Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019

25.06.2018

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities

verfasst von: Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, Miguel Angel Carbajo, Jose Maria Jimenez, Maria Jose Castro, Gilberto Gonzalez, Javier Ortiz-de-Solorzano, Lorea Zubiaga

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) has exponentially increased in the last decade, as it is associated with very low complications, mortality, readmissions and reoperations rates, and shows excellent short- and long-term benefits of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of SG, RYGB, and OAGB, on short- and long-term weight loss and comorbidities resolution.

Methods

A prospective randomized clinical study of all morbidly obese patients undergoing SG, RYGB, and OAGB, as primary bariatric procedures, was performed. Patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups: those patients undergoing SG, those ones undergoing RYGB and those ones undergoing OAGB. BMI, excess BMI loss (EBMIL) and remission of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hypertension (HT), and dyslipidemia (DL) were assessed.

Results

600 patients were included in the study, 200 in each group. Follow-up rate at 5 years postoperatively was 91% in SG group, 92% in RYGB, and 90% in OAGB. OAGB achieves significantly greater EBMIL than RYGB and SG at 1, 2, and 5 years (p < 0.001, respectively). At 5 years, OAGB achieves significantly greater remission of T2DM (p = 0.027), HT (p = 0.006), and DL (p < 0.001) than RYGB and SG. RYGB did not show significant superiority than SG in short- and long-term remission of T2DM and HT, but achieves greater remission of DL (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

OAGB achieves superior mid- and long-term weight loss than RYGB and SG. There are no significant differences in weight loss between SG and RYGB at 1, 2, and 5 years. OAGB achieves better short- and long-term resolution rates of DM, HT, and DL than SG and RYGB. RYGB and SG obtain similar T2DM and HT remissions, but RYGB reaches significantly greater rates of DL remission. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03467646.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG et al (2016) Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988–1994 through 2013–2014. JAMA 315:2292–2299CrossRef Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG et al (2016) Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988–1994 through 2013–2014. JAMA 315:2292–2299CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Melissas J, Stavroulakis K, Tzikoulis V et al (2017) Sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Data from IFSO-European chapter center of excellence program. Obes Surg 27:847–855CrossRef Melissas J, Stavroulakis K, Tzikoulis V et al (2017) Sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Data from IFSO-European chapter center of excellence program. Obes Surg 27:847–855CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbajo MA, Luque de Leon E, Jimenez JM et al (2017) Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg 27:1153–1167CrossRef Carbajo MA, Luque de Leon E, Jimenez JM et al (2017) Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg 27:1153–1167CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg 252:319–324CrossRef Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg 252:319–324CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N et al (2011) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev 12:602–621CrossRef Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N et al (2011) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev 12:602–621CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25:1822–1832CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25:1822–1832CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez V, Carrasco F, Cuevas A et al (2016) Mechanisms of long-term weight regain in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Nutrition 32:303–308CrossRef Alvarez V, Carrasco F, Cuevas A et al (2016) Mechanisms of long-term weight regain in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Nutrition 32:303–308CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Tovar J, Martinez R, Bonete JM et al (2016) Long-term weight and metabolic effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy calibrated with a 50-Fr Bougie. Obes Surg 26:32–37CrossRef Ruiz-Tovar J, Martinez R, Bonete JM et al (2016) Long-term weight and metabolic effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy calibrated with a 50-Fr Bougie. Obes Surg 26:32–37CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Kadre L, Tinoco AC, Tinoco RC et al (2013) Overcoming the learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 12-year experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:867–872CrossRef El-Kadre L, Tinoco AC, Tinoco RC et al (2013) Overcoming the learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 12-year experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:867–872CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F et al (2011) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:516–525CrossRef Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F et al (2011) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:516–525CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Disse E, Pasquer A, Espalieu P et al (2014) Greater weight loss with the omega loop bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study. Obes Surg 24:841–846CrossRef Disse E, Pasquer A, Espalieu P et al (2014) Greater weight loss with the omega loop bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study. Obes Surg 24:841–846CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jammu GS, Sharma R (2016) A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and mini gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg 26:926–932CrossRef Jammu GS, Sharma R (2016) A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and mini gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg 26:926–932CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC et al (2012) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg 22:1827–1834CrossRef Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC et al (2012) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg 22:1827–1834CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W et al (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 242:20–28CrossRef Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W et al (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 242:20–28CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737CrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoar S, Saber AA (2017) Long-term and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:170–180CrossRef Shoar S, Saber AA (2017) Long-term and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:170–180CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J et al (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:241–254CrossRef Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J et al (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:241–254CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Karra E, Yousseif A, Batterham RL (2010) Mechanisms facilitating weight loss and resolution of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery. Trends Endocrin Met 21:337–344CrossRef Karra E, Yousseif A, Batterham RL (2010) Mechanisms facilitating weight loss and resolution of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery. Trends Endocrin Met 21:337–344CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaziano TA, Abrahams-Gessel S, Alam S et al (2016) Comparison of nonblood-based and blood-based total CV risk scores in global populations. Glob Heart 11:37–46CrossRef Gaziano TA, Abrahams-Gessel S, Alam S et al (2016) Comparison of nonblood-based and blood-based total CV risk scores in global populations. Glob Heart 11:37–46CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB et al (2013) Cliniacl practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient – 2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of clinical endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society of Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:159–191CrossRef Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB et al (2013) Cliniacl practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient – 2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of clinical endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society of Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:159–191CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities
verfasst von
Jaime Ruiz-Tovar
Miguel Angel Carbajo
Jose Maria Jimenez
Maria Jose Castro
Gilberto Gonzalez
Javier Ortiz-de-Solorzano
Lorea Zubiaga
Publikationsdatum
25.06.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.