Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2018

19.07.2017

Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis

verfasst von: Mikito Inokuchi, Masatoshi Nakagawa, Toshiro Tanioka, Keisuke Okuno, Kentaro Gokita, Kazuyuki Kojima

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic (laparoscopy-assisted) gastrectomy (LG) has several short-term benefits as compared with open distal gastrectomy (OG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Survival rates did not differ significantly between LG and OG in retrospective studies of AGC, although some studies included unmatched groups of patients or patients with AGC who had a preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer. The aim of present study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with AGC who underwent LG with those of patients with AGC who underwent OG using a propensity-score matching analysis.

Methods

The study group comprised patients with a preoperative and pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AGC who underwent LG or OG with lymphadenectomy between January 2001 and December 2012 in our hospital. To minimize bias between the LG and OG groups, propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model and the following variables: sex, age, body-mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, type of gastrectomy, and clinical and pathological tumor stage. After propensity-score matching, 104 patients (52 who underwent LG and 52 who underwent OG) were studied.

Results

LG was associated with significantly earlier initiation of food intake (p <0.01) and a significantly shorter period of postoperative hospitalization (p <0.01). The incidence of all-grade overall, surgical, and medical complications did not differ significantly between the LG group and OG group (p = 0.24, p = 0.12, and p >0.99). Overall and relapse-free survival also did not differ between the LG group and OG group (p = 0.96, p = 0.91). In each tumor stage, overall and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between the LG group and OG group.

Conclusion

LG can be a feasible treatment that is beneficial in terms of earlier recovery after operation and can be expected to result in similar survival as OG in patients with AGC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M (2016) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20:699–708CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M (2016) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20:699–708CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen K, Xu XW, Zhang RC, Pan Y, Wu D, Mou YP (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19:5365–5376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen K, Xu XW, Zhang RC, Pan Y, Wu D, Mou YP (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19:5365–5376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang W, Zhang X, Shen C, Zhi X, Wang B, Xu Z (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 18:e88753CrossRef Wang W, Zhang X, Shen C, Zhi X, Wang B, Xu Z (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 18:e88753CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataoka K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Nakamura K, Morita S, Yoshikawa T, Ito S, Kinoshita T, Fukagawa T, Sasako M, Stomach Cancer Study Group/Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2016) Non-randomized confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage i gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401. J Gastric Cancer 16:93–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kataoka K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Nakamura K, Morita S, Yoshikawa T, Ito S, Kinoshita T, Fukagawa T, Sasako M, Stomach Cancer Study Group/Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2016) Non-randomized confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage i gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401. J Gastric Cancer 16:93–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35CrossRefPubMed Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong O, Jung MR, Kim GY, Kim HS, Ryu SY, Park YK (2013) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method. J Am Coll Surg 216:184–191CrossRefPubMed Jeong O, Jung MR, Kim GY, Kim HS, Ryu SY, Park YK (2013) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method. J Am Coll Surg 216:184–191CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW, Ryu SY, Park YK, Kim S, Kim YW (2015) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 102:1500–1505CrossRefPubMed Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW, Ryu SY, Park YK, Kim S, Kim YW (2015) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 102:1500–1505CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Inokuchi M, Otsuki S, Ogawa N, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kawano T, Kojima K (2016) Postoperative complications of laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis of high-quality case-controlled studies. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016:2617903CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inokuchi M, Otsuki S, Ogawa N, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kawano T, Kojima K (2016) Postoperative complications of laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis of high-quality case-controlled studies. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016:2617903CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai J, Wei D, Gao CF, Zhang CS, Zhang H, Zhao T (2011) A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. Dig Surg 28:331–337CrossRefPubMed Cai J, Wei D, Gao CF, Zhang CS, Zhang H, Zhao T (2011) A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. Dig Surg 28:331–337CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M, Xu M, Zhuang B, Zhang P, Yu B, Min Z (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 19:939–950CrossRefPubMed Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M, Xu M, Zhuang B, Zhang P, Yu B, Min Z (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 19:939–950CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou ZH, Zhao LY, Mou TY, Hu YF, Yu J, Liu H, Chen H, Wu JM, An SL, Li GX (2014) Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:16750–16764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zou ZH, Zhao LY, Mou TY, Hu YF, Yu J, Liu H, Chen H, Wu JM, An SL, Li GX (2014) Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:16750–16764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Q, Wang J, Zhang G, Wang J, Yang B, Zhang Z (2016) Feasibility and safety comparison of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric carcinoma with D2 lymphadenectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:323–328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Q, Wang J, Zhang G, Wang J, Yang B, Zhang Z (2016) Feasibility and safety comparison of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric carcinoma with D2 lymphadenectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:323–328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KH, Kim YM, Kim MC, Jung GJ (2013) Is laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy feasible for the treatment of gastric cancer? A case-matched study. Dig Surg 30:348–354CrossRefPubMed Kim KH, Kim YM, Kim MC, Jung GJ (2013) Is laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy feasible for the treatment of gastric cancer? A case-matched study. Dig Surg 30:348–354CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JX, Huang CM, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Jun L, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M (2016) Is all advanced gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case-control study using a propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1252–1260CrossRefPubMed Lin JX, Huang CM, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Jun L, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M (2016) Is all advanced gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case-control study using a propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1252–1260CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, Yoshida K, Takagane A, Kojima K, Sakuramoto S, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2015) A multi-institutional, prospective, phase ii feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 39:2734–2741CrossRefPubMed Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, Yoshida K, Takagane A, Kojima K, Sakuramoto S, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2015) A multi-institutional, prospective, phase ii feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 39:2734–2741CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura A, Ogata K, Kogure N, Yanoma T, Suzuki M, Toyomasu Y, Ohno T, Mochiki E, Kuwano H (2016) Outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1 plus lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis. Surg Endosc 30:2090–2096CrossRefPubMed Kimura A, Ogata K, Kogure N, Yanoma T, Suzuki M, Toyomasu Y, Ohno T, Mochiki E, Kuwano H (2016) Outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1 plus lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients postoperatively diagnosed with locally advanced disease or lymph node metastasis. Surg Endosc 30:2090–2096CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Ohyama S, Yamada K, Yamaguchi T (2009) Better prognosis of T2 gastric cancer with preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1514–1519CrossRefPubMed Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Ohyama S, Yamada K, Yamaguchi T (2009) Better prognosis of T2 gastric cancer with preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1514–1519CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810CrossRefPubMed Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd english edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd english edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hao Y, Yu P, Qian F, Zhao Y, Shi Y, Tang B, Zeng D, Zhang C (2016) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study in a single minimally invasive surgery center. Medicine 95:e3936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hao Y, Yu P, Qian F, Zhao Y, Shi Y, Tang B, Zeng D, Zhang C (2016) Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study in a single minimally invasive surgery center. Medicine 95:e3936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W (2008) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for T2b advanced gastric cancers: three years’ experience. J Surg Oncol 98:515–519CrossRefPubMed Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W (2008) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for T2b advanced gastric cancers: three years’ experience. J Surg Oncol 98:515–519CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Lenzi E, Moraldi L, Cantafio S, Feroci F (2011) Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a case-control study. Updates Surg 63:17–23CrossRefPubMed Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Lenzi E, Moraldi L, Cantafio S, Feroci F (2011) Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a case-control study. Updates Surg 63:17–23CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y, Yu P, Hao Y, Qian F, Tang B, Shi Y, Luo H, Zhang Y (2011) Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2960–2966CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Yu P, Hao Y, Qian F, Tang B, Shi Y, Luo H, Zhang Y (2011) Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2960–2966CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Qi F, Jiang Y, Zhai H, Ji Y (2015) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:13564–13570PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Y, Qi F, Jiang Y, Zhai H, Ji Y (2015) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:13564–13570PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Kim MC, Kim W, Ryu SY, Ryu SW, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Kim HH, Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2012) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 26:1548–1553CrossRefPubMed Park DJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Kim MC, Kim W, Ryu SY, Ryu SW, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Kim HH, Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2012) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 26:1548–1553CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly KJ, Selby L, Chou JF, Dukleska K, Capanu M, Coit DG, Brennan MF, Strong VE (2015) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the west: a case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3590–3596CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kelly KJ, Selby L, Chou JF, Dukleska K, Capanu M, Coit DG, Brennan MF, Strong VE (2015) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the west: a case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3590–3596CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, Piao Z, Park YK (2014) Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2994–3001CrossRefPubMed Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, Piao Z, Park YK (2014) Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2994–3001CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou D, Quan Z, Wang J, Zhao M, Yang Y (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer: effect of learning curve on short-term outcomes. a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:139–150CrossRefPubMed Zhou D, Quan Z, Wang J, Zhao M, Yang Y (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer: effect of learning curve on short-term outcomes. a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:139–150CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS, Shin DJ, Ahn HS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2016) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 19:264–272CrossRefPubMed Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS, Shin DJ, Ahn HS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2016) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 19:264–272CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg 101:1209–1229CrossRefPubMed Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg 101:1209–1229CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis
verfasst von
Mikito Inokuchi
Masatoshi Nakagawa
Toshiro Tanioka
Keisuke Okuno
Kentaro Gokita
Kazuyuki Kojima
Publikationsdatum
19.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5730-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.