Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2021

19.10.2020 | Original Article

Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma

verfasst von: Risa Fukui, Hiroaki Nozawa, Yugo Hirata, Kazushige Kawai, Keisuke Hata, Toshiaki Tanaka, Takeshi Nishikawa, Yasutaka Shuno, Kazuhito Sasaki, Manabu Kaneko, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Hirofumi Sonoda, Hiroaki Ishii, Soichiro Ishihara

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

A diverting stoma is created to prevent anastomotic leakage and related complications impairing sphincteric function in rectal surgery. However, diverting stoma may be left unclosed. This study is aimed to analyze preoperative factors including anorectal manometric data associated with diverting stoma non-reversal before rectal surgery. We also addressed complications related to diverting stoma in patients undergoing surgery for rectal malignant tumor.

Methods

A total of 203 patients with rectal malignant tumor who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery with diverting stoma were retrospectively evaluated. The risk factors for non-reversal of diverting stoma were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. For these analyses, anorectal manometric data were measured before rectal surgery. The association between stoma-related complications and other clinicopathological features was also analyzed.

Results

During the median follow-up of 46.4 months, 24% (49 patients) did not undergo stoma reversal. Among parameters that were available before rectal surgery, age ≥ 75 years, albumin < 3.5 g/dl, tumor size ≥ 30 mm, tumor distance from the anal verge < 4 cm, and maximum squeezing pressure (MSP) < 130 mmHg measured by anorectal manometry (ARM) were independent factors associated with stoma non-reversal. The most common stoma-related complication was peristomal skin irritation (25%). Ileostomy was the only factor associated with peristomal skin irritation.

Conclusion

The current study demonstrated that low preoperative MSP evaluated by ARM, old age, hypoalbuminemia, and a large tumor close to the anus were predictive of diverting stoma non-reversal. Stoma site should be well deliberated when patients have the aforementioned risk factors for diverting stoma non-reversal.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Srg 81(9):1376–1378CrossRef Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Srg 81(9):1376–1378CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M (1997) Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10 Suppl):S43–S47CrossRef Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M (1997) Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10 Suppl):S43–S47CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, Parneix M (1999) Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42(9):1168–1175CrossRef Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, Parneix M (1999) Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42(9):1168–1175CrossRef
6.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(4):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70047-5CrossRef den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(4):297–303. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s1470-2045(07)70047-5CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kochi M, Egi H, Adachi T, Takakura Y, Mukai S, Taguchi K, Nakashima I, Sumi Y, Akabane S, Sato K, Yoshinaka H, Hattori M, Ohdan H (2019) Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Today 50:516–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01926-2CrossRefPubMed Kochi M, Egi H, Adachi T, Takakura Y, Mukai S, Taguchi K, Nakashima I, Sumi Y, Akabane S, Sato K, Yoshinaka H, Hattori M, Ohdan H (2019) Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Today 50:516–524. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00595-019-01926-2CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef
25.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Gunther K, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W (2003) Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome. Color Dis 5(5):458–464CrossRef Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Gunther K, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W (2003) Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome. Color Dis 5(5):458–464CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Chudner A, Gachabayov M, Dyatlov A, Lee H, Essani R, Bergamaschi R (2019) The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404(2):129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01758-1CrossRef Chudner A, Gachabayov M, Dyatlov A, Lee H, Essani R, Bergamaschi R (2019) The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404(2):129–139. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00423-019-01758-1CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin ZL, Yu WK, Shi JL, Chen QY, Tan SJ, Li N (2014) Temporary decompression in critically ill patients: retrospective comparison of ileostomy and colostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 61(131):647–651PubMed Lin ZL, Yu WK, Shi JL, Chen QY, Tan SJ, Li N (2014) Temporary decompression in critically ill patients: retrospective comparison of ileostomy and colostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 61(131):647–651PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Flor-Lorente B, Sánchez-Guillén L, Pellino G, Frasson M, García-Granero Á, Ponce M, Domingo S, Paya V, García-Granero E (2019) “Virtual ileostomy” combined with early endoscopy to avoid a diversion ileostomy in low or ultralow colorectal anastomoses. A preliminary report. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404(3):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01776-zCrossRef Flor-Lorente B, Sánchez-Guillén L, Pellino G, Frasson M, García-Granero Á, Ponce M, Domingo S, Paya V, García-Granero E (2019) “Virtual ileostomy” combined with early endoscopy to avoid a diversion ileostomy in low or ultralow colorectal anastomoses. A preliminary report. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404(3):375–383. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00423-019-01776-zCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma
verfasst von
Risa Fukui
Hiroaki Nozawa
Yugo Hirata
Kazushige Kawai
Keisuke Hata
Toshiaki Tanaka
Takeshi Nishikawa
Yasutaka Shuno
Kazuhito Sasaki
Manabu Kaneko
Koji Murono
Shigenobu Emoto
Hirofumi Sonoda
Hiroaki Ishii
Soichiro Ishihara
Publikationsdatum
19.10.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02011-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.