Skip to main content

01.01.2012 | Breast | Ausgabe 1/2012

European Radiology 1/2012

Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis

European Radiology > Ausgabe 1/2012
María Nieves Plana, Carmen Carreira, Alfonso Muriel, Miguel Chiva, Víctor Abraira, Jose Ignacio Emparanza, Xavier Bonfill, Javier Zamora



To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting additional lesions and contralateral cancer not identified using conventional imaging in primary breast cancer.


We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to estimate diagnostic accuracy indices and the impact of MRI on surgical management.


Fifty articles were included (n = 10,811 women). MRI detected additional disease in 20% of women and in the contralateral breast in 5.5%. The summary PPV of ipsilateral additional disease was 67% (95% CI 59–74%). For contralateral breast, the PPV was 37% (95% CI 27–47%). For ipsilateral lesions, MRI devices ≥1.5 Tesla (T) had higher PPV (75%, 95% CI 64–83%) than MRI with <1.5 T (59%, 95% CI 53–71%). Similar results were found for contralateral cancer, PPV 40% (95% CI 29–53%) and 19% (95% CI 8–39%) for high- and low-field equipments, respectively. True positive MRI findings prompted conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to more extensive surgery in 12.8% of women while in 6.3% this conversion was inappropriate.


MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy, but MRI findings should be pathologically verified because of the high FP rate. Future research on this emerging technology should focus on patient outcome as the primary end-point.

Key Points

• Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging is becoming increasingly popular for cancer staging before surgery.
• This diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis updates previous ones demonstrating MRI has high diagnostic accuracy and causes more extensive surgery.
• Magnetic Resonance protocols at 1.5 T or greater shows greater positive predictive value than lower-field equipments.
• The actual impact on clinical relevant outcomes should be addressed with properly designed randomized controlled trials.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf

Alle e.Med Abos bis 30. April 2021 zum halben Preis!

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

European Radiology 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Radiologie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Radiologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.