Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2018

18.09.2017 | Original Article

Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse

verfasst von: Brian J. Linder, Sherif A. El-Nashar, Alain A. Mukwege, Amy L. Weaver, Michaela E. McGree, Deborah J. Rhodes, John B. Gebhart, Christopher J. Klingele, John A. Occhino, Emanuel C. Trabuco

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) or sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and evaluate predictors of prolapse recurrence.

Methods

The medical records of patients managed surgically for stage IV apical POP from January 2002 to June 2012 were reviewed. A follow-up survey was sent to these patients. The primary outcome, prolapse recurrence, was defined as recurrence of prolapse symptoms measured by validated questionnaire or surgical retreatment. Survival time free of prolapse recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated factors for an association with recurrence.

Results

Of 2633 women treated for POP, 399 (15.2%) had stage IV apical prolapse and were managed with either USLS (n = 355) or sacrocolpopexy (n = 44). Those managed with USLS were significantly older (p < 0.001) and less likely to have a prior hysterectomy (39.7 vs 86.4%; p < 0.001) or prior apical prolapse repair (8.2 38.6%; p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 4.3 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.1–7.7]. Survival free of recurrence was similar between USLS and sacrocolpopexy (p = 0.43), with 5-year rates of 88.7 and 97.6%, respectively. Younger age [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–2.13; p = 0.008] and prior hysterectomy (aHR 2.8, 95% CI 1.39–5.64; p = 0.004) were associated with the risk of prolapse recurrence, whereas type of surgery approached statistical significance (aHR 2.76, 95% CI 0.80–9.60; p = 0.11).

Conclusions

Younger age and history of prior hysterectomy were associated with an increased risk of recurrent prolapse symptoms. Notably, excellent survival free of prolapse recurrence were obtained with both surgical techniques.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):609–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):609–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278–83.CrossRefPubMed Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gotthart PT, Aigmueller T, Lang PF, Ralph G, Bjelic-Radisic V, Tamussino K. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(9):1221–4.CrossRefPubMed Gotthart PT, Aigmueller T, Lang PF, Ralph G, Bjelic-Radisic V, Tamussino K. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(9):1221–4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvatore S, Siesto G, Serati M. Risk factors for recurrence of genital prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(5):420–4.CrossRefPubMed Salvatore S, Siesto G, Serati M. Risk factors for recurrence of genital prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(5):420–4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Denman MA, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL. Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):555):e551–5.CrossRef Denman MA, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL. Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):555):e551–5.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Aslam MF, Osmundsen B, Edwards SR, Matthews C, Gregory WT. Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015. Aslam MF, Osmundsen B, Edwards SR, Matthews C, Gregory WT. Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Diez-Itza I, Aizpitarte I, Becerro A. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery: a review at 5 years after surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(11):1317–24.CrossRefPubMed Diez-Itza I, Aizpitarte I, Becerro A. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery: a review at 5 years after surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(11):1317–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieminen K, Huhtala H, Heinonen PK. Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(5):471–8.CrossRefPubMed Nieminen K, Huhtala H, Heinonen PK. Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(5):471–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1533–8.CrossRefPubMed Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1533–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD004014. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD004014.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolusari A, Yildizhan R, Adali E, et al. Short-term results of posterior intravaginal slingplasty in grade 4 uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(1):55–8.CrossRefPubMed Kolusari A, Yildizhan R, Adali E, et al. Short-term results of posterior intravaginal slingplasty in grade 4 uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(1):55–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, et al. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):645–50.CrossRefPubMed Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, et al. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):645–50.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, Lee RA. Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(2):281–5.PubMed Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, Lee RA. Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(2):281–5.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Klingele CJ, Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Gebhart JB, Riederer SG, Zinsmeister AR. Pelvic organ prolapse in defecatory disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):315–20.CrossRefPubMed Klingele CJ, Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Gebhart JB, Riederer SG, Zinsmeister AR. Pelvic organ prolapse in defecatory disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):315–20.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1388–95.CrossRefPubMed Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1388–95.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK, et al. The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am j obstet gynecol. 2009;200(5):580. e581-587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK, et al. The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am j obstet gynecol. 2009;200(5):580. e581-587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell KA, Guess MK, Chen H, Andikyan V, Bercik R, Taylor HS. HOXA11 Is critical for development and maintenance of uterosacral ligaments and deficient in pelvic prolapse. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(3):1050–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Connell KA, Guess MK, Chen H, Andikyan V, Bercik R, Taylor HS. HOXA11 Is critical for development and maintenance of uterosacral ligaments and deficient in pelvic prolapse. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(3):1050–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):295–302.CrossRefPubMed DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):295–302.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvatore S, Athanasiou S, Digesu GA, et al. Identification of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):301–4.CrossRefPubMed Salvatore S, Athanasiou S, Digesu GA, et al. Identification of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):301–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664. e661-667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664. e661-667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):572. e571-576CrossRefPubMed Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):572. e571-576CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):625–32.CrossRefPubMed Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):625–32.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rondini C, Braun H, Alvarez J, et al. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(8):1131–8.CrossRefPubMed Rondini C, Braun H, Alvarez J, et al. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(8):1131–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse
verfasst von
Brian J. Linder
Sherif A. El-Nashar
Alain A. Mukwege
Amy L. Weaver
Michaela E. McGree
Deborah J. Rhodes
John B. Gebhart
Christopher J. Klingele
John A. Occhino
Emanuel C. Trabuco
Publikationsdatum
18.09.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3482-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.