Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
verfasst von:
Richard A. P. Takx, Radko Krissak, Christian Fink, Valentin Bachmann, Thomas Henzler, Mathias Meyer, John W. Nance, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Paul Apfaltrer
To investigate the relationship between image quality and patient size at 100 kilovoltage (kV) compared to 120 kV ECG-gated Triple-Rule-Out CT angiography (TRO-CTA).
Methods
We retrospectively included 73 patients (age 64 ± 14 years) who underwent retrospective ECG-gated chest CTA. 40 patients were scanned with 100 kV while 33 patients with 120 kV. Body mass index (BMI), patients’ chest circumference (PC) and thoracic surface area (TSA) were recorded. Quantitative image quality was assessed as vascular attenuation in the ascending aorta (AA), pulmonary trunk (PA) and left coronary artery (LCA) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the AA.
Results
There was no significant difference in BMI (26.0 ± 4.6 vs. 28.0 ± 6.7 kg/m2), PC (103 ± 7 vs. 104 ± 10 cm2) and TSA (92 ± 15 vs. 91 ± 19 cm2) between 100 kV and 120 kV group. Mean vascular attenuation was significantly higher in the 100 kV compared to the 120 kV group (AA 438 vs. 354 HU, PA 460 vs. 349 HU, LCA 370 vs. 299 HU all p < 0.001). SNR was not significantly different, even after adjusting for patient size. Radiation dose was significantly lower in the 100 kV group (10.7 ± 4.1 vs. 20.7 ± 10.7 mSv; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
100 kV TRO-CTA is feasible in normal-to-overweight patients while maintaining image quality and achieving substantial dose reduction.
Key Points
• 100 kV protocols result in a significantly lower radiation dose.
• Mean vascular attenuation is significantly higher using 100 kV.
• SNR and CNR are not significantly different between 100 kV and 120 kV.
• 100 kV CTA is feasible regardless of patient size while maintaining image quality.
Abkürzungen
BMI
body mass index
CTA
computed tomography angiography
CTDIvol
volume CT dose index
DLP
dose length product
kV
kilovoltage
PC
patients’ chest circumference
TRO
triple rule out
TSA
thoracic surface area
Introduction
ECG-gated computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest has been shown to be a reliable and comprehensive non-invasive imaging test to exclude acute coronary syndrome, aortic dissection and pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain (i.e., Triple Rule Out (TRO)-CTA) [1‐9].
However, the potential harm of radiation exposure is of concern, as it has been postulated to be associated with a non-negligible lifetime attributable risk of cancer [10]. This risk varies noticeably and is substantially greater for females, younger patients, and for combined cardiac and aortic scans [10]. Previous studies demonstrated that lowering the kilovoltage (kV) setting from standard 120 kV to 100 kV allows a significant reduction of radiation exposure independent from the CT scanner hardware [11‐14]. Radiation dose reduction through kV adjustment, however, may adversely affect image quality due to the inverse relationship between radiation exposure and image noise [15]. Empiric selection criteria for application of reduced peak tube potential include markers of body size (e.g., body mass index [BMI]); however, body size selection criteria are likely crude given interpatient differences in weight distribution and body composition [15]. Patients’ chest area and BMI have been found to frequently be discordant, which can lead to over radiating patients when using BMI to select tube potential [16]. However, there remains hesitation among clinicians to lower kV out of fear for not achieving adequate image quality for diagnosis. The hypothesis of this study was that 100 kV CTA is feasible in normal-to-overweight patients while maintaining appropriate diagnostic image quality. Accordingly, we investigated the relationship between image quality and patient size in patients undergoing 100 kV vs. 120 kV ECG-gated TRO-CTA.
Anzeige
Materials and methods
Patient population
Seventy-three consecutive patients (mean age 64 ± 13, range 25–83 years) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent TRO-CTA for acute chest pain evaluation referred by our chest pain unit between October 2009 and January 2011. The 100 kV scanning was performed at the discretion of the attending radiologist. In our institution, TRO-CTA is used to assess patients with acute chest pain for pulmonary embolism, acute aortic syndrome, acute coronary syndrome and other thoracic pathologic conditions with a single examination.
CT technique
All imaging exams were conducted on a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Definition, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). Retrospectively ECG-gated spiral CTA of the heart was acquired from the level of the carina. Then, 120 ml of iodine contrast (Imeron 400, Bracco Imaging S.p.A., Milan, Italy) was injected using a power injector with an injection rate of 4 ml/s and followed by a saline chaser of 40 ml. Patients were instructed to hold their breath at a mid-inspiratory position. The cranio-caudal acquisition was started using automatic bolus triggering at 2 sec intervals in the ascending aorta (trigger level 100 HU) with a delay of 5 sec. The following additional scan parameters were applied for the TRO-CTA: detector collimation 2 × 32 × 0.6 mm, slice acquisition 2 × 64 × 0.6 mm using z-flying focal spot, gantry rotation time 330 ms, tube current time product 320 mAs, and the pitch automatically adapted to the patient’s heart rate using a reference value of 0.28. Automatic tube current modulation (CARE Dose 4D) and automatic ECG-pulsing for radiation dose reduction were applied. For data reconstruction, axial images of the thoracic scan range were reconstructed with 1.0 mm slice thickness and 0.8 mm increment using a B30f soft tissue kernel. In addition, the heart was reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.6 mm and 0.5 mm increment using a B26f soft tissue kernel in the optimal diastolic and systolic phase as determined by the CT software. Dose length product (DLP) and volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were collected. The effective dose was calculated using a conversion coefficient of 0.017 mSv mGy-1cm-1 [17].
Image analysis
The quantitative measurements were performed on the axial images with 1 mm slice thickness by one experienced reviewer (radiologist with 5 years of experience in cardiothoracic imaging). A circular region of interest (ROI) was placed in the following anatomical regions: main pulmonary artery, ascending aorta, left ventricle, right ventricle, left main coronary artery, and epicardial fat. Calcifications and plaques within the ROIs were avoided. Mean attenuation values were recorded in Hounsfield Units (HU). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was defined as the ratio of the mean attenuation in the ascending aorta to the standard deviation of this ROI. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was defined as the ratio of the mean attenuation in the ascending aorta minus mean attenuation of epicardial fat to the standard deviation of the attenuation value in the ascending aorta. Patient size was measured as BMI, patients’ chest circumference (PC) at the level of the origin of the left main coronary and thoracic surface area (TSA), defined as the product of dorso-ventral and latero-lateral diameters of the chest at the same level as above (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Example image of measurements (a) ROI in ascending aorta and pulmonary artery. b Left main coronary artery and epicardial fat. c left and right ventricle. d anthropomorphic measures at level of the origin of the left main coronary artery
×
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were listed as mean plus standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significant differences in mean values. Linear regression was applied to generate adjusted p-values. Correlations were calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient or Spearman’s rank. Discrete variables were evaluated using the Fisher’s exact test. A p-value smaller than 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. Analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY, USA).
Anzeige
Results
Baseline characteristics
There was no significant difference in BMI between the 100 kV and 120 kV group (26.0 ± 4.6 vs. 28.0 ± 6.7 kg/m2; p = 0.138), PC (103 ± 7 vs. 104 ± 10 cm2; p = 0.737) or TSA (92.4 ± 15.2 vs. 90.9 ± 19.2 cm2; p = 0.815). Both groups showed similar age (65 ± 12 vs. 63 ± 16 years; p = 0.521) and similar proportion of males (27 vs. 20 males, p = 0.540). Detailed characteristics of the study population are listed in Table 1. The correlation between BMI and TSA/PC was moderate while the correlation between TSA and PC was high (Fig. 2).
Table 1
Patient characteristics and radiation dose
100 kV (n = 40)
120 kV (n = 33)
p-value
BMI (kg/m2)
26.0 ± 4.6
28.0 ± 6.7
0.138
<25
19
14
25.1 – 30
17
11
>30.1
4
8
CTDI (mGy)
19.2 ± 6.9
41.3 ± 21.5
<0.001
mAs
162.4 ± 55.6
192.9 ± 70.8
0.044
DLP (mGy cm)
630 ± 240
1215 ± 626
<0.001
Fig. 2
Correlation plot between the various anthropomorphic measures. a PC and BMI, b TSA and BMI, and c PC and TSA
×
Image quality
A radiologist (5 years of experience) graded all studies as of diagnostic quality. The average attenuation of contrast medium in the low-dose group was significantly higher at all vascular levels (all p < 0.05; Table 2; Fig. 3). There was no significant difference in the mean attenuation values of epicardial fat between the groups (p = 0.40). Image noise in the main pulmonary artery and left main coronary artery was higher in the low-voltage group (p < 0.05). Image noise in the right ventricle and epicardial fat showed no significant difference as presented in Table 2.
Table 2
Mean attenuation and noise
100 kV (n = 40)
120 kV (n = 33)
p-value
p-value adjusted for BMI
p-value adjusted for PC
p-value adjusted for TSA
Attenuation
Pulmonary artery
459.8 ± 107.2
348.6 ± 85.3
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Ascending Aorta
435.7 ± 102.4
353.6 ± 66.9
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Left ventricle
407.9 ± 97.6
326.2 ± 68.9
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Right ventricle
405.5 ± 135.3
335.3 ± 118.9
0.024
0.040
0.029
0.021
Left coronary artery
369.5 ± 117.1
299.4 ± 101.3
0.009
0.015
0.011
0.009
Epicardial fat
99.8 ± 25.5
93.9 ± 25.6
0.335
0.404
0.367
0.336
Noise
Pulmonary artery
30.3 ± 10.9
22.3 ± 8.5
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
Ascending Aorta
27.4 ± 9.2
22.3 ± 9.1
0.057
0.061
0.049
0.060
Left ventricle
36.6 ± 15.7
31.9 ± 22.9
0.302
0.188
0.212
0.269
Right ventricle
46.3 ± 21.7
40.8 ± 24.7
0.315
0.231
0.258
0.303
Left main coronary artery
67.9 ± 28.5
48.3 ± 21.9
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
Epicardial fat
33.9 ± 14.3
32.0 ± 20.0
0.649
0.657
0.594
0.645
CNR aorta
12.6 ± 4.7
13.8 ± 8.9
0.463
0.419
0.391
0.453
SNR aorta
16.9 ± 6.9
17.7 ± 6.9
0.623
0.460
0.529
0.666
Fig. 3
The right coronary artery in patients of similar BMI scanned with Triple-Rule-Out CT angiography at 100 kV (a) and 120 kV (b)
×
The difference in the calculated SNR and CNR between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.46 and p = 0.62), which was maintained after adjusting for body size measures.
Radiation dose
Mean CTDIvol in the 100 kV group was 19.2 ± 6.9 mGy and was significantly lower compared to the 120 kV group (41.3 ± 21.5 mGy, p < 0.001). Mean DLP in the 100 kV group was 630 ± 240 mGy cm and was significantly lower in comparison with the 120 kV group (1215 ± 626 mGy cm, p < 0.001). The mean estimated effective radiation dose for the 100 kV group was 10.7 ± 4.1 mSv and 20.7 ± 10.7 mSv (p < 0.001), corresponding to a 55 % reduction in radiation exposure by lowering tube voltage to 100 kV. Radiation dose results are summarized in Table 1. A moderate correlation was found between BMI and effective radiation dose for both the 100 kV group and the 120 kV group (r = 0.326, p = 0.043 and r = 0.357, p = 0.041, respectively).
Discussion
Our results show that 100 kV TRO-CTA of the chest can be performed with appropriate diagnostic image quality and substantial dose reduction in our patient population, which included predominantly normal-to-overweight individuals. Even after adjusting for measures of patient size, no significant differences were found in image quality between 100 kV and 120 kV. Reducing tube voltage to 100 kV results in an approximately 55 % lower effective radiation dose compared to a 120 kV TRO-CTA protocol performed while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Similar reductions were reported by Feuchtner et al. [12], where a radiation dose reduction of 47 % was achieved using 100 kV.
The mean attenuation values of the pulmonary artery, the ascending aorta, the left ventricle, the right ventricle and the left main coronary artery were significantly higher at 100 kV, which is in line with published data on low kV imaging [18, 19].
This observation can be explained by the photoelectric effect, which results in increased photon attenuation as tube voltages approach the k-edge of a given element; in case of iodine-based contrast materials, vascular attenuation is expected to increase with decreasing tube voltages to approximately 33 kV (the approximate k-edge of iodine) [20, 21]. The photoelectric effect is the dominant mechanism of photon attenuation in materials containing high-atomic number elements (e.g., iodinated contrast material). In contrast, Compton scatter is the dominant interaction in tissues lacking high-atomic number elements (e.g., soft tissue and fat). Accordingly, no significant difference in mean attenuation of the (fatty) tissue adjacent to the left coronary artery was observed [22]. A disadvantage of lower tube voltage (and the major reason for diagnostic tube voltage ranges used in current clinical imaging) is the concomitant increase in image noise [20]. While the noise level for the 100 kV CTA protocol was found to be higher in the current study, as expected, all imaging studies were considered of diagnostic quality, which was supported by non-significant differences in SNR and CNR between both protocols. In a prior study on 100 kV imaging by Krissak et al. [22] the feasibility of TRO-CTA with 100 kV was demonstrated in non-obese patients. In this current study we extend the use of 100 kV imaging to normal-to-overweight patients, which was maintained even after adjusting for measures of patient size.
Despite growing evidence of non-inferior image quality using low kV protocols in nonobese patients [11, 22], data regarding the impact of body habitus, i.e., chest dimensions, PC, and TSA has been lacking. This is of particular concern, as a recent anthropomorphic phantom study found that patients’ chest area and BMI classes were frequently discordant, which could potentially lead to over-radiating patients when using BMI to select the tube voltage [16]. BMI, while an imperfect but convenient proxy for human body fat, does not reliably represent the body shape, especially in patients with central obesity; this can become particularly troublesome in TRO-CTA, where the scan field is limited to the chest. Conversely, a large-chested woman probably requires more radiation than a small-chested man with a similar BMI [23]. Thus, the findings of our study extend prior data, establishing radiation dose reduction and maintaining image quality even after adjusting for patient size.
Anzeige
Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. Second, we only had a small percentage of subjects with a BMI above 30, which may hamper the generalizability of the results to morbidly obese individuals. Finally, in this study we did not evaluate the effect of iterative image reconstruction techniques, which would reduce image noise [24, 25].
In conclusion, 100 kV TRO-CTA can be performed in normal-to-overweight patients, while maintaining image quality and achieving substantial dose reductions.
Acknowledgments
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Richard A.P. Takx. The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Methodology: retrospective, cross sectional study, performed at one institution.
Anzeige
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
