Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

27.01.2022 | Epidemiology

Long-term outcomes of women with large DCIS lesions treated with breast-conserving therapy

verfasst von: Danielle Rodin, Rinku Sutradhar, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sumei Gu, Neil Faught, Ezra Hahn, Cindy Fong, Sabina Trebinjac, Lawrence Paszat, Eileen Rakovitch

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The paucity of data on women with large (≥ 40 mm) DCIS tumors lead to uncertainty on the safety of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for these patients. We evaluated the impact of large tumor size on local recurrence (LR) among women with DCIS treated with BCS ± radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

Treatment and outcomes were ascertained through administrative databases for all women with DCIS in Ontario from 1994 to 2003 treated with BCS ± RT with negative margins; 82% had pathology review. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of tumor size on LR. 10- and 15-year LR-free survival (LRFS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

The cohort includes 2049 women treated by BCS (N = 1073 with RT). Median follow-up is 14 years (IQR 9–17 years). Referenced to tumors ≤ 10 mm, the risk of LR following BCS was significantly higher for larger tumors: HR ≥ 40 mm = 3.67 (95% CI 2.13, 6.33; p < 0.001), HR 26–39 mm = 2.27 (95% CI 1.47, 3.50, p < 0.001), and HR 11–25 mm = 1.42 (95% CI 1.06, 1.92, p = 0.02). However, for individuals with BCS + RT, large tumor size was not associated with a significantly increased risk of LR (HR ≥ 40 mm = 1.92 (95% CI 0.97, 3.79); HR 26–39 mm = 1.81 (95% CI 1.09–2.99)). For women with tumors ≥ 40 mm, 10-year LRFS risk for those treated by BCS alone, BCS + RT without boost, and BCS + RT with boost was 58.9%, 82.8%, and 83.9%.

Conclusion

Large DCIS lesions ≥ 40 mm are associated with higher risks of LR following BCS, but high long-term LRFS rates can be achieved with the addition of breast RT.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagara Y, Mallory MA, Wong S et al (2015) Survival benefit of breast surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Surg 150(8):739–745CrossRef Sagara Y, Mallory MA, Wong S et al (2015) Survival benefit of breast surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Surg 150(8):739–745CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al (1998) Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 16(2):441–452CrossRef Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al (1998) Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 16(2):441–452CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS et al (2000) Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853: EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet 355(9203):528–533CrossRef Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS et al (2000) Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853: EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet 355(9203):528–533CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Donker M, Litiere S, Werutsky G et al (2013) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma In Situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4054–4059CrossRef Donker M, Litiere S, Werutsky G et al (2013) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma In Situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4054–4059CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(6):478–488CrossRef Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(6):478–488CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Correa C, McGale P et al (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 41:162–177CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Correa C, McGale P et al (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 41:162–177CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R et al (2015) Trends in treatment patterns and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(12):263CrossRef Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R et al (2015) Trends in treatment patterns and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(12):263CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mammary Fold Academic Research Collaborative (2016) Variation in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ in the UK: results of the Mammary fold national practice survey. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(8):1153–1161CrossRef Mammary Fold Academic Research Collaborative (2016) Variation in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ in the UK: results of the Mammary fold national practice survey. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(8):1153–1161CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Seguin R, Peiris L (2021) National variations in the work-up, investigation, and surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast across canadian surgeons. Curr Oncol 28(2):1366–1375CrossRef Seguin R, Peiris L (2021) National variations in the work-up, investigation, and surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast across canadian surgeons. Curr Oncol 28(2):1366–1375CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufman SA, Harris EE, Bailey L et al (2015) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncology 29(6):446–458PubMed Kaufman SA, Harris EE, Bailey L et al (2015) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncology 29(6):446–458PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton SN, Nichol A, Wai E et al (2019) Local relapse after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for extensive pure ductal carcinoma in situ ≥4 cm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103(2):381–388CrossRef Hamilton SN, Nichol A, Wai E et al (2019) Local relapse after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for extensive pure ductal carcinoma in situ ≥4 cm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103(2):381–388CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L et al (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ: the LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51(12):1497–1510CrossRef Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L et al (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ: the LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51(12):1497–1510CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Francis A, Thomas J, Fallowfield L et al (2015) Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial. Eur J Cancer 51(16):2296–2303CrossRef Francis A, Thomas J, Fallowfield L et al (2015) Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial. Eur J Cancer 51(16):2296–2303CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakovitch E, Sutradhar R, Lalani N et al (2019) Multiple foci of microinvasion is associated with an increased risk of invasive local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178(1):169–176CrossRef Rakovitch E, Sutradhar R, Lalani N et al (2019) Multiple foci of microinvasion is associated with an increased risk of invasive local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178(1):169–176CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakovitch E, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W et al (2017) Multigene expression assay and benefit of radiotherapy after breast conservation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(4):14CrossRef Rakovitch E, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W et al (2017) Multigene expression assay and benefit of radiotherapy after breast conservation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(4):14CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH et al (1996) A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 77(11):2267–2274CrossRef Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH et al (1996) A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 77(11):2267–2274CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua BH, Link E, Kunkler I, et al. A randomized phase III study of radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast (BIG 3–07/TROG 07.01). San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021; San Antonio, Texas. Chua BH, Link E, Kunkler I, et al. A randomized phase III study of radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast (BIG 3–07/TROG 07.01). San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021; San Antonio, Texas.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mercieca-Bebber R, King MT, Boxer MM et al (2017) What quality-of-life issues do women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) consider important when making treatment decisions? Breast Cancer 24(5):720–729CrossRef Mercieca-Bebber R, King MT, Boxer MM et al (2017) What quality-of-life issues do women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) consider important when making treatment decisions? Breast Cancer 24(5):720–729CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayman JA, Kabeto MU, Schipper MJ, Bennett JE, Vicini FA, Pierce LJ (2005) Assessing the benefit of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma-in-situ. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5171–5177CrossRef Hayman JA, Kabeto MU, Schipper MJ, Bennett JE, Vicini FA, Pierce LJ (2005) Assessing the benefit of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma-in-situ. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5171–5177CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Subhedar P, Olcese C, Patil S, Morrow M, Van Zee KJ (2015) Decreasing recurrence rates for ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 2996 women treated with breast-conserving surgery over 30 years. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3273–3281CrossRef Subhedar P, Olcese C, Patil S, Morrow M, Van Zee KJ (2015) Decreasing recurrence rates for ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 2996 women treated with breast-conserving surgery over 30 years. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3273–3281CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat van la Parra RFD, Clough KB, Lejalle-Alaeddine C, Poulet B, Sarfati I, Nos C (2019) Oncoplastic level 2 mammoplasty for large DCIS: 5-year results. Ann Surg Oncol 26(8):2459–2465CrossRef van la Parra RFD, Clough KB, Lejalle-Alaeddine C, Poulet B, Sarfati I, Nos C (2019) Oncoplastic level 2 mammoplasty for large DCIS: 5-year results. Ann Surg Oncol 26(8):2459–2465CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakovitch E, Sutradhar R, Nofech-Mozes S et al (2021) 21-gene assay and breast cancer mortality in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 113(5):572–579CrossRef Rakovitch E, Sutradhar R, Nofech-Mozes S et al (2021) 21-gene assay and breast cancer mortality in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 113(5):572–579CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicini FA, Shah CS, Whitworth PW et al (2021) Biosignatures to optimize adjuvant radiation therapy use in patients with DCIS with high risk clinicopathologic features. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 111(3S):S34–S35CrossRef Vicini FA, Shah CS, Whitworth PW et al (2021) Biosignatures to optimize adjuvant radiation therapy use in patients with DCIS with high risk clinicopathologic features. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 111(3S):S34–S35CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ et al (2016) Society of surgical oncology-american society for radiation oncology-american society of clinical oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Pract Radiat Oncol 6(5):287–295CrossRef Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ et al (2016) Society of surgical oncology-american society for radiation oncology-american society of clinical oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Pract Radiat Oncol 6(5):287–295CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al (1999) Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353(9169):1993–2000CrossRef Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al (1999) Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353(9169):1993–2000CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes JF, Sestak I, Howell A et al (2016) Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10021):866–873CrossRef Forbes JF, Sestak I, Howell A et al (2016) Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10021):866–873CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term outcomes of women with large DCIS lesions treated with breast-conserving therapy
verfasst von
Danielle Rodin
Rinku Sutradhar
Sharon Nofech-Mozes
Sumei Gu
Neil Faught
Ezra Hahn
Cindy Fong
Sabina Trebinjac
Lawrence Paszat
Eileen Rakovitch
Publikationsdatum
27.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06488-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Welche Krebserkrankungen bei Zöliakie häufiger auftreten

Eine große Kohortenstudie hat den Zusammenhang zwischen Zöliakie und gastrointestinalen Krebserkrankungen und inflammatorischen Krankheiten untersucht. Neben gastrointestinalen Tumoren ist auch ein nicht solider Krebs häufiger.

Adjuvanter PD-L1-Hemmer verhindert Rezidive bei Hochrisiko-Urothelkarzinom

Sind Menschen mit muskelinvasivem Urothelkarzinom für die neoadjuvante platinbasierte Therapie nicht geeignet oder sprechen sie darauf nicht gut an, ist Pembrolizumab eine adjuvante Alternative: Die krankheitsfreie Lebenszeit wird dadurch mehr als verdoppelt.

Duale Checkpointhemmung gegen Melanome verlängert langfristig das Leben

Im Vergleich zu den Überlebenschancen vor der Einführung von Immuncheckpointhemmern (ICI) ist der Fortschritt durch eine ICI-Kombination mit unterschiedlichen Tagets bei fortgeschrittenem Melanom erstaunlich. Das belegen die finalen Ergebnisse der CheckMate-067-Studie und geben Betroffenen "Hoffnung auf Heilung".

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.