The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01610-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
In peripheral artery disease (PAD), endovascular treatment success of heavily calcified lesions is often compromised by a number of vascular complications, such as recoils, dissections and need for target vessel re-interventions. The increasing use of scoring balloon techniques has raised the hope for better periprocedural outcomes; however, the knowledge regarding the actual benefits of the scoring balloon technique in comparison to standard therapy is still limited. Thus, the aim of the current study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of scoring balloon angioplasty in a real-life patients’ collective with PAD.
A total of 425 patients with moderate to severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions received interventional treatment between 2011 and 2018 at the single center; 230 received a treatment with a scoring balloon (AngioSculpt™), and 195 received a plain procedure without AngioSculpt™. Key questions of this analysis were: (1) whether AngioSculpt™ can be used as a safe and effective stand-alone treatment in heavily calcified lesions in a 24-month follow-up, as well as (2) whether target lesion preparation with scoring balloon bears additional benefits to standard treatment (PTA ± stent implantation). In terms of freedom from target lesion revascularization there were no significant differences between AngioSculpt™ and standard procedure (82.3% vs. 78.1%, P > 0.05). Vessel preparation with balloon angioplasty had no additional effects on survival and amputation rates in comparison to standard treatment without AngioSculpt™ (P > 0.05). The deployment of a scoring balloon did not reduce the subsequent need for additional stent implantations (32.6%, and 32.3%, P > 0.05).
Lesion preparation with AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon represents a safe and effective tool in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions. In this retrospective analysis, AngioSculpt™ scoring balloon angioplasty did not significantly improve vessel patency- both when used as an adjunctive in preparation for stenting and as stand-alone treatment. A prospective study is needed to further investigate the scoring balloon treatment options.
Baril DT, Marone LK, Kim J, Go MR, Chaer RA, Rhee RY (2008) Outcomes of endovascular interventions for TASC II B and C femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Surg 48(3):627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.059 CrossRefPubMed
Price LZ, Faries PL, McKinsey JF, Prakash K, Tang GH, Kovacic JC, Tadros RO (2019) The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and novel treatment of calcific arterial disease. Surg Technol Int 34:351–358 PubMed
Lichtenberg M, Korosoglou G (2019) Atherectomy plus antirestenotic therapy for SFA lesions: evolving evidence for better patency rates in complex lesions. J Cardiovasc Surg 60(2):205–211. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10844-0 CrossRef
Dias-Neto M, Matschuck M, Bausback Y, Banning-Eichenseher U, Steiner S, Branzan D, Staab H, Varcoe RL, Scheinert D, Schmidt A (2018) Endovascular treatment of severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions using the “pave-and-crack” technique: technical description and 12-month results. J Endovasc Ther 25(3):334–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602818763352 CrossRefPubMed
Lugenbiel I, Grebner M, Zhou Q, Strothmeyer A, Vogel B, Cebola R, Muller O, Brado B, Mittnacht M, Kohler B, Katus H, Blessing E (2018) Treatment of femoropopliteal lesions with the AngioSculpt scoring balloon—results from the Heidelberg PANTHER registry. VASA Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten 47(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000671 CrossRefPubMed
Gray WA, Granada JF (2010) Drug-coated balloons for the prevention of vascular restenosis. Circulation 121(24):2672–2680. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.936922 CrossRefPubMed
Fonseca A, Costa JDER Jr, Abizaid A, Feres F, Abizaid AS, Costa R, Staico R, Mattos LA, Sousa AG, Grube E, Sousa JE (2008) Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the novel AngioSculpt scoring balloon catheter for the treatment of complex coronary lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 20(1):21–27 PubMed
Schmidt T, Hansen S, Meincke F, Frerker C, Kuck KH, Bergmann MW (2016) Safety and efficacy of lesion preparation with the AngioSculpt Scoring Balloon in left main interventions: the ALSTER Left Main registry. EuroIntervention 11(12):1346–1354. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M05_04 CrossRefPubMed
Scheinert D, Peeters P, Bosiers M, O’Sullivan G, Sultan S, Gershony G (2007) Results of the multicenter first-in-man study of a novel scoring balloon catheter for the treatment of infra-popliteal peripheral arterial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Intervent 70(7):1034–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21341 CrossRef
Abdel-Wahab M, Toelg R, Byrne RA, Geist V, El-Mawardy M, Allali A, Rheude T, Robinson DR, Abdelghani M, Sulimov DS, Kastrati A, Richardt G (2018) High-speed rotational atherectomy versus modified balloons prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent 11(10):e007415. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007415 CrossRef
Brodmann M, Werner M, Holden A, Tepe G, Scheinert D, Schwindt A, Wolf F, Jaff M, Lansky A, Zeller T (2019) Primary outcomes and mechanism of action of intravascular lithotripsy in calcified, femoropopliteal lesions: results of Disrupt PAD II. Catheter Cardiovasc Intervent 93(2):335–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27943 CrossRef
Marmagkiolis K, Lendel V, Cilingiroglu M (2015) OCT evaluation of directional atherectomy compared to balloon angioplasty. Cardiovasc Revasc Med Includ Mol Intervent 16(6):373–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2015.02.003 CrossRef
- Long-term outcome upon treatment of calcified lesions of the lower limb using scoring angioplasty balloon (AngioSculpt™)
Oliver J. Müller
Hugo A. Katus
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie
Mail Icon II