Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2018

09.07.2018 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Liver Resections for Primary Hepatobiliary Malignancies: A Multicenter Study

verfasst von: Sidrah Khan, MD, Rachel E. Beard, MD, Peter T. Kingham, MD, Yuman Fong, MD, Thomas Boerner, MD, John B. Martinie, MD, Dioneses Vrochides, MD, Joseph F. Buell, MD, Eren Berber, MD, Bora Kahramangil, MD, Roberto I. Troisi, MD, Aude Vanlander, MD, Michele Molinari, MD, Allan Tsung, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has emerged as a feasible alternative to laparoscopic or open resections with comparable perioperative outcomes. Little is known about the oncologic adequacy of RLS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing RLS for primary hepatobiliary malignancies.

Methods

We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients who underwent RLS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC), or gallbladder cancer (GBC) between 2006 and 2016. Age, gender, histology, resection margin status, extent of surgical resection, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

Of the 61 included patients, 34 (56%) had RLS performed for HCC, 16 (26%) for CC, and 11 (18%) for GBC. The majority of resections were nonanatomical or segmental resections (39.3%), followed by central hepatectomy (18%), left-lateral sectionectomy (14.8%), left hepatectomy (13.1%), right hepatectomy (13.1%), and right posterior segmentectomy (1.6%). R0 resection was achieved in 94% of HCC, 68% of CC, and 81.8% of GBC patients. Median hospital stay was 5 days, and conversion to open surgery was needed in seven patients (11.5%). Grade III–IV Dindo–Clavien complications occurred in seven patients with no perioperative mortality. Median follow-up was 75 months (95% confidence interval 36–113), and 5-year OS and DFS were 56 and 38%, respectively. When stratified by tumor type, 3-year OS was 90% for HCC, 65% for GBC, and 49% for CC (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

RLS can be performed for primary hepatobiliary malignancies with long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to published open and laparoscopic data.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson AB, D’Angelica MI, Abrams TA, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. J Natl Comprehen Cancer Network JNCCN. 2009;7(4):350–91.CrossRef Benson AB, D’Angelica MI, Abrams TA, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. J Natl Comprehen Cancer Network JNCCN. 2009;7(4):350–91.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabbach G, Assi HA, Bolotin G, et al. Hepatobiliary tumors: update on diagnosis and management. J Clin Trans Hepatol. 2015;3:169–81.CrossRef Kabbach G, Assi HA, Bolotin G, et al. Hepatobiliary tumors: update on diagnosis and management. J Clin Trans Hepatol. 2015;3:169–81.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma: hype and reality. Hepatology. 2014;60(3):779–81.CrossRefPubMed El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma: hype and reality. Hepatology. 2014;60(3):779–81.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.CrossRefPubMed Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheth S, Bedford A, Chopra S. Primary gallbladder cancer: recognition of risk factors and the role of prophylactic cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(6):1402–10.CrossRefPubMed Sheth S, Bedford A, Chopra S. Primary gallbladder cancer: recognition of risk factors and the role of prophylactic cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(6):1402–10.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2008;22(11):2350–6.CrossRef Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2008;22(11):2350–6.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;141(2):15–20.CrossRef Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;141(2):15–20.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong J, Altaf K, Javed MA, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(45):6657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xiong J, Altaf K, Javed MA, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(45):6657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, et al. Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):842–8.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, et al. Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):842–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagante F, Spolverato G, Strasberg SM, et al. Minimally invasive vs. open hepatectomy: a comparative analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(9):1608–17.CrossRefPubMed Bagante F, Spolverato G, Strasberg SM, et al. Minimally invasive vs. open hepatectomy: a comparative analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(9):1608–17.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2016;30(5):1999–2010.CrossRef Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2016;30(5):1999–2010.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. World consensus conference on laparoscopic surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. World consensus conference on laparoscopic surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayahi G, Cherqu D, Geller DA, et. al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection. A Report from the Second International Consensus Conference, Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–29. Wakabayahi G, Cherqu D, Geller DA, et. al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection. A Report from the Second International Consensus Conference, Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–29.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao L, Xiang L, Li J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(10):2994–3001.CrossRefPubMed Xiao L, Xiang L, Li J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(10):2994–3001.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J. A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(2):139–42.CrossRefPubMed Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J. A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(2):139–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467–77.PubMed Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467–77.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(3):295–301.CrossRefPubMed Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(3):295–301.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Han DH, Choi SH, Park EJ, et al. Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg. 2016;12(4):735–42.CrossRef Han DH, Choi SH, Park EJ, et al. Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg. 2016;12(4):735–42.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):549–55.CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):549–55.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery. 2011;149(1):29–39.CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery. 2011;149(1):29–39.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, et al. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2015;22(10):721–7.CrossRef Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, et al. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2015;22(10):721–7.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee W, Park J-H, Kim J-Y, et al. Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4835–40.CrossRefPubMed Lee W, Park J-H, Kim J-Y, et al. Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4835–40.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn S, Cho A, Kim EK, Paik KY. Favorable long-term oncologic outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma following laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2016;26(6):447–52.CrossRef Ahn S, Cho A, Kim EK, Paik KY. Favorable long-term oncologic outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma following laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2016;26(6):447–52.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang X, Liu L, Zhang Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcomes. J BUON. 2016;21(1):135–41.PubMed Jiang X, Liu L, Zhang Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcomes. J BUON. 2016;21(1):135–41.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Leong WQ, Ganpathi IS, Kow AWC, et al. Comparative study and systematic review of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(27):2765–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leong WQ, Ganpathi IS, Kow AWC, et al. Comparative study and systematic review of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(27):2765–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Levi Sandri GB, Spoletini G, Mascianà G, et al. The role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO). 2017;43(9):1617–1621.CrossRefPubMed Levi Sandri GB, Spoletini G, Mascianà G, et al. The role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO). 2017;43(9):1617–1621.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Uy BJ, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY. Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(4):272–7.CrossRefPubMed Uy BJ, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY. Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(4):272–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Corrati A, Angelini M. Robotics in general surgery. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):777.CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Corrati A, Angelini M. Robotics in general surgery. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):777.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, et al. Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2016;30(7):3060–70.CrossRef Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, et al. Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2016;30(7):3060–70.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, et al. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepato-Biliary Pancr Sci. 2011;18(4):471-80.CrossRef Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, et al. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepato-Biliary Pancr Sci. 2011;18(4):471-80.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai ECH, Yang GPC, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg. 2013;205(6):697–702.CrossRefPubMed Lai ECH, Yang GPC, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg. 2013;205(6):697–702.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Y, Hu R, Lai H, Lee P. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg. 2014;37(2):53–7.CrossRefPubMed Wu Y, Hu R, Lai H, Lee P. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg. 2014;37(2):53–7.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen BY, Zhan Q, Deng XX, et al. Radical resection of gallbladder cancer: could it be robotic? Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2012;26(11):3245–50.CrossRef Shen BY, Zhan Q, Deng XX, et al. Radical resection of gallbladder cancer: could it be robotic? Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2012;26(11):3245–50.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanisamy S, Patel N, Sabnis S, Palanisamy N, et al. Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for suspected early gall bladder carcinoma: thinking beyond convention. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2016;30(6):2442–8.CrossRef Palanisamy S, Patel N, Sabnis S, Palanisamy N, et al. Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for suspected early gall bladder carcinoma: thinking beyond convention. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2016;30(6):2442–8.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiu CJ, Yang J, Hong Y, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2350–3.CrossRef Xiu CJ, Yang J, Hong Y, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2350–3.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Chen X, Sun D. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Perc Tech. 2016;26(6):e157–e160. Zhang Y, Chen X, Sun D. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Perc Tech. 2016;26(6):e157–e160.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KF, Chong CN, Wong J, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis. World J Surg. 2011;35:2268.CrossRefPubMed Lee KF, Chong CN, Wong J, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis. World J Surg. 2011;35:2268.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong J, Altaf K, Javed M, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(45):6657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xiong J, Altaf K, Javed M, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(45):6657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Cipriani F, Fantini C, Ratti F, et al. Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. Can we extend the surgical indication in cirrhotic patients? Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):617–26.CrossRefPubMed Cipriani F, Fantini C, Ratti F, et al. Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. Can we extend the surgical indication in cirrhotic patients? Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):617–26.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Liver Resections for Primary Hepatobiliary Malignancies: A Multicenter Study
verfasst von
Sidrah Khan, MD
Rachel E. Beard, MD
Peter T. Kingham, MD
Yuman Fong, MD
Thomas Boerner, MD
John B. Martinie, MD
Dioneses Vrochides, MD
Joseph F. Buell, MD
Eren Berber, MD
Bora Kahramangil, MD
Roberto I. Troisi, MD
Aude Vanlander, MD
Michele Molinari, MD
Allan Tsung, MD
Publikationsdatum
09.07.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6629-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.