Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 8/2021

26.06.2021 | Original Research

Lymph Node Metastatic Patterns and Survival Predictors Based on Tumor Size in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

verfasst von: Ning Pu, Qiangda Chen, Wei Gan, Yuandi Shen, Shanshan Gao, Joseph R. Habib, Hanlin Yin, Jicheng Zhang, Benedict Kinny-Köster, Ming Cui, Junhao Li, Yiran Dong, Minako Nagai, Lingxiao Liu, Jun Yu, Wenchuan Wu, Wenhui Lou

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. Larger tumor size is widely acknowledged to be associated with increased lymph node (LN) metastatic potential. However, the quantitative relationships between tumor size and LN metastasis or survival remain unclear. This study aims to quantify the objective relationship between tumor size and the prevalence of LN metastases across a spectrum primary tumor size.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 9958 patients with resected PDAC without distant metastasis. The prevalence of LN metastases, LN ratio (LNR), and N2/N1 ratio were assessed amongst different tumor sizes, and the relationships were displayed by matched curves.

Results

In the enrolled cohort, age, tumor site, grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th node staging, tumor size, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were identified as significant independent predictors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). For tumors within 1–40 mm in size, the prevalence of node-positive disease is closely modelled using a logarithmic formula [0.249 × ln (size) + 0.452] × 100%. The prevalence plateaued between 70% and 80% beyond 40 mm. The mean LNR increased in a stepwise manner as tumor size increased from 1–5 mm (LNR = 0.024) to 41–45 mm (LNR = 0.177); then, beyond 45 mm, it plateaued near 0.170. N2/N1 ratio gradually increased along with tumor size from 1–5 mm (N2/N1 = 0.286) to 41–45 mm (N2/N1 = 1.016), and when tumor size reached to 41–45 mm or more, the ratio stabilized around 1.000. In addition, significant survival prediction by AJCC N staging was observed when tumors ranging between 16 and 45 mm in size.

Conclusion

Regional LN involvement demonstrated a logarithmic growth with increasing tumor sizes in patients with resected PDAC . The probability of metastasis in each regional LN for resected PDAC with tumors greater than 40 mm in size was near 17.0% and their overall prevalence of LN metastasis was 70–80%. Among which, 50% of patients had an N2 stage. Such prediction may be a potential and promising tool for guiding lymphadenectomy in PDAC surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin L, Pu N, Thompson E, Miao Y, Wolfgang C, Yu J. Improved assessment of response status in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy using somatic mutations and liquid biopsy analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(3):740–8.CrossRef Yin L, Pu N, Thompson E, Miao Y, Wolfgang C, Yu J. Improved assessment of response status in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy using somatic mutations and liquid biopsy analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(3):740–8.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, et al. Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(20):2324–8.CrossRef Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, et al. Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(20):2324–8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu N, Gao S, Yin H, et al. Cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes proliferation in pancreatic cancer by targeting CYR61/CTGF via the hippo pathway. Cancer Lett. 2019;460:42–53.CrossRef Pu N, Gao S, Yin H, et al. Cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes proliferation in pancreatic cancer by targeting CYR61/CTGF via the hippo pathway. Cancer Lett. 2019;460:42–53.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):185–91.CrossRef Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):185–91.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ansari D, Bauden M, Bergstrom S, Rylance R, Marko-Varga G, Andersson R. Relationship between tumour size and outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104(5):600–7.CrossRef Ansari D, Bauden M, Bergstrom S, Rylance R, Marko-Varga G, Andersson R. Relationship between tumour size and outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104(5):600–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Muralidhar V, Nipp RD, Mamon HJ, et al. Association between very small tumor size and decreased overall survival in node-positive pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(13):4027–34.CrossRef Muralidhar V, Nipp RD, Mamon HJ, et al. Association between very small tumor size and decreased overall survival in node-positive pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(13):4027–34.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lodish H, Berk A, Kaiser CA, et al. Molecular cell biology. New York: Freeman; 2008. Lodish H, Berk A, Kaiser CA, et al. Molecular cell biology. New York: Freeman; 2008.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sopik V, Narod SA. The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: on the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(3):647–56.CrossRef Sopik V, Narod SA. The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: on the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(3):647–56.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu N, Li J, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of prognostic prediction between nomogram based on lymph node ratio and AJCC 8th staging system for patients with resected pancreatic head carcinoma: a SEER analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:227–38.CrossRef Pu N, Li J, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of prognostic prediction between nomogram based on lymph node ratio and AJCC 8th staging system for patients with resected pancreatic head carcinoma: a SEER analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:227–38.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Morales-Oyarvide V, Rubinson DA, Dunne RF, et al. Lymph node metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and survival. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(12):1874–82.CrossRef Morales-Oyarvide V, Rubinson DA, Dunne RF, et al. Lymph node metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and survival. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(12):1874–82.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, Ishikawa O, et al. Perineural invasion and lymph node involvement as indicators of surgical outcome and pattern of recurrence in the setting of preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):95–102.CrossRef Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, Ishikawa O, et al. Perineural invasion and lymph node involvement as indicators of surgical outcome and pattern of recurrence in the setting of preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):95–102.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Asano D, Nara S, Kishi Y, et al. A single-institution validation study of lymph node staging by the AJCC 8th edition for patients with pancreatic head cancer: a proposal to subdivide the N2 category. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(7):2112–20.CrossRef Asano D, Nara S, Kishi Y, et al. A single-institution validation study of lymph node staging by the AJCC 8th edition for patients with pancreatic head cancer: a proposal to subdivide the N2 category. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(7):2112–20.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Malleo G, Maggino L, Ferrone CR, et al. Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1138–46.CrossRef Malleo G, Maggino L, Ferrone CR, et al. Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1138–46.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156(3):591–600.CrossRef Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156(3):591–600.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Slidell MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, et al. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):165–74.CrossRef Slidell MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, et al. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):165–74.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Malleo G, et al. Does size matter in pancreatic cancer? Reappraisal of tumour dimension as a predictor of outcome beyond the TNM. Ann Surg. 2017;266(1):142–8.CrossRef Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Malleo G, et al. Does size matter in pancreatic cancer? Reappraisal of tumour dimension as a predictor of outcome beyond the TNM. Ann Surg. 2017;266(1):142–8.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu N, Gao S, Beckman R, et al. Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma. Oxford: HPB; 2020.CrossRef Pu N, Gao S, Beckman R, et al. Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma. Oxford: HPB; 2020.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Park H, An S, Eo SH, et al. Survival effect of tumor size and extrapancreatic extension in surgically resected pancreatic cancer: proposal for improved T classification. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(11):2341–6.CrossRef Park H, An S, Eo SH, et al. Survival effect of tumor size and extrapancreatic extension in surgically resected pancreatic cancer: proposal for improved T classification. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(11):2341–6.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu N, Zhao G, Yin H, et al. CD25 and TGF-beta blockade based on predictive integrated immune ratio inhibits tumor growth in pancreatic cancer. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):294.CrossRef Pu N, Zhao G, Yin H, et al. CD25 and TGF-beta blockade based on predictive integrated immune ratio inhibits tumor growth in pancreatic cancer. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):294.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.CrossRef Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu N, Yin L, Habib JR, et al. Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol. 2019;15(30):3457–65.CrossRef Pu N, Yin L, Habib JR, et al. Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol. 2019;15(30):3457–65.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Song M, Yoon SB, Lee IS, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III? Eur J Cancer. 2018;104:62–9.CrossRef Song M, Yoon SB, Lee IS, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III? Eur J Cancer. 2018;104:62–9.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma C, Yang P, Li J, Bian Y, Wang L, Lu J. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: variability in measurements of tumor size among computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic specimens. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(3):782–8. Ma C, Yang P, Li J, Bian Y, Wang L, Lu J. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: variability in measurements of tumor size among computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic specimens. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(3):782–8.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassardjian A, Stanzione N, Wang HL. Comparative accuracy of tumor size assessment and stage analysis by imaging modalities versus gross examination for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2019;48(2):223–7.CrossRef Kassardjian A, Stanzione N, Wang HL. Comparative accuracy of tumor size assessment and stage analysis by imaging modalities versus gross examination for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2019;48(2):223–7.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K. Correlation of tumor size and survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018;9(5):910–21.CrossRef Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K. Correlation of tumor size and survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018;9(5):910–21.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, et al. International validation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(12):e183617.CrossRef van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, et al. International validation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(12):e183617.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, Cho CS, Nathan H. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):2023–30.CrossRef Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, Cho CS, Nathan H. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):2023–30.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cong L, Liu Q, Zhang R, et al. Tumor size classification of the 8(th) edition of TNM staging system is superior to that of the 7(th) edition in predicting the survival outcome of pancreatic cancer patients after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10383.CrossRef Cong L, Liu Q, Zhang R, et al. Tumor size classification of the 8(th) edition of TNM staging system is superior to that of the 7(th) edition in predicting the survival outcome of pancreatic cancer patients after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10383.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Petermann D, Demartines N, Schafer M. Is tumour size an underestimated feature in the current TNM system for malignancies of the pancreatic head? HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(11):872–81.CrossRef Petermann D, Demartines N, Schafer M. Is tumour size an underestimated feature in the current TNM system for malignancies of the pancreatic head? HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(11):872–81.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Lymph Node Metastatic Patterns and Survival Predictors Based on Tumor Size in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
verfasst von
Ning Pu
Qiangda Chen
Wei Gan
Yuandi Shen
Shanshan Gao
Joseph R. Habib
Hanlin Yin
Jicheng Zhang
Benedict Kinny-Köster
Ming Cui
Junhao Li
Yiran Dong
Minako Nagai
Lingxiao Liu
Jun Yu
Wenchuan Wu
Wenhui Lou
Publikationsdatum
26.06.2021
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01819-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Advances in Therapy 8/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.