Background
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer in the developed world [
1,
2]. The high mortality rate (>70%) has been attributed to the advanced stage at diagnosis of most cases and the high relapse rate to paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery, which is the standard of care for patients [
3,
4]. EOC is classified into the major histological subtypes referred to as serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell or undifferentiated, based on the morphology of the tumour cells, and assigned a tumour grade according to degree of differentiation where high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) represents the largest proportion (up to 70%) of EOC cases [
5,
6]. Molecular genetic profiling suggests that HGSC is a disease distinct from the other histotypes [
7] with over 95% harbouring somatic
TP53 mutations and extensive genomic anomalies [
8-
11]. With the exception of high-grade endometrioid carcinomas (HGEC), which appear to overlap in their molecular genetic features with HGSC, the less common histotypes are each distinguishable from HGSC based on somatic mutations occurring in specific genes and gene expression profiles [
12-
14].
Our group has focused on investigating somatic molecular genetic events associated with tumour suppressor pathways affected in HGSC [
15-
18]. Towards this goal, we have started characterizing the genes reprogrammed in the context of a tumourigenic OV90 EOC cell line rendered non-tumourigenic as a consequence of a unique complementation assay involving the transfer of normal chromosomal fragments [
15,
16,
18]. OV90, derived from a long-term passage of undifferentiated adenocarcinoma of malignant ovarian ascites, exhibits the molecular genetic characteristics of HGSC, which includes the presence of a somatic
TP53 mutation and complex genomic rearrangements overlapping the spectrum of anomalies observed in HGSCs [
15,
19]. The non-tumourigenic hybrids displayed an altered cell morphology, a reduced capacity for colonies in soft agarose assays, inability to form spheroids in culture assays, and were unable to form tumours after injection into both subcutaneous and intraperitoenal sites in nude mice [
15]. A comparative analysis of transcriptomes from the parental tumourigenic OV90 cell line, with each non-tumourigenic genetically derived hybrid, identified a number of genes exhibiting differential expression, some of which have been shown to be implicated in EOC and other cancers [
15,
17,
20,
21]. The non-tumourigenic hydrids each acquired a unique spectrum of chromosome 3 genes as a consequence of the complementation assay [
15]. However, they all shared in common a transferred 3q12-pter interval, which contained a number of interesting candidates posted to elicit tumour suppressor pathways, including
VGLL3 [
15,
16,
18]. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (
IGFBP7), a gene suspected to play a role in tumour suppressor pathways in various cancer types but not extensively studied in EOC, was among the list of genes which were reprogrammed as a consequence of tumour suppression in our OV90 cell line model [
15,
22-
27].
IGFBP7 (
IGFBP-related protein-1 or
MAC25) is localized to chromosome 4q12 and encodes a secreted IGFBP-related protein, a member of the IGFBP family, that binds to IGF
-I and IGF-II with low affinity, and binds to insulin and activin with higher affinity [
28-
30]. In various cancer types,
IGFBP7 has been implicated in cellular processes including cell differentiation, cell adhesion, angiogenesis, cell growth and survival, senescence and apoptosis [
23,
27,
31-
34]. The study of
IGFBP7 in a variety of cancers, including breast, thyroid, lung, prostate, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic and liver cancer has suggested a role of a tumour suppressor gene [
22,
24,
26,
27,
35-
38]. In each of these cancer types or cell lines,
IGFBP7 was shown down-regulated and in some cases, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), gene deletion or DNA methylation were postulated as a mechanism of inactivation to affect the gene expression [
25-
27,
37,
39-
43].
IGFBP7 expression has been shown to be inversely correlated with tumour grade and stage in hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer, and has been associated with favourable outcomes in breast, pancreatic, colorectal and liver cancer patients [
26,
35-
38,
40,
42,
44,
45]. The emerging role of
IGFBP7 in the development and prognosis of a variety of cancer types is interesting given our observations that gene expression was up-regulated in our genetically modified non-tumourigenic OV90 cell line hybrids, as this would support a role in the tumour suppressor phenotype in this model.
In this report, we describe the gene and protein expression profile IGFBP7 in normal ovarian surface epithelial cells and fallopian tube samples respectively, as well as in HGSC samples and relate our findings to disease outcome. We focus on HGSC, as this is the most common subtype of EOC. We report the gene and protein expression profile of various well-characterized EOC cell lines, and investigate possible mechanisms of gene inactivation. We also describe various in vitro growth effects of exposing EOC cell lines to human recombinant IGFBP7 protein and conditioned media (CM) derived from IGFBP7 protein expressing cells. To our knowledge this is the first report of the expression profile of IGFBP7 in HGSC. We observed overall low or absent expression of IGFBP7 gene and protein relative to normal tissues, and a significant correlation with decreased protein expression in HGSC samples and prolonged overall survival. Our findings combined with dysregulation in a genetic modified ovarian cancer cell line model rendered non-tumourigenic which resulted in the up-regulation of IGFBP7, supports a role in tumour suppressor pathways.
Discussion
In this study we have shown for the first time significant
IGFBP7 under-expression in HGSC samples relative to reference NOSE cells. These results are intriguing in light of our observation of IGFBP7 protein expression in epithelial cells of distal fimbrae of the fallopian tube, as both NOSE and fallopian tubes have been proposed as the progenitor cell type for HGSC [
58,
65,
66]. Although it is difficult to directly compare gene expression with protein expression using IHC results, only about 8% of HGSC samples exhibited strong staining of epithelial tumour cells by IHC analysis of a TMA containing tumour cores as compared with about 72.6% of samples which showed absent or low staining levels. This suggests the possibility that IGFBP7 protein levels are indeed low or absent in the vast number of epithelial tumour cells of HGSCs.
We observed a significant positive association between IGFBP7 staining intensity in the epithelial cells of HGSC samples and overall survival. In our TMA analyses, the samples with no IGFBP7 staining were from patients that exhibited the poorest outcome, suggesting a role of IGFBP7 in molecular pathways associated with favourable outcome in HGSC. To our knowledge, our study is the first showing a significant correlation between expression of the protein and a more favourable patient outcome in HGSC. An association between low IGFBP7 expression and poor outcome was also observed in pancreatic ductal, breast and hepatocellular adenocarcinoma [
26,
35-
38,
40,
42,
44,
45]. These observations suggest a role of IGFBP7 in molecular pathways associated with favourable outcome in HGSC and other cancer types. In contrast, IGFBP7 expression has also been associated with poorest outcome of patient with oesophagial adenocarcinoma [
67] or colorectal cancer [
68]. It has become increasingly apparent that the levels of IGFBP7 differ in different cancer types, where relatively higher levels of expression have been described in gliobastomas multiforme [
63], oesophageal squamous cell [
69], and colorectal carcinoma [
70]. The differences in protein expression might reflect a context dependent function of IGFBP7, although this requires further exploration.
Our findings with HGSC tissues and normal cells are largely consistent with the gene expression in EOC cell lines. With the exception of TOV81D and TOV21G, our EOC cell lines exhibited low levels or the absence of both gene and protein expression. The
IGFBP7 expression in TOV81D is interesting as this cell line is not tumourigenic in immunocompromised mouse tumour xenograft models and was derived from a sample from a patient having an unusually prolonged overall survival which was in excess of 7 years [
19]. TOV21G was derived from a patient with a clear cell carcinoma, a disease which exhibits distinct clinical course that differs from HGSC, HGEC and undifferentiated adenocarcinomas, cancer types from which the other EOC cell lines were derived (see Table
1) [
19]. Moreover, TOV21G is an unusually rare case of EOC in that it shows evidence of methylated alleles in
MLH1, a mismatch repair gene [
56] and thus it is possible that molecular pathways that implicate
IGFBP7 differ in this cell line as compared to other EOC cell lines studied. Consistent with this notion is a recent report showing that TOV21G exhibited a ‘hypermutator’ genotype along with a low alteration of copy number alteration, a phenotype distinct from the other 46 EOC cell lines examined in the study and from HGSC [
71]. Thus, our results, suggest that underexpression is associated with tumourigenicity and that expression of
IGFBP7 may be important for tumour suppressor pathway phenotype.
The absence of
IGFBP7 expression in OV90, TOV112D, TOV2223, TOV1946 and OV1946 is also interesting given the observation of LOH or allelic imbalance of the
IGFBP7 locus at 4q12 in these EOC cell lines as compared to TOV81D and TOV21G. These findings are consistent with a high frequency (in greater than 50% of the tumours) of LOH and copy number loss involving the 4q arm as deduced by genome wide genotyping assays in our analysis of 79 HGSC samples that were examined in the present study and reported previously by our group [
10], and in the analysis of 489 HGSC samples that were examined by the TCGA group [
11]. Somatic mutation and epigenetic analyses of our cell lines, however, only demonstrated the possibility of promoter epigenetic silencing occurs in TOV2223G and TOV112D. These observations are consistent with recent reports from the TCGA analysis of HGSCs [
11], where there was no evidence of
IGFBP7 somatic mutations by exome sequencing analysis (n = 316 samples) nor for epigenetic silencing by CpG methylation array analyses (n = 489 samples) [
11].
IGFBP7 intragenic mutations were also not found in relation to down-regulation in breast and colorectal cancers [
54], although there is evidence of epigenetic silencing occurring in other types of cancer cell lines [
24-
26,
41]. Thus, when taken together, other mechanisms may be involved in regulating
IGFBP7 expression in HGSC.
The absence or low levels of
IGFBP7 expression observed in HGSC samples is consistent with our observation that
IGFBP7 was among the list of genes up-regulated (reprogrammed) in the context of suppressing tumourigenic potential in our chromosome 3 complementation assays involving OV90 [
15].
IGFBP7 has been proposed as a candidate tumour suppressor gene as suggested by experiments demonstrating suppression of tumourigenicity in murine lung, prostate and colorectal, breast and skin cancers xenograft models with rIGFBP7 [
25,
26,
35,
62,
72]. Thus, our observations that rIGFBP7 affects the migration rate of cells in
in vitro wound healing assays of EOC cell lines is intriguing. However, rIGFBP7 appears to have no significant impact on cell proliferation, viability or spheroid formation (though there was a modest effect of spheroid formation with TOV112D). Wajapyee et al. reported that the induction of the apoptotic process by
IGFBP7 largely occurred in NCI60 human cancer cell lines that harboured an activated
BRAF or
RAS mutation. Among the six ovarian cancer cell lines treated with rIGFBP7 in that study, only OVCAR5, which harbours an activated
RAS mutation, exhibited susceptibility to rIGFBP7 as measured by the percentage of apopototic cells 24 hours after treatment [
62]. Neither OV90 nor TOV112D EOC cell lines investigated in our study harbour activating
BRAF or
RAS mutations [
19,
46]. Moreover mutations in these genes are not a feature of HGSCs [
7,
11]. In breast cancer, IGFBP7 treatment inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis and senescence,
in vitro and
in vivo, only in cell lines that were tested negative for HER2/neu, estrogen and progesterone [
72]. In the same report, IGFBP7 effects were associated with strong activation of the p38 MAPK pathway and both p53 and p21
cip1 were up-regulated implicating known senescence pathways involving these proteins [
72]. In light of these observations, it is therefore interesting that both OV90 and TOV112D harbour somatic
TP53 mutations, a feature of over 90% of HGSCs [
8-
10,
73]. Thus rIGFBP7 may have interacted with factors in alternative pathways to result in the effects observed with OV90 and TOV112D in wound healing assays.
In our study, rIGFBP7 protein inhibited the phosphorylation of both ERK and AKT protein in OV90 cell line, which is consistent with reports of similar assays with different human cell lines types [
23,
24,
34,
63,
64]. Biochemical analyses have revealed that IGFBP7 interacts with activin, a member of the TGFβ superfamily of signalling proteins [
29], and that IGFBP7 can be activated by TGFβ proteins and retinoic acid [
74-
76]. A recent study revealed that IGFBP7 acts as an IGF1/2 antagonist by directly binding to IGF-1 receptor (IGF1R) and hindering its activation and internalization, which results in blocking downstream phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signalling and thereby inhibiting protein synthesis, cell growth and survival [
34]. These observations are intriguing given the high frequency of AKT signalling pathway activation in HGSC [
77-
79], whereby the TCGA study identified alteration in the PI3K/AKT and RAS pathways in approximately 45% of HGSC [
11].
Recent studies have reported an important role of IGFBP7 in therapy sensitization in different types of invasive cancers [
80-
82]. In acute myeloid leukemia cells, IGFBP7 cooperates with chemotherapy to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and this mechanism is independent of ERK and AKT activation [
82]. Interestingly, IGFBP7 has been identified with IGFBP4 in the secretome of mesenchymal stem cells and promotes their senescence [
83]. While the mechanism has not been elucidated it has been proposed that this interaction participates in the inhibition of stem cell renewal and cancer development [
83].
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
KG participated in the study design, performed and analyzed in vitro functional assays, protein expression assays in EOC cell lines, analyzed and interpreted data and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. MQ contributed to the conception of the project, performed RT-PCR, analyzed the gene expression microarray and the IHC of the TMA. KCG analyzed the IHC of the TMA and performed the statistical analyses. RS carried out the gene mutation and methylation analyses. KR reviewed the pathology of the HGSCs and fallopian tube specimen. DP reviewed the clinical history of the patients from which the clinical specimens are derived. AMMM supervised the IHC analysis of the TMA, participated in the study design and edited the manuscript. PT conceived and managed the project, interpreted data and drafts the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.