nach oben

Erschienen in:

25.01.2019 | Original Contribution

Magnesium and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and intervention studies

verfasst von: Nicola Veronese, Jacopo Demurtas, Gabriella Pesolillo, Stefano Celotto, Tommaso Barnini, Giovanni Calusi, Maria Gabriella Caruso, Maria Notarnicola, Rosa Reddavide, Brendon Stubbs, Marco Solmi, Stefania Maggi, Alberto Vaona, Joseph Firth, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Ligia Dominguez, Mario Barbagallo

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nutrition | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To map and grade all health outcomes associated with magnesium (Mg) intake and supplementation using an umbrella review.

Methods

Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using placebo/no intervention as control group. We assessed meta-analyses of observational studies based on random-effect summary effect sizes and their p values, 95% prediction intervals, heterogeneity, small-study effects and excess significance. For meta-analyses of RCTs, outcomes with a random-effect p value < 0.005 and a high-GRADE assessment were classified as strong evidence.

Results

From 2048 abstracts, 16 meta-analyses and 55 independent outcomes were included (36 in RCTs and 19 in observational studies). In RCTs of Mg versus placebo/no active treatment, 12 over 36 outcomes reported significant results (p < 0.05). A strong evidence for decreased need for hospitalization in pregnancy and for decreased risk of frequency and intensity of migraine relapses in people with migraine was observed using the GRADE assessment. In observational studies, 9/19 outcomes were significant (p < 0.05). However, only one outcome presented highly suggestive evidence (lower incidence of type 2 diabetes in people with higher Mg intake at baseline) and one suggestive (lower incidence of stroke associated with higher Mg intake at baseline).

Conclusion

Strong evidence according to the GRADE suggests that Mg supplementation can decrease the risk of hospitalization in pregnant women and reduce the intensity/frequency of migraine. Higher Mg intake is associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes and stroke with highly suggestive and suggestive evidence, respectively, in observational studies.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Arnaud MJ (2008) Update on the assessment of magnesium status. Br J Nutr 99(Suppl 3):S24–S36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711450800682X CrossRefPubMed

Swaminathan R (2003) Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin Biochem Rev Aust Assoc Clin Biochem 24(2):47–66

Veronese N, Zanforlini BM, Manzato E, Sergi G (2015) Magnesium and healthy aging. Magnes Res 28(3):112–115. https://doi.org/10.1684/mrh.2015.0387 CrossRefPubMed

Volpe SL (2013) Magnesium in disease prevention and overall health. Adv Nutr (Bethesda Md) 4(3):378S–383S. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003483 CrossRef

Whang R (1987) Magnesium deficiency: pathogenesis, prevalence, and clinical implications. Am J Med 82(3A):24–29CrossRefPubMed

Galan P, Preziosi P, Durlach V, Valeix P, Ribas L, Bouzid D, Favier A, Hercberg S (1997) Dietary magnesium intake in a French adult population. Magnes Res 10(4):321–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1303_4 CrossRefPubMed

Moshfegh AG, Ahuja J, Rhodes J, LaComb D, Randy (2009) What we eat in America. NHANES 2005–2006: usual nutrient intakes from food and water compared to 1997 dietary reference intakes for vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400530/pdf/0506/usual_nutrient_intake_vitD_ca_phos_mg_2005-06.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018

Barbagallo M, Dominguez LJ (2015) Magnesium and type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes 6(10):1152–1157. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i10.1152 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Guerrero-Romero F, Rodríguez-Morán M (2009) The effect of lowering blood pressure by magnesium supplementation in diabetic hypertensive adults with low serum magnesium levels: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Hum hypertens 23(4):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2008.129 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Veronese N, Stubbs B, Solmi M, Noale M, Vaona A, Demurtas J, Maggi S (2017) Dietary magnesium intake and fracture risk: data from a large prospective study. Br J Nutr 117(11):1570–1576. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114517001350 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Dominguez LJ, Barbagallo M, Lauretani F, Bandinelli S, Bos A, Corsi AM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L (2006) Magnesium and muscle performance in older persons: the InCHIANTI study. Am J Clin Nutr 84(2):419–426CrossRefPubMed

12.

Veronese N, Stubbs B, Maggi S, Notarnicola M, Barbagallo M, Firth J, Dominguez LJ, Caruso MG (2017) Dietary magnesium and incident frailty in older people at risk for knee osteoarthritis: an eight-year longitudinal study. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111253 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Ioannidis JP (2009) Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses. CMAJ 181(8):488–493. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081086 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Avelino-Silva TJ, Jaluul O (2017) Malnutrition in hospitalized older patients: management strategies to improve patient care and clinical outcomes. Int J Gerontol 11(2):56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2016.11.002 CrossRef

16.

IntHout J, Ioannidis JPA, Rovers MM, Goeman JJ (2016) Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6(7):e010247. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J (2003) Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut 52(suppl 7):vii1PubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Carvalho AF, Kohler CA, Brunoni AR, Miskowiak KW, Herrmann N, Lanctot KL, Hyphantis TN, Quevedo J, Fernandes BS, Berk M (2016) Bias in peripheral depression biomarkers. Psychother Psychosom 85(2):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441457 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Organization WH (2011) WHO guidelines approved by the guidelines review committee. In: WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. World Health Organization, Geneva

22.

Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P (2015) Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 13(3):132–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Belbasis L, Savvidou MD, Kanu C, Evangelou E, Tzoulaki I (2016) Birth weight in relation to health and disease in later life: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Med 14(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0692-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP (2016) Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 23:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.12.008 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Dinu M, Pagliai G, Casini A, Sofi F (2017) Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomized trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 27(1):e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2016.11.055 CrossRef

26.

Kyrgiou M, Kalliala I, Markozannes G, Gunter MJ, Paraskevaidis E, Gabra H, Martin-Hirsch P, Tsilidis KK (2017) Adiposity and cancer at major anatomical sites: umbrella review of the literature. BMJ 356:j477. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j477 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Li X, Meng X, Timofeeva M, Tzoulaki I, Tsilidis KK, Ioannidis PA, Campbell H, Theodoratou E (2017) Serum uric acid levels and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of evidence from observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. BMJ 357:j2376. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2376 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Theodoratou E, Tzoulaki I, Zgaga L, Ioannidis JPA (2014) Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. BMJ 348:g2035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Veronese N, Solmi M, Caruso MG, Giannelli G, Osella AR, Evangelou E, Maggi S, Fontana L, Stubbs B, Tzoulaki I (2018) Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Am J Clin Nutr 107(3):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqx082 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Ioannidis JA (2018) The proposal to lower p value thresholds to 0.005. Jama 319(14):1429–1430. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1536 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers EJ, Berk R, Bollen KA, Brembs B, Brown L, Camerer C, Cesarini D, Chambers CD, Clyde M, Cook TD, De Boeck P, Dienes Z, Dreber A, Easwaran K, Efferson C, Fehr E, Fidler F, Field AP, Forster M, George EI, Gonzalez R, Goodman S, Green E, Green DP, Greenwald AG, Hadfield JD, Hedges LV, Held L, Hua Ho T, Hoijtink H, Hruschka DJ, Imai K, Imbens G, Ioannidis JPA, Jeon M, Jones JH, Kirchler M, Laibson D, List J, Little R, Lupia A, Machery E, Maxwell SE, McCarthy M, Moore DA, Morgan SL, Munafó M, Nakagawa S, Nyhan B, Parker TH, Pericchi L, Perugini M, Rouder J, Rousseau J, Savalei V, Schönbrodt FD, Sellke T, Sinclair B, Tingley D, Van Zandt T, Vazire S, Watts DJ, Winship C, Wolpert RL, Xie Y, Young C, Zinman J, Johnson VE (2018) Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav 2(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z CrossRefPubMed

32.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Chen GC, Pang Z, Liu QF (2012) Magnesium intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 66(11):1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.135 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Sarai M, Tejani AM, Chan AH, Kuo IF, Li J (2013) Magnesium for alcohol withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD008358. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008358.pub2 CrossRef

35.

Han S, Crowther CA, Moore V (2013) Magnesium maintenance therapy for preventing preterm birth after threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD000940. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000940.pub3 CrossRef

36.

Makrides M, Crosby DD, Bain E, Crowther CA (2014) Magnesium supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000937. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000937.pub2 CrossRef

37.

Ko HJ, Youn CH, Kim HM, Cho YJ, Lee GH, Lee WK (2014) Dietary magnesium intake and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Nutr Cancer 66(6):915–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2014.922203 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Zhang X, Li Y, Del Gobbo LC, Rosanoff A, Wang J, Zhang W, Song Y (2016) Effects of magnesium supplementation on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials. Hypertension 68(2):324–333. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07664 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Chiu HY, Yeh TH, Huang YC, Chen PY (2016) Effects of Intravenous and oral magnesium on reducing migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Physician 19:E97–E112PubMed

40.

Cheungpasitporn W, Thongprayoon C, Harindhanavudhi T, Edmonds PJ, Erickson SB (2016) Hypomagnesemia linked to new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Res 41(2):142–147. https://doi.org/10.3109/07435800.2015.1094088 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Fang X, Han H, Li M, Liang C, Fan Z, Aaseth J, He J, Montgomery S, Cao Y (2016) Dose-response relationship between dietary magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8110739 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Fang X, Wang K, Han D, He X, Wei J, Zhao L, Imam MU, Ping Z, Li Y, Xu Y, Min J, Wang F (2016) Dietary magnesium intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Med 14(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0742-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Jiang L, He P, Chen J, Liu Y, Liu D, Qin G, Tan N (2016) Magnesium levels in drinking water and coronary heart disease mortality risk: a meta-analysis. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8010005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Han H, Fang X, Wei X, Liu Y, Jin Z, Chen Q, Fan Z, Aaseth J, Hiyoshi A, He J, Cao Y (2017) Dose-response relationship between dietary magnesium intake, serum magnesium concentration and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr J 16(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0247-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Wu J, Xun P, Tang Q, Cai W, He K (2017) Circulating magnesium levels and incidence of coronary heart diseases, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr J 16(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0280-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Veronese N, Watutantrige SF, Luchini C, Solmi M, Sartore G, Sergi G, Manzato E, Barbagallo M, Maggi S, Stubbs B (2016) Effect of magnesium supplementation on glucose metabolism in people with or at risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr 70(12):1354–1359. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.154 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Farsinejad-Marj M, Saneei P, Esmaillzadeh A (2016) Dietary magnesium intake, bone mineral density and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteop Int 27(4):1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3400-y CrossRef

48.

Simental-Mendía LE, Sahebkar A, Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Romero F (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effects of magnesium supplementation on insulin sensitivity and glucose control. Pharmacol Res 111:272–282CrossRefPubMed

49.

Dong J-Y, Xun P, He K, Qin L-Q (2011) Magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes. Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies 34(9):2116–2122. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0518 CrossRef

50.

Suarez A, Pulido N, Casla A, Casanova B, Arrieta FJ, Rovira A (1995) Impaired tyrosine-kinase activity of muscle insulin receptors from hypomagnesaemic rats. Diabetologia 38(11):1262–1270CrossRefPubMed

51.

Mauskop A, Altura BM (1998) Magnesium for migraine. CNS drugs 9(3):185–190CrossRef

52.

Weaver K (1990) Magnesium and migraine. Headache 30(3):168–168CrossRef

53.

Swanson DR (1988) Migraine and magnesium: eleven neglected connections. Perspect Biol Med 31(4):526–557CrossRefPubMed

54.

Younger DS (2016) Epidemiology of migraine. Neurol Clin 34(4):849–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.011 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Finkbeiner S, Stevens CF (1988) Applications of quantitative measurements for assessing glutamate neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 85(11):4071–4074CrossRef

56.

Stys PK, Ransom BR, Waxman SG (1990) Effects of polyvalent cations and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers on recovery of CNS white matter from anoxia. Neurosci Lett 115(2–3):293–299CrossRefPubMed

57.

Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA (2007) The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. CMAJ 176(8):1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060410 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Rothstein HR (2008) Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. BMJ 336(7658):1413–1415. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a117 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Ioannidis JP (2016) The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 94(3):485–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Kavvoura FK, Liberopoulos G, Ioannidis JP (2007) Selection in reported epidemiological risks: an empirical assessment. PLoS Med 4(3):e79. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040079 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Gröber U, Schmidt J, Kisters K (2015) Magnesium in prevention and therapy. Nutrients 7(9):8199–8226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Magnesium and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and intervention studies
verfasst von: Nicola Veronese
Jacopo Demurtas
Gabriella Pesolillo
Stefano Celotto
Tommaso Barnini
Giovanni Calusi
Maria Gabriella Caruso
Maria Notarnicola
Rosa Reddavide
Brendon Stubbs
Marco Solmi
Stefania Maggi
Alberto Vaona
Joseph Firth
Lee Smith
Ai Koyanagi
Ligia Dominguez
Mario Barbagallo
Publikationsdatum: 25.01.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nutrition / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1436-6207
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-01905-w

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Magnesium and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational and intervention studies

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Determination of the prebiotic activity of wheat arabinogalactan peptide (AGP) using batch culture fermentation

Relationship between sensory liking for fat, sweet or salt and cardiometabolic diseases: mediating effects of diet and weight status

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D response to vitamin D supplementation in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical intervention trials

Prudent dietary pattern influences homocysteine level more than folate, vitamin B12, and docosahexaenoic acid: a structural equation model approach

Chocolate and risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Dietary patterns interact with chromosome 9p21 rs1333048 polymorphism on the risk of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors in apparently healthy Tehrani adults

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Update Innere Medizin