Background
Methods
Assessment of implementation strategies
Recruitment
Data collection
Analysis
Results
Respondent characteristics
Year 1 (FY15) | Year 2 (FY16) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic |
N
| % |
N
| % |
Number of sites (of 130 total) | 80 | 62 | 105 | 81 |
HIT members | 68 | 85 | 95 | 90 |
Years in VA | ||||
< 3 | 13 | 16 | 23 | 22 |
4 to 9 | 25 | 31 | 31 | 30 |
10 to 19 | 25 | 31 | 38 | 36 |
> 20 | 17 | 21 | 13 | 12 |
Specialty | ||||
Gastroenterology | 33 | 41 | 42 | 40 |
Hepatology | ||||
Infectious disease | 17 | 21 | 21 | 20 |
Pharmacy | 13 | 16 | 31 | 30 |
Primary care | 8 | 10 | 6 | 6 |
Other (VERC, transplant) | 9 | 11 | 5 | 5 |
Site complexity | ||||
1a | 27 | 33 | 34 | 32 |
1b | 14 | 18 | 15 | 14 |
1c | 12 | 15 | 16 | 15 |
2 | 14 | 18 | 19 | 18 |
3 | 12 | 15 | 21 | 20 |
Responding VA sites | ||
---|---|---|
Year 1 (N = 80) | Year 2 (N = 105) | |
Number of viremic veterans | ||
Total in all sites | 103,991 | 112,935 |
Range | 47 to 4243 | 38 to 3415 |
Median (n, IQR) | 1149 (624, 1759) | 935 (523, 1467) |
HCV treatment starts | ||
Total (n) | 20,503 | 31,821 |
Range (n) | 3 to 1044 | 4 to 810 |
Median (n, IQR) | 197 (124, 312) | 264 (145, 416) |
% Treated | ||
Total (treated/viremic) | 20% | 28% |
Range (%) | 6 to 47 | 7 to 60 |
Median (%) | 18 (15, 24) | 29 (24, 34) |
Association between the total number of strategies endorsed and treatment starts
Specific strategies endorsed in each year
# | Strategy and Cluster | Year 1 N = 80 | Year 2 N = 105 | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure | ||||
1 | • Change physical structure and equipment | 53% | 51% | − 2% |
2 | • Change the record systems | 71% | 57% | − 14% |
3 | • Change the location of clinical service sites | 26% | 37% | 11% |
4 | • Develop a separate organization or group responsible for disseminating HCV care | 23% | 33% | 10% |
5 | • Mandate changes to HCV care | 55% | 52% | − 3% |
6 | • Create or change credentialing and/or licensure standards | 29% | 30% | 1% |
7 | • Participate in liability reform efforts that make clinicians more willing to deliver the clinical innovation | 4% | 11% | 7% |
8 | • Change accreditation or membership requirements | 4% | 1% | − 3% |
Financial | ||||
9 | • Access new funding | 30% | 41% | 11% |
10 | • Alter incentive/allowance structures | 5% | 10% | 5% |
11 | • Provide financial disincentives for failure to implement or use the clinical innovations | 0% | 2% | 2% |
12 | • Respond to proposals to deliver HCV care | 44% | 51% | 7% |
13 | • Change billing | 11% | 14% | 3% |
14 | • Place HCV medications on the formulary | 70% | 69% | − 1% |
15 | • Alter patient fees | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | • Use capitated payments | 0% | 1% | 1% |
17 | • Use other payment schemes | 5% | 2% | − 3% |
Support clinicians | ||||
18 | • Create new clinical teams | 46% | 50% | 4% |
19 | • Facilitate the relay of clinical data to providers | 56% | 68% | 12% |
20 | • Revise professional roles | 50% | 55% | 5% |
21 | • Develop reminder systems for clinicians | 34% | 44% | 10% |
22 | • Develop resource sharing agreements | 26% | 35% | 9% |
Provide interactive assistance | ||||
23 | • Use outside assistance often called “facilitation” | 8% | 12% | 4% |
24 | • Have someone from inside the clinic or center (often called “local technical assistance”) tasked with assisting the clinic | 15% | 25% | 10% |
25 | • Provide clinical supervision | 44% | 48% | 4% |
26 | • Use a centralized system to deliver facilitation | 28% | 28% | 0% |
Adapt and tailor to context | ||||
27 | • Use data experts to manage HCV data | 58% | 70% | 12% |
28 | • Use data warehousing techniques | 85% | 91% | 6% |
29 | • Tailor strategies to deliver HCV care | 63% | 81% |
18%*
|
30 | • Promote adaptability | 55% | 75% |
20%*
|
Train and educate stakeholders | ||||
31 | • Conduct educational meetings | 51% | 64% | 13% |
32 | • Have an expert in HCV care meet with providers to educate them | 41% | 53% | 12% |
33 | • Provide ongoing HCV training | 49% | 60% | 11% |
34 | • Facilitate the formation of groups of providers and fostered a collaborative learning environment | 44% | 43% | − 1% |
35 | • Developed formal educational materials | 39% | 35% | − 4% |
36 | • Distribute educational materials | 55% | 55% | 0% |
37 | • Provide ongoing consultation with one or more HCV treatment experts | 58% | 71% | 13% |
38 | • Train designated clinicians to train others | 20% | 26% | 6% |
39 | • Vary the information delivery methods to cater to different learning styles when presenting new information | 36% | 36% | 0% |
40 | • Give providers opportunities to shadow other experts in HCV | 33% | 22% | − 11% |
41 | • Use educational institutions to train clinicians | 11% | 15% | 4% |
Develop stakeholder interrelationships | ||||
42 | • Build a local coalition/team to address challenges | 53% | 53% | 0% |
43 | • Conduct local consensus discussions | 48% | 54% | 6% |
44 | • Obtain formal written commitments from key partners that state what they will do to implement HCV care | 4% | 4% | 0% |
45 | • Recruit, designate, and/or train leaders | 26% | 23% | − 3% |
46 | • Inform local opinion leaders about advances in HCV care | 49% | 46% | − 3% |
47 | • Share the knowledge gained from quality improvement efforts with other sites outside your medical center | 38% | 57% |
19%*
|
48 | • Identify and prepare champions | 50% | 52% | 2% |
49 | • Organize support teams of clinicians who are caring for patients with HCV and given them time to share the lessons learned and support one another’s learning | 26% | 32% | 6% |
50 | • Use advisory boards and interdisciplinary workgroups to provide input into HCV policies and elicit recommendations | 26% | 22% | − 4% |
51 | • Seek the guidance of experts in implementation | 44% | 50% | 6% |
52 | • Build on existing high-quality working relationships and networks to promote information sharing and problem solving related to implementing HCV care | 61% | 71% | 10% |
53 | • Use modeling or simulated change | 13% | 15% | 2% |
54 | • Partner with a university to share ideas | 14% | 11% | − 3% |
55 | • Make efforts to identify early adopters to learn from their experiences | 16% | 24% | 8% |
56 | • Visit other sites outside your medical center to try to learn from their experiences | 15% | 20% | 5% |
57 | • Develop an implementation glossary | 3% | 6% | 3% |
58 | • Involve executive boards | 23% | 33% | 10% |
Use evaluative and iterative strategies | ||||
59 | • Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators to change | 26% | 30% | 4% |
60 | • Conduct a local needs assessment | 45% | 43% | − 2% |
61 | • Develop a formal implementation blueprint | 34% | 36% | 2% |
62 | • Start with small pilot studies and then scale them up | 23% | 25% | 2% |
63 | • Collect and summarize clinical performance data and give it to clinicians and administrators to implement changes in a cyclical fashion using small tests of change before making system-wide changes | 21% | 26% | 5% |
64 | • Conduct small tests of change, measured outcomes, and then refined these tests | 19% | 21% | 2% |
65 | • Develop and use tools for quality monitoring | 41% | 32% | − 9% |
66 | • Develop and organize systems that monitor clinical processes and/or outcomes for the purpose of quality assurance and improvement | 30% | 28% | − 2% |
67 | • Intentionally examine the efforts to promote HCV care | 61% | 69% | 8% |
68 | • Develop strategies to obtain and use patient and family feedback | 20% | 20% | 0% |
Engage consumers | ||||
69 | • Involve patients/consumers and family members | 50% | 61% | 11% |
70 | • Engage in efforts to prepare patients to be active participants in HCV care | 63% | 57% | − 6% |
71 | • Intervene with patients/consumers to promote uptake and adherence to HCV treatment | 71% | 79% | 8% |
72 | • Use mass media to reach large numbers of people | 18% | 36% |
18%*
|
73 | • Promote demand for HCV care among patients through any other means | 40% | 52% | 12% |
Both years | Year 1 only | Year 2 only |
---|---|---|
Change infrastructure | ||
• Change physical structure/equipment • Change the location of clinical service sites | • Change accreditation or membership requirements • Liability reform | • Change the record systems |
Financial strategies | ||
• Alter incentive/allowance structures | ||
Support clinicians | ||
• Create new clinical teams • Revise professional roles | • Develop resource sharing agreements | • Facilitate the relay of clinical data to providers |
Provide interactive assistance | ||
• Provide clinical supervision | • Local technical assistance • Use a centralized system to deliver facilitation | |
Adapt and tailor to the context | ||
• Use data experts to manage HCV data | ||
Train/educate providers | ||
• Facilitate the formation of groups of providers and foster a collaborative learning environment | • Conduct educational meetings • Have an expert in HCV care meet with providers to educate them • Provide ongoing HCV training • Vary information delivery methods | • Use educational institutions to train clinicians • Distribute educational materials |
Develop stakeholder interrelationships | ||
• Build a local coalition/team to address challenges • Conduct local consensus discussions • Recruit, designate, and/or train leaders • Use modeling or simulated change • Make efforts to identify early adopters to learn from their experiences | • Partner with a university • Visit other sites outside your medical center to try to learn from their experiences • Identify and prepare champions • Inform local opinion leaders • Share the knowledge gained from quality improvement efforts with other sites • Build on existing high-quality working relationships and networks to promote information sharing and problem solving | • Organize support teams of clinicians who are caring for patients with HCV and given them time to share the lessons learned and support one another’s learning • Involve executive boards |
Use evaluative and iterative strategies | ||
• Collect and summarize clinical performance data and give it to clinicians and administrators to implement changes in a cyclical fashion using small tests of change before making system-wide changes | • Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators to change • Develop a formal implementation blueprint • Develop and organize systems that monitor clinical processes and/or outcomes for the purpose of quality assurance and improvement • Intentionally examine the efforts to promote HCV care • Conduct small tests of change, measured outcomes, and then refined these tests • Develop strategies to obtain and use patient and family feedback | |
Engage consumers | ||
• Engage in efforts to prepare patients to be active participants in HCV care |
Strategy | Non-HIT member endorsement (%) | HIT member endorsement (%) |
---|---|---|
Year 1
| N = 12 | N = 68 |
• Conduct educational meetings
|
17%
|
57%
|
• Provide ongoing HCV training
|
17%
|
54%
|
• Conduct local consensus discussions
|
17%
|
53%
|
• Use a centralized system to deliver facilitation
|
0%
|
32%
|
• Share the knowledge gained from quality improvement efforts with other sites outside your medical center
|
8%
|
43%
|
• Tailor strategies to deliver HCV care | 33% | 68% |
• Develop resource sharing agreements
|
0%
|
31%
|
• Build a local coalition/team to address challenges
|
25%
|
57%
|
• Respond to proposals to deliver HCV care | 17% | 49% |
• Provide clinical supervision
|
17%
|
49%
|
Year 2
| N = 10 | N = 95 |
• Inform local opinion leaders about advances in HCV care | 82% | 100% |
• Identify and prepare champions | 84% | 96% |
Attribution to the HIT Collaborative
Cluster | Percent of strategies attributed to HIT Collaborative | ||
---|---|---|---|
Year 1 | Year 2 | Change | |
Change infrastructure | 48 | 54 | 6 |
Financial strategies | 56 | 65 | 9 |
Support clinicians | 57 | 63 | 6 |
Provide interactive assistance | 40 | 58 | 18 |
Adapt and tailor to the context | 58 | 63 | 5 |
Train and educate stakeholders | 27 | 40 | 13 |
Develop stakeholder relationships | 41 | 59 | 18 |
Use evaluative and iterative strategies | 38 | 59 | 21 |
Engage consumer | 20 | 34 | 14 |