Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

26.07.2024 | Original Article

Long-term patient-reported outcomes of open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation

verfasst von: Mark A. Pianka, Vishal Sundaram, Isabel Wolfe, Bradley Lezak, Michael R. Moore, Michael J. Alaia, Andrew J. Feldman, Laith M. Jazrawi

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OSBT) with cortical button fixation has been shown to deliver acceptable results in the short and intermediate term for long head of the biceps (LHB) pathology with the benefit of smaller bone tunnel diameter and a reduced risk of postoperative humeral shaft fracture. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether OSBT with cortical button fixation results in significant improvements in patient reported outcomes (PROs) from pre-operative to long-term final follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent OSBT with cortical button fixation at a single institution between the years of 2012 and 2014 was conducted and PROs were collected in the intermediate (> 2 years follow-up) and long term (> 9 years follow-up). PROs were measured pre-operatively, at intermediate follow-up, and at long-term follow-up using three validated questionnaires: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Patients were additionally asked at final follow-up if they would undergo the same procedure again if they needed it.

Results

Twenty-nine (29) patients with a mean age of 51.16 ± 9.06 years at the time of surgery were included in the study at final follow-up. Mean final follow-up time was 10.2 ± 0.5 years (range: 9.2–11.1 years). All PROs (ASES, OSS, and DASH) demonstrated statistically significant improvements from pre-operative to final follow-up with p < 0.01 for each. The proportions of patients exceeding established values for minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were 96.55%, 93.10%, and 75.86% for ASES, OSS, and DASH respectively. Only one patient had required re-operation as of final follow-up. None experienced humeral fractures post-operatively. A significant majority (89.66%; p < 0.01) of patients reported that they would undergo the same procedure again if they needed it. Fifty-three (53) patients were included in the study at intermediate follow-up with a mean follow-up time of 3.5 ± 1.4 years (range: 2–5.3 years). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the PRO measures from intermediate to long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

This study reported a minimum 9-year follow-up of patients undergoing OSBT with cortical button fixation for the management of LHBT pathology in the setting of concomitant shoulder procedures. All patients had significantly improved functional outcomes assessed with ASES, OSS, and DASH and no obvious differences in median group scores were found between patients assessed at intermediate (mean 3.5 years) and final (mean 10.2 years) follow-up. No infections, fractures, or fixation failures were reported.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Elser F, Braun S, Dewing CB, Giphart JE, Millett PJ (2011) Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon. Arthroscopy 27(4):581–592CrossRefPubMed Elser F, Braun S, Dewing CB, Giphart JE, Millett PJ (2011) Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon. Arthroscopy 27(4):581–592CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Khazzam M, George MS, Churchill RS, Kuhn JE (2012) Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):136–145CrossRefPubMed Khazzam M, George MS, Churchill RS, Kuhn JE (2012) Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):136–145CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nho SJ, Strauss EJ, Lenart BA et al (2010) Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(11):645–56CrossRefPubMed Nho SJ, Strauss EJ, Lenart BA et al (2010) Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(11):645–56CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K (1999) Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):644–654CrossRefPubMed Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K (1999) Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):644–654CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ et al (2003) Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(3):633–639CrossRefPubMed Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ et al (2003) Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(3):633–639CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurley ET, Colasanti CA, Lorentz NA et al (2022) Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be an alternative to arthroscopic repair for SLAP tears in patients under 30. Arthroscopy 38(2):307–312CrossRefPubMed Hurley ET, Colasanti CA, Lorentz NA et al (2022) Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be an alternative to arthroscopic repair for SLAP tears in patients under 30. Arthroscopy 38(2):307–312CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ (2005) Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 33(2):208–213CrossRefPubMed Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ (2005) Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 33(2):208–213CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ (2000) The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9(5):382–385CrossRefPubMed Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ (2000) The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9(5):382–385CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schickendantz M, King D (2016) Nonoperative management (including ultrasound-guided injections) of proximal biceps disorders. Clin Sports Med 35(1):57–73CrossRefPubMed Schickendantz M, King D (2016) Nonoperative management (including ultrasound-guided injections) of proximal biceps disorders. Clin Sports Med 35(1):57–73CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(2):326–332CrossRefPubMed Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(2):326–332CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsythe B, Berlinberg EJ, Diaz CC et al (2022) No difference in clinical outcomes for arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis at midterm follow-up: a randomized prospective analysis. Am J Sports Med 50(6):1486–1494CrossRefPubMed Forsythe B, Berlinberg EJ, Diaz CC et al (2022) No difference in clinical outcomes for arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis at midterm follow-up: a randomized prospective analysis. Am J Sports Med 50(6):1486–1494CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Voss A, Cerciello S, Yang J, Beitzel K, Cote MP, Mazzocca AD (2016) Open subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps. Clin Sports Med 35(1):137–152CrossRefPubMed Voss A, Cerciello S, Yang J, Beitzel K, Cote MP, Mazzocca AD (2016) Open subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps. Clin Sports Med 35(1):137–152CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O et al (2005) Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy 21(8):992–998CrossRefPubMed Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O et al (2005) Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy 21(8):992–998CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron SL, Shamah S, McGee AW, Alaia MJ, Feldman AJ, Jazrawi LM (2019) Clinical outcomes of open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation (2013). Bull Hosp Jt Dis 77(4):238–243 Baron SL, Shamah S, McGee AW, Alaia MJ, Feldman AJ, Jazrawi LM (2019) Clinical outcomes of open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation (2013). Bull Hosp Jt Dis 77(4):238–243
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Meadows JR, Diesselhorst MM, Finnoff JT, Swanson BL, Swanson KE (2016) Clinical and sonographic evaluation of bicortical button for proximal biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop 45(5):E283–E289PubMed Meadows JR, Diesselhorst MM, Finnoff JT, Swanson BL, Swanson KE (2016) Clinical and sonographic evaluation of bicortical button for proximal biceps tenodesis. Am J Orthop 45(5):E283–E289PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Snir N, Hamula M, Wolfson T, Laible C, Sherman O (2013) Long head of the biceps tenodesis with cortical button technique. Arthrosc Tech 2(2):e95–e97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Snir N, Hamula M, Wolfson T, Laible C, Sherman O (2013) Long head of the biceps tenodesis with cortical button technique. Arthrosc Tech 2(2):e95–e97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Puzzitiello RN, Gowd AK, Liu JN, Agarwalla A, Verma NN, Forsythe B (2019) Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28(4):639–647CrossRefPubMed Puzzitiello RN, Gowd AK, Liu JN, Agarwalla A, Verma NN, Forsythe B (2019) Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28(4):639–647CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ (2009) Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum 61(5):623–632CrossRefPubMed Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ (2009) Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum 61(5):623–632CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook JB, Sedory DM, Freidl MC, Adams DR (2017) Low incidence of failure after proximal biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button. J Orthop 14(3):384–389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cook JB, Sedory DM, Freidl MC, Adams DR (2017) Low incidence of failure after proximal biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button. J Orthop 14(3):384–389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalid MA, Morris RP, Black N, Maassen NH (2020) Biomechanical evaluation of humerus fracture after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw versus unicortical button. Arthroscopy 36(5):1253–1260CrossRefPubMed Khalid MA, Morris RP, Black N, Maassen NH (2020) Biomechanical evaluation of humerus fracture after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw versus unicortical button. Arthroscopy 36(5):1253–1260CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21(11):1296–1306CrossRefPubMed Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21(11):1296–1306CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacheta L, Rosenberg SI, Brady AW, Dornan GJ, Millett PJ (2019) Biomechanical comparison of subpectoral biceps tenodesis onlay techniques. Orthop J Sports Med 7(10):2325967119876276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lacheta L, Rosenberg SI, Brady AW, Dornan GJ, Millett PJ (2019) Biomechanical comparison of subpectoral biceps tenodesis onlay techniques. Orthop J Sports Med 7(10):2325967119876276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dekker TJ, Peebles LA, Preuss FR, Goldenberg BT, Dornan GJ, Provencher MT (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis of biceps tenodesis fixation strengths: fixation type and location are biomechanically equivalent. Arthroscopy 36(12):3081–3091CrossRefPubMed Dekker TJ, Peebles LA, Preuss FR, Goldenberg BT, Dornan GJ, Provencher MT (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis of biceps tenodesis fixation strengths: fixation type and location are biomechanically equivalent. Arthroscopy 36(12):3081–3091CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dein EJ, Huri G, Gordon JC, McFarland EG (2014) A humerus fracture in a baseball pitcher after biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 42(4):877–879CrossRefPubMed Dein EJ, Huri G, Gordon JC, McFarland EG (2014) A humerus fracture in a baseball pitcher after biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 42(4):877–879CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Virk MS, Nicholson GP (2016) Complications of proximal biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. Clin Sports Med 35(1):181–188CrossRefPubMed Virk MS, Nicholson GP (2016) Complications of proximal biceps tenotomy and tenodesis. Clin Sports Med 35(1):181–188CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hipp JA, Edgerton BC, An KN, Hayes WC (1990) Structural consequences of transcortical holes in long bones loaded in torsion. J Biomech 23(12):1261–1268CrossRefPubMed Hipp JA, Edgerton BC, An KN, Hayes WC (1990) Structural consequences of transcortical holes in long bones loaded in torsion. J Biomech 23(12):1261–1268CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs AN, Umlauf JA, Kniss JR (2020) Proximal humerus fracture following arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 50(11):649CrossRefPubMed Jacobs AN, Umlauf JA, Kniss JR (2020) Proximal humerus fracture following arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 50(11):649CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term patient-reported outcomes of open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation
verfasst von
Mark A. Pianka
Vishal Sundaram
Isabel Wolfe
Bradley Lezak
Michael R. Moore
Michael J. Alaia
Andrew J. Feldman
Laith M. Jazrawi
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2024
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04036-z

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).


Jetzt entdecken!

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Viele Versäumnisse bei Psoriasis-Arthritis

Menschen mit Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) müssen länger auf die Diagnose warten und werden zögerlicher behandelt als an rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) Erkrankte. Diese Defizite hat eine Untersuchung in Großbritannien aufgedeckt.

Yoga gegen Kniearthrose nicht schlechter als Krafttraining

Menschen mit Gonarthrose profitieren von Yogaübungen nicht weniger als von gezielten Kräftigungsübungen für die lädierten Knie. In einer Vergleichsstudie haben sich für Yogis und Yoginis sogar einige Vorteile ergeben.

Muskelrelaxanzien wohl nur bei akuten Kreuzschmerzen hilfreich

Bei akuten Rückenschmerzen können Muskelrelaxanzien, eventuell in Kombination mit NSAR, zur Schmerzlinderung beitragen. Wegen der Nebenwirkungen wird jedoch empfohlen, die Medikamente nur über wenige Tage einzusetzen.

Wie bereits der virtuelle "Blick ins Grüne" Schmerzen lindern kann

Dass der Blick in die Natur Menschen dazu bringen kann, Schmerzen weniger stark zu empfinden, konnte bereits mehrfach nachgewiesen werden. Jetzt ließen sich in einer experimentellen Studie sogar allein durch das Betrachten von Videos mit Naturszenen analgetische Effekte erzeugen.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.