Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

22.07.2017

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study

verfasst von: Mrinal Yadava, Matthew Nugent, Angela Krebsbach, Jessica Minnier, Peter Jessel, Charles A. Henrikson

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have traditionally been a contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recent studies suggest that MRI can be conducted safely in select patients with pacemakers (PPMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We sought to determine the safety of MRI in patients with CIEDs, using a protocol for patient selection and device programming.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-center study. Patients with a PPM or ICD and a clinical indication for MRI were considered. Exclusion criteria included newly implanted devices (<4 weeks), PPMs manufactured before 1996 and ICDs before 2000, epicardial and abandoned leads, and pacemaker-dependent ICD patients. Pacemaker-dependent PPM patients were programmed to asynchronous pacing. Tachycardia detection/therapies were disabled for ICDs. Devices were interrogated pre- and post-scan, and at follow-up 1–6 weeks later. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) was not tested post-scan. Patients were followed to monitor device therapies.

Results

Two hundred twenty-seven patients underwent 293 scans. Devices included 170 (70.6%) PPMs and 71 (29.5%) ICDs. Thirteen (4.4%) scans were aborted mainly due to subjective complaints or artifact on scout cardiac imaging. Post-scan and follow-up interrogation demonstrated no changes in device parameters requiring reprogramming or revision. Over long-term follow-up (median, 354 days [IQR 65–629]), nine ICD patients had appropriate shocks (median, 3 [IQR 1–8]). One had four inappropriate shocks for atrial fibrillation. All tachyarrhythmias meeting criteria for defibrillation were successfully terminated.

Conclusions

MRI can be conducted safely in patients with CIEDs when done in a protocoled manner with appropriate supervision. DFT testing after MRI may not be necessary.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang AE, Matory YL, Dwyer AJ, Hill SC, Girton ME, Steinberg SM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the evaluation of soft tissue tumors of the extremities. Ann Surg. 1987;205(4):340–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang AE, Matory YL, Dwyer AJ, Hill SC, Girton ME, Steinberg SM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the evaluation of soft tissue tumors of the extremities. Ann Surg. 1987;205(4):340–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ridgway JP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part I. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:71. Ridgway JP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part I. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:71.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. 2007;116(24):2878–91.CrossRefPubMed Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. 2007;116(24):2878–91.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Babouri A, Hedjeidj A. In vitro investigation of eddy current effect on pacemaker operation generated by low frequency magnetic field. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf. 2007;2007:5684–7. Babouri A, Hedjeidj A. In vitro investigation of eddy current effect on pacemaker operation generated by low frequency magnetic field. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf. 2007;2007:5684–7.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Moshage W, Diem B, Bieberle T, Schibgilla V, Bachmann K. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. Am Heart J. 1997;134(3):467–73.CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Moshage W, Diem B, Bieberle T, Schibgilla V, Bachmann K. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. Am Heart J. 1997;134(3):467–73.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Luechinger R, Duru F, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R. Force and torque effects of a 1.5-tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2001;24(2):199–205.CrossRefPubMed Luechinger R, Duru F, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R. Force and torque effects of a 1.5-tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2001;24(2):199–205.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Luechinger R, Zeijlemaker VA, Pedersen EM, Mortensen P, Falk E, Duru F, et al. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(4):376–83. discussion 325–7 CrossRefPubMed Luechinger R, Zeijlemaker VA, Pedersen EM, Mortensen P, Falk E, Duru F, et al. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(4):376–83. discussion 325–7 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, Wilkoff BL. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 1996;19(6):913–9.CrossRefPubMed Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, Wilkoff BL. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 1996;19(6):913–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sommer T, Lauck G, Schimpf R, von Smekal A, Wolke S, Block W, et al. MRI in patients with cardiac pacemakers: in vitro and in vivo evaluation at 0.5 tesla. RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Nukl. 1998;168(1):36–43.CrossRef Sommer T, Lauck G, Schimpf R, von Smekal A, Wolke S, Block W, et al. MRI in patients with cardiac pacemakers: in vitro and in vivo evaluation at 0.5 tesla. RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Nukl. 1998;168(1):36–43.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sommer T, Vahlhaus C, Lauck G, von Smekal A, Reinke M, Hofer U, et al. MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. Radiology. 2000;215(3):869–79.CrossRefPubMed Sommer T, Vahlhaus C, Lauck G, von Smekal A, Reinke M, Hofer U, et al. MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. Radiology. 2000;215(3):869–79.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, Schimpf R, Schumacher B, Jung W, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 tesla? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2001;24(4 Pt 1):489–95.CrossRefPubMed Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, Schimpf R, Schumacher B, Jung W, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 tesla? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2001;24(4 Pt 1):489–95.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(7):1315–24.CrossRefPubMed Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(7):1315–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Ojo JL, Moya F, Villalba J, Sanz O, Pavón R, Garcia D, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2005;28(4):274–8.CrossRefPubMed Del Ojo JL, Moya F, Villalba J, Sanz O, Pavón R, Garcia D, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2005;28(4):274–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimbel JR, Kanal E, Schwartz KM, Wilkoff BL. Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2005;28(4):270–3.CrossRefPubMed Gimbel JR, Kanal E, Schwartz KM, Wilkoff BL. Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2005;28(4):270–3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation. 2006;114(12):1285–92.CrossRefPubMed Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation. 2006;114(12):1285–92.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2008;31(10):1241–5.CrossRefPubMed Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2008;31(10):1241–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Naehle CP, Zeijlemaker V, Thomas D, Meyer C, Strach K, Fimmers R, et al. Evaluation of cumulative effects of MR imaging on pacemaker systems at 1.5 tesla. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2009;32(12):1526–35.CrossRefPubMed Naehle CP, Zeijlemaker V, Thomas D, Meyer C, Strach K, Fimmers R, et al. Evaluation of cumulative effects of MR imaging on pacemaker systems at 1.5 tesla. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2009;32(12):1526–35.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Naehle CP, Strach K, Thomas D, Meyer C, Linhart M, Bitaraf S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):549–55.CrossRefPubMed Naehle CP, Strach K, Thomas D, Meyer C, Linhart M, Bitaraf S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):549–55.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke PT, Ghanbari H, Alexander PB, Shaw MK, Daccarett M, Machado C. A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI). J Interv Card Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythm Pacing. 2010;28(1):59–66.CrossRef Burke PT, Ghanbari H, Alexander PB, Shaw MK, Daccarett M, Machado C. A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI). J Interv Card Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythm Pacing. 2010;28(1):59–66.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Halshtok O, Goitein O, Abu Sham’a R, Granit H, Glikson M, Konen E. Pacemakers and magnetic resonance imaging: no longer an absolute contraindication when scanned correctly. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ. 2010;12(7):391–5.PubMed Halshtok O, Goitein O, Abu Sham’a R, Granit H, Glikson M, Konen E. Pacemakers and magnetic resonance imaging: no longer an absolute contraindication when scanned correctly. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ. 2010;12(7):391–5.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without specific absorption rate restrictions. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2010;12(7):947–51. Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without specific absorption rate restrictions. Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2010;12(7):947–51.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Strach K, Naehle CP, Mühlsteffen A, Hinz M, Bernstein A, Thomas D, et al. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: increased safety for pacemaker patients? Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2010;12(7):952–60. Strach K, Naehle CP, Mühlsteffen A, Hinz M, Bernstein A, Thomas D, et al. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: increased safety for pacemaker patients? Eur Eur Pacing Arrhythm Card Electrophysiol J Work Groups Card Pacing Arrhythm Card Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2010;12(7):952–60.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Naehle CP, Kreuz J, Strach K, Schwab JO, Pingel S, Luechinger R, et al. Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 T. Am Heart J. 2011;161(6):1096–105.CrossRefPubMed Naehle CP, Kreuz J, Strach K, Schwab JO, Pingel S, Luechinger R, et al. Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 T. Am Heart J. 2011;161(6):1096–105.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazarian S, Hansford R, Roguin A, Goldsher D, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, et al. A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):415–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nazarian S, Hansford R, Roguin A, Goldsher D, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, et al. A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):415–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, Anderson JL, Arshad A, Biederman RWW, et al. Assessing the risks associated with MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(8):755–64.CrossRefPubMed Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, Anderson JL, Arshad A, Biederman RWW, et al. Assessing the risks associated with MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(8):755–64.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Langman DA, Goldberg IB, Finn JP, Ennis DB. Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2011;33(2):426–31.CrossRefPubMed Langman DA, Goldberg IB, Finn JP, Ennis DB. Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2011;33(2):426–31.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH, Espinosa RE, Wood CP, Felmlee JP, et al. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2014;37(10):1284–90.CrossRefPubMed Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH, Espinosa RE, Wood CP, Felmlee JP, et al. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2014;37(10):1284–90.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Healey JS, Hohnloser SH, Glikson M, Neuzner J, Viñolas X, Mabo P, et al. The rationale and design of the Shockless IMPLant evaluation (SIMPLE) trial: a randomized, controlled trial of defibrillation testing at the time of defibrillator implantation. Am Heart J. 2012;164(2):146–52.CrossRefPubMed Healey JS, Hohnloser SH, Glikson M, Neuzner J, Viñolas X, Mabo P, et al. The rationale and design of the Shockless IMPLant evaluation (SIMPLE) trial: a randomized, controlled trial of defibrillation testing at the time of defibrillator implantation. Am Heart J. 2012;164(2):146–52.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweeney MO. Antitachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia using implantable cardioverter defibrillators: pacing. Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2004;27(9):1292–305.CrossRefPubMed Sweeney MO. Antitachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia using implantable cardioverter defibrillators: pacing. Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2004;27(9):1292–305.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher JD, Mehra R, Furman S. Termination of ventricular tachycardia with bursts of rapid ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41(1):94–102.CrossRefPubMed Fisher JD, Mehra R, Furman S. Termination of ventricular tachycardia with bursts of rapid ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41(1):94–102.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertomeu-González V, Moreno-Arribas J, Castillo-Castillo J, Martínez-Ferrer J, Viñolas X, Rodríguez A, et al. Etiology and programming effects on shock efficacy in ICD recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2016;39(1):73–80.CrossRefPubMed Bertomeu-González V, Moreno-Arribas J, Castillo-Castillo J, Martínez-Ferrer J, Viñolas X, Rodríguez A, et al. Etiology and programming effects on shock efficacy in ICD recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2016;39(1):73–80.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2007;26(5):1322–7.CrossRefPubMed Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2007;26(5):1322–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
verfasst von
Mrinal Yadava
Matthew Nugent
Angela Krebsbach
Jessica Minnier
Peter Jessel
Charles A. Henrikson
Publikationsdatum
22.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0262-6

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Koronare Herzkrankheit: Das waren die Top-Studien 2024

Zum Thema Koronare Herzkrankheit gab es 2024 wichtige neue Studien. Beleuchtet wurden darin unter anderem der Stellenwert von Betablockern nach Herzinfarkt, neue Optionen für eine Lipidsenkung sowie die Therapie bei infarktbedingtem kardiogenem Schock.

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Kaffeegenuss sicher bei Vorhofflimmern

Menschen mit Vorhofflimmern fürchten oft, Kaffee könnte schlecht für ihr Herz sein. Solche Ängste sind offenbar unbegründet: Zwei Schweizer Untersuchungen deuten sogar auf eine reduzierte Rate von kardiovaskulären Ereignissen unter Kaffeetrinkern.

Mit jedem Defibrillationsversuch sinkt die Überlebenschance

Wie wirkt es sich auf die Prognose aus, wenn bei Herzstillstand einmal, zweimal oder gar 29 Mal geschockt werden muss? Laut einer aktuellen Studie besteht ein deutlicher Zusammenhang zwischen der Zahl der Defibrillationsversuche und den Überlebenschancen.

EKG Essentials: EKG befunden mit System (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

In diesem CME-Kurs können Sie Ihr Wissen zur EKG-Befundung anhand von zwölf Video-Tutorials auffrischen und 10 CME-Punkte sammeln.
Praxisnah, relevant und mit vielen Tipps & Tricks vom Profi.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.