, Fromm R, Paynter S (2006) Outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band repositioning for slippage or pouch dilation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:627–631PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson L, Ma W, Hirschowitz B (1999) Association of obesity with hiatal hernia and esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2840PubMedCrossRef Wilson L, Ma W, Hirschowitz B (1999) Association of obesity with hiatal hernia and esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2840PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gulkarov I, Wetterau M, Ren CJ, Fielding GA (2008) Hiatal hernia repair at the initial laparoscopic adjustable gastric band operation reduces the need for reoperation. Surg Endosc 22:1035–1041PubMedCrossRef Gulkarov I, Wetterau M, Ren CJ, Fielding GA (2008) Hiatal hernia repair at the initial laparoscopic adjustable gastric band operation reduces the need for reoperation. Surg Endosc 22:1035–1041PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynoso JF, Goede MR, Tiwari MM, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D, McBride CL (2011) Primary and revisional laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement in patients with hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:290–294PubMedCrossRef Reynoso JF, Goede MR, Tiwari MM, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D, McBride CL (2011) Primary and revisional laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement in patients with hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:290–294PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan K, Finch R, Fielding G (2003) Laparoscopic gastric banding and crural repair in the obese patient with a hiatal hernia. Obes Surg 13:772–775PubMedCrossRef Dolan K, Finch R, Fielding G (2003) Laparoscopic gastric banding and crural repair in the obese patient with a hiatal hernia. Obes Surg 13:772–775PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharaf RN, Weinshel EH, Bini EJ, Rosenberg J, Ren CJ (2004) Radiologic assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Does it play an important preoperative role in bariatric surgery? Obes Surg 14:313–317PubMedCrossRef Sharaf RN, Weinshel EH, Bini EJ, Rosenberg J, Ren CJ (2004) Radiologic assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Does it play an important preoperative role in bariatric surgery? Obes Surg 14:313–317PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heacock L, Parikh M, Jain R, Balthazar E, Hindman N (2012) Improving the diagnostic accuracy of hiatal hernia in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 22:1730–1733PubMedCrossRef Heacock L, Parikh M, Jain R, Balthazar E, Hindman N (2012) Improving the diagnostic accuracy of hiatal hernia in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 22:1730–1733PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich J, Strom K, Pasquariello J, Fresco S, Barbalinardo J (2010) Routine hiatal hernia repair in laparoscopic gastric banding. Surg Technol Int 20:163–166PubMed Reich J, Strom K, Pasquariello J, Fresco S, Barbalinardo J (2010) Routine hiatal hernia repair in laparoscopic gastric banding. Surg Technol Int 20:163–166PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Location and number of sutures placed for hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: does it matter?
verfasst von
Nabeel R. Obeid
Spencer Deese-Laurent
Bradley F. Schwack
Heekoung Youn
Marina S. Kurian
Christine Ren-Fielding
George A. Fielding
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3161-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.